REFORMED?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
Strangely to this forum I am reformed more than armenian.
First, it's Arminian, not Armenian. Secondly, you lean more toward Catholicism or another works false gospel than anything else.

Nothing about you or your teachings are Reformed, so don't flatter yourself; none of your doctrine is that sound.
 
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0
Not really . I say Reformed as to show folks where I am coming from. The word dose not define me it only points to my general theological beliefs. It has nothing to do with a sign on a building. In fact quite often My congregational brothers and sisters study the word in a building with a sign out front saying " over a billion served "
Blessings
Bill
So, basically, just as in the case of so many churches, REFORMED simply means what you, personally, intend it to mean.

If that is the case — and it often seems to be — then people really need not become upset with others when they assume that when someone says they are REFORMED, that it means the last thing they heard another state it meant........ pretty much, nothing in particular.
 

Laish

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2016
1,666
449
83
58
No Willie my intention was to say politely please don't pigeonhole folks .
Blessings
Bill
 

MarcR

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2015
5,486
183
63
No Israel was a part of the world that were to keep themselves separate from the world . Much of God's laws showed this . They were to be a distinct people in a world ( people) corrupted by sin . Israel now looking for a savior ( The Messiah ) understood that they Israel were going to be saved . John points out not only us (Israel)but the world ( all nations or peoples) .
I understand it as a general statement not a particular one .
Blessings
Bill
Thayer, Arndt and Gingrich, and Robinson, and Kittle all believe it refers to humanity in this context.

How did you arrive at your non-standard interpretation? I'm asking for information not being snide!
 
Last edited:
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0
No Willie my intention was to say politely please don't pigeonhole folks .
Blessings
Bill
It's not pigeonholing a person if they, themselves, have chosen to classify themselves as a member of a particular and specific group that is widely understood to believe a certain self-defined way.
 

Laish

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2016
1,666
449
83
58
Thayer, Arndt and Gingrich, and Robinson, and Kittle all believe it refers to humanity in this context.

How did you arrive at your non-standard interpretation? I'm asking for information not being snide!
if John were to be referring to humanity in general the part of his statement where he said us wouldn't be needed .
also another way what the difference between all peoples and all nations? In a general sense.
Blessings
Bill
 

Laish

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2016
1,666
449
83
58
It's not pigeonholing a person if they, themselves, have chosen to classify themselves as a member of a particular and specific group that is widely understood to believe a certain self-defined way.
That's cool .
I just use the term to show a general but not necessarily complete description of where I am coming from. Not who I am .
If you were to ask who I am I say I am Christian like many others here . We may disagree on stuff but we are in Christ brother . That's is What counts and is the most accurate.
Blessings
Bill
 

MarcR

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2015
5,486
183
63
if John were to be referring to humanity in general the part of his statement where he said us wouldn't be needed .
also another way what the difference between all peoples and all nations? In a general sense.
Blessings
Bill
I'm not persuaded; but no hard feelings! The Lord will correct one or both of us when we arrive:)
 

Laish

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2016
1,666
449
83
58
I'm not persuaded; but no hard feelings! The Lord will correct one or both of us when we arrive:)
No hard feelings. This is one of the good things about a civil disagreement. Our conversation keeps both of us in His word !
Blessings brother
Bill
 

graceNpeace

Senior Member
Aug 12, 2016
2,180
107
63
Strangely to this forum I am reformed more than armenian.

I do not believe you persuade people into the Kingdom, the seed is planted and in good soil
bears fruit.

Some get confused about the definitions because from what I understand Calvin did not make
them, but they were created to refute armenian positions.

I also have a problem with Calvin as a believer who had people executed for their doctrinal
positions, which Luther equally was brutal about, and anti-semetic.

So though these reformers where focus points of great change 25% of Europe died in the
wars and conflict that erupted. This was a terrible time, with much evil and things completely
alien to the gospel and Christ.

And of the groups I know who are most structured and uptight, it is the reformed who are
most like this, which is partly why the Charismatic movement has largely been in Armenian
circles. So mixing this with WOF, prosperity gospel, is a strange mixture of traditions.
Sorry Peter, if there were a theological tradition or denomination titled 'confused' that would be you...
 

