Sabbath: The Lord's Day
- Thread starter ozell
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
You are a liar in saying I am ashamed to be called a Christian, anyone may call me a Christian or a Jew, but neither would be correct except for the meaning of the words spoken. Being counted among the faithful makes one a child of Yahweh in Yeshua. Not only have you twisted what is posted you lie about it on top of that. Ask that I be banned for this and I ask that your posts directed at me be examined. I will not be found at fault. As for the original tree, you gave a great impression of declaring all Jews starting with pharisees as un-believing, never would I say this. I do not even approach saying you are damned, but you intimate that I have stated this about others, this is simply another lie. Look back and see my posts have been based on the teachings from the Word with quotes. Do not ever say I am ashamed of the brethren or being counted with them. You could not possibly know that, and it is lying. Also, any time anything about the Jewishness of the faith of the Children of God, Yahweh, is mentioned you rant about the Talmud and other obscure Hebrew publications, things I would not even touch, declaring me to be following them in some manner. Now I will not even follow rabbinical teachings let alone all of those writings, I only read the Word, and I pray when I read it. If you hate Jews so much as to transfer that to me simply because I love the name I believe Jesus was called by His parents and friends and name by His and our Heavenly Father, then young man, you have a great love problem. Now respect your brethren beginning with your elders, because right now you are impressing others with nonsense out of your head and not from the Word of Yahweh.
exactly.
but you love to muddy the water.
that's as antisemitic as it gets.
you're not a jew but in the spiritual application paul used it for CORRECTION regarding the sectarians.
find out who they were and why their gospel was cursed.
faithful in WHAT?
faithful to WHOM?
do unbelieving jews worship the true God?
that's a straight-forward answer, and its in Scripture, in the words of Christ.
do they?
why would i ask you be banned?
you go examine your own words.
do you think you are helping jews by taking their name?
JaumeJ, you have made the blasphemous claim that jews (or anyone else for that matter) are the ROOT, when the ROOT is Christ.
i have yet to see you correct this.
until you do, the rebuke stands.
show me where i have said all jews are unbelieving.
i said jews who believe count themselves as CHRISTIANS.
that's why the christian church is CHRISTIAN - made up of jew and gentile. throughout the ages.
but you continually rebuild that wall of separation Jesus Christ SUFFERED AND DIED and tore down.
this new movement where we are supposedly returning to Judaism roots is FALSE and dangerous.
the fruit of it is seen everywhere - a return to Moses.
and you are contributing to it.
the jews of Christ's day were the natural branches. virtually NONE of todays jews are. what do not you understand about that?
what are you talking about?
i never said you said anyone was damned.
you don't pay attention at all.
i said ALL men including unbelieving jews will utterly perish without repentence and faith IN JESUS CHRIST ALONE.
you're telling christians to esteem and learn from unbelieving jews!
look where that's getting us.
it's all over these forums.
Christ's Cross and Resurrection is sidelined for MOSES!!!!
that is death!
i've looked at your 7th day teachings. and the rest.
you're on one side of a barrier that Christ tore down.
where's JESUS, JaumeJ?
what jewishness?
this is the core of my dispute with you.
you really need to do a study on Judaism, because you're playing right into the hands of satan, and anyone who goes even a little way beyond where you are in the WRONG direction may never come back.
regarding TRUE TORAH religion, you show me anywhere in the NT teachings where gentiles are commanded to be jewish.
paul CURSED that teaching. so who are YOU to restart it?
faith in Jesus Christ!
what else? circumcision? sabbath-keeping? hand-washing? Aliyah?
believing in a 1,000 kingdom in the future where jews will be saved?
i can't think of a more miserable form of anti-semitism: romantic philo-semitism is HURTING jews!
that's your problem. if you understood what real horrifying bondage jews are in under Judaism your hair would stand on end.
if you understood that the vast majority of jews have been lied to about their heritage, and that they are gentiles, believing a pagan occult religion of superstition and rabbi-worship, you'd be more careful when calling yourself a jew. religious jews today do NOT WORSHIP the God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob! if you're to lazy to find that out it's on your head.
either understand why Paul taught that lesson to and WHEN, or not - you may not be as hard-core as the judaizers of old, but you are on dangerous ground.
you take this label and toss it to the wind.
you haven't even begun to love jews - when you are actually stoned, beaten or shot for telling them the truth, then you'll know what loving them is.
puffing them up is not loving them.
no, its not simple because you choose a Hebrew Name over and English one.
i've read your posts.
but you love to muddy the water.
that's as antisemitic as it gets.
you're not a jew but in the spiritual application paul used it for CORRECTION regarding the sectarians.
find out who they were and why their gospel was cursed.
faithful in WHAT?
faithful to WHOM?
do unbelieving jews worship the true God?
that's a straight-forward answer, and its in Scripture, in the words of Christ.
do they?
why would i ask you be banned?
you go examine your own words.
do you think you are helping jews by taking their name?
