Popeless Catholics

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Dan_473

Senior Member
Mar 11, 2014
9,054
1,051
113
Thanks for reminding me of a couple of things...

The oferring plate is passesd around but voluntary donations are not really spoken about unless there's some kind of special need. This is one thing I like a lot about the RCC - I don't go to church to hear a 10 minute sermon about how I should be tithing.

If a person believes in the Real Presence, he can receive communion, otherwise, no.

A lot is the same!

Fran
Hi Fran,

sounds like we have some different impressions of a few of the details of what the rcc teaches...

but I think we agree for the most part.
 

Bladerunner

Senior Member
Aug 22, 2016
3,076
59
48
Hi Dan,

The RCC says that the truth is in the bible but the church is the pillar of truth - it holds the truth to be imparted to the people.

In the U.S. it was not encouraged that the bible be read until about the 80's. I remember that when I was saved I could not find a bible study - one of the reasons I left the RCC.

Now they do tell their parishoners to read the bible and they do have bible study but few attend. There is very little interest in a church by church basis.

In Europe it was a SIN to read the bible until recently. It was discouraged vehemently.
Seminarians could not read the Old Testament without prior authority by a superior. This was true even in the 1960's, as told to me by a priest friend of mine.

Today Catholics are encouraged to read the bible and attend bible study, but, as you can imagine, the majority wonder why it would even be necessary since they attend Mass and there are three readings each week. OT, Letter, Gospel.

The O.T. and Letter is read by the laity. The Gospel is read by either a priest or a deacon. There are 3 different "sets", A,B and C (year A, etc.) If you go to Mass every day for three years you do hear the entire bible, although not in order.

At the reading of the gospel, the congregation stands and makes a cross on their forehead, lips, and heart. I used to teach kids this meant: Hear God, Speak God, Love God. Or, God in the mind, God in our words, God in our heart.

For the consecration of the "bread", which are round wafers or hosts, the congragation should be kneeling, but many just stand and bow their head.

This is the time when transubstantiation takes place. The equivalent of the Real Presence in the Lutheran church. I don't know about others. When Luther died, he still believed in the Real Presence.

The Apostle's Creed and the Lord's Prayer are recited as a group at different times of the Mass.
Also, at the beginning of the Mass a comunal confession is celebrated and all veniel sins are forgiven. (The Penetential Rite).
Mortal sins can only be forgiven (absolved) by a priest.

I'm not Catholic and do not agree with much of their dogma and doctrine, but I'll defend them when necessary.

Fran
And to what point that you will defend them. I don't think it is defendable!
 

Timeline

Senior Member
Mar 20, 2014
1,826
17
38
What does this pertain to: are you talking about yourself here?

I am pointing out the fact that the priesthood of the Catholic Church is fiction. We are all the priests and Jesus Christ is the High Priest.

The RCC has inserted a priesthood between the priests and the High Priest.
 

Bladerunner

Senior Member
Aug 22, 2016
3,076
59
48
I'm not into reading books other people write ABOUT churches.
I'd rather learn about the church on my own and make up my own mind about it.

It's kind of like reading ABOUT the bible
Instead of reading the bible, I'd reather read the bible...

Pope Francis is making a concerted effort (woth other churches) to try and come closer together in doctrineal beliefs.
The Catholic Church is changing a lot. I believe this is why Benedict retired; he did not agree with these changes.

IF the Pope were to become the head of the big one.world church, no one will mind because the Catholic Church will have changed drastically by then. It's not happening in our lifetime.

It took about 40 years for Vatican Council II to really start taking effect. Catholics don't accept change easily.

I'd relax if I were you. I have a feeling the Lord is coming back soon and I also believe the Anti-Christ will be taking over the church. Pope Francis is not the Anti-Christ. He is FOR Christ.

Fran

Hi FranC... You said that you had rather learn about the church on your own and make up my own mind about it. That is ok but when History is written in many different places, most not available on the Internet, it is hard to get a full picture of something good or bad.

Having said that, The book I recommended, was researched for several years prior to being written and includes excerpts of the actual History. While is is not the only information out there about the RCC, it is a good one to start with. It will give you questions you can answer elsewhere.

WHile the RCC appears to have gone some changing of the guard, it has not really changed its colors. The Pope is the Vicar of Christ and is still infallible. The 950 Million people that are Catholics in the world are at risk because of the teachings of this church. Some see through the veil and turn away from SOME of the teachings. Is this turning away from SOME of teachings enough. Only Jesus Christ Knows.

