Mary the mother of my Lord (Heresy?)

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

sanglina

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
857
4
0
Just wanted to share Thomas Ice explanation about the woman in Rev. 12

THE WOMAN IN REVELATION 12
Tom's Perspectives
by Thomas Ice
And a great sign appeared in heaven: a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars; she was with child; and she cried out, being in labor and in pain to give birth.

—Revelation 12:1–2
Down through church history virtually all Christian interpreters of Revelation 12 have understood the symbol of the woman in labor as the church. This began to change about 200 years ago when literal hermeneutics were more rigorously applied to the Book of Revelation and Bible Prophecy in general. It took this long for some within the church to begin to overcome the stranglehold that replacement theology or supersessionism had on the church. For most of her history, when Christians read biblical passages, they automatically assumed that it was referring to them and the church. Most have thought that the church has forever replaced Israel and that Israel, as a nation, has no future. This is why a correct understanding of who the woman in Revelation 12 represents is a watershed issue for understanding Revelation as a whole.

HOW TO INTERPRET SYMBOLS
Revelation 12 is said by some to be the most symbolic chapter in the most symbolic book in the New Testament. That may very well be true! Even though symbols are used to tell the prophetic story of Israel, the symbols are clear when interpreted by comparing Scripture with Scripture. Arnold Fruchtenbaum rightly tells us “that every symbol in the Revelation is explained either elsewhere in the Revelation itself or somewhere else in the Bible.”1. In this passage, as well as throughout the Book of Revelation, symbols represent literal, historical persons, places or things. John MacArthur says, “The literal approach to interpreting Scripture allows for normal use of symbolic language, but understands that it points to a literal reality.” We use symbols for athletic teams. The Bears beat the Lions, 35–21. It is understood that both teams had humans playing for their squads, but their team mascots are bears and lions. The same approach is used in many prophetic sections of both the Old and New Testaments where symbols are used of people and kingdoms. “The symbols used in this book are taken from the Scriptures themselves and thus do not allow arbitrary interpretations to be imposed upon them.”

4. WHY THE WOMAN REFERS TO ISRAEL
Who does the woman of Revelation 12 symbolize? While Catholics and most replacement theologians believe that the woman in this passage is the Church, even
preterists like Gary DeMar are able to realize that the biblical symbolism of Genesis 37:9–11 demands that Revelation 12 uses it to refer to Israel. However, preterist err in seeing it as a reference to Israel in the past and not including the future.

How can we be sure that the woman represents Israel?
First, the context immediately preceding chapter 12 sets the stage for our view, as well as the larger context of the entire Book of Revelation. ”And the temple of God which is in heaven was opened; and the ark of His covenant appeared in His temple, and there were flashes of lightning and sounds and peals of thunder and an earthquake and a great hailstorm” (Rev. 11:19). The ark of the covenant is never associated with the church but always with the nation of Israel. This gives a Jewish flavor to the context and prepares the way for God’s disclosure about Israel in chapter 12.

Second, Israel is often represented throughout the Old Testament as a woman (Isa. 26:18; 47:7–9; 54:1–6; 66:7–8; Jer. 4:31; 31:32; Lam. 1:1; Ezek. 16:32; Hosea 2:16; Micah 4:9–10; 5:1–3). John Walvoord says, “In the Old Testament, Israel frequently is presented as the wife of Jehovah, often in her character as being unfaithful to her husband. Here the godly remnant of Israel is standing true to God in the time of the great tribulation.” This fits into the overall motif since this woman gives birth to a son.

Third, John’s reference to the sun, moon, and stars in his description of the woman relates to similar descriptions of Israel in the Old Testament (see Gen. 37: 9–11). In Genesis 37 the sun refers to Jacob, “who stood in the lineage to inherit the blessings of the “Abrahamic covenant.” The moon represents Rachel, Jacob’s wife and the matriarch of the 12 tribes of Israel. The 11 stars in Genesis 37 refer to the sons of Jacob (the 12th star to whom the 11 bow is Joseph, thus 12 stars) and the 12 tribes of Israel or Jacob. This is “a clear reference to the twelve tribes of Israel, not only in Joseph’s dream (cf. Gen. 37:9–10), but also by comparison with the twelve tribes in Rev. 7:5–8 and 21:12.” J. Dwight Pentecost also points out other Old Testament passages “where heavenly bodies are associated with Israel’s istory” (see Josh. 10:12–14; Jud. 10:12–14; Ps. 89:35–37; Jer. 31:35–36).

