KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLES

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
KJV1611

KJV1611

Banned
#981
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
#981
trofimus said:
Jesus is not Father. Jesus is Son.

And because He was begotten "before time began", it means He is eternal.
Click to expand...
The verse I posted said he is called the eternal father. Do you say this scripture is wrong?
 
KJV1611

KJV1611

Banned
#982
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
#982
More evidence.

[h=1]John 14:8-10 King James Version (KJV)[/h]8 Philip saith unto him, Lord, show us the Father, and it sufficeth us.
9 Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Show us the Father?
10 Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? the words that I speak unto you I speak not of myself: but the Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works.
 
Dino246

Dino246

Senior Member
#983
Jun 30, 2015
25,707
13,909
113
#983
KJV1611 said:
This I don't understand. Are you saying God couldn't or wouldn't do the number patterns in other languages?
Click to expand...
I said precisely what I meant, but I'll rephrase it for you: firstly, I said nothing about God's capacity and I said nothing about His will. I said that I don't give credence to number patterns in anything other than the original languages, unless the patterns also exist in the original languages. If it isn't in the Greek (or Hebrew), I don't base any belief on it.
 
KJV1611

KJV1611

Banned
#984
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
#984
Dino246 said:
I said precisely what I meant, but I'll rephrase it for you: firstly, I said nothing about God's capacity and I said nothing about His will. I said that I don't give credence to number patterns in anything other than the original languages, unless the patterns also exist in the original languages. If it isn't in the Greek (or Hebrew), I don't base any belief on it.
Click to expand...
I gotcha. Originals are where it's at with you.:)
 
Lucy-Pevensie

Lucy-Pevensie

Senior Member
#985
Dec 20, 2017
9,388
5,729
113
#985
KJV1611 said:
No scripture says that Jesus was begotten of God in eternity past. This where reading a bible your native is imperative.
Click to expand...
Eternity doesn't have a past. God simply IS. He has no beginning, he is not a created being. The Son IS begotten of The Father in eternity.
 
KJV1611

KJV1611

Banned
#986
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
#986
Lucy-Pevensie said:
Eternity doesn't have a past. God simply IS. He has no beginning, he is not a created being. The Son IS begotten of The Father in eternity.
Click to expand...
Do you know of a verse that says that?
 
trofimus

trofimus

Senior Member
#987
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
#987
KJV1611 said:
No scripture says that Jesus was begotten of God in eternity past.
Click to expand...

"The Lord made me the beginning of his ways for his works.
He established me before time began, before he made the earth: even before he made the depths; before the fountains of water came forth: before the mountains were settled, and before all hills, he begets me."
Proverbs 8:22
 
trofimus

trofimus

Senior Member
#988
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
#988
KJV1611 said:
The verse I posted said he is called the eternal father. Do you say this scripture is wrong?
Click to expand...
Yes, I think this translation is wrong.

It should be "father of the age to come", IMHO.
 
Last edited:
James37

James37

Banned
#989
Nov 24, 2017
1,004
31
0
#989
Dino246 said:
I said precisely what I meant, but I'll rephrase it for you: firstly, I said nothing about God's capacity and I said nothing about His will. I said that I don't give credence to number patterns in anything other than the original languages, unless the patterns also exist in the original languages. If it isn't in the Greek (or Hebrew), I don't base any belief on it.
Click to expand...
The number patterns are in the original languages. The first pattern is in Genesis 1:1 which contains 7 words in the Hebrew. The gematria of these 7 words is 2701 (37 x 73).
 
Lucy-Pevensie

Lucy-Pevensie

Senior Member
#991
Dec 20, 2017
9,388
5,729
113
#991
KJV1611 said:
Do you know of a verse that says that?
Click to expand...
What was wrong with the verses from Colossians that I posted yesterday? [or was it the day before?]
Colossians 1, John 1. The Son was there in the beginning. All things were created through him.

Exodus 3:14
(KJV)
And God said unto Moses, I Am That I Am: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I Am hath sent me unto you.

I Am that I Am (אֶהְיֶה אֲשֶׁר אֶהְיֶה‬ ’ehyeh ’ăšer ’ehyeh) The self-existent or eternal one.
 
KJV1611

KJV1611

Banned
#992
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
#992
Lucy-Pevensie said:
What was wrong with the verses from Colossians that I posted yesterday? [or was it the day before?]
Colossians 1, John 1. The Son was there in the beginning. All things were created through him.