I agree the Pope will not be the Anti-christ. I do not think he (the pope) will even fit the False Profit position. However, because of the Catholic Churches dealings with outrageous SIN and Abominations since its inception, She (RCC) will qualify it for the "Woman who rides the Beast.' Rem in Rev. this woman is killed of by the beast.

Thank you for the discussion.
 
Apr 30, 2016
5,162
75
0
If Jesus needed Mary to be sinless so that He could be born sinless you still have the same problem, of all mothers going all the way back needing to be sinless to produce a sinless Mary, otherwise it is all poppycock, which we know it is anyways, since saying Mary was sinless directly contradicts many other Scriptures. RCC elevates Mary way above and beyond anything Scriptures or Jesus ever did!

I said nothing wrong, and the RCC are certainly wrong.

The immaculate conception and the bodily assumption of Mary are both beliefs mandated by papal decree and yet there is no basis for either in Scripture. Perpetual virginity also goes against what Scripture says. Roman Catholics pray to Mary to intercede on their behalf while Jesus told us to pray to the Father, and Scripture attests that there is one mediator between God and man.
Hi Magenta,

I'm not arguing with you.

I think you didn't grasp my first two sentences.
Here they are again:

Hi Magenta,
I'm not defending incorrect doctrine.
I'm explaining how they understand it.


I agree with you!

Fran
 
Apr 30, 2016
5,162
75
0
Good morning Magenta. Well if that is what is meant by immaculate conception then I'm with you. I thought it meant that Mary didn't have intercourse to conceive Jesus. Thanks for the clarification.
Hi PennEd

You're proving what I Always say. So much is misunderstood.
I should tell you not to feel badly - many Catholics think the Immac. Concept. is referring to Jesus and not Mary.

So, it's good to talk about this, I guess.

Fran
 
D

Depleted

Guest
1. I can't reply because I have no details.

2. Sometimes there WASN'T a marriage to begin with... This is one of the reason for annulment. There are other reasons a church divorce may be granted, but not many because marriage is a covenant between God and man.

3. Pope Francis is trying to remove the charge for an annulment.

There's a charge because church attorneys are involved - it's a rather long process.

I'll add that sometimes priests can make a mistake. For instance, many years ago a friend of mine was not allowed to baptize a baby because she had left her husband but WAS NOT IN A DIFFERENT RELATIONSHIP. She had the right to baptize the baby, the priest made a mistake. This happens because there are too many man-made rules in the RCC church.

There is no perfect church, BTW.

Fran
My brother was married the first time in a Lutheran church. They had two children. Those kids are not bastards, and to say think you (the priest) even has to tell me that, galls me.

It is wrong that only people who can afford $3000 after a marriage goes wrong are embraced back into church. My mother couldn't afford the $3000 so she was denied communion. (She told the bishop in that area where he could shove his decision too, and yet her dying wish was for me to remain a Catholic and raise my little brother as a Catholic. Serious double whammy, since I'm that little brother's godmother and had just become born again. She believed what the church taught her to believe, Catholicism saves.)

Church lawyers? Really? So they make up the rules, and then hire their entire justice system to enforce them? In both cases (brother's and Dad's second marriage), they were already legally not married. (My brother got his divorce. Mom died before hse could divorce Dad.)

Pope Francis wants to include homosexuals now. He would, if he had sole authority. This isn't merely "imperfection." This nullifies the OT and NT.

Honestly? I was both Catholic and born again, so I don't count a Catholic as unable to be a Christian. But what you're teaching is either standing up for a belief system that you don't believe in and then trying to tell people stuff about it that is simply wrong.

As for my meme for DustyRhodes? I read what he said. It's still a pile of cow patties. Especially from someone who says he refuses to associate with such kinds. Really? I don't associate with nomads in the Sahara Desert, but because of that I have no idea what they believe and wouldn't be so bold as to fill in the gapsd, since I don't know. That's exactly what he claimed to do there.

To begin with every denomination sets out to brainwash and the younger they can get them, the better since they are malleable. And they are taught in that denomination that whatever is said there is the final authority on all Christian things. Therefore they get dug in.
Originally Posted by DustyRhodes

To begin with every denomination sets out to brainwash and the younger they can get them, the better since they are malleable. And they are taught in that denomination that whatever is said there is the final authority on all Christian things. Therefore they get dug in.
 
Apr 30, 2016
5,162
75
0
And to what point that you will defend them. I don't think it is defendable!
If a bunch of persons were attacking YOU, I'd also defend the right of YOUR Church to teach what it does,
even though I may not agree with its doctrine.

I like to discuss and debate doctrine,
I DO NOT like to attack people because I think they're in the wrong Church.