Fourth, it is Israel and not the church that gives birth to the male child (verse 5) within biblical imagery. Paul confirms this when writing concerning the Israelites,
“from whom is the Christ according to the flesh” (Rom. 9:5). It is obvious the male child refers to Christ since Revelation 12:5 says He will rule the nations with a rod of iron (Ps. 2:9). Jesus is also said to rule with a rod of iron in Revelation 2:27 and 19:15. John 4:22 also tells us that “salvation is from the Jews,” which means that redemption came through the nation of Israel in the form of their Messiah—the male child.

Fifth, since we are dealing with the male child of 12:5, then we should note a parallelism between Revelation 12 and Micah 5 that supports the notion that the woman
in Revelation refers to Israel. The parallelism between Revelation 12 and Micah 5 helps to identify the woman as Israel. In Micah 5:2 is recorded the birth of the ruler. The rejection of this ruler results in the setting aside of the nation (“therefore will he give them up,” Mic. 5:3). The nation will be in travail “until the time that she which travaileth hath brought forth” (Mic. 5:3), that is, until the accomplishment of God’s purpose. The same program is outlined in Revelation 12.

Sixth,a comparison of Revelation 12:7–9 with Daniel 12:1–7 confirms the identification of the woman as Israel. Gary Cohen notes: In Revelation 12, we see a woman being persecuted by Satan, and Michael the archangel at this time fights against Satan (vv. 7–9). Likewise, in Daniel 12:1 when Daniel’s people are said to be in their “time of trouble such as never was since there was a nation,” a time lasting 3 ½ years (3 ½ times—Dan 12:7), Michael “shall . . . stand up” and contend for Israel, Daniel’s people. Thus both Revelation 12 and Daniel 12 show Michael contending against Satan concerning the 3 ½ year Great Tribulation of Israel.

Seventh, John’s reference to the woman’s flight into the wilderness (verse 14) is reminiscent of Israel’s past wilderness experiences. As in the Exodus Israel was carried on “eagles’ wings” and protected from the Egyptians (Exod. 19:4) so also the woman will be carried to a place of protection—the “wilderness” (verse 14). Just as the nation was sustained by the manna during the wilderness wandering, so the woman is “nourished” in the wilderness. As the wilderness in Israel’s past has been a place of God’s protection and provision, so it will be in Israel’s future. God will preserve a remnant. It should be noted that the flight of the woman to the wilderness is the same flight indicated by Jesus in Matthew 24:16 where those in Judea are warned to flee into the mountains. Those heeding Christ’s warning will find protection, but the rest will perish. Of Israel God said, “I will allure her, bring her into the wilderness, and speak kindly to her” (Hos. 2:14). Revelation 12 illustrates God’s faithfulness in caring for Israel even in the most difficult of times known as the great tribulation.

Eighth, when the woman is taken to refer to Israel, it harmonizes all of the imagery throughout the rest of Revelation 12. However, if the woman refers to Mary, then when did she flee into the wilderness for 3 ½ years? If it is a reference to the church or the people of God (including Gentiles) then when did the church give birth to Jesus or flee into the wilderness so that the Dragon made war with the rest of her offspring? “All this is seen in connexion with Israel; for God intends, as far as this world is concerned, all power and glory to circle round Israel,” notes William Kelly. “As for the church, she will have all in perfection with Christ, and in Christ; but as far as the earth is concerned, Israel will be the centre. The woman is the symbol of God’s purpose as bound up with Israel.” Maranatha!

