The earth is 5,992 years old. http://www.wisdomofgod.us/2018/07/3...n-and-when-the-sabbath-and-jubilee-years-are/ .
Jesus is Jehovah? So Jehovah is Son in trinity?
- Thread starter User46952
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
The blood of animals atone for sins, but they cannot cause a man to stop sinning, which is why they had to continued to be sacrificed daily. The blood of the Messiah, however, can cause a man to stop sinning, through belief in him, and by receiving the anointing, which cuts away sin in the heart, which is circumcision of the heart. This is why it is said, "and he has perfected continually those who have been set apart", which is what being set apart by the anointing means. Also, the Messiah was made to be a sacrifice not by the will of man, but by the will of God, because although we ourselves are not authorized to murder, hence "you shall not murder", God does indeed have authority to take life just as he has authority to give life, because he is the creator, for whatever purpose pleases him. And so, the death of the Messiah was appointed by God to be atonement and deliverance for those who believe in the Messiah. You have therefore taken Jeremiah 32:35 and twisted it to imply that God did evil by making the Messiah a sacrifice for sins, which is what the scriptures claim he became.
J
Ok then jaybird! Suppose you tell me what "facts" I got wrong and what was illogical or unresoned with what I said? Or are you going to give us the same ole excuse of, "I got to watch what I post or I'll get banned?" 
PS: You also said this? "what does this mean? you believe the earth is only 6k years old? What do you think it means jaybird?
IN GOD THE SON,
bluto
PS: You also said this? "what does this mean? you believe the earth is only 6k years old? What do you think it means jaybird?IN GOD THE SON,
bluto
-
1
- Show all
The big problem your having is that you are looking at all of this from a strickly human point of view and not from God's view. God created mankind and told him to be fruitful and multiply. You as with all humans are the product of your parents and you have the same nature as your parents which is a human nature. Lions produce other lion cubs, birds produce birds and dogs begat dog puppies.
So tell me, who is the Father of Jesus Christ? In the case of Jesus Christ He is the only one that has two natures, one on His mothers side which is human and one on His Fathers side which is deity. Did you ever wonder why Jesus refered to Himself numerous times as the "Son of Man" and as the "Son of God?" The birth of Jesus Christ was a miracle where the Holy Spirit of God overshadowed Mary to give birth to a Son who is Jesus Christ. Read the account at Matthew 1:19-23. This is also why at Matthew 1:23 His name will be "Immanuel, which translated means "God with us."
This is also why John 3:16 says that Jesus Christ is the "ONLY" begotten Son of God as in there are no others. You can prove me wrong in all of this by simply giving me an example of a son that does not share the same nature as its father. You can't because it's a universal law. You also brought up the issue of "firstborn." The Greek word for firstborn is "protokos" and has a variety of meanings depending on the context.
Yes, it can mean firstborn by literal birth. It can also mean firstborn in the sense of "preeminence." Just read Romans 8:29. At Colossians 1:18 it says that Jesus Christ is the "firstborn" from the dead. Of course this not mean literal birth but He was the first one to resurrect from the dead in a "permanent" way defeating death so that we can have eternal life. So, please tell me what I have said that you consider "blasphemy?"
IN GOD THE SON,
bluto
So tell me, who is the Father of Jesus Christ? In the case of Jesus Christ He is the only one that has two natures, one on His mothers side which is human and one on His Fathers side which is deity. Did you ever wonder why Jesus refered to Himself numerous times as the "Son of Man" and as the "Son of God?" The birth of Jesus Christ was a miracle where the Holy Spirit of God overshadowed Mary to give birth to a Son who is Jesus Christ. Read the account at Matthew 1:19-23. This is also why at Matthew 1:23 His name will be "Immanuel, which translated means "God with us."
This is also why John 3:16 says that Jesus Christ is the "ONLY" begotten Son of God as in there are no others. You can prove me wrong in all of this by simply giving me an example of a son that does not share the same nature as its father. You can't because it's a universal law. You also brought up the issue of "firstborn." The Greek word for firstborn is "protokos" and has a variety of meanings depending on the context.
Yes, it can mean firstborn by literal birth. It can also mean firstborn in the sense of "preeminence." Just read Romans 8:29. At Colossians 1:18 it says that Jesus Christ is the "firstborn" from the dead. Of course this not mean literal birth but He was the first one to resurrect from the dead in a "permanent" way defeating death so that we can have eternal life. So, please tell me what I have said that you consider "blasphemy?"
IN GOD THE SON,
bluto
The big problem your having is that you are looking at all of this from a strickly human point of view and not from God's view. God created mankind and told him to be fruitful and multiply. You as with all humans are the product of your parents and you have the same nature as your parents which is a human nature. Lions produce other lion cubs, birds produce birds and dogs begat dog puppies.