Fran
 
Apr 30, 2016
5,162
75
0
My brother was married the first time in a Lutheran church. They had two children. Those kids are not bastards, and to say think you (the priest) even has to tell me that, galls me.

It is wrong that only people who can afford $3000 after a marriage goes wrong are embraced back into church. My mother couldn't afford the $3000 so she was denied communion. (She told the bishop in that area where he could shove his decision too, and yet her dying wish was for me to remain a Catholic and raise my little brother as a Catholic. Serious double whammy, since I'm that little brother's godmother and had just become born again. She believed what the church taught her to believe, Catholicism saves.)

Church lawyers? Really? So they make up the rules, and then hire their entire justice system to enforce them? In both cases (brother's and Dad's second marriage), they were already legally not married. (My brother got his divorce. Mom died before hse could divorce Dad.)

Pope Francis wants to include homosexuals now. He would, if he had sole authority. This isn't merely "imperfection." This nullifies the OT and NT.

Honestly? I was both Catholic and born again, so I don't count a Catholic as unable to be a Christian. But what you're teaching is either standing up for a belief system that you don't believe in and then trying to tell people stuff about it that is simply wrong.

As for my meme for DustyRhodes? I read what he said. It's still a pile of cow patties. Especially from someone who says he refuses to associate with such kinds. Really? I don't associate with nomads in the Sahara Desert, but because of that I have no idea what they believe and wouldn't be so bold as to fill in the gapsd, since I don't know. That's exactly what he claimed to do there.


Originally Posted by DustyRhodes

To begin with every denomination sets out to brainwash and the younger they can get them, the better since they are malleable. And they are taught in that denomination that whatever is said there is the final authority on all Christian things. Therefore they get dug in.
You're not required to listen to anything I say.

And I 'd like to say, at this point, that DustyRhodes has 1,000X more spirituality
than you do.

And this is the FIRST TIME I've ever commented on someones' walk with the Lord.
Your hated is too obvious.

Have you read Mathew 5:43-48?


Fran
 
Apr 30, 2016
5,162
75
0
I am pointing out the fact that the priesthood of the Catholic Church is fiction. We are all the priests and Jesus Christ is the High Priest.

The RCC has inserted a priesthood between the priests and the High Priest.
I agree.

But know what's funny?

The Catholic Church, at least here by me, has begun to say that we are all priests. I was pretty shocked when
I heard this from friends who heard the priest that said it.

Now this is spoken of in the Catechism of the Catholic Church (the CCC) paragraphs nos. 1546 and 1547, but it
was never actually taught before.

Fran
 

OneFaith

Senior Member
Sep 5, 2016
2,270
369
83
Most people who talk about "false doctrines" don't even know what a doctrine means. It does not mean "human rules."
Both are doctrines- human rules (false doctrine) and the doctrine of Christ (New Testament). We see this in 1 Timothy 4. They abandoned THE Faith (God's doctrine/New Testament) to follow deceiving spirits. These false doctrines included forbidding people to marry, and to abstain from certain foods.

Now they followed these things as a way to serve God- so they stilled believed in God- they did not abandon faith in God, but more specifically THEE Faith (the doctrine of God/belief/practice in the truth).

If false doctrine wasn't a doctrine at all, God would not have said "Their doctrine is merely human rules." Not all human rules are doctrines, but if you tell somebody you must obey them in order to go to heaven- then it becomes a doctrine.
 

Timeline

Senior Member
Mar 20, 2014
1,826
17
38
I agree.

But know what's funny?

The Catholic Church, at least here by me, has begun to say that we are all priests. I was pretty shocked when
I heard this from friends who heard the priest that said it.

Now this is spoken of in the Catechism of the Catholic Church (the CCC) paragraphs nos. 1546 and 1547, but it
was never actually taught before.

Fran

How far do you suppose they will allow this to go - all of their "authority" is tied up in this separation? :)

I mean, if we are all priests (and all Christians are), we would confess our sins one to another instead of "being required to go into a confessional", etc., etc., etc.
 
J

jaybird88

Guest
the church of England and Catholicism were pretty much the same, same traditions, rituals, doctrines and beliefs. what hurts your spirit is how much these two were bitter enemies that hated each other. lots of death and destruction between these two especially in Ireland, the Irish were made 2nd class citizens in their own home because of their faith. the root of all the problems were these two churches and the substance of both churches were the same. makes no sense at all.
 

Hizikyah

Senior Member
Aug 25, 2013
11,634
372
0
It is very likely that any denomanation/church that has accepted any false doctrines of Rome, are daughters of the harlot...