Courtesy: http://www.pre-trib.org/data/pdf/Ice-TheWomaninRevelation.pdf
 
Last edited:
J

JLHillsSr

Guest
Rom 6:4 KJV - Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.
Rom 8:11 KJV - But if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you, he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his Spirit that dwelleth in you.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
The Nestorian heresy regarded Christ as a human person joined to the divine person of God's Son. Opposing this heresy, St. Cyril of Alexandria and the third ecumenical council, at Ephesus in 431, confessed "that the Word, uniting to himself in his person the flesh animated by a rational soul, became man." Christ's humanity has no other subject than the divine person of the Son of God, who assumed it and made it his own, from his conception. For this reason the Council of Ephesus proclaimed in 431 that Mary truly became the Mother of God by the human conception of the Son of God in her womb: "Mother of God, not that the nature of the Word or his divinity received the beginning of its existence from the holy Virgin, but that, since the holy body, animated by a rational soul, which the Word of God united to himself according to the hypostasis, was born from her, the Word is said to be born according to the flesh."

I recommend you stop listening to men. And seek God for his councel.

The son of God created mankind. He has no beginning or no end. Has no mother or father. He was not a created being, Is is God almight. He, in his brightest moment, Emptied himself, and took the form of a man. May gave him a body, her seed touched by the HS so it would not be tainted by the sin of Adam, Bore a child, and at the moment of birth, God entered that body and became the God-man.

As he himself stated, Before abraham was born, he always existed (I I am)
 
Dec 5, 2012
885
5
0

I recommend you stop listening to men. And seek God for his councel.

The son of God created mankind. He has no beginning or no end. Has no mother or father. He was not a created being, Is is God almight. He, in his brightest moment, Emptied himself, and took the form of a man. May gave him a body, her seed touched by the HS so it would not be tainted by the sin of Adam, Bore a child, and at the moment of birth, God entered that body and became the God-man.

As he himself stated, Before abraham was born, he always existed (I I am)
I recommend you listen to guidance and wisdom. To claim infallibility for your self is non sense. You can study the reason why many christians including the reformers believed this to be true, and it has been true since the beginning. It is as of recently that this truth has been attacked so much. Your claim is a man made believe for in the bible many, many times it says she is the Mother. and Jesus was not of two entities, that was one of the first heresies the church had to clarify.
 
K

kenisyes

Guest
ok now I am completely confused. What vision is this?
Sorry, Rev. 12, first few verses, the woman in the sky, chased by the dragon.. The discussion has been because Geometar equated it with Mary.
 
K

kenisyes

Guest
The teachings never change, but much has change in the church as to the way they teach. Even the way we celebrate Mass has change the way some things are said in english to be more in par with all other languages.

To give you an idea here is a link on the way catholic teaching on our bodies today.

Link ---> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X0-wXODqTsU <---
Listened to the first two. A couple observations:
1. He makes the statement that the trinity is like the married couple should be. That's true of their closeness, but he sounds like he is implying that the physical relationship is on the same order. Eve was extracted from Adam (his built-up rib). But all three Persons of the Trinity always existed, and are co-equal. Is he implying that "begotten" is somehow the same is "extracted" like by taking a rib, and building it up?
2. Mary is presented as being the first to accept the marriage proposal of God for His church, or do I misunderstand? That would be fine, if it were Scriptural. That she accepted the marriage proposal for the Bride is clear. But she was not the first. Acts 7:38 establishes that the church existed at Sinai, and when Jesus says "I will build my church", the Greek verb refers to expansion of a house, not to initial construction. Is. 62 and the Song of Songs express the concept that Israel is a bride, and Mary is a part of Israel.
 
K

kenisyes

Guest
4. WHY THE WOMAN REFERS TO ISRAEL
Who does the woman of Revelation 12 symbolize? While Catholics and most replacement theologians believe that the woman in this passage is the Church, even
preterists like Gary DeMar are able to realize that the biblical symbolism of Genesis 37:9–11 demands that Revelation 12 uses it to refer to Israel. However, preterist err in seeing it as a reference to Israel in the past and not including the future.
Once you abandon replacement theology, both are correct. As in what I just posted a minute ago, the church was Israel at this time, with the Gentiles gradually being grafted on. Messianic Jews are absolute proof that the fulfillment of the promised return of Jews in our day to believe in Jesus. The church has always been both Jews and Gentiles who follow Jesus, but the Gentiles have kept the Israel part of the church hidden for many years.
 
