Sabbath

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
124
63
If we read the Bible we will see that Abraham kept the law. When God gave the ten commandments to Moses, Israel was in Egypt for 400 years. They were at as place where they didn't know God anymore and He had to bring them back to His law.

Remember, God is the same yesterday, toady and tomorrow...
Abraham kept the laws of his tribe, which he believed were of God, not the Law of Moses.

The Law given by Moses was in the form of a suzerainty treaty. The Deliverer was commanding their obedience on the grounds that He had delivered them (Exod 20.2). It thus referred to those whom He had delivered and their descendants, and those who later joined the covenant. It did not refer to the past. They were not 'brought back to His law'. It was a new revelation. (If we follow your argument then the New Testament is just a repetition of the Law of Moses, which is ridiculous). It is called progressive revelation
 

KohenMatt

Senior Member
Jun 28, 2013
4,022
224
63
So, you propose to do away with the Christian religion?.
If you had read the previous posts you would know, lol.
No, your statement is non sequitur, he stated no such thing.
Correct, he said no such thing. If otherwise, please quote the direct post.

My guess is that you made this statement out of a desire to create shock value and to flippantly make the conversation more combative.
 

john832

Senior Member
May 31, 2013
11,365
186
63
Abraham kept the laws of his tribe, which he believed were of God, not the Law of Moses.

The Law given by Moses was in the form of a suzerainty treaty. The Deliverer was commanding their obedience on the grounds that He had delivered them (Exod 20.2). It thus referred to those whom He had delivered and their descendants, and those who later joined the covenant. It did not refer to the past. They were not 'brought back to His law'. It was a new revelation. (If we follow your argument then the New Testament is just a repetition of the Law of Moses, which is ridiculous). It is called progressive revelation
Now we see where you are coming from. That about ends this conversation.
 

AngelFrog

Senior Member
Feb 16, 2015
648
58
28
No friend, day 7 of the creation...
Very true.
Genesis 2:1-25

Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them. And on the seventh day God finished his work that he had done, and he rested on the seventh day from all his work that he had done. So God blessed the seventh day and made it holy, because on it God rested from all his work that he had done in creation. These are the generations of the heavens and the earth when they were created, in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens. When no bush of the field was yet in the land and no small plant of the field had yet sprung up—for the Lord God had not caused it to rain on the land, and there was no man to work the ground, ...
 
Dec 9, 2011
13,867
1,746
113
Hello AngelFrog
I don't think JESUS would say the law would pass until all of it be fulfilled then say that the sabbath is abolished.

And i agree with what scripture says there in Mark 2:27.
The sabbath was made for man ,but if a person is going to church on saturday out of obligation then i think that is legalism.
JESUS is my sabbath whether its saturday or sunday or anyday.

Are you under grace or law?
remember it can't be both
Well, most people don't think that He meant really ANYTHING that He said.



So, in other words, you won't do something just because God SAYS to? You will only do it if you decide to? After all, if God says to do something and expects you to, that is legalism?



We are under BOTH! It is a matter of grace and law. When one breaks the Law, grace is the forgiveness and restoration that is provided by the sacrifice of Christ.

Please show me a scripture that says you can't have both.

If one is not under Law, then he needs no grace. If there is no Law then there is no sin. If there is no sin then there is no need for grace.
Well, most people don't think that He meant really ANYTHING that He said.
I mean that JESUS was going to fulfill all the law before he started the new covenant grace

So, in other words, you won't do something just because God SAYS to? You will only do it if you decide to? After all, if God says to do something and expects you to, that is legalism?
I'm saying that i would recognize what doing what GOD says from the heart and just doing it outwardly.

We are under BOTH! It is a matter of grace and law. When one breaks the Law, grace is the forgiveness and restoration that is provided by the sacrifice of Christ.
we are under law if we haven't moved on to grace but we are not under law and grace at the same time.

Please show me a scripture that says you can't have both.
I could show you a scripture that tells about how the spirit lust against the flesh and vice versa but i would have to do some searching to find exactly what you ask but hopefully you know that they couldn't purify the spirit in the wilderness they only purified the flesh.

If one is not under Law, then he needs no grace. If there is no Law then there is no sin. If there is no sin then there is no need for grace.
i agree that if a person is not under law but under grace that the schoolmaster has done its job and i agree that where there is no law sin is not imputed.
 
Dec 26, 2014
3,757
19
0
what if I IMPUTE SIN, regardless of if there is any law or not ????????

so that even IF THERE IS NO LAW, SIN IS IMPUTED ??????



