No major doctrines changed?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

2ndTimeIsTheCharm

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2023
1,936
1,133
113
The main issue I have with Moffatt's translation is he moved some chapters and sections around in certain books to try and synchronize the flow of the ideas/storyline. He captures some great literary expressions from the original Hebrew and Greek languages. I feel like I'm reading great poetry/prose from highly skilled classical writers!
Yeah, I looked him up and found out about the ordering before I downloaded his work. His notes are pretty clear too!

 

SilverFox7

Well-known member
Dec 24, 2022
698
446
63
Grand Rapids, Michigan
Yeah, I looked him up and found out about the ordering before I downloaded his work. His notes are pretty clear too!

The Preface and Introduction are superbly written as well. Yes, it's not a perfect translation, but his intent was Holy Spirit inspired.

It's just a fun Biblical text to read!
 

hornetguy

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2016
7,179
1,801
113
I did not make the comparison initially someone else on the thread did, I just do not think it is a valid analogy.

The "many, many" is growing exponentially thanks to our education system, so is it the KJV or the illiterate masses?
Well, it would depend on which translation uses the texts, especially the ones that have been discovered since 1611, most accurately.
The KJV is not "the" standard, it is simply "a" standard.
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
26,074
13,778
113
What are the specific issues with Moffatt's translation of this verse?
Moffat's translation of Mark chapter 16 has many problems, the worst being that he has taken snippets out of spurious GNOSTIC GOSPELS and inserted them into the text. If that is not BLATANT CORRUPTION then we do not understand corruption of the text. He has also made gratuitous changes to the text (bolded), and has followed the Critical Text rather than the Received Text.


Moffat's translation (below) is in red and the KJV translation is in blue (side by side)

Moffatt(i) 1 And when the sabbath had passed Mary of Magdala, Mary the mother of James, and Salome bought some spices in order to go and anoint him;
1 And when the sabbath was past, Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James, and Salome, had bought sweet spices, that they might come and anoint him.
2 and very early on the first day of the week they went to the tomb, after sunrise.
2And very early in the morning the first day of the week, they came unto the sepulchre at the rising of the sun.
3 They said to themselves, "Who will roll away the boulder for us at the opening of the tomb?" (for it was a very large boulder).
3And they said among themselves, Who shall roll us away the stone from the door of the sepulchre? for it was very great.
4 But when they looked they saw the boulder had been rolled to one side,
4And when they looked, they saw that the stone was rolled away:
5 and on entering the tomb they saw a youth sitting on the right dressed in a white robe. They were bewildered,
5And entering into the sepulchre, they saw a young man sitting on the right side, clothed in a long white garment; and they were affrighted.
6 but he said to them, "Do not be bewildered. You are looking for Jesus of Nazaret, who was crucified? He has risen, he is not here. That is the place where he was laid.
6And he saith unto them, Be not affrighted: Ye seek Jesus of Nazareth, which was crucified: he is risen; he is not here: behold the place where they laid him.
7 Go you and tell his disciples and Peter, 'He precedes you to Galilee; you shall see him there, as he told you.'"
7But go your way, tell his disciples and Peter that he goeth before you into Galilee: there shall ye see him, as he said unto you.
8 And they fled out of the tomb, for they were seized with terror and beside themselves. They said nothing to anyone, for they were afraid of — .
8And they went out quickly, and fled from the sepulchre; for they trembled and were amazed: neither said they any thing to any man; for they were afraid.
9 (a) Now after he rose early on the first day of the week, he appeared first to Mary of Magdala out of whom he had cast seven daemons.
9Now when Jesus was risen early the first day of the week, he appeared first to Mary Magdalene, out of whom he had cast seven devils.
10 She went and reported it to those who had been with him, as they mourned and wept;
10And she went and told them that had been with him, as they mourned and wept.
11 but although they heard he was alive and had been seen by her, they would not believe it.
11And they, when they had heard that he was alive, and had been seen of her, believed not.
12 After this he appeared in another form to two of them as they were walking on their way to the country.
12After that he appeared in another form unto two of them, as they walked, and went into the country.
13 They too went and reported it to the rest, but they would not believe them either.
13And they went and told it unto the residue: neither believed they them.
14 Afterwards he appeared at table to the eleven themselves and reproached them for their unbelief and dulness of mind, because they had not believed those who saw him risen from the dead. [Note: there is a huge difference between dulness of mind and hardness of heart]
14Afterward he appeared unto the eleven as they sat at meat, and upbraided them with their unbelief and hardness of heart, because they believed not them which had seen him after he was risen.