Dec 5, 2012
885
5
0
Listened to the first two. A couple observations:
1. He makes the statement that the trinity is like the married couple should be. That's true of their closeness, but he sounds like he is implying that the physical relationship is on the same order. Eve was extracted from Adam (his built-up rib). But all three Persons of the Trinity always existed, and are co-equal. Is he implying that "begotten" is somehow the same is "extracted" like by taking a rib, and building it up?
2. Mary is presented as being the first to accept the marriage proposal of God for His church, or do I misunderstand? That would be fine, if it were Scriptural. That she accepted the marriage proposal for the Bride is clear. But she was not the first. Acts 7:38 establishes that the church existed at Sinai, and when Jesus says "I will build my church", the Greek verb refers to expansion of a house, not to initial construction. Is. 62 and the Song of Songs express the concept that Israel is a bride, and Mary is a part of Israel.
Good observations. I understand what he means but can not explain it with words. The way you present you questions is how I question too. Then I research, pray, discern and hopefully understand the great mysteries of our Lord. I like Scott Hahn, he explains things in a way I get it most of the time.

Tp understand more of this marriage you might want to lister to Christopher west theology of the body
Link here --->https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X0-wXODqTsU <---
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Sorry, Rev. 12, first few verses, the woman in the sky, chased by the dragon.. The discussion has been because Geometar equated it with Mary.
oh ok. I see.. That woman would Be Isreal. as isreal gave birth to Christ through Abraham, Issac and jacob.. The dragon would be satan, and her offspring would be the church.. they have some funky doctrines..lol How this could be mary :rolleyes:
 
K

kenisyes

Guest
Good observations. I understand what he means but can not explain it with words. The way you present you questions is how I question too. Then I research, pray, discern and hopefully understand the great mysteries of our Lord. I like Scott Hahn, he explains things in a way I get it most of the time.
I have my answers, but I am questioning for the sake of the thread. This is presented as authentic Catholic teaching, is it not? Those interested in Mary's position in the Catholic church would like to know what they say, as well as what God tells each of us.
 
Dec 5, 2012
885
5
0
I have my answers, but I am questioning for the sake of the thread. This is presented as authentic Catholic teaching, is it not? Those interested in Mary's position in the Catholic church would like to know what they say, as well as what God tells each of us.
I can not say that this is the exact teaching because I do not know if it has the NIHIL OBSTAT or IMPRIMATUR approved. I do know Scott Hahn was a Bible Only Christian who became a modern day catholic scholar.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
I recommend you listen to guidance and wisdom.
Who can give more wisdom or guidance than God himself.? Certainly not any man! Even Paul said to trust no men. Not even himself.

To claim infallibility for your self is non sense.
To claim than any man holds the sway of infallibility in ANYTHING is nonsense. We are not supposed to place our eternity in the hands of men, But in God. God is not going to sit there on the last day and said you did not listen to these men. He will say you did not study to show they self approved, by seeking my truth,,if your basing your eternity on what men say, your in serious danger.

You can study the reason why many christians including the reformers believed this to be true, and it has been true since the beginning. It is as of recently that this truth has been attacked so much. Your claim is a man made believe for in the bible many, many times it says she is the Mother. and Jesus was not of two entities, that was one of the first heresies the church had to clarify.

I have studied it. And I see nothing but speculation and personal bias. This doctrine was fought in the church in the 400's because it was added between the first and 4th centuries. and there was alot of disagreements. Unfortunately the church of rome decided to go with the more pegan belief, then the true Christian belief, because they wanted their pagan people to join them. what a better way?
 