So tell me, who is the Father of Jesus Christ? In the case of Jesus Christ He is the only one that has two natures, one on His mothers side which is human and one on His Fathers side which is deity. Did you ever wonder why Jesus refered to Himself numerous times as the "Son of Man" and as the "Son of God?" The birth of Jesus Christ was a miracle where the Holy Spirit of God overshadowed Mary to give birth to a Son who is Jesus Christ. Read the account at Matthew 1:19-23. This is also why at Matthew 1:23 His name will be "Immanuel, which translated means "God with us."
This is also why John 3:16 says that Jesus Christ is the "ONLY" begotten Son of God as in there are no others. You can prove me wrong in all of this by simply giving me an example of a son that does not share the same nature as its father. You can't because it's a universal law. You also brought up the issue of "firstborn." The Greek word for firstborn is "protokos" and has a variety of meanings depending on the context.
Yes, it can mean firstborn by literal birth. It can also mean firstborn in the sense of "preeminence." Just read Romans 8:29. At Colossians 1:18 it says that Jesus Christ is the "firstborn" from the dead. Of course this not mean literal birth but He was the first one to resurrect from the dead in a "permanent" way defeating death so that we can have eternal life. So, please tell me what I have said that you consider "blasphemy?"
IN GOD THE SON,
bluto
So tell me, who is the Father of Jesus Christ? In the case of Jesus Christ He is the only one that has two natures, one on His mothers side which is human and one on His Fathers side which is deity. Did you ever wonder why Jesus refered to Himself numerous times as the "Son of Man" and as the "Son of God?" The birth of Jesus Christ was a miracle where the Holy Spirit of God overshadowed Mary to give birth to a Son who is Jesus Christ. Read the account at Matthew 1:19-23. This is also why at Matthew 1:23 His name will be "Immanuel, which translated means "God with us."
This is also why John 3:16 says that Jesus Christ is the "ONLY" begotten Son of God as in there are no others. You can prove me wrong in all of this by simply giving me an example of a son that does not share the same nature as its father. You can't because it's a universal law. You also brought up the issue of "firstborn." The Greek word for firstborn is "protokos" and has a variety of meanings depending on the context.
Yes, it can mean firstborn by literal birth. It can also mean firstborn in the sense of "preeminence." Just read Romans 8:29. At Colossians 1:18 it says that Jesus Christ is the "firstborn" from the dead. Of course this not mean literal birth but He was the first one to resurrect from the dead in a "permanent" way defeating death so that we can have eternal life. So, please tell me what I have said that you consider "blasphemy?"
IN GOD THE SON,
bluto
Oh please jaybird, quit acting like your some kind of "martyr" that people are suppose to feel sorry for. I don't look at this stuff as some sort of game or to win arguments. And answer me this, why has not cgneustar been banned for posting the following website, read the words. I hope he is not banned because this websites is a good way to reach people in my opinion. http://www.wisdomofgod.us/2019/05/14/the-lie-of-the-trinity/
IN GOD THE SON,
bluto
IN GOD THE SON,
bluto
Quite the contrary, whether this is true or not, the flood story is indeed known to be mentioned in Sumerian texts, https://www.google.com/search?q=sum...0j69i57j0l4.3267j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 .
By "none takes it from me" he means no one on earth took his life from him because he willingly laid it down, not that God who appoints everything did not take his life. Why else do you think the Messiah wept bitterly and said, "if it be possible, may this cup pass from me, nonetheless, your will be done and not mine"? Because he knew it was the will of God that he die. You people quite literally oppose everything that is true, deviating to the left and to the right in every way possible, even in such basic matters as this.
J
guess i should have phrased this a bit different.
most every ancient culture have a flood story, but not one of them have a flood story that take place in the middle of their civilization. matter of fact Egypt, India and China all pinpoint the flood to around 10,000 BC, which is 12 thousand years back. and before the flood there was another age. gobekli tepe goes back to 9000BC and thats mainstream scholars.
the young earth idea has always been baffling to me, ancient history supports the bible on so many ways but the young earth idea really puts the bible out there as far fetched.
most every ancient culture have a flood story, but not one of them have a flood story that take place in the middle of their civilization. matter of fact Egypt, India and China all pinpoint the flood to around 10,000 BC, which is 12 thousand years back. and before the flood there was another age. gobekli tepe goes back to 9000BC and thats mainstream scholars.
the young earth idea has always been baffling to me, ancient history supports the bible on so many ways but the young earth idea really puts the bible out there as far fetched.