GNOSTIC ADDITION! (PURE BALONEY)
[But they excused themselves, saying, "This age of lawlessness and unbelief lies under the sway of Satan, who will not allow what lies under the unclean spirits to understand the truth and power of God; therefore," they said to Christ, "reveal your righteousness now." Christ answered them, "The term of years for Satan's power has now expired, but other terrors are at hand. I was delivered to death on behalf of sinners, that they might return to the truth and sin no more, that they might inherit that glory of righteousness which is spiritual and imperishable in heaven."]

15 And he said to them, "Go to all the world and preach the gospel to every creature:
15And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.
16 he who believes and is baptized shall be saved, but he who will not believe shall be condemned. [ Note: there is a huge difference between condemned and damned]
16He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.
17 And for those who believe, these miracles will follow: they will cast out daemons in my name, they will talk in foreign tongues,
17And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues; [Note: the Greek text has "new" καιναῖς, kainais not "foreign"]
18 they will handle serpents, and if they drink any deadly poison, it will not hurt them; they will lay hands on the sick and make them well."
18They shall take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them; they shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall recover.
19 Then after speaking to them the Lord Jesus was taken up to heaven and sat down at the right hand of God,
19So then after the Lord had spoken unto them, he was received up into heaven, and sat on the right hand of God.
20 while they went out and preached everywhere, the Lord working with them and confirming the word by the miracles that endorsed it.
20And they went forth, and preached every where, the Lord working with them, and confirming the word with signs following. Amen.

ANOTHER GNOSTIC ADDITION!
[(b) But they gave Peter and his companions a brief account of all these injunctions. And, after that, Jesus himself sent out by means of them from east to west the sacred and imperishable message of eternal salvation.]
 
Jun 20, 2022
6,460
1,330
113
Mark 15:25 "And it was the third hour, and they crucified him." (KJV)

John 19:14-16 "And it was the preparation of the passover, and about the sixth hour: and he saith unto the Jews, Behold your King! But they cried out, Away with him, away with him, crucify him. Pilate saith unto them, Shall I crucify your King? The chief priests answered, We have no king but Caesar. Then delivered he him therefore unto them to be crucified. And they took Jesus, and led him away." (KJV)

Case closed.
We don't have concrete evidence how time was kept. But considering it was Passover and Holiday, 6th hour would be morning and by 3 pm He was on a Cross until 6 pm??

People today get Death Row and 15 years at the point of 6th hour. Ancient People solved problems quickly.
 
Jun 20, 2022
6,460
1,330
113
I meant the oldest ones we have available to us....
If you mean oldest factual Greek New Testament Text, we have a 3rd Century copy that verifies the Jerome Vulgate New Testament word for word, before it later became manipulated well long after his death in the 7th to 10th Centuries by the Catholic Church in Rome.
 
Dec 21, 2020
1,825
474
83
You could start by purchasing and carefully studying The Revision Revised by John William Burgon. That is only the tip of the iceberg, since Burgon wrote many other books to prove that the Minority Text is thoroughly corrupt.
Was Burgon KJVO? Would your opinion be swayed if I provided resources in favor of accepting the minority texts?

That is where you need to personally do your due diligence.

But I will give you just one glaring example -- the OMISSION of Acts 8:37, which (1) totally undermines the doctrine that only sincere believers may be baptized and also Romans 10:9-10: That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.
Do you understand that water baptism is optional, and that what really matters is that a person has done what Romans 10:9 says to do? When a person does that he is baptized in the Holy Spirit, which is the one baptism that matters (Eph 4:5).

Indeed it undermines (2) a plain understanding of Scripture, and also undermines (3) the doctrine of the preservation of the Word of God and (4) the commandment to not tamper with a single word of the Bible. The NIV adds and substracts words from Scripture at will.
So does the KJV. The difference is that the KJV usually italicizes them, some (not all) newer translations do not.

And I would not say that it is "at will." The NIV translators, and other translators who use all the texts available, work from those texts. They are not "out to deceive" or to lead people astray.

A question was asked in verse 36 and in the King James Bible the correct answer was provided in verse 37. But according to the NIV NO ANSWER WAS GIVEN to a very critical question!

NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION: ACTS 8 PARAPHRASED AND DISTORTED
26 Now an angel of the Lord said to Philip, “Go south to the road—the desert road—that goes down from Jerusalem to Gaza.”
27 So he started out, and on his way he met an Ethiopian eunuch, an important official in charge of all the treasury of the Kandake
["which means" ADDED] “queen of the Ethiopians”. This man had gone to Jerusalem to worship,
28 and on his way home was sitting in his chariot reading
["the Book of" ADDED] Isaiah the prophet.
29 The Spirit told Philip, “Go to that chariot and stay near it.”
30 Then Philip ran up to the chariot and heard the man reading Isaiah the prophet. “Do you understand what you are reading?” Philip asked.
31 “How can I,” he said, “unless someone explains it to me?” So he invited Philip to come up and sit with him.
32 This is the passage of Scripture the eunuch was reading:
“He was led like a sheep to the slaughter,
and as a lamb before its shearer is silent,
so he did not open his mouth.
33 In his humiliation he was deprived of justice.
Who can speak of his descendants? [The Greek genea = generation not "descendants"]
34 The eunuch asked Philip, “Tell me, please, who is the prophet talking about, himself or someone else?”
35 Then Philip began with that very passage of Scripture and told him the good news about Jesus.
36 As they traveled along the road, they came to some water and the eunuch said, “Look, here is water. What can stand in the way of my being baptized?”
[37] [c]
[FOOTNOTED and how many will bother with false and misleading footnotes?]
38 And he gave orders to stop the chariot. Then both Philip and the eunuch went down into the water and Philip baptized him.
39 When they came up out of the water, the Spirit of the Lord suddenly took Philip away, and the eunuch did not see him again, but went on his way rejoicing.
40 Philip, however, appeared at Azotus and traveled about, preaching the gospel in all the towns until he reached Caesarea.

************************************************
KING JAMES BIBLE
36 And as they went on their way, they came unto a certain water: and the eunuch said, See, here is water; what doth hinder me to be baptized?
37 And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.
You obviously have a very strong opinion on this. It's interesting that although you decry and discredit the modern translations, you have no problem declaring that the KJV translators got it wrong in Eccles. 12:7.

Acts 8:37 is not in texts that are older than the TR. People a lot smarter than me have worked diligently to make the best translations they could, and I am not hobbled by the KJVO mindset. As far as I have been able to put together, here are the verses that exist in the KJV that may be of questionable authenticity:

Prov 3:3; Matt 12:47; 17:21; 18:11; 23:14; Mark 7:16; 9:44, 46; 11:26; 15:28; 16:9-20; Luke 17:36; 22:43-44; 23:17; John 5:3-4; 7:53-8:11; Acts 8:37; 15:34; 24:6-8; 28:29; Rom 16:24; 2 Pet 3:18; 1 John 5:7.

Additionally, while 1 Cor 14:34-35 are in every manuscript, they are located in different positions in some of them. That, and the fact that they essentially silence half of the church, causes their authenticity to be questionable. I realize this will probably upset you, that is not my intention.

Even though I do not think the omission of Acts 8:37 in newer translations constitutes a "doctrinal difference," thanks for responding.
 
Jun 20, 2022
6,460
1,330
113
If people are actually interested in a View of the Bible from the Hebrew side that is easy to read and understand.

Plus, how they translated the Ancient Greek Text was using the Greek Language translated into Hebrew then English.

The TLV is a Hebrew view of the Greek New Testament.

I am not even claiming accuracy, but it’s no different than translating Greek to English or in this case, Greek to Aramaic Hebrew to English.

It is a different read but you also get chances to expand your understanding of the original Greek Same Words translated in a unique style but very ancient and modern simultaneously.

Good Read!
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,595
13,858
113
Moffat... has also made gratuitous changes to the text (bolded), and has followed the Critical Text rather than the Received Text.
While it's fine to note Moffat's choice of source material, that's not something that is going to convince anyone who is not already a TR- or KJV-onlyist.

Moffat's translation (below) is in red and the KJV translation is in blue (side by side)
Moffatt(i) 1 And when the sabbath had passed Mary of Magdala, Mary the mother of James, and Salome bought some spices in order to go and anoint him;
1 And when the sabbath was past, Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James, and Salome, had bought sweet spices, that they might come and anoint him.
This is a difference of wording, not a "gratuitous change".

2 and very early on the first day of the week they went to the tomb, after sunrise.
2And very early in the morning the first day of the week, they came unto the sepulchre at the rising of the sun.
At? Or after? Without additional evidence, you have no legitimate complaint.

3 They said to themselves, "Who will roll away the boulder for us at the opening of the tomb?" (for it was a very large boulder).
3And they said among themselves, Who shall roll us away the stone from the door of the sepulchre? for it was very great.

4 But when they looked they saw the boulder had been rolled to one side,
4And when they looked, they saw that the stone was rolled away:
Both of these are minor variants in word selection, not "gratuitious changes".

5 and on entering the tomb they saw a youth sitting on the right dressed in a white robe. They were bewildered,
5And entering into the sepulchre, they saw a young man sitting on the right side, clothed in a long white garment; and they were affrighted.
As is this.