Laish

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2016
1,666
449
83
58
Sorry Peter, if there were a theological tradition or denomination titled 'confused' that would be you...
You should warn folks before ya post things like this . I was drinking pop when reading this . It's killer on the nostrils.
Still let's keep PJ in our prayers.
Blessings
Bill
 

Bladerunner

Senior Member
Aug 22, 2016
3,076
59
48
I was NOT trying to represent a church! I was trying to confirm or correct my understanding of Church history for no other reason than a love of history.
"THE WOman Rides the Beast" by David hunt.......gives you the ins and outs of the Churches history, including: the inquisition, reformation, crusades, etc. I recommend it Highly... If you have the ability, Amazon offers a free E-Kindle reader for your PC, tablet or android device (Phone). You can then order books and download them from Amazon/Kindle for low prices.

Your assumptions on your first post were correct and rightly so.

 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
26,074
13,771
113
If Jesus was atoning everybody in the whole world whoever lived, then all would be saved
There is no need to continue promoting this fallacy. Every sinner who hears the Gospel MUST repent and believe on the Lord Jesus Christ. So only those who "obey the Gospel" are saved. Since all will not obey the Gospel all will not be saved. By the same token if all would obey the Gospel, all would be saved. And the Lord Jesus Christ actually taught this in the context of John 3:16, but the Calvinists simply brushed it aside. So please note carefully.

ALL COULD BE SAVED
For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. (John 3:17)

BUT ALL WILL NOT BE SAVED
He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. (John 3:18,19)
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
26,074
13,771
113
Now as to nehemiah6 I am still awaiting proof of your claim that Spurgeon preached or taught that other than the elect are saved, or however you put it. You need to be backing up your claim. I know for certain it's false, but am expecting;

1) You to take something out of context he stated (kind of how you do with Scripture) or;

2) Just avoid it altogether and make pretense that what you said is true when you know it isn't true.

3) Just more arguing, and offerings of unsubstantiated claims which the naïve will accept as being true when it is false.

Oh, and for the record, Paul expected none other to be saved, because none other than His chosen will be saved.

But this first: The duplicity of folks who are against biblical election is remarkable.
Since this is a personal attack, I will have no choice other than to report it to the moderators. However, for those who might be curious, I will also post an excerpt from Spurgeon that shows that while on one hand he said he was a Calvinist, on the other hand His sermons could not avoid preaching that the offer of salvation was to all who would repent and believe. So kindly read carefully what he says:

QUOTED FROM “PLENTEOUS REDEMPTION” (Sermon #351, December 16, 1860).

Christ has redeemed the souls of all His people who shall ultimately be saved. To state it after the
Calvinistic form, Christ has redeemed His elect. But since you do not know His elect until they are revealed, we will alter that and say, Christ has redeemed all penitent souls; Christ has redeemed all believing souls; and Christ has redeemed the souls of all those who die in infancy—seeing it is to be received that all those who die in infancy are written in the Lamb’s book of life, and are graciously privileged by God to go at once to heaven—instead of toiling through this weary world. The souls of all those who were written before all worlds in the Lamb’s book of life, who in process of time are humbled before God, who in due course are led to lay hold of Christ Jesus as the only refuge of their souls, who hold on their way and ultimately attain to heaven—these, I believe were redeemed—and I most firmly and solemnly believe the souls of no other men were in that sense subjects of Christ’s redemption....

And, now, a word or two concerning the last thought—“PLENTEOUS REDEMPTION.”... It is “plenteous” when we consider the millions who have been redeemed. Think, if you can, how
great that host who have already washed their robes, and made them white in the blood of the Lamb. And then think how many now with weary feet are plodding their way to paradise—all of them redeemed— they all shall sit down at the marriage supper of the Lamb! Is it not “plenteous redemption” when you reflect that it is a “multitude that no man can number,” that will be gathered in? Let us close that by saying, “And why not you?” If so many are redeemed, why should not you be? Why should you not seek for mercy on the strength of that, knowing that all who seek will most assuredly receive, for they would not have sought unless it had been prepared for them?