JaumeJ, you have made the blasphemous claim that jews (or anyone else for that matter) are the ROOT, when the ROOT is Christ.
i have yet to see you correct this.
until you do, the rebuke stands.
show me where i have said all jews are unbelieving.
i said jews who believe count themselves as CHRISTIANS.
that's why the christian church is CHRISTIAN - made up of jew and gentile. throughout the ages.
but you continually rebuild that wall of separation Jesus Christ SUFFERED AND DIED and tore down.
this new movement where we are supposedly returning to Judaism roots is FALSE and dangerous.
the fruit of it is seen everywhere - a return to Moses.
and you are contributing to it.
the jews of Christ's day were the natural branches. virtually NONE of todays jews are. what do not you understand about that?
what are you talking about?
i never said you said anyone was damned.
you don't pay attention at all.
i said ALL men including unbelieving jews will utterly perish without repentence and faith IN JESUS CHRIST ALONE.
you're telling christians to esteem and learn from unbelieving jews!
look where that's getting us.
it's all over these forums.
Christ's Cross and Resurrection is sidelined for MOSES!!!!
that is death!
i've looked at your 7th day teachings. and the rest.
you're on one side of a barrier that Christ tore down.
where's JESUS, JaumeJ?
what jewishness?
this is the core of my dispute with you.
you really need to do a study on Judaism, because you're playing right into the hands of satan, and anyone who goes even a little way beyond where you are in the WRONG direction may never come back.
regarding TRUE TORAH religion, you show me anywhere in the NT teachings where gentiles are commanded to be jewish.
paul CURSED that teaching. so who are YOU to restart it?
faith in Jesus Christ!
what else? circumcision? sabbath-keeping? hand-washing? Aliyah?
believing in a 1,000 kingdom in the future where jews will be saved?
i can't think of a more miserable form of anti-semitism: romantic philo-semitism is HURTING jews!
that's your problem. if you understood what real horrifying bondage jews are in under Judaism your hair would stand on end.
if you understood that the vast majority of jews have been lied to about their heritage, and that they are gentiles, believing a pagan occult religion of superstition and rabbi-worship, you'd be more careful when calling yourself a jew. religious jews today do NOT WORSHIP the God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob! if you're to lazy to find that out it's on your head.
either understand why Paul taught that lesson to and WHEN, or not - you may not be as hard-core as the judaizers of old, but you are on dangerous ground.
you take this label and toss it to the wind.
you haven't even begun to love jews - when you are actually stoned, beaten or shot for telling them the truth, then you'll know what loving them is.
puffing them up is not loving them.
no, its not simple because you choose a Hebrew Name over and English one.
i've read your posts.
Last edited:
Now you have truly shown your nakedness, my screen name is Valencian, given to my by Valencians. It is also Catalan. Jaume is James in Valenciano, and James is a transliteration of a Hebrew name. I have learned enough Hebrew to read the Word in Hebrew, and it has been a blessing. Now I could apologize to you for my previous post, but it is all true. As for being stoned, beaten or shot, I am certain you would be only too happy to perform those atrocities, they had not entered into my mind. If and when Yahweh, God's time comes for me, He will prepare me for whatever may be my own fate. As for what I have already experienced at the hands of man, you could never know but my Father knows, and you really should learn to watch that tongue of yours.
I have looked at some of your other posts, and its seem you hearts desire is more to control others and confuse. In one post you are talking about laws, and in another you are telling a brother his theology is wretched.
Too bad you believe theologies. I believe the Word as given and preserved by Yahweh, God. When you attain that level of trust perhaps we can talk, until then, you cannot be family in Yeshua with all the stories you make up here.
