No Longer to Obey Commandments

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,426
6,655
113
Yes the law declares the soul that's sins, must die.....the law of sin and death!
Please stay on topic.........do not hijack my thread.........seriously..........
 

john832

Senior Member
May 31, 2013
11,365
186
63
My question has always been... "Why on earth do some (if not most Christians today) have a problem with obeying the moral persuasions of Exodus 20 through 23?" After all, that is (for the most part) instructions on how to love our neighbor along with Matthew 7:12, Matthew 22:37-39, and Leviticus 19:11-18. Also see Deuteronomy 6:1-6, 30:6, and 13:1-3. Call me a legalistic if I esteem all of what God has given to mankind, including His Words. ALL of His words. It is relevant for today as it was way back when.
See obedience to the law of Moses is not a "moral persuasions" its the law of sin and death...if you break it you die...and its not just kinda keep it, it demands you keep it all, all the time (every jot and tittle). It has one purpose, to condemn you and the whole world! Now Christ came to justify you, why would you turn from Him back to the law? Or why would you dishonor the law by watering it down so you can feel self-righteous about yourself?
Ok just-me, there is your answer. Paul said the same thing just slightly differently...

Rom 8:7 Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.
 
M

Mitspa

Guest
Please stay on topic.........do not hijack my thread.........seriously..........
Brother...how can you speak about obedience and not show that obedience is not based on legalism...No its very much related to your topic, even if you don't see it! But I will leave your thread...and let you deal with half-truths if that's what you want?
 

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,426
6,655
113
Brother...how can you speak about obedience and not show that obedience is not based on legalism...No its very much related to your topic, even you don't see it! But I will leave your thread...and let you deal with half-truths if that's what you want?
The well worn argument of OT Law does NOT have to be the centerpiece of every thread on CC.

No problem with discussing the meaning/ways of obedience. The rest of us have been doing it here without having to go off topic to do so. Surely you can discuss obedience based on NT Scriptures. The Gospel of Christ and the Epistles have many examples within them. No need to drag in the OT Laws of Moses.

Half-truths? Seriously? The Gospel of Jesus is half-truth? We are dealing with His Gospel.

You are welcome to join in, but doing so by staying on topic. I don't see how that is unreasonable. Common courtesy suggests folks should try to stay on topic when commenting on a thread.

Why not answer the questions raised in the OP using NT Scripture examples rather than enter into the same well worn argument of OT Law?
 

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,426
6,655
113
NOTE TO ALL:

This is the topic of this OP.

IF the two commandments fulfill all other commandments of Christ as recorded in His Gospel, do they also fulfill all the commandments of Paul, James, John and Peter as recorded in their Epistles?

Please strive to stay on topic. I would rather this thread die from lack of comments than be hijacked by off topic arguments. At least it will have died of natural causes and not murder.
 
P

psychomom

Guest
p_r, if Jesus said love fulfills the Law, He must have meant it.

that said, we're sheep....not the brightest.
so the NT commands are there to help, instruct and guide us, yes?
to show us more of what Love looks like?

God doesn't need our good works, but our neighbor does, Martin Luther said.
isn't that why most of the NT commands are horizontal?

(did i do as you asked?
:confused: )
 

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,426
6,655
113
p_r, if Jesus said love fulfills the Law, He must have meant it.

that said, we're sheep....not the brightest.
so the NT commands are there to help, instruct and guide us, yes?
to show us more of what Love looks like?

God doesn't need our good works, but our neighbor does, Martin Luther said.
isn't that why most of the NT commands are horizontal?

(did i do as you asked?
:confused: )
Yes, you did. :) Consider your answer to the question I posed. If, as you say, love fulfills all of the commandments, then how are we to do good works for our neighbor without physical action?

If love fulfills all the commandments, what happens to Communion and Baptism?
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,144
613
113
70
Alabama
Yes, you did. :) Consider your answer to the question I posed. If, as you say, love fulfills all of the commandments, then how are we to do good works for our neighbor without physical action?

If love fulfills all the commandments, what happens to Communion and Baptism?
"If you love me you will keep my commandments."
 
P

psychomom

Guest
Yes, you did. :) Consider your answer to the question I posed. If, as you say, love fulfills all of the commandments, then how are we to do good works for our neighbor without physical action?
quite clearly, action is required!
it's like in James when he says if you see your neighbor in need and say, be warmed, be filled'.
(modern day equivalent, i'll pray for you?)
no---take them some food....buy them some fuel oil.