6 but he said to them, "Do not be bewildered. You are looking for Jesus of Nazaret, who was crucified? He has risen, he is not here. That is the place where he was laid.
6And he saith unto them, Be not affrighted: Ye seek Jesus of Nazareth, which was crucified: he is risen; he is not here: behold the place where they laid him.
Given that the pronunciation of the Hebrew "th" is closer to "t" than the English "th", this rendering is actually more correct than the KJV.

14 Afterwards he appeared at table to the eleven themselves and reproached them for their unbelief and dulness of mind, because they had not believed those who saw him risen from the dead.
[Note: there is a huge difference between dulness of mind and hardness of heart]
Here I agree.

16 he who believes and is baptized shall be saved, but he who will not believe shall be condemned.
16He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.
[ Note: there is a huge difference between condemned and damned]
Um, no. There is a small difference between them, and they are often used synonymously.

17 And for those who believe, these miracles will follow: they will cast out daemons in my name, they will talk in
foreign tongues,
17And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues; [Note: the Greek text has "new" καιναῖς, kainais not "foreign"]
Which "Greek text"? Your criticism is only valid if the source used by Moffat as 'new' rather than 'foreign'. Either way, the point is valid; they spoke in other languages not learned in the normal way.

19 Then after speaking to them the Lord Jesus was taken up to heaven and sat down at the right hand of God,
19So then after the Lord had spoken unto them, he was received up into heaven, and sat on the right hand of God.
This is a minor difference in wording.

Most of your "gratuitous changes" are simply different choices for wording and have no bearing on doctrine. As usual, you have overstated your case. If you focused on just the additional text, I would see no reason to criticize your post.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
61,118
30,252
113
We don't have concrete evidence how time was kept. But considering it was Passover and Holiday, 6th hour would be morning and by 3 pm He was on a Cross until 6 pm??

People today get Death Row and 15 years at the point of 6th hour. Ancient People solved problems quickly.
Jesus was on the cross at noon when three hours of darkness commenced.

Some would maybe want to say this was a solar eclipse, but since Passover
is always on a full moon, that would be a cosmological impossibility
.:D
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
26,074
13,778
113
Most of your "gratuitous changes" are simply different choices for wording and have no bearing on doctrine.
The very fact that heretical Gnostic doctrine was included should have been enough. But you let that slide to go into other matters. No bearing on doctrine? Is eternal damnation a Bible doctrine? And if Moffat changed that to "condemnation" it is not a change of doctrine? How about dullness of mind verses hardness of heart? Does the Bible condemn "dullness of mind" or does it condemn hardness of heart? The text had σκληροκαρδίαν sklērokardian = hardness of heart. WHICH MEANS THAT MOFFAT HAS TAMPERED WITH THE TEXT AND YOU HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH THE TAMPERING OF THE TEXT! Which means that you are on the side of the corrupters (which we have known all along).
 
L

Locoponydirtman

Guest
What if Goliath is more an epithet than a name, and like usual people are making a big deal about nothing?
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
26,074
13,778
113
Was Burgon KJVO? Would your opinion be swayed if I provided resources in favor of accepting the minority texts?
You want this to be a debate or do you want the truth? Start digging and digging real hard before you respond again.
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
26,074
13,778
113
What if Goliath is more an epithet than a name, and like usual people are making a big deal about nothing?
Sure, tampering with the Word is God is no big deal to many Christians. Does the Bible present the word "Goliath" as a name?
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,772
8,612
113
We don't have concrete evidence how time was kept. But considering it was Passover and Holiday, 6th hour would be morning and by 3 pm He was on a Cross until 6 pm??

People today get Death Row and 15 years at the point of 6th hour. Ancient People solved problems quickly.
6am = dawn
9am = 3rd hour
12 noon = 6th hour
3pm = 9th hour
6pm = dusk
9pm = 1st watch
12pm = 2nd watch
3am = 3rd watch
 

hornetguy

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2016
7,179
1,801
113
If you mean oldest factual Greek New Testament Text, we have a 3rd Century copy that verifies the Jerome Vulgate New Testament word for word, before it later became manipulated well long after his death in the 7th to 10th Centuries by the Catholic Church in Rome.
Actually I was talking about the story of David and Goliath...
 
Dec 21, 2020
1,825
474
83
...How about dullness of mind verses hardness of heart? Does the Bible condemn "dullness of mind" or does it condemn hardness of heart? The text had σκληροκαρδίαν sklērokardian = hardness of heart....
You do realize that Dino AGREED with you on that, right?