I have looked at some of your other posts, and its seem you hearts desire is more to control others and confuse. In one post you are talking about laws, and in another you are telling a brother his theology is wretched.
Too bad you believe theologies. I believe the Word as given and preserved by Yahweh, God. When you attain that level of trust perhaps we can talk, until then, you cannot be family in Yeshua with all the stories you make up here.
Last edited:
you really ought to read with more comprehension JaumeJ.
i couldn't care less what your name is.
i said:
"no, its not simple (sic) because you choose a Hebrew Name over and English one.
i've read your posts.
meaning your choice to call Jesus Yeshua.
meaning your choice of the Name Yeshua is not simply the reason i take exception to your ideas.
go back again and see the flow of the conversation - your name means nothing.
you won't correct this either, i'm sure.
see, more evidence you have no idea what you are doing (let alone talking about).
i said: you have not even BEGUN to love jews - when you start being persecuted for taking away their false ideas about God, then you'll know what loving them is like.
this is the same for all - the Cross is a scandal and an offense to jews and foolishness to gentiles.
that had nothing to do with YOU. but you like the idea, clearly.
i have no doubt you will refuse to correct this rash and hideous remark either.
i won't comment on this.
it's not your business.
i don't need your approval.
salvation by Law keeping is wretched, Christless theology.
but you click like on all the same.
i couldn't care less what your name is.
i said:
"no, its not simple (sic) because you choose a Hebrew Name over and English one.
i've read your posts.
meaning your choice to call Jesus Yeshua.
meaning your choice of the Name Yeshua is not simply the reason i take exception to your ideas.
go back again and see the flow of the conversation - your name means nothing.
you won't correct this either, i'm sure.
see, more evidence you have no idea what you are doing (let alone talking about).
i said: you have not even BEGUN to love jews - when you start being persecuted for taking away their false ideas about God, then you'll know what loving them is like.
this is the same for all - the Cross is a scandal and an offense to jews and foolishness to gentiles.
that had nothing to do with YOU. but you like the idea, clearly.
i have no doubt you will refuse to correct this rash and hideous remark either.
i won't comment on this.
it's not your business.
i don't need your approval.
salvation by Law keeping is wretched, Christless theology.
but you click like on all the same.
what are you talking about.
you're not that interesting that i would 'stalk you'.
i have an interest in the Sabbath thread, for reasons clearly stated.
don't flatter yourself.
and what's this post of yours? going into my profile?what's that?
get a life.
i'll defend the christian faith against the judaizers whenever i choose.
if you're among them so be it.
you're not that interesting that i would 'stalk you'.
i have an interest in the Sabbath thread, for reasons clearly stated.
don't flatter yourself.
and what's this post of yours? going into my profile?what's that?
get a life.
i'll defend the christian faith against the judaizers whenever i choose.
if you're among them so be it.
no, its not simple because you choose a Hebrew Name over and English one.
Your grammar is spotty, you should have the antecedent contained in your sentence, not in a boxed quote.
As for teaching Judaism or my judaizing, if you call sharing the Word from Genesis to the amen of Revelation Judaism or judaizing, then YES I must be just that. Now it is a lie, another lie, to say I teach to obey the law without Grace. I have posted explicitly from the Word. The law is a tutor until Grace. Now if it was our tutor it is good, but not for salvation. It is a good reference on many points of morality and conduct. If you think otherwise, you do not know the Messiah of Yahweh, God, as do all the brethren here in the room, and you are a fraud.
Just because you know a lot of scriptures to quote to support your current way of thinking does not indicate faith, hope, or love, this would be in the total content of what you purport as truth.
So far with me, you have tried to convince me of hopelessness, hate and distrust of the Word.
Sorry, I cannot fall for your conniving. Good night from Spain.
Your grammar is spotty, you should have the antecedent contained in your sentence, not in a boxed quote.
As for teaching Judaism or my judaizing, if you call sharing the Word from Genesis to the amen of Revelation Judaism or judaizing, then YES I must be just that. Now it is a lie, another lie, to say I teach to obey the law without Grace. I have posted explicitly from the Word. The law is a tutor until Grace. Now if it was our tutor it is good, but not for salvation. It is a good reference on many points of morality and conduct. If you think otherwise, you do not know the Messiah of Yahweh, God, as do all the brethren here in the room, and you are a fraud.
