Slain in the spirit?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
20,801
7,111
113
62
I agree that receiving the Holy Spirit does not automatically occur when a person is baptized in water in the name of Jesus. This idea is not consistent with scripture.

Consider, however, at what point, and what evidence confirms the arrival of the Holy Spirit into one's body. The accounts I shared reveal both points. (Acts 2:4, 38-42, 8:12-18, 9:17-18, 10:43-48, 19:1-7, 22:16)

Consider Acts 2:4, the Holy Spirit was received by those who had, prior to the event, accepted that Jesus was the resurrected Son of God.

Consider those in Acts 8. The people knew that had not received the Holy Spirit. How did they know this?

Consider Jesus' words in Luke 11:13. God gives the Holy Spirit to those who ask. How does one know they need
to ask?

Consider Paul's question in Acts 19:2. And what the entire account reveals about when the Holy Spirit is actually
received, and the evidence that proved the experience took place. (Acts 3:7)


Lastly, consider that Paul understood there is no difference in the Spirit of God and the Spirit of Christ, they are one in the same:
"But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God
dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his." Romans 8:9
I believe you have two things confused as one. I believe there is a difference between the indwelling of the Spirit and the baptism of the Spirit.
 

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
5,348
1,140
113
...
Fruit is how one measures the reality of a changed heart.
I do believe as well that fruit of the Spirit will confirm yet again the authenticity of the initial experience of being indwelt as evidenced by speaking tongues.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
20,801
7,111
113
62
I do believe as well that fruit of the Spirit will confirm yet again the authenticity of the initial experience of being indwelt as evidenced by speaking tongues.
I understand. But in doing so you require a sign for salvation rather than as an authentication of salvation.
 

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
5,348
1,140
113
Water there is the gospel...1 Peter 1:23.
Faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.
Scripture confirms over and over that the water spoken of relates to water baptism in the name of Jesus for remission of sin.

The faith that arises from hearing the word of God is that Jesus is the risen Son of God whose sacrifice paid the penalty for all mankind. And faith that what God says is true regarding repentance, water baptism, and His promise to dwell in those who obey Him results in the NT rebirth. Afterward, those who experience the NT rebirth are led by the indwelling presence of the Holy Spirit on a journey that requires continual steps of faith in pursuit of becoming Christ-like. Those who endure to the end of their life or until Jesus returns will be saved.
 

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
5,348
1,140
113
I understand all that.
Trouble is, you seem to think that by getting saved it puts a person on automatic pilot to finding sound doctrine and achieving maturity in Christ. But, Scripture also teaches that not every saved person does spiritually mature in Christ. Though, over time
they will become more sophisticated in presenting their preferred false doctrines. Leading them to thinking they are mature.


As far as I am concerned.
Simply put...
You are of a different spirit.
And, I, of you.

You can not receive from me.
And, likewise in reverse.

So, why don't you just rest it?

The Lord will sort it out when the chosen time comes.
In the mean while, from what we now know about each other?
You and I will only waste time.
Time which the Lord wants to be redeemed.

So? Why not, you go with what the spirit of your choice?
The one that holds a personal appeal for you.

As for myself?
I will continue to where I believe He is sending me.

Wishing for you a blessed Evaluation when you appear before the Lord.

grace and peace.... GeneZ
We are all on a journey of learning. I certainly don't claim to know it all, nor will I ever, in this life or the next. I do, however, continue to search the scriptures when confronted with the viewpoints of others. It would be foolish to neglect to do so. But, nothing I've been presented with changes what the bible reveals, and I have personally experienced concerning the NT rebirth.

Thanks for the discussion.
 

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
5,348
1,140
113
Did all speak in tongues?

1 Corinthians 12:29-31, tells us no.

Are all apostles? Are all prophets? Are all teachers? Do all work miracles?
Do all have gifts of healing? Do all speak in tongues? Do all interpret?
Now eagerly desire the greater gifts.
Many fail to understand that Paul is talking about the spiritual gift of tongues for the church congregation NOT the manifestation of tongues in personal prayer.