Since there would have been a multitude of sinners in his audience, he says to anyone and everyone "And why not you?" Although in good conscience he should have added "But only if you are one of the elect".
 
Dec 28, 2016
5,455
236
63
There is no need to continue promoting this fallacy.
Well then stop whilst you can.

Every sinner who hears the Gospel MUST repent and believe on the Lord Jesus Christ.
Agreed. However, those who truly repent are those who have been gifted repentance.

When they heard this, they quieted down and glorified God, saying, “Well then, God has granted to the Gentiles also the repentance that leads to life.”[Acts 11:18]

He is the one whom God exalted to His right hand as a Prince and a Savior, to grant repentance to Israel, and forgiveness of sins.[Acts 5:31]

Or do you think lightly of the riches of His kindness and tolerance and patience, not knowing that the kindness of God leads you to repentance?[Romans 2:4]

I now rejoice, not that you were made sorrowful, but that you were made sorrowful to the point of repentance; for you were made sorrowful according to the will of God, so that you might not suffer loss in anything through us. For the sorrow that is according to the will of God produces a repentance without regret, leading to salvation, but the sorrow of the world produces death.[2 Corinthians 7:9,10]

In all of these verses, it clearly shows it is God who gifts repentance to those He has chosen to gift it to.


So only those who "obey the Gospel" are saved. Since all will not obey the Gospel all will not be saved. By the same token if all would obey the Gospel, all would be saved. And the Lord Jesus Christ actually taught this in the context of John 3:16, but the Calvinists simply brushed it aside. So please note carefully.

ALL COULD BE SAVED
For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. (John 3:17)

BUT ALL WILL NOT BE SAVED
He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. (John 3:18,19)
Not all have the ears to hear the gospel. These are those who God justly left to themselves.
 

MarcR

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2015
5,486
183
63
Not sure about this portion of the quote below.

"BUT, THAT FORGIVENESS DOES NOT EXTEND to the person who committed them....unless or until the person who committed them acknowledges the Lordship (Ownership) of Jesus."

Not every saved believer that accepts Jesus's sacrifice on the cross acknowledges the Lordship as in Ownership of Jesus for which is why Paul reminds saved believers of this truth.... even though they were still saved as in still His.

1 Corinthians 6:[SUP]17 [/SUP]But he that is joined unto the Lord is one spirit. [SUP]18 [/SUP]Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body. [SUP]19 [/SUP]What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own? [SUP]20 [/SUP]For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God's.

I am not sure why you didn't lead with...."BUT, THAT FORGIVENESS DOES NOT EXTEND to the person who committed them unless they accepted Jesus's sacrifice on the cross..... "

.....
since you pointed out that the unsaved were identified as rejecting Jesus's sacrifice on the cross.

I do wonder though if every saved believer coming to Jesus acknowledges that sacrifice for themselves though since Romans 10th chapter speaks of salvation for those that believe in the Lord Jesus Christ and that God raised Him from the dead. There is no mention of the necessity of acknowledging His sacrifice on the cross for them or ownership, but believing that Jesus is God and that God raised Him from the dead and believing in that, they are saved.

Then you have John 1:12-13 that testified that even those who just believe in His name are saved.

I am sure that in some gospel presentation in Acts, the sacrifice on the cross was mentioned as "the preaching of the cross" was mentioned in the letter to the church at Corinth....but I do wonder how much of the gospel is preached to sinners before they had believed in His name?

John 1:[SUP]12 [/SUP]But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: [SUP]13 [/SUP]Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.

1 John 5:[SUP]11 [/SUP]And this is the record, that God hath given to us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. [SUP]12 [/SUP]He that hath the Son hath life; and he that hath not the Son of God hath not life. [SUP]13 [/SUP]These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life, and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God.

Albeit, His disciples should teach new believers more about Him so that their love may grow more and more in the knowledge of Him so that their joy may be full.[SUB][/SUB]
SG,

Imoved this downthread for you so you can find it more easily
 

MarcR

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2015
5,486
183
63
I see where we are talking at cross purposes.

1 Jn 2:2
2 And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world.
KJV

Jn 1:29
29 The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world.
KJV


All sins of every person saved or unsaved were forgiven through Jesus' sacrifice of Himself on the cross.