THINKING THINKING THINKING........ seeing if people will start or are even able to start thinking !
 

KohenMatt

Senior Member
Jun 28, 2013
4,022
224
63
For salvation i agree its grace
Bur for daily living if you already have grace then its obedience and renewing the mind.
And then I would say obedience to what?
The Holy Spirit.
Which teaches what God's will is.
Which is the instructions He has already given.
 

john832

Senior Member
May 31, 2013
11,365
186
63
I mean that JESUS was going to fulfill all the law before he started the new covenant grace
So, to fill full...

G4137

πληρόω
plēroō
play-ro'-o
From G4134; to make replete, that is, (literally) to cram (a net), level up (a hollow), or (figuratively) to furnish (or imbue, diffuse, influence), satisfy, execute (an office), finish (a period or task), verify (or coincide with a prediction), etc.: - accomplish, X after, (be) complete, end, expire, fill (up), fulfil, (be, make) full (come), fully preach, perfect, supply.
Total KJV occurrences: 90

means to do away with.



I'm saying that i would recognize what doing what GOD says from the heart and just doing it outwardly.
And if that is different than scripture so what? And if someone else sees it differently than you, then they are correct also?

1Co 1:10 Now I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you; but that ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment.

So if one thinks that taking the Passover once a year is correct and another thinks that grape juice and a cracker every day is correct, they are both right? Extend that out a little and you end up with LAWLESSNESS.



we are under law if we haven't moved on to grace but we are not under law and grace at the same time.
Now wait a minute, if you are under grace then the Law no longer defines sin? Just what is sin? Bible definition is no longer correct?

1Jn 3:4 Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.

Why wasn't John informed of this?

I could show you a scripture that tells about how the spirit lust against the flesh and vice versa but i would have to do some searching to find exactly what you ask but hopefully you know that they couldn't purify the spirit in the wilderness they only purified the flesh.
I'll do it for you...

Gal 5:17 For the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh: and these are contrary the one to the other: so that ye cannot do the things that ye would.

In the wilderness, Israel did not have access to the Holy Spirit with the exception of the very few God called prior to Pentecost, 31AD.

So, anyhoo, what this scripture says is that we still battle our carnal nature just as Paul did...

Rom 7:14 For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin.
Rom 7:15 For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I.
Rom 7:16 If then I do that which I would not, I consent unto the law that it is good.
Rom 7:17 Now then it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.
Rom 7:18 For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not.
Rom 7:19 For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do.
Rom 7:20 Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.
Rom 7:21 I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me.
Rom 7:22 For I delight in the law of God after the inward man:
Rom 7:23 But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members.
Rom 7:24 O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death?
Rom 7:25 I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.

And the deliverance is through Christ.


i agree that if a person is not under law but under grace that the schoolmaster has done its job and i agree that where there is no law sin is not imputed.
The schoolmaster was the Law of Sacrifices that pointed to Christ...

Heb 10:1 For the law having a shadow of good things to come, and not the very image of the things, can never with those sacrifices which they offered year by year continually make the comers thereunto perfect.
Heb 10:2 For then would they not have ceased to be offered? because that the worshippers once purged should have had no more conscience of sins.
Heb 10:3 But in those sacrifices there is a remembrance again made of sins every year.
Heb 10:4 For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins.

It gave a bloody reminder that we are sinners and need the sacrifice of Christ to be cleansed. We must go to God and ask for this cleansing (grace Heb 4:15-16) daily...

Mat 6:12 And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors.

Part of our daily prayer (actually we should do this three times a day Psa 55:17) is to ask forgiveness and also we must forgive others daily.
 

john832

Senior Member
May 31, 2013
11,365
186
63
what if I IMPUTE SIN, regardless of if there is any law or not ????????

so that even IF THERE IS NO LAW, SIN IS IMPUTED ??????




THINKING THINKING THINKING........ seeing if people will start or are even able to start thinking !
IMPOSSIBLE.
 
Dec 9, 2011
13,867
1,746
113
what if I IMPUTE SIN, regardless of if there is any law or not ????????

so that even IF THERE IS NO LAW, SIN IS IMPUTED ??????



THINKING THINKING THINKING........ seeing if people will start or are even able to start thinking !
I'm thinking that i am not sure i know what you are saying because thats GODs call.
 

MarcR

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2015
5,486
183
63
I think the question of why we have denominations belongs on a separate thread.