Paul explained there is a difference. Tongues spoken between God's Spirit and man's spirit edifies the born again Christian. (1 Cor. 14)
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
20,801
7,111
113
62
Scripture confirms over and over that the water spoken of relates to water baptism in the name of Jesus for remission of sin.

The faith that arises from hearing the word of God is that Jesus is the risen Son of God whose sacrifice paid the penalty for all mankind. And faith that what God says is true regarding repentance, water baptism, and His promise to dwell in those who obey Him results in the NT rebirth. Afterward, those who experience the NT rebirth are led by the indwelling presence of the Holy Spirit on a journey that requires continual steps of faith in pursuit of becoming Christ-like. Those who endure to the end of their life or until Jesus returns will be saved.
We disagree on what leads to salvation and what accompanies salvation. If, in fact, salvation is of grace and not of works, any works should be viewed as the result of salvation and not its cause. Thus, the performance of works should be expected in proximity to the occurrence of salvation and be attributed to it, rather than as a contributing factor to salvation.

You seem to believe otherwise. I think the reason for this is because you make no distinction between the indwelling of the Spirit which places one into Christ, and the baptism of the Spirit which authenticates the reality of the indwelling Spirit.
 

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
5,348
1,140
113
What about timothy? he didn't speak in tongues as far as we know it was not recorded as such but he was adored by paul and was full of the spirit himself
Not every scripture will include all the specific details related to an experience. It is not necessary to give specific details over and over once they have been established/revealed by 2-3 scriptures. (Deut. 19:15, 2 Cor. 13:1, Matt. 18:16)

The specific details related to the NT rebirth are found in Acts 2:4, 38-42, 10:43-48, 19:1-7. They include belief in Jesus as the risen Son of God, repentance, water baptism in the name of Jesus for remission of sin, and receiving the Holy Spirit with the evidence of speaking in tongues. The accounts referenced establish that those who were indwelt by the Holy Spirit all spoke in tongues. And, Acts 8:12-16 alludes to the same. As such, it is not necessary that all the details be recorded in every scripture.

Since it is proven in God's word that when people receive the Holy Spirit they speak in tongues we can be confident that the same applied to Timothy.

"And when the day of Pentecost was fully come, they were all with one accord in one place.
And suddenly there came a sound from heaven as of a rushing mighty wind, and it filled all the house where they were sitting.
And there appeared unto them cloven tongues like as of fire, and it sat upon each of them.
And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance." (Acts 2:1-4)

"Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost." (Acts 2:38)
 

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
5,348
1,140
113
Yes, but taking the verses out of the context of the purpose, can lead you in an wrong direction. There are no 3 references who show you that speaking in tongues was a sign for baptised with the Holy Spirit.
If you use Acts 2 f.e. then you miss
✝ Acts 2:3

"And there appeared unto them cloven tongues like as of fire, and it sat upon each of them."
Where this is reportet again?
Must you not expect that this will be the same for every believer?

If you read all this passages, Acts 8, 10, 19 without having a doctrine behind in mind, you can understand that this was a sign for the Jews that the Samaritans and the Gentiles are also acceptet as they are. And for the disciples of John the Baptist it was a proof that the gospel which Peter teaches about Jesus Christ is right.
But folks creating from this an doctrine, which splittes the follower of Christ. Because they teach you cant have the baptising with the Holy Spirit if you cant speaking in tomgues.
In 1. Cor. 12, 30 Paul said clear that the gift of speaking in tongues is not all believers given.
✝ 1 Corinthians 12:30

"Have all the gifts of healing? do all speak with tongues? do all interpret?"

But the pentecostals and also the charismatics ignore this vers ore discuss it a away.
Because it shows that their teaching is wrong.
Of the detailed accounts, Acts 19:1-7 specifically debunks the idea that speaking in tongues was just a sign for the Jews.
 

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
5,348
1,140
113
Tongues are not for today....

They were to be a warning sign to the Jews who were rejecting Jesus Christ, and who would continue in their rejection.
It was like signs that were given to Pharaoh. Pharaoh rejected and did not repent.

Note..., t says, the sign was given to a specific people ("this people").
To whom?
To unbelieving Jews.