Just because you know a lot of scriptures to quote to support your current way of thinking does not indicate faith, hope, or love, this would be in the total content of what you purport as truth.
So far with me, you have tried to convince me of hopelessness, hate and distrust of the Word.
Sorry, I cannot fall for your conniving. Good night from Spain.
still no retraction on the blasphemy of claiming jews are the Root of Jesse?
of course not - your foundation is Judaism, not Christ.
ελθουσης δε της πιστεως ουκετι υπο παιδαγωγον εσμεν
no apologies for rash misreading and accusing?
no apologies for claiming i'd enjoy murdering you (of course its all about JaumeJ
the Law was a tutor period.
now that faith (in Christ and His Work) has come, we are no longer under the tutor. period.
the tutor is for babies who need rules and regulations.
that's why you're ambivalent about Saul - he disagrees with you.
sons of the bondwoman will never inherit the kingdom.
shuffle the deck all you like.
of course not - your foundation is Judaism, not Christ.
ελθουσης δε της πιστεως ουκετι υπο παιδαγωγον εσμεν
no apologies for rash misreading and accusing?
no apologies for claiming i'd enjoy murdering you (of course its all about JaumeJ
the Law was a tutor period.
now that faith (in Christ and His Work) has come, we are no longer under the tutor. period.
the tutor is for babies who need rules and regulations.
that's why you're ambivalent about Saul - he disagrees with you.
sons of the bondwoman will never inherit the kingdom.
shuffle the deck all you like.
A
still no retraction on the blasphemy of claiming jews are the Root of Jesse?
of course not - your foundation is Judaism, not Christ.
ελθουσης δε της πιστεως ουκετι υπο παιδαγωγον εσμεν
no apologies for rash misreading and accusing?
no apologies for claiming i'd enjoy murdering you (of course its all about JaumeJ
the Law was a tutor period.
now that faith (in Christ and His Work) has come, we are no longer under the tutor. period.
the tutor is for babies who need rules and regulations.
that's why you're ambivalent about Saul - he disagrees with you.
sons of the bondwoman will never inherit the kingdom.
shuffle the deck all you like.
of course not - your foundation is Judaism, not Christ.
ελθουσης δε της πιστεως ουκετι υπο παιδαγωγον εσμεν
no apologies for rash misreading and accusing?
no apologies for claiming i'd enjoy murdering you (of course its all about JaumeJ
the Law was a tutor period.
now that faith (in Christ and His Work) has come, we are no longer under the tutor. period.
the tutor is for babies who need rules and regulations.
that's why you're ambivalent about Saul - he disagrees with you.
sons of the bondwoman will never inherit the kingdom.
shuffle the deck all you like.
This is the problem with them. They won't reply to what you ask, even if you ask them hundreds of times. They will pick what suits best for them to accuse you and then write at length of loving God and His word. I wonder if their conscience is awake.
Remember people, we don't hate any man but their doctrine and their faith. If a Muslim or a Jew believes in the Son of God and confesses Him as his Lord then he is no more a Muslim or a Jew, he is a Christian. I have many friends who were Hindus and Muslims but now are Christians. If according to you about my character is true then I would continue to hate them even after they became Christians.
Bro. Cenallen, I am sure you won't be understood just like I am not understood. This is not because they don't want to but they have hardened their hearts not to understand. They don't even understand how the God in flesh stood at variance with men who chose to harden their hearts to not to understand Him until they finally nailed Him.
To day, if you hear His voice, harden not your hearts.
I don't even like the name of the tread. The sabbath is not the Lord's day. The sabbath, 7th day, day of rest, is a type and symbol of Christ. Those today who truly know God, keep His rest perfectly every day, for once you're saved that person enters into the Lord's rest through repentance, faith through grace, and by accepting the gift of Christ's blood and receiving Him as our Lord.
The Lord's day, is the day the 1st Century Christians gathered together to break bread, and celebrate and fellowship, worship God our father through our savior and mediator. This day, was clearly Sunday.
See Jesus is our sabbath rest ... Don't listen to these literal sabbath day keepers, they are in the fringe of slipping back into Judaism. Read Hebrews.
The Lord's day, is the day the 1st Century Christians gathered together to break bread, and celebrate and fellowship, worship God our father through our savior and mediator. This day, was clearly Sunday.
