nomatter what u Believe me or not

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
soberxp

soberxp

Senior Member
#62
May 3, 2018
2,511
482
83
#62
Depleted said:
This is one of those moments where what you're saying means something to you, but I'm not understanding it. I don't think westerners will understand it. It sounds like we're unborn babies permanently, forever in the mother's womb. (Womb is usually what we call the uterus too. I don't know why. Just a word more often used in conversation. Less intimate, I guess.)

Nothing for or against what you're saying, because I don't understand it, but I do understand it will set off more than a few westerners with a negative feel to it. Something like if you've ever seen westerners do something that, according to your culture, shows disrespect, but they only do that because they don't know it is showing disrespect. They're naive. To us, "uterus" is usually a word used in a medical setting. When it's not about anything medical, it feels like watching pornography. We're not, and you're not, but the feeling is close to that. We get embarrassed by it. (Womb, on the other hand, has less of that effect.)

And just something funny about this -- rumor has it, Chinese is the hardest language to learn. I keep thinking how hard you're trying for English. And I think, "Wow. He's doing good, looking up English words online to communicate when he doesn't quite know that word. How bad would we be, if we had to do the same thing in his language?" :)
Click to expand...
http://t1.qpic.cn/mblogpic/fc0fdeac597755223338/460
hope it help u to understand. copy and post ,not just check it out .
 
soberxp

soberxp

Senior Member
#64
May 3, 2018
2,511
482
83
#64
Depleted said:
I've been reading your thread. I can't say I understand the visions at all, but if I ever told you what I've seen, you probably wouldn't understand it either. Our cultures are so different, just that makes it get lost in translations. But, I do get God started calling you on October 10, 2008.

Might I make a suggestion that spans all cultures? Instead of seeking signs, (and it is a wonderful feeling when given a sign, so I do get why it would be easy to keep seeking signs themselves), seek the Lord instead. His signs are amazing, but that's just the tip of the iceberg. There is so much more than that.


As for myopia? We're more apt to call that nearsightedness in English. It's not a disease. It's not that big a deal, thanks to the Lord for someone inventing eyeglasses. But I know there are moments when I can see clearly, and most moments I need my glasses. Assume you get what most people get -- old-age eyes the older you get. My husband was born with more-than-perfect eyesight. He had 20/10 eyesight. (What most people can see at 10 feet, he could see at 20 feet.) Now he is 71 years old, and bemoaning needing glasses. But, truthfully, he felt like he needed glasses 20 years ago and his eyesight got "so bad" he could only see like most people. Now his eyesight is as bad as mine was at birth. 20/50. (What most people can see at 50 feet, we could see at 20 feet.) For me, I'd still would like 20/50, because mine got worse.

All in all, it really doesn't matter, because we can see 20/20 with glasses.

All that just to say, myopia isn't one of those things we need a miracle for. We don't really need miracles. What we do need is the Lord.
Click to expand...
10.10.2008, that's meaning a lot to my [FONT=微软雅黑]culture , at 5.12 ,2008 there is a [FONT=微软雅黑]M = 8 earthquake[/FONT] in [FONT=微软雅黑]Sichuan Province 。
[FONT=微软雅黑]besides，10 in chinese the word is 十 , [FONT=微软雅黑]And ten months pregnant normally. my story start at chinese [FONT=微软雅黑]dragon , my point is not the chinese dragon , maybe it's just "[FONT=微软雅黑]Dragon Ball" [FONT=微软雅黑]A Japanese [FONT=微软雅黑]cartoon[/FONT] , that [FONT=微软雅黑]dragon [FONT=微软雅黑]can resurrect all men and women . let's dont [FONT=微软雅黑]focus [/FONT]on the [FONT=微软雅黑]dragon part . but what god's [FONT=微软雅黑]purpose . [/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT]
 
L

LPT

Guest
#66
#66
soberxp said:
did you try this ? and understand what i said .?!
I would say ,even after our birth, we still live in [FONT=微软雅黑] "uterus" , what we have done ,all by hands as we still [FONT=微软雅黑]growing in "[FONT=微软雅黑]uterus[/FONT]"[/FONT], you call that "[FONT=微软雅黑]born[/FONT] again" "reborn" ,can you get what i mean ? [FONT=微软雅黑]We've been designed so cleverly by God[/FONT][/FONT]
Click to expand...
Wo mingbai ni de yisi shi xiongdi
 
soberxp

soberxp

Senior Member
#67
May 3, 2018
2,511
482
83
#67
garee said:
It’s actually the things that you do not see by faith. We see orunderstand as we are given his faith to see the eternal and anything that is not of his faith is sin .

It is simply the father of lies bringing pictures into one fleshly mind.Just as he did with the Son of man in Mathew 4 . Christ's response all three time, as it is written. The one source of Christian faith.

18 Let no man beguile you of your reward in avoluntary humility and worshipping of angels, intruding into those things whichhe hath not seen, vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind, Col 2 :18

God is no longer bringing any new revelations in any manner as of His last before he sealed up the possibility of adding more. The book of Revelation.