Rev 17:5, "and upon her forehead a name written, a secret: BAḆEL THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF THE WHORES AND OF THE ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.
 

Bladerunner

Senior Member
Aug 22, 2016
3,076
59
48
I am pointing out the fact that the priesthood of the Catholic Church is fiction. We are all the priests and Jesus Christ is the High Priest.

The RCC has inserted a priesthood between the priests and the High Priest.
Timeline, please do not think I am attacking you or FranC. I just do not know where you are coming from. Are you a Catholic Priest, etc.

You last statement is a little more revealing, yet in a previous post (Page 8)
you said: "I have been to a lot more church buildings than I have services at those buildings. None of them, except the RCC, have the tabernacle structure, candle lighting area, statues. They don't have "confessionals", "holy water", priests (for we are a holy priesthood - not just a few select men).

But, for example, the preacher in a lot of churches is not an elder, but holds some kind of unscriptural authority. "


What makes the priest in the Catholic Church more Holy than those non-elder, unscriptural authority type of Preachers, Ministers, etc.? The fact that the Pope THE 'Vicar of Christ' tells them so????????????

In my opinion, a preacher, minister, priest, etc. are all the same IF they are teaching the people (either in a congregation or without) the gospel of Jesus Christ. I am pretty sure Jesus just might agree. Because His Church is the PEOPLE not four walls and all the forced doctrines people must follow before they have any hope of being in heaven.

Again, I am not attacking you just presenting my opinion and thank you for you time and opinion as well.

May your day have an extra measure of Blessings.




 

AllenW

Senior Member
Apr 20, 2016
1,450
70
48
If a person knows what Christianity is then they will know that catholicism and islam is not Christianity.. If they do not fully understand what Christianity is then they cannot say they are Christians can they.... One must know what Christianity is before they can claim to be a Christian in truth. Christianity is not about being earnest or enthusiastic or a doer of works or a really nice person. It is about believing the Word of God and trusting in the Atonement secured by the work of Jesus for ones salvation from the eternal lake of fire..

If people only have a surface understanding of their religion then they are not in their religion they are in some nowhere zone where they think anything and everything goes.. They will stand for nothing because they have nothing solid to stand upon..
That's a lot of bold talk.
Saying such things over the internet using a false identity does nothing to support the validity of what you say.
Try saying that to the face of someone who is a member of the Knights of Columbus.
Then we'll see if the Spirit of God is there to help you out.
 
D

Depleted

Guest
Depleted, it's rather difficult to hear anyone call the Pope a non-Christian man just because you don't agree with CAtholic
dogma or doctrine or rules.

We do not like Catholicism
But we must love Catholics

This is their church, this is what they believe. Maybe what WE believe is wrong!!

People who THINK they are saved, most probably are.
One is NOT SAVED because he has the correct doctrine figured out.

One is saved because he loves Jesus and is following what he was taught.

The TEACHER will answer to God,
NOT the student.

Fran
Actually, there have been Christian popes in my lifetime. Just not this one.

And, no one is not saved because he loves Jesus. Jesus saves. We love him after being saved. We don't love a caricature of some god we want him to be, like this pope does, name the god we created "Jesus," and then fit into those who love Jesus. It's either the Jesus the Bible talks about, or it's not love for Jesus. It's love for self-inventions.
 
D

Depleted

Guest
Or they are Christians who don't fully understand your objections to Catholics or Muslims. They may just be looking at the people and not the false doctrines that most of the people don't understand anyway.

Most people only have a surface understanding of the religion they claim to believe in.
And then again, Jesus saves. Not religion. :p

(Some bit of tease in that truth. lol)
 
D

Depleted

Guest
I am pointing out the fact that the priesthood of the Catholic Church is fiction. We are all the priests and Jesus Christ is the High Priest.

The RCC has inserted a priesthood between the priests and the High Priest.
Meh. I don't think that's a point that changes if someone is saved though. Sort of like tongues. If you get it wrong, (and I so get many think there is a right and wrong to tongues), it doesn't affect relationship with Christ. (I also know of some nondenoms who put the pastor in between Christ and the people.)
 
D

Depleted

Guest
You're not required to listen to anything I say.

And I 'd like to say, at this point, that DustyRhodes has 1,000X more spirituality
than you do.

And this is the FIRST TIME I've ever commented on someones' walk with the Lord.
Your hated is too obvious.

Have you read Mathew 5:43-48?


Fran
Cool. I'm not big on "spirituality." The meaning has become, "It is more important to look good, than be good."