If love fulfills all the commandments, what happens to Communion and Baptism?
wouldn't that be loving God? doing as He asks?
 
M

Mitspa

Guest
The well worn argument of OT Law does NOT have to be the centerpiece of every thread on CC.

No problem with discussing the meaning/ways of obedience. The rest of us have been doing it here without having to go off topic to do so. Surely you can discuss obedience based on NT Scriptures. The Gospel of Christ and the Epistles have many examples within them. No need to drag in the OT Laws of Moses.

Half-truths? Seriously? The Gospel of Jesus is half-truth? We are dealing with His Gospel.

You are welcome to join in, but doing so by staying on topic. I don't see how that is unreasonable. Common courtesy suggests folks should try to stay on topic when commenting on a thread.

Why not answer the questions raised in the OP using NT Scripture examples rather than enter into the same well worn argument of OT Law?
No... what you seem to want to do is have a discussion about obedience and restrict it to what you understand...We learn obedience from the letter to the spirit by using the examples of the law, compared to faith and love. To say folks will find the truth of obedience without those examples given in scripture, is just silly and cannot help anyone! There is a reason Paul used the contrast between law and grace throughout his epistle to teach true obedience to God.
 

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,426
6,655
113
No... what you seem to want to do is have a discussion about obedience and restrict it to what you understand...We learn obedience from the letter to the spirit by using the examples of the law, compared to faith and love. To say folks will find the truth of obedience without those examples given in scripture, is just silly and cannot help anyone! There is a reason Paul used the contrast between law and grace throughout his epistle to teach true obedience to God.
No, what I am doing is posing the question:


IF the two commandments fulfill all other commandments of Christ as recorded in His Gospel, do they also fulfill all the commandments of Paul, James, John and Peter as recorded in their Epistles?

If folks can not understand the question, or are unable to answer the question based on the Gospel of Christ and the Epistles of the Apostles, then that is their fault. For both the Gospel of Christ and the Epistles of the Apostles provide numerous examples of the answer to this question.

Simply accusing others of "lesser understanding" does not validate anything.
 

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,426
6,655
113
quite clearly, action is required!
it's like in James when he says if you see your neighbor in need and say, be warmed, be filled'.
(modern day equivalent, i'll pray for you?)
no---take them some food....buy them some fuel oil.




wouldn't that be loving God? doing as He asks?

Yes, and it is based on both spiritual and physical obedience is it not........or, correctly, ARE THEY not? :)

 
M

Mitspa

Guest
No, what I am doing is posing the question:


IF the two commandments fulfill all other commandments of Christ as recorded in His Gospel, do they also fulfill all the commandments of Paul, James, John and Peter as recorded in their Epistles?

If folks can not understand the question, or are unable to answer the question based on the Gospel of Christ and the Epistles of the Apostles, then that is their fault. For both the Gospel of Christ and the Epistles of the Apostles provide numerous examples of the answer to this question.

Simply accusing others of "lesser understanding" does not validate anything.
Well your starting from a false premise....and wont allow anyone to show that your wrong because you don't want to hear that YOUR WORNG! Christ was not preaching that by keeping parts of the law of Moses was obedience , he was uses the law as a shadow of His Commandment and law to love...If folks still see obedience to moses as obedience to Christ, that's false doctrine! Your just trying to teach false doctrine and not have anyone debate the truth....
 
P

psychomom

Guest
Yes, and it is based on both spiritual and physical obedience is it not........or, correctly, ARE THEY not? :)

this is my understanding. :)

words alone won't cut it.
i mean, sometimes we use words to obey the Lord Jesus...(talking to others...or better, listening)
sometimes we skip certain words to obey Him, too.
:rolleyes:


 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,144
613
113
70
Alabama
Yes, and it is based on both spiritual and physical obedience is it not........or, correctly, ARE THEY not? :)

What I have seen is a lot of people who hide behind "We are saved by grace through faith, not by works" as an excuse to disregard whatever commands are represented in the New covenant. They attempt to equate obedience to works of law, this way they can feel justified in disobedience. They feel uncomfortable when confronted by NT commandments. To admit that these are binding would make them accountable to the commands so, in order to nullify the commands they attempt to hide behind "We are saved by grace through faith, not by works." Where, in either covenant, do we find that disobedience is ever acceptable to the Lord?
 