Need more than he has revealed? Why go above that which is written?
Click to expand...
I have said :[FONT=微软雅黑]Does anything I say seem so contradictory?[/FONT]
fleshly mind？why not ,cuz i just have a fleshly mind . [FONT=微软雅黑]illusion[/FONT] ? [FONT=微软雅黑]non-existent , it's my real life . not because what i want and what i [FONT=微软雅黑]Dream [/FONT], i just want to share the good news about second coming of jesus , and it's [FONT=微软雅黑]wrote [/FONT]in the bible

Mark13:26 "At that time men will see the Son of Man coming in clouds with great power and glory.[/FONT]

where is the new [FONT=微软雅黑]chapter come from ? that's your [FONT=微软雅黑]illusion[/FONT] .maybe someting not peace in your heart/mind ,honest .

peace , bro[/FONT]
 
L

LPT

Guest
#69
#69
soberxp said:
yes,we are brother and sister , we still live in "uterus" as god's children.
Click to expand...
A women's menstrual cycles and stages of life are intrinsically linked to the cycles of the Earth, Moon and Sun. The moon cycle is 29.5 days, and the average woman's menstrual cycle is 29.5 days. Women who's cycles are closest to the 29.5 day cycle have higher rates of fertility. In addition, there are 13 moon cycles in a calendar year, and the average age of menarche is age 13. The average age of menopause is 52, which is also the number of weeks in a year. There are an average of 4 weeks to a women's menstrual cycle and 4 seasons in a year.
 
blue_ladybug

blue_ladybug

Senior Member
#70
Feb 21, 2014
70,920
9,669
113
#70
Absolute baloney. A woman's menstrual cycle is NOT a month long.. :rolleyes: At the most, it's 6 or 7 days..

That has NOTHING to do with the earth, sun or moon. Neither does people's stages of life.
 
L

LPT

Guest
#71
#71
blue_ladybug said:
Absolute baloney. A woman's menstrual cycle is NOT a month long.. :rolleyes: At the most, it's 6 or 7 days..

That has NOTHING to do with the earth, sun or moon. Neither does people's stages of life.
Click to expand...
Ahh whatcha you talking about I didn't write it is a month long, it is on average every 29.5 days. Where in the world did you come up with that I said a month long. no doubt the length stage went right over your head, it's not based in stages of ones life but the period a woman is usually able to get pregnant is from around 13 to 52 yrs old.


these are the 4 cycles,

1.Menstruation
2.follicular phase
3.ovulation
4.luteal phase
 
Last edited by a moderator:
blue_ladybug

blue_ladybug

Senior Member
#72
Feb 21, 2014
70,920
9,669
113
#72
How do you know so much about a woman's menstrual cycle? Either way, it has nothing to do with the phases of the earth, moon or sun.
 
L

LPT

Guest
#73
#73
blue_ladybug said:
How do you know so much about a woman's menstrual cycle? Either way, it has nothing to do with the phases of the earth, moon or sun.
Click to expand...
I apologize for yesterday if I offended you, isn't this what it is about, I know more than you think I do. you don't have to believe, i bet you didn't know ancient women use to curve the cycles on bone and or stone, ancient calendars.
 
blue_ladybug

blue_ladybug

Senior Member
#74
Feb 21, 2014
70,920
9,669
113
#74
Nah, no worries.. I don't offend easily. :)

LPT said:
I apologize for yesterday if I offended you, isn't this what it is about, I know more than you think I do. you don't have to believe, i bet you didn't know ancient women use to curve the cycles on bone and or stone, ancient calendars.
Click to expand...
 
L

LPT

Guest
#75
#75
blue_ladybug said:
Nah, no worries.. I don't offend easily. :)
Click to expand...
cool back to what I was saying this is not a biological coincedience, but by design a woman's fertility is at its peak at 29.5 days just like the moon not by chance by design.

The length of a woman's menstrual cycle has long been known to bear some reflection of the underlying endocrine milieu as well as her potential for fertility. Vollman at al. (1968, 1970, 1977) as well as Treloar et al. (1967, 1981) through their extensive prospective studies, have clearly shown that women whose cycles approach the 29.5 day span have the highest likelihood of fertile cycles, while women whose cycles become longer or shorter have a proportionately diminishing incidence of fertile cycles. About 28% of reproductively mature women show a 29.5 + 1 day cycle length (Vollman 1968, 1970, 1977).
That the most fertile reproductive cycle has the same length as the lunar cycle, i.e. 29.5 days, is an intriguing biological coincidence. In 1979, we reported that although previous investigators had failed to find a relationship between menses onset and the lunar cycle, their failure derived from the inappropriateness to the methods employed. By selecting the subpopulation of women (approximately 30%) who cycle as often as the moon does, i.e. 29.5+1 day, a significant pattern was revealed. There was an increased likelihood of menstruation onset in the light half of the lunar month. Thus, in a selected population of 312 women, prospective menstrual cycle records maintained during the Autumn of 1977 showed that 69% of the subsample whose menstrual length was 29.5+ 1 day showed menses onset within 7.5 days of the full moon (Cutler 1980a).
 
L

LPT

Guest
#80
#80
Bless you all for you all do make me chuckle from time to time...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.