Exodus 3:14
(KJV)
And God said unto Moses, I Am That I Am: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I Am hath sent me unto you.

I Am that I Am (אֶהְיֶה אֲשֶׁר אֶהְיֶה‬ ’ehyeh ’ăšer ’ehyeh) The self-existent or eternal one.
Click to expand...
That proves that God is eternal I agree, where does it show that Jesus the eternal God came out of th Father?
 
KJV1611

KJV1611

Banned
#994
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
#994
trofimus said:
Yes, I think this translation is wrong.

It should be "father of the age to come", IMHO.
Click to expand...
It would be hard to argue a point when you don't accept what the verses say. :)
 
trofimus

trofimus

Senior Member
#995
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
#995
KJV1611 said:
It would be hard to argue a point when you don't accept what the verses say. :)
Click to expand...
Son is not Father.

No matter what verse you want to use for that, its really against the Trinity doctrine.

 
KJV1611

KJV1611

Banned
#996
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
#996
trofimus said:

"The Lord made me the beginning of his ways for his works.
He established me before time began, before he made the earth: even before he made the depths; before the fountains of water came forth: before the mountains were settled, and before all hills, he begets me."
Proverbs 8:22
Click to expand...
Have you looked up the definition of establish?

es·tab·lish
əˈstabliSH/
verb

  • 1.
    set up (an organization, system, or set of rules) on a firm or permanent basis.
    "the British established a rich trade with Portugal"


  • [TABLE="class: vk_tbl vk_gy"]
    [TR]
    [TD="class: lr_dct_nyms_ttl"]synonyms:[/TD]
    [TD]set up, start, initiate, institute, form, found, create, inaugurate; More
    [/TD]
    [/TR]
    [/TABLE]

  • 2.
    achieve permanent acceptance or recognition for.
    "the principle of the supremacy of national parliaments needs to be firmly established"


Establish does not mean begotten or monogenes.
 
Last edited:
trofimus

trofimus

Senior Member
#997
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
#997
KJV1611 said:
Have you looked up the definition of establish?

es·tab·lish
əˈstabliSH/
verb

  • 1.
    set up (an organization, system, or set of rules) on a firm or permanent basis.
    [COLOR=#878787 !important]"the British established a rich trade with Portugal"

  • [TABLE="class: vk_tbl vk_gy"]
    [TR]
    [TD="class: lr_dct_nyms_ttl"]synonyms:[/TD]
    [TD]set up, start, initiate, institute, form, found, create, inaugurate; More

    [/TD]
    [/TR]
    [/TABLE]







  • 2.
    achieve permanent acceptance or recognition for.
    [COLOR=#878787 !important]"the principle of the supremacy of national parliaments needs to be firmly established"


    [/COLOR]




[/COLOR]
Establish does not mean begotten or monogenes.
Click to expand...
Please, notice what I made bold - begets.


"The Lord made me the beginning of his ways for his works.
He established me before time began, before he made the earth: even before he made the depths; before the fountains of water came forth: before the mountains were settled, and before all hills, he begets me."
Proverbs 8:22
 
KJV1611

KJV1611

Banned
#998
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
#998
trofimus said:
Son is not Father.

No matter what verse you want to use for that, its really against the Trinity doctrine.

Click to expand...
There is no argument against the godhead, the argument is the eternal Christ coming out of the Father.... is not true in no way shape or form.
 
trofimus

trofimus

Senior Member
#999
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
#999
KJV1611 said:
There is no argument against the godhead, the argument is the eternal Christ coming out of the Father.... is not true in no way shape or form.
Click to expand...
You are also arguing that Son is Father (based on your version of Is 9:6), so I am confused how is that a no argument against Trinity...
 
James37

James37

Banned
#1,000
Nov 24, 2017
1,004
31
0
#1,000
trofimus said:
d) whenever somebody "discover number patterns", yes, a KJV reader.
Click to expand...
trofimus said:
So, you cannot be surprised that we are looking for connections why it is so. It cannot be a mere coincidence.
Click to expand...
AmazingWord - Messages often overlooked in the Bible (KJV, NIV, NASB...): God's Number 37 - theme tells of perfection/sanctification/being saved...

This article is from 2010 and is about the number 37 and the Bible. Whoever wrote this article is quoting a NASB (for sure in Psalm 37:37). The point is here is a person using a modern bibles discussing number patterns of 37 who is not some KJVO. This is just an example of why the opinions of people can be easily dismissed because they are not grounded in truth.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.