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,426
6,655
113
Well your starting from a false premise....and wont allow anyone to show that your wrong because you don't want to hear that YOUR WORNG! Christ was not preaching that by keeping parts of the law of Moses was obedience , he was uses the law as a shadow of His Commandment and law to love...If folks still see obedience to moses as obedience to Christ, that's false doctrine! Your just trying to teach false doctrine and not have anyone debate the truth....[/QUOTE]

And yet again, you are blinded by your own prejudices..........you are the only person on this thread who has tried to insert obedience to the law of Moses. The rest of us fully understand what is being discussed. No one here has even slightly suggested that obedience to Moses equates to obedience to Christ. It is you who is bringing this into the discussion.

If you can not understand the commandments Christ gave to the church in His Gospel, and the Commandments the Apostles gave to the church in their Epistles........that's on you.

The premise is not false............or, if it is, then the Gospel of Christ is false. I'm going with Christ on this one.

As for my being wrong..............all I have done is offer the question for discussion........and allowed others to give their opinions..............so can't see what judgment is being passed on what? That you don't understand the question?

Are you not a devout disciple of "love only?" Do you not shout from the rooftops that all one has to do is fulfill the two commandments, and all other commandments are automatically fulfilled? If so, then you should understand the question.

If not......see my comments and psychomom's comments.........that should help you to understand,
 
M

Mitspa

Guest
Well your starting from a false premise....and wont allow anyone to show that your wrong because you don't want to hear that YOUR WORNG! Christ was not preaching that by keeping parts of the law of Moses was obedience , he was uses the law as a shadow of His Commandment and law to love...If folks still see obedience to moses as obedience to Christ, that's false doctrine! Your just trying to teach false doctrine and not have anyone debate the truth....[/QUOTE]

And yet again, you are blinded by your own prejudices..........you are the only person on this thread who has tried to insert obedience to the law of Moses. The rest of us fully understand what is being discussed. No one here has even slightly suggested that obedience to Moses equates to obedience to Christ. It is you who is bringing this into the discussion.

If you can not understand the commandments Christ gave to the church in His Gospel, and the Commandments the Apostles gave to the church in their Epistles........that's on you.

The premise is not false............or, if it is, then the Gospel of Christ is false. I'm going with Christ on this one.

As for my being wrong..............all I have done is offer the question for discussion........and allowed others to give their opinions..............so can't see what judgment is being passed on what? That you don't understand the question?

Are you not a devout disciple of "love only?" Do you not shout from the rooftops that all one has to do is fulfill the two commandments, and all other commandments are automatically fulfilled? If so, then you should understand the question.

If not......see my comments and psychomom's comments.........that should help you to understand,
What ever...its your thread.... Who wants to hear you go on and on about how people need to do it your way?
 

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,426
6,655
113
this is my understanding. :)

words alone won't cut it.
i mean, sometimes we use words to obey the Lord Jesus...(talking to others...or better, listening)
sometimes we skip certain words to obey Him, too.
:rolleyes:
The church today must obey the commandments of Christ.........now, this is done BOTH in spiritual obedience (as in the two commandments of love) and in physical obedience (as in Communion, Baptism).

The same goes for the commandments/instructions given by the Apostles in their Epistles. But there are those who refuse to accept physical obedience, because they believe that physical action equates to obedience to the Law of Moses, and that simply is not true. They believe that physical obedience equates to legalism...........well, if that is true, then anyone who celebrates Communion or Baptism is a legalist.

This is the point..............this is the point. Obedience to the commandments of Christ is both spiritual and physical.
 

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,426
6,655
113
What ever...its your thread.... Who wants to hear you go on and on about how people need to do it your way?
Seriously? as opposed to doing it your way? Not for nothing, but if being obedient to Christ is "doing it my way," then Praise God...............I will do it that way.

If you can not answer the question......just post derogatory remarks? Is that your way?
 
Dec 26, 2014
3,757
19
0
as evidences by his thread that says he is happy with his own self-righteousness,

and all his other posts (or she/ it/ autobot?)

he cannot understand anything at all that is true, nor can he/she/it grasp truth or understanding or wisdom.

quite a number of others have tried with all patience and gentleness and self-control to explain the scriptures to him/her/it,

but he/she/it does not seem able at all to read what they say even,
let alone understand it --- as they have

noted in many many posts.