See Jesus is our sabbath rest ... Don't listen to these literal sabbath day keepers, they are in the fringe of slipping back into Judaism. Read Hebrews.
L
No where in the bible dos it say the lord's day is Sunday. There is only one verse in the whole bible that says Lord's day.
Rev_1:10 I was in the Spirit on the Lord's day, and heard behind me a great voice, as of a trumpet,
Although unique in Scripture, the term kuriakē hēmera has a long history in post-Biblical Greek. Like its abbreviated form, kuriakē, it is a familiar term in the Church Fathers for the first day of the week, and in modern Greek kuriakē is the usual term for Sunday. Its Latin equivalent, dominica dies, is a common designation for the same day, and has passed into several modern languages, such as Spanish, domingo, and French, dimanche, both terms for Sunday. For this reason many scholars hold the opinion that kuriakē hēmera in the present passage also refers to Sunday, and that John not only received his vision on that day but also recognized it as “the Lord’s day,” presumably because on that day Christ had risen from the dead.
There are both negative and positive reasons for rejecting this interpretation. First is the recognized principle of historical method, that an allusion is to be interpreted only in terms of evidence that is previous to it in point of time or contemporary with it, and not by historical data from a later period. This principle has an important bearing on the problem of the meaning of the expression “Lord’s day” as it appears in the present passage. Although this term occurs frequently in the Church Fathers with the meaning of Sunday, the first conclusive evidence of such use does not appear until the latter part of the 2d century in the Apocryphal Gospel According to Peter (9, 12; ANF, vol. 9, p. 8), where the day of Christ’s resurrection is termed the “Lord’s day.” Since this document was written at least three quarters of a century after John wrote the Revelation, it cannot be presented as a proof that the phrase “Lord’s day” in John’s time refers to Sunday. Numerous examples might be cited to show the rapidity with which words can change their meanings. Therefore the meaning of “Lord’s day” here is better determined by reference to Scripture rather than to subsequent literature.
On the positive side of the question is the fact that although the Scripture nowhere identifies Sunday as having any religious connection with the Lord, repeatedly it recognizes that the seventh day, the Sabbath, is the Lord’s special day. God is said to have blessed and sanctified the seventh day (see Gen. 2:3); He declared it to be the memorial of His act of creation (see Ex. 20:11); He called it specifically “my holy day” (see Isa. 58:13); and Jesus declared Himself to be “Lord also of the sabbath” (see Mark 2:28) in the sense that as Lord of men, He was also Lord over that which was made for man, the Sabbath. Thus, when the phrase “Lord’s day” is interpreted in accordance with evidence prior to and contemporary with John’s time, it appears that there is only one day to which it can refer, and that is the seventh-day Sabbath.
Nichol, Francis D.: The Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary, Volume 7. Review and Herald Publishing Association, 1978; 2002, S. 735
Rev_1:10 I was in the Spirit on the Lord's day, and heard behind me a great voice, as of a trumpet,
Although unique in Scripture, the term kuriakē hēmera has a long history in post-Biblical Greek. Like its abbreviated form, kuriakē, it is a familiar term in the Church Fathers for the first day of the week, and in modern Greek kuriakē is the usual term for Sunday. Its Latin equivalent, dominica dies, is a common designation for the same day, and has passed into several modern languages, such as Spanish, domingo, and French, dimanche, both terms for Sunday. For this reason many scholars hold the opinion that kuriakē hēmera in the present passage also refers to Sunday, and that John not only received his vision on that day but also recognized it as “the Lord’s day,” presumably because on that day Christ had risen from the dead.
There are both negative and positive reasons for rejecting this interpretation. First is the recognized principle of historical method, that an allusion is to be interpreted only in terms of evidence that is previous to it in point of time or contemporary with it, and not by historical data from a later period. This principle has an important bearing on the problem of the meaning of the expression “Lord’s day” as it appears in the present passage. Although this term occurs frequently in the Church Fathers with the meaning of Sunday, the first conclusive evidence of such use does not appear until the latter part of the 2d century in the Apocryphal Gospel According to Peter (9, 12; ANF, vol. 9, p. 8), where the day of Christ’s resurrection is termed the “Lord’s day.” Since this document was written at least three quarters of a century after John wrote the Revelation, it cannot be presented as a proof that the phrase “Lord’s day” in John’s time refers to Sunday. Numerous examples might be cited to show the rapidity with which words can change their meanings. Therefore the meaning of “Lord’s day” here is better determined by reference to Scripture rather than to subsequent literature.