BUT, THAT FORGIVENESS DOES NOT EXTEND to the person who committed them unless or until the person who committed them acknowledges the Lordship (Ownership) of Jesus.


The unsaved are those who reject Jesus' sacrifice on the cross.
Sorry, SG,

This is the post I meant to move
 
Dec 28, 2016
5,455
236
63
1 Jn 2:2
2 And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world.
KJV
He is the propitiation, not a potential propitiation. Now, in this propitiation, it satisfied God's wrath. If Jesus literally propitiated God on behalf of the whole world, i.e. everybody whoever lived, then God's wrath for everybody whoever lived is no longer there. If its no longer there, then in the day of judgment, all go to heaven. The cross of the Christ is efficacious, and does not make everybody savable, but saves those for whom the Christ died for, i.e. the elect of God.

Jn 1:29
29 The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world.
KJV
And if He literally take the world's sin away, i.e. everybody whoever lived, then everybody whoever lived goes to heaven. Their sins are no longer there, as He has taken them away. There's no getting around this Brother Marc. If one holds to a universal atonement, one must hold to universalism. The cross is that efficacious.

We do not believe that Christ made any effectual atonement for those who are forever damned; we dare not think that the blood of Christ was ever shed with the intention of saving those whom God foreknew never could be saved, and some of whom were even in Hell when Christ, according to some men’s account, died to save them. [SUP][1][/SUP]
Spurgeon said the Christ did not make any effectual atonement for the non-elect...me paraphrasing that. That's what he meant.


Perhaps I am misreading Mr Spurgeon's statement; but I cant see how he could reach such a conclusion without ignoring the cited Scriptures. Please show me what I am missing.
Look at another verse that gets misapplied.

namely, that God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself, not counting their trespasses against them, and He has committed to us the word of reconciliation. [2 Corinthians 5:19]

Now, ppl when they read that quickly say Jesus is reconciling the world, meaning He is leaving no one out. One huge problem, as there is a 2,000 lb purple elephant that needs to be addressed...'not counting their trespasses against them'. Now, if this is universal in its scope, then no one's sins are held against them, and all go to heaven.

Reconciliation means to make two enemies friends. So, if the Christ is reconciling the world to Himself, i.e. everybody whoever lived, then everybody whoever lived is saved. To hold to a universal atonement means you must hold to universalism to remain consistent with one's belief(s).
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
26,074
13,771
113
These are those who God justly left to themselves.
You have no problem contradicting Scripture in order to continue believing your false doctrines. God left no one to themselves, and had He done so, He would be contradicting His own Word.

So why don't you simply sit down where you can meditate on Scripture, and meditate on these passages? But beyond that, BELIEVE what God has said.

18 And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth.

19
Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:


20
Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen. (Matthew 28:18-20)

15 And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.

16
He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned. (Mark 16:15,16)


45 Then opened he their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures,

46
And said unto them, Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day:


47
And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem.


48
And ye are witnesses of these things.
(Luke 24:45-48)
 

joaniemarie

Senior Member
Jan 4, 2017
3,198
303
83
1 Jn 2:2
2 And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world.
KJV

Jn 1:29
29 The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world.
KJV


All sins of every person saved or unsaved were forgiven through Jesus' sacrifice of Himself on the cross.

The unsaved are those who reject Jesus' sacrifice on the cross.

Jesus said " ye have not chosen me; but, I have chosen You." Soverign election! Jn 15:16

Jesus also said " whosoever will may come" man's freewill! Rv 22:17 my paraphrase.

How can these two statements from Jesus be simultaneously true?

I believe that God, in His divine sovereignty chooses on the basis of foreknowledge of who will willingly accept Jesus' sacrifice on their behalf.


Personally., i can't figure out how God does it the whole predestination subject and free will subject. But I do know based on the Bible that God loved everyone and gave everyone an opportunity to accept His Son Jesus. But not everyone will. The reason people are going to hell is not because of all their many sins.,, but because they rejected Jesus Christ. He who has the Son has life... he who has not the Son of God has not life but the wrath of God abides on them John 3:36

[SUP]36 [/SUP]He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.