K

kenisyes

Guest
I can not say that this is the exact teaching because I do not know if it has the NIHIL OBSTAT or IMPRIMATUR approved. I do know Scott Hahn was a Bible Only Christian who became a modern day catholic scholar.
I thought I heard him claim that it was. He said he was making it simple for a wider audience, but it was still based on a recent encyclical.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
Once you abandon replacement theology, both are correct. As in what I just posted a minute ago, the church was Israel at this time, with the Gentiles gradually being grafted on. Messianic Jews are absolute proof that the fulfillment of the promised return of Jews in our day to believe in Jesus. The church has always been both Jews and Gentiles who follow Jesus, but the Gentiles have kept the Israel part of the church hidden for many years.
??
you mean dispensationalists have?

orthodoxy has always recognized the Church is jews (natural believing branches) and gentiles (wild branches grafted in). one new man.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
??
you mean dispensationalists have?

orthodoxy has always recognized the Church is jews (natural believing branches) and gentiles (wild branches grafted in). one new man.
this is not even true. Saved jews as well as saved gentiles have been part of the church since adam. I, Being an avid pre-millenialists have not denied this. Nor to be honest. do any people in my church which are the same deny this.. They were saved according to the adamic covenant, which was later confirmed by PART of the abrahamic covenant, and later by the new covenant. All taught grace,

the problem is the skewed form of dispensationalism which wants to separate Isreal.. while replacing it with the church in the church age, and return it back to Isreal in the later day.. This is the error
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
this is not even true. Saved jews as well as saved gentiles have been part of the church since adam. I, Being an avid pre-millenialists have not denied this. Nor to be honest. do any people in my church which are the same deny this.. They were saved according to the adamic covenant, which was later confirmed by PART of the abrahamic covenant, and later by the new covenant. All taught grace,

the problem is the skewed form of dispensationalism which wants to separate Isreal.. while replacing it with the church in the church age, and return it back to Isreal in the later day.. This is the error
okay EG.
but i don't accept any form of dispensationalism.
including the kind that says there's anything unfulfilled that was promised to abraham.
even if its just Land.
i love you though:)
zone.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
okay EG.
but i don't accept any form of dispensationalism.
including the kind that says there's anything unfulfilled that was promised to abraham.
even if its just Land.
i love you though:)
zone.
Thats fine. Just like I do not accept any form of ammillenialism which states God will not keep his eternal promise to the nation bore by Abraham Isaac and Jacob.

I am just hoping you start to realise my form of pre-mil does not come close to most of what you have been taught.

BAnd I still love you :)
 
Dec 5, 2012
885
5
0

I have studied it. And I see nothing but speculation and personal bias. This doctrine was fought in the church in the 400's because it was added between the first and 4th centuries. and there was alot of disagreements. Unfortunately the church of rome decided to go with the more pegan belief, then the true Christian belief, because they wanted their pagan people to join them. what a better way?
You truly believe Jesus is that weak? Come on, he said he will be with His church. Is man more powerful than God? Do you really think Jesus let pagan doctrines to enter His church? I don't think we believe in the same God, I believe he is more powerful than any men, and guides His church.

Do people confuse (T)raditions and (t)raditions, yes they do, and we need guidance in understanding them. Lighting a candle for a deceased is romantic, but not a (T)radition. The Eucharist and Baptism are (T)raditions.
 
K

kenisyes

Guest
??
you mean dispensationalists have?

orthodoxy has always recognized the Church is jews (natural believing branches) and gentiles (wild branches grafted in). one new man.
I never saw Jewish believers until I saw Messianic Jews. I was always taught Jews needed to convert to a Gentile denomination in order to get "saved". Just my personal experience before, say, 1980.
 
J

JLHillsSr

Guest
This is, by far the, the closest description of Christ I have read.
Jhn 1:14 actually explains this. Once it is realized that John was a fisherman, first, you know that when sales are "made", they are fastened to the mast. Therefore, the Word, (Jehovah) was fastened to the flesh, i.e. That Holy Thing spoken of in Luke 1:35.

Jhn 1:14- And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
Luk 1:35 KJV - And the angel answered and said unto her, The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God.