On the positive side of the question is the fact that although the Scripture nowhere identifies Sunday as having any religious connection with the Lord, repeatedly it recognizes that the seventh day, the Sabbath, is the Lord’s special day. God is said to have blessed and sanctified the seventh day (see Gen. 2:3); He declared it to be the memorial of His act of creation (see Ex. 20:11); He called it specifically “my holy day” (see Isa. 58:13); and Jesus declared Himself to be “Lord also of the sabbath” (see Mark 2:28) in the sense that as Lord of men, He was also Lord over that which was made for man, the Sabbath. Thus, when the phrase “Lord’s day” is interpreted in accordance with evidence prior to and contemporary with John’s time, it appears that there is only one day to which it can refer, and that is the seventh-day Sabbath.
Nichol, Francis D.: The Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary, Volume 7. Review and Herald Publishing Association, 1978; 2002, S. 735
Jesus nor any of His Apostles never, not once, instructed Christians to keep the Sabbath? Doesn't anyone else find that strange, if indeed it is something that Jesus wanted us to continue to follow?
Keeping the Sabbath was a LAW under the old covenant, yet under the new covenant we see no such law at all, nor are we told to continue to do that old covenant law. For more information on this topic please read the following webpages, click on them to go:
Should we obey the Old Testament part one
Should we obey the Old Testament part two
and
Sabbath keeping?
^i^
Keeping the Sabbath was a LAW under the old covenant, yet under the new covenant we see no such law at all, nor are we told to continue to do that old covenant law. For more information on this topic please read the following webpages, click on them to go:
Should we obey the Old Testament part one
Should we obey the Old Testament part two
and
Sabbath keeping?
^i^
Mat 5:16 Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven.
Mat 5:17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Mat 5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
Mat 5:19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
Mat 5:20 For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven.
It is not a burden to spend one day a week with Yahweh, God, and resting from the other six days. It is symbolic (to me) of the eternal rest with Him to come. Perhaps I am wrong, but it is not harmful to any of the family in Messiah.
Mat 5:17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Mat 5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
Mat 5:19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
Mat 5:20 For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven.
It is not a burden to spend one day a week with Yahweh, God, and resting from the other six days. It is symbolic (to me) of the eternal rest with Him to come. Perhaps I am wrong, but it is not harmful to any of the family in Messiah.
L
The sabbath was not an issue back then. Acts shows that they kept the Sabbath of the Lord
[FONT="]Acts 13:14[/FONT][FONT="]
(14) But when they departed from Perga, they came to Antioch in Pisidia, and went into the synagogue [/FONT][FONT="]on the sabbath day, [/FONT][FONT="]and sat down.
[/FONT][FONT="]Acts 13:27[/FONT][FONT="]
(27) For they that dwell at Jerusalem, and their rulers, because they knew him not, nor yet the voices of the prophets which are read [/FONT][FONT="]every sabbath day,[/FONT][FONT="] they have fulfilled them in condemning him.
[/FONT][FONT="]Acts 13:42[/FONT][FONT="]
(42) And when the Jews were gone out of the synagogue, the Gentiles besought that these words might be preached to them [/FONT][FONT="]the next sabbath.
[/FONT][FONT="]Acts 13:44[/FONT][FONT="]
(44) And [/FONT][FONT="]the next sabbath day[/FONT][FONT="] came almost the whole city together to hear the word of God.
[/FONT][FONT="]Acts 16:13[/FONT][FONT="]
(13) And [/FONT][FONT="]on the sabbath[/FONT][FONT="] we went out of the city by a river side, where prayer was wont to be made; and we sat down, and spake unto the women which resorted thither.
[/FONT][FONT="]Acts 17:2[/FONT][FONT="]
(2) And Paul, as his manner was, went in unto them, and [/FONT][FONT="]three sabbath days [/FONT][FONT="]reasoned with them out of the scriptures,
[/FONT][FONT="]Acts 18:4[/FONT][FONT="]
(4) And he reasoned in the synagogue [/FONT][FONT="]every sabbath,[/FONT][FONT="] and persuaded the Jews and the Greeks.
[/FONT]