Brethren, stop thinking like children. In regard to evil be infants,
but in your thinking be adults.
In the Law it is written:
“With other tongues
and through the lips of foreigners
I will speak to this people, (Israel)
but even then they will not listen to me,
says the Lord.”
Tongues, then, are a sign, not for believers but for unbelievers.

Paul, in essence, was saying that unbelieving Jews who were rejecting Jesus Christ in the face of tongues were just as bad as Pharaoh had been when presented the signs from God!

Not everyone can be caught up in the invisible power that grabs people into what were temporary gifts.
For not everybody can be hypnotized.
Hypnotists know this.
"I pray not that thou shouldest take them out of the world, but that thou shouldest keep them from the evil.
They are not of the world, even as I am not of the world.
Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth.

As thou hast sent me into the world, even so have I also sent them into the world.
And for their sakes I sanctify myself, that they also might be sanctified through the truth.


Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on me through their word;
That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: that the world may believe that thou hast sent me." John 17:15-21
 

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
5,348
1,140
113
I believe you have two things confused as one. I believe there is a difference between the indwelling of the Spirit and the baptism of the Spirit.
I don't see a difference revealed in scripture.
 

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
5,348
1,140
113
I understand. But in doing so you require a sign for salvation rather than as an authentication of salvation.
I don't require a sign, scripture reveals people speak in tongues when they receive the Holy Spirit. Those who believe what God revealed expect it will happen.
 

Genez

Junior Member
Oct 12, 2017
3,914
635
113
Many fail to understand that Paul is talking about the spiritual gift of tongues for the church congregation NOT the manifestation of tongues in personal prayer.

Paul explained there is a difference. Tongues spoken between God's Spirit and man's spirit edifies the born again Christian. (1 Cor. 14)
I see? You say one is not a gift. The other way is?

You make stuff up to fit your experience...

1 Corinthians 14:27-28 says that if there is no interpreter, you should speak to yourself and to God.

Meaning?
When you speak allegedly in tongues, when alone?
The only difference? (with the same gift)
Would be ,you do not need an interpreter when alone.

Now go make up some more new rules to get your people excited to hear about them....
Excited,... Because, it works for them.

this is silly....
 

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
5,348
1,140
113
Do you believe one is inward and one is outward?
I see only one experience related to the Holy Spirit as recorded on the day the NT church was birthed. And thereafter in relation to Gentiles, and 12 individuals in Ephesus. The same was alluded to concerning the Samaritans. (Acts 8:12-16) The experience was internal; people spoke in tongues as a result of the Holy Spirit entering their body.
 

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
5,348
1,140
113
I see? You say one is not a gift. The other way is?

You make stuff up to fit your experience...

1 Corinthians 14:27-28 says that if there is no interpreter, you should speak to yourself and to God.

When you speak allegedly in tongues when alone the only difference?
With the same gift?
Would be you do not need an interpreter when alone.

Now go make up some more new rules and get your people excited to hear about them....
... Because, it works for them.

this is silly....
You really should study what the Apostle Paul took the time to explain. 1 Cor. 12 and 14 reveal the different manifestations of tongues.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
20,801
7,111
113
62
I see only one experience related to the Holy Spirit as recorded on the day the NT church was birthed. And thereafter in relation to Gentiles, and 12 individuals in Ephesus. The same was alluded to concerning the Samaritans. (Acts 8:12-16) The experience was internal; people spoke in tongues as a result of the Holy Spirit entering their body.
Go to Acts 2:37 and you will see the work of the indwelling Spirit.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
20,801
7,111
113
62
I see only one experience related to the Holy Spirit as recorded on the day the NT church was birthed. And thereafter in relation to Gentiles, and 12 individuals in Ephesus. The same was alluded to concerning the Samaritans. (Acts 8:12-16) The experience was internal; people spoke in tongues as a result of the Holy Spirit entering their body.
Where does it say that the Holy Spirit that fell indwelt them?
 

Genez

Junior Member
Oct 12, 2017
3,914
635
113
You really should study what the Apostle Paul took the time to explain. 1 Cor. 12 and 14 reveal the different manifestations of tongues.
Tongues were still active within the Church at the time of writing.

You fail to rightly divide the Word of God.