The OP asked:

Do we need to keep the sabbath? I dunno if I posted about this but I am still confused.

Matthew 5:19 says that if you ignore the least of these commands you get the least position in heaven. So can someone please explain this to me?

btw, what is the purpose of the Sabbath and why is it so hard to keep


The question " do we need to keep the Sabbath?" is answered by Paul in:

Ro 14:5-6
5 One man esteemeth one day above another: another esteemeth every day alike. Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind.
6 He that regardeth the day, regardeth it unto the Lord; and he that regardeth not the day, to the Lord he doth not regard it. He that eateth, eateth to the Lord, for he giveth God thanks; and he that eateth not, to the Lord he eateth not, and giveth God thanks.
KJV

The simple answer appears to be NO!

The answer to "What is the purpose of the sabbath?" IMO is that God has designated a time at which He desires His people to fellowship with Him. If the question had been 'Is God pleased by Sabbath observance?' my answer would be 'Yes.'

the answer to "Why is it so hard to keep?" is : IMO It doesn't need to be difficult at all.
 
Dec 9, 2011
13,867
1,746
113
The 10 teach us how to do the 2. Otherwise, everyone is left to their own devices and can still claim they're doing the 2.
the ten show you that you have not met GODS standard of perfection and need a savoir.Once you realize that then move on to grace.

But its GOD that teaches the ten just condemn.
 
Dec 9, 2011
13,867
1,746
113
So, to fill full...

G4137

πληρόω
plēroō
play-ro'-o
From G4134; to make replete, that is, (literally) to cram (a net), level up (a hollow), or (figuratively) to furnish (or imbue, diffuse, influence), satisfy, execute (an office), finish (a period or task), verify (or coincide with a prediction), etc.: - accomplish, X after, (be) complete, end, expire, fill (up), fulfil, (be, make) full (come), fully preach, perfect, supply.
Total KJV occurrences: 90

means to do away with.





And if that is different than scripture so what? And if someone else sees it differently than you, then they are correct also?

1Co 1:10 Now I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you; but that ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment.

So if one thinks that taking the Passover once a year is correct and another thinks that grape juice and a cracker every day is correct, they are both right? Extend that out a little and you end up with LAWLESSNESS.





Now wait a minute, if you are under grace then the Law no longer defines sin? Just what is sin? Bible definition is no longer correct?

1Jn 3:4 Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.

Why wasn't John informed of this?



I'll do it for you...

Gal 5:17 For the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh: and these are contrary the one to the other: so that ye cannot do the things that ye would.

In the wilderness, Israel did not have access to the Holy Spirit with the exception of the very few God called prior to Pentecost, 31AD.

So, anyhoo, what this scripture says is that we still battle our carnal nature just as Paul did...

Rom 7:14 For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin.
Rom 7:15 For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I.
Rom 7:16 If then I do that which I would not, I consent unto the law that it is good.
Rom 7:17 Now then it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.
Rom 7:18 For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not.
Rom 7:19 For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do.
Rom 7:20 Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.
Rom 7:21 I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me.
Rom 7:22 For I delight in the law of God after the inward man:
Rom 7:23 But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members.
Rom 7:24 O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death?
Rom 7:25 I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.

And the deliverance is through Christ.




The schoolmaster was the Law of Sacrifices that pointed to Christ...

Heb 10:1 For the law having a shadow of good things to come, and not the very image of the things, can never with those sacrifices which they offered year by year continually make the comers thereunto perfect.
Heb 10:2 For then would they not have ceased to be offered? because that the worshippers once purged should have had no more conscience of sins.
Heb 10:3 But in those sacrifices there is a remembrance again made of sins every year.
Heb 10:4 For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins.

It gave a bloody reminder that we are sinners and need the sacrifice of Christ to be cleansed. We must go to God and ask for this cleansing (grace Heb 4:15-16) daily...

Mat 6:12 And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors.

Part of our daily prayer (actually we should do this three times a day Psa 55:17) is to ask forgiveness and also we must forgive others daily.
The law is not done away with for the lawless but it is done away with for those under grace and JESUS said that he is faithful to forgive us of our sins if we confess our sins.
the law was not made for the righteous but it was made for the lawless because a person should recognize their guilt before they will truly believe they are guilty.
Remember that its the spirit that gives life the body counts for nothing and since the spirit and the body lust against each other and JESUS said that the words that he spoke were spirit and life then the spirit is the truth.