Thank you brother, you preach Christ with your humility.
1 Peter 5:4And when the chief Shepherd appears, you will receive the unfading crown of glory. 5Young men, in the same way, submit yourselves to your elders. And all of you, clothe yourselves with humility toward one another, because, “God opposes the proud, but gives grace to the humble.”
Humbleness leads us to greater grace.
Bless you bro.
1 Peter 5:4And when the chief Shepherd appears, you will receive the unfading crown of glory. 5Young men, in the same way, submit yourselves to your elders. And all of you, clothe yourselves with humility toward one another, because, “God opposes the proud, but gives grace to the humble.”
Humbleness leads us to greater grace.
Bless you bro.
I want to be careful in how I write this, and make sure that people understand I am not trying to take a side. Simply, realize that while Angela has been a bit on the warpath we should acknowledge that it is in sincerity and with genuine concern for the believer. She cares for people and doesn't want them to get stuck and harmed by a doctrine that in her own opinion is dangerous. So she is passionate for the defense of those hurting, and doesn't want people to suffer.
VVith this in mind, answer in grace and with meekness. I myself was rather forward in coming to the defense of a fellow believer and that has been resolved privately. She does realize she has acted contrary to certain forum etiquette, but is steadfast in protecting what she believes to be the truth and to not allow people to get into a doctrine she perceives to be harmful. So again, this in mind, we need to come to a mutual understanding of where this perceived danger is located (within the doctrine) and how to resolve this misunderstanding, if it is one.
I apologize to anyone that was surprised by my forward response, in defense of a fellow believer. I should have handled that a little better. Now, lets move on to understanding.
VVith this in mind, answer in grace and with meekness. I myself was rather forward in coming to the defense of a fellow believer and that has been resolved privately. She does realize she has acted contrary to certain forum etiquette, but is steadfast in protecting what she believes to be the truth and to not allow people to get into a doctrine she perceives to be harmful. So again, this in mind, we need to come to a mutual understanding of where this perceived danger is located (within the doctrine) and how to resolve this misunderstanding, if it is one.
I apologize to anyone that was surprised by my forward response, in defense of a fellow believer. I should have handled that a little better. Now, lets move on to understanding.