Re: Eternal Security Goes Along w/ Salvation by Faith, Not Works
Atwood,
Cassian, what leads you to think that you ranting proves something? God's word is the proof or disproof. But the whole concept of salvation involves passivity: Christ is the Savior, the believer is the saved (passive), the savee. We are called to rest in Him.
I and a couple of others are the only ones that are actually teaching what scripture means. You are ranting about eternal security which has never been a teaching of scripture. You are going all over the map trying to find something that might give your view some validity, but alas you run dry every time. You have pretty much descredited all other scripture just to isolated your couple of texts that you think supports eternal security.
Salvation is passive if it is in regards to what Christ did for us. Man cannot save himself from death and sin, which is why we needed Christ. But all men, the world has been saved by Christ. He reconciled the world back to God. He made all men righteous, which does not mean salvation. It means to be put into a correct relationship with God. This is why our faith justifies, it places us in a correct relationship with God so that we can begin to attain to eternal life. Eternal life is all about man working with God. It is the whole purpose of our existence and you have this errant notion that we are saved simply by believing at one moment of time. Nothing exists in scripture that hints or states this.
I have not made eternal security dependent on the doctrine of predestination, which is Biblical, but Christians interpret it differently. We will understand it better bye & bye.
Eternal security depends on no election system, but is the direct teaching of the Bible, repeated over & over.
Admittedly you have a very confused theology. But OSAS, ES, or what you now call OSS is ONLY connected by the Reformed position of election/predestination. There can be no ES without predestination. Since the REformed postion of predestination is also not found in scripture, so is the fate of OSS, ES or OSAS.
These are historical facts which you have not refuted and cannot refute.
The gifts & the calling of God are irrevocable.
forenew >foreordained >called >justified >glorified. Rom 8. And since justification is by faith, we have to insert it in that chain somewhere before "justified."
so they are, but the issue has never been what God promises but what can man promise. We are speaking about a mutual, covanantal, synergistic relationship which depends on man's faith. YOur constant use of Rom 8:29-30 does not support ES either. This whole discourse is not even about salvation necessarily. It is Pauls comfort speack to the Christians in Rome who were being persecuted and thought that God had forsaken them. Paul then gives his summary of God's love for those that love Him.
How can it be that when a sinner who is vile (Romans 1-3) is by God's miracle made righteous & declared righteous (justification) that is not part of salvation? Such a person must go to Heaven. There is no way that a righteous person declared righteous would not go to Heaven. Who can condemn? It is God who justifies, God who declares righteous!
It is part of salvation but is NOT salvation, just as repentance is part, but not salvation, just as baptism is part, but not salvation. being declared righteous does not constitute salvation. It merely puts one into a correct relationship with God. Just as Christ reconciled the world back to God, meaning He put the world back into a correct relationship with God. More precisely, He gave life to the world which is what Rom 5:18 states, as well as I Cor 15:22.
In this area, we deal not with possibilities but Bible facts. Men are saved through faith, and they are eternally secure. They trust the Savior, & He delivers His promise of eternal life.
"I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish."
"whosoever believes . . . eternal life."
yes, true, but it also has the condition of being continuous and active. This is the issue here. YOu have this notion that man is saved finitely upon faith only, a one time mental affirmation and that decision cannot be changed. Whereas, scripture, most of the NT is written about that decision changing. Constant warnings not to lose faith. Loss of faith will forfeit the inheritance of eternal life. NOthing could be more clear, but with your blinders on, you have bypassed and dismissed most of the NT.
You cannot backquote where I ever discarded faith, but argued for it posting many scriptures; same with eternal security. Also, I have not argued for eternal security off the doctrine of predestination, but presented scriptures for consideration for anyone who cares to ponder the matter. Persons can believe eternal security & justification by faith without thinking that God caused them to believe. We don't have to solve the problem of predestination to conclude eternal security.
ES ONLY exists in the REformed interpretation of election/predestination. ES does not exist in scripture when interpreted as it has always been understood from the beginning.
My statement.the clear teaching that a believer can lose faith,
your response.....
As so often, dear Cassian you just say things. Where is your proof of that one?
This entire thread. In EVERY single POST YOU MADE IN REPLY TO THE OPPOSITION they have presented the Biblcial facts that a believer can lose faith. YOu have redefined faith, what constitutes a believer, what even constitutes an apostate, and every twist imaginable to dismiss scripture so that your false view is left standing isolated from all of scripture.
Simply putting your trust in Christ is NOT salvation either. It includes all the responses in this thread that shows that a believer's faith must be active, he must endure, he must be transformed into Christ likeness. If he at any time decides that the relationship with Christ is not suitable for him, he can leave. Scripture gives many examples of believers leaving, many exhortations to remain.
You have discarded them all, redefined them, so that most of scripture becomes meaningless verbiage, so that your isolated texts stand alone. Even at that, many of them have conditions built right into the text that you have isolated.