S
His truth is what they could not accept (just like the Pharisees), and they left on their own because they were not chosen. Again, you seem to have a problem with John Calvin's teachings, and that's fine. I don't know much about him or his doctrines. But if we set aside what theologians teach and just ask, "what does the Bible have to say?", then we can search it out without preconceived notions. I (and perhaps you also) believe that Jesus Christ is God in the flesh. Well, so does Catholicism. Does that mean that you identify with Catholicism in any way? I don't think so because I sure don't. It's the same with what any religion or any theologian teaches. It's what is being taught, not who is teaching it that matters.
Now, the Bible teaches (not Calvin, not me) that no human being had a choice insofar as salvation is concerned. Man's will played no part. I believe I posted some scriptures concerning this in one of my previous responses to you. Here is some of it:
"Here are a few more for you to consider and see how they agree (because agreement is the key) with the doctrine of free will.
John 1:12 (KJV 1900)
But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: (This is the free will doctrine position, but it's incomplete. Here is the rest of the verse).
John 1:13 (KJV 1900)
Which were born (meaning, born again), not of blood (not of bloodline), nor of the will of the flesh (not born again by the will of our flesh) nor of the will of man (not born again by man's own will), but of God (but we are born again by the will of God).
James 1:18 (KJV 1900)
Of his own will begat he us with the word of truth, that we should be a kind of firstfruits of his creatures. "
Can you answer a question for me? How does John 1:13 agree with the doctrine of free will? Or James 1:18? And there are so many more. It all has to agree, and it does, but not with the free will doctrine.
But then what happens to the rest of the world? Well, God teaches us that God a just God. And that means that God must execute perfect justice according to his written law, that all have sinned and the penalty for sin is death. So, God would have been perfectly just if he decided to wipe mankind off the face of the earth, right? Well, the bible also teaches us that God is a merciful God. So, rather than let everyone perish justly because of their sins, God chose to save some for his glory. He calls them the elect. And it was their sins that Christ paid for.
God helps us understand his sovereignty in this matter by telling us about Jacob who was loved (meaning he had his sins paid for) and Jacob who was hated (meaning, he did not have his sins paid for). God answer the question of this being unfair.
Romans 9:11–16 (KJV 1900)
(For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth 12 It was said unto her, The elder shall serve the younger. 13 As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.
14 What shall we say then? Is there unrighteousness with God? God forbid. 15 For he saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion. 16 So then it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy.
Romans 9:19–21 (KJV 1900)
Thou wilt say then unto me, Why doth he yet find fault? For who hath resisted his will? (Why does God still blame me for my sin if none can resist his will?) 20 Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus? 21 Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?
All of this has to be taken into consideration and it has to agree with whatever doctrine we hold to be true, or else we're not holding a true doctrine.
Now, the Bible teaches (not Calvin, not me) that no human being had a choice insofar as salvation is concerned. Man's will played no part. I believe I posted some scriptures concerning this in one of my previous responses to you. Here is some of it:
"Here are a few more for you to consider and see how they agree (because agreement is the key) with the doctrine of free will.
John 1:12 (KJV 1900)
But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: (This is the free will doctrine position, but it's incomplete. Here is the rest of the verse).
John 1:13 (KJV 1900)
Which were born (meaning, born again), not of blood (not of bloodline), nor of the will of the flesh (not born again by the will of our flesh) nor of the will of man (not born again by man's own will), but of God (but we are born again by the will of God).
James 1:18 (KJV 1900)
Of his own will begat he us with the word of truth, that we should be a kind of firstfruits of his creatures. "
Can you answer a question for me? How does John 1:13 agree with the doctrine of free will? Or James 1:18? And there are so many more. It all has to agree, and it does, but not with the free will doctrine.
But then what happens to the rest of the world? Well, God teaches us that God a just God. And that means that God must execute perfect justice according to his written law, that all have sinned and the penalty for sin is death. So, God would have been perfectly just if he decided to wipe mankind off the face of the earth, right? Well, the bible also teaches us that God is a merciful God. So, rather than let everyone perish justly because of their sins, God chose to save some for his glory. He calls them the elect. And it was their sins that Christ paid for.
God helps us understand his sovereignty in this matter by telling us about Jacob who was loved (meaning he had his sins paid for) and Jacob who was hated (meaning, he did not have his sins paid for). God answer the question of this being unfair.
Romans 9:11–16 (KJV 1900)
(For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth 12 It was said unto her, The elder shall serve the younger. 13 As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.
14 What shall we say then? Is there unrighteousness with God? God forbid. 15 For he saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion. 16 So then it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy.
Romans 9:19–21 (KJV 1900)
Thou wilt say then unto me, Why doth he yet find fault? For who hath resisted his will? (Why does God still blame me for my sin if none can resist his will?) 20 Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus? 21 Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?
All of this has to be taken into consideration and it has to agree with whatever doctrine we hold to be true, or else we're not holding a true doctrine.
I do not believe in predestination according to Calvin
I do not believe God has created people as fodder for the fire
I believe Jesus died for the world as the Bible states, but certainly not universalism...not all accept Christ, but we do have a choice...in fact that is illustrated by the example you give...you see it as they walked away because God said not you, not you and not you and not those other guys either.
it is also a big concern that Calvinists and those equally persuaded, do not believe the Spirit of God is at work in this world today as He has always been. they do not believe the spiritual gifts are for today and that is contrary to biblical truth. so I have to wonder how far the deception and blindness goes...for that is what it is
the Bible is not a smorgasbord
Now, the Bible teaches (not Calvin, not me) that no human being had a choice insofar as salvation is concerned. Man's will played no part.
- 1
- Show all