Sovereignty of God and Moral Responsibility of Man

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
A

Abiding

Guest
Anyone can exegete. Its the hermeneutic
that bugs me.:cool:
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Elin said:
Scripture doesn't address that there, so I'm not going to conclude it. (1Co 4:6)
Yes it does. [SUP]3 [/SUP]Who being the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person
No complainin', when I open an objectionable thread on the secret will of God and the revealed will of God (Dt 29:29).
 
A

Abiding

Guest
No complainin', when I open an objectionable thread on the secret will of God and the revealed will of God (Dt 29:29).
Well dont go getting your hopes up with me. I dont find all that
much in what you write that i object to.

Just the philosophically motivated overly onto scripture.
Looking forward to that new thread.:cool:
 
Jan 11, 2013
2,256
17
0
Still tryin' to communicate when you agree that we cannot. . .
Of course we cannot, your statement that the Christian has limited free will to obey/not to sin, and then citing Rom8:7&8 in suppoort of that leaves us nowhere to go. Pity you don't feel you can defend, or respond as to why you cite those verses in support of your position, but that's OK.
If you at anytime feel you can move on from stressing predestination, man is born with a sin nature, and he only has a limited free will to obey, I will follow any thread of yours avidly. So far it seems a pretty depressing, weak and empty Gospel
 
C

cfultz3

Guest
no clue why really.
who cares about two words: "limited atonement" ppl can't stand.

unless you're a universalist, at the end of it all, the conclusion ought to be the same.
anyways
It is not the two words which matter, but the conclusion it leads to. It can lead a person to assume that it does not matter what you do, you will end up where you are destined to be. It would have one reasoning: if I am destined for hell, why try to have faith in Christ, it would be useless. If I am destined for Heaven, why even live my faith, I am going there anyway.
 
C

cfultz3

Guest
The major difference is: that is not the jist of Luke.


No, the leaven was the hypocrisy of the Pharisees.

12:1 is in the context of the fierce opposition of the Pharisees and the teachers of the law, who besieged Jesus with questions waiting to catch him in something he might say (Lk 11:53-54).

Jesus tells them they are not to do as the hypocritical Pharisees do, who were questioning him, not for the sake of learning, but only to trap him.
If they do as the Pharisees do, they will also be hypocrites.


No, it doesn't, you have added that to v.2.

Vv. 2-3 tell them that nothing will be hidden in the hypocrisy of the Pharisees (v.2), and likewise in any hypocrisy they would practice (v.3).

Then follows the warnings and encouragements regarding persecution (vv. 4-7).


Yes, that forewarning is in regard to persecution, and has noting to do with the yeast of the Pharisees.


No, it is not about accountability to God.

That is treated elsewhere.


And another really good thing to keep in mind is his warning against hypocrisy.
I have but one thing to say......
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
Anyone can exegete. Its the hermeneutic
that bugs me.:cool:
fair enough.
i know what you mean about hermeneutics.

there was nothing much new in the exegesis in the vids.
i've seen them.
and heard it all already:)
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
Of course we cannot, your statement that the Christian has limited free will to obey/not to sin, and then citing Rom8:7&8 in suppoort of that leaves us nowhere to go. Pity you don't feel you can defend, or respond as to why you cite those verses in support of your position, but that's OK.
If you at anytime feel you can move on from stressing predestination, man is born with a sin nature, and he only has a limited free will to obey, I will follow any thread of yours avidly. So far it seems a pretty depressing, weak and empty Gospel
weren't you over on skinksi's case about perfectionism?
when did you change yer mind on that?:rolleyes:
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
It is not the two words which matter, but the conclusion it leads to. It can lead a person to assume that it does not matter what you do, you will end up where you are destined to be. It would have one reasoning: if I am destined for hell, why try to have faith in Christ, it would be useless. If I am destined for Heaven, why even live my faith, I am going there anyway.
wow.....i guess if anyone thought this way:

"If I am destined for Heaven, why even live my faith, I am going there anyway."

they weren't actually born again.
what's "live my faith"?
what does that mean?

don't we live a Christian life - because we are new creatures?

i know you don't believe in eternal security.
so you are consistent.
 
A

Abiding

Guest
fair enough.
i know what you mean about hermeneutics.

there was nothing much new in the exegesis in the vids.
i've seen them.
and heard it all already:)
Ok, you asked me a few times.
So there ya go. catch ya later.
 
C

cfultz3

Guest
wow.....i guess if anyone thought this way:

"If I am destined for Heaven, why even live my faith, I am going there anyway."

they weren't actually born again.
what's "live my faith"?
what does that mean?

don't we live a Christian life - because we are new creatures?

i know you don't believe in eternal security.
so you are consistent.
But, limit atonement will lead one to think this. Let us stay on topic here please.
 
Dec 26, 2012
5,853
137
0
Of course we cannot, your statement that the Christian has limited free will to obey/not to sin, and then citing Rom8:7&8 in suppoort of that leaves us nowhere to go. Pity you don't feel you can defend, or respond as to why you cite those verses in support of your position, but that's OK.
If you at anytime feel you can move on from stressing predestination, man is born with a sin nature, and he only has a limited free will to obey, I will follow any thread of yours avidly. So far it seems a pretty depressing, weak and empty Gospel
She hasn't gotten to the gospel yet,she's laying the back drop against which the gospel will be seen. :)
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
It is not the two words which matter, but the conclusion it leads to. It can lead a person to assume that it does not matter what you do, you will end up where you are destined to be. It would have one reasoning: if I am destined for hell, why try to have faith in Christ, it would be useless. If I am destined for Heaven, why even live my faith, I am going there anyway.
anyways...the conclusion I MEANT one who is not a universalist would reach is simply:

all men will not be saved = the atonement was not saving for them - clearly.

nothing more nothing less. that's the conclusion i addressed.
that's exactly why this discussion goes where it does.

supposedly we know that truth - that not all men will be saved.
but the rest is unspeakable.
which is ridiculous.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
But, limit atonement will lead one to think this. Let us stay on topic here please.
i am on topic.
it would lead who to conclude that?
a saved person?

not me. so i have no idea what you're talking about.
i've seen you be all about obeying out of love and gratitude.
now if we say not all men will be saved it means you might live like satan?


i don't know who will be saved....do you?
 
Mar 8, 2013
244
6
0
As believers, are we sure that heaven is ours to inherit nomatter what?

do we believe TOWARD that place in heaven?

Can we lose it?

If we can lose it, then a large portion of our faith is believing TOWARD that place in heaven, is it not?

So then walking the way is for our own gain if we can lose our place, or else pointless if we are 'SECURE', is it not?

I disagree.

One who holds to Jesus' teaching for the sake of its fruit, its benefit and its simplicity is the one who is TRULY saved. Saved from all this 'is it, is it not, what if, how come, why so, how do I know I'm 'saved', what do I NEED to do?'

Believe - Be convinced of

Have faith - Trust in. Have immaculate hope.

Work - Show love
 
C

cfultz3

Guest
i am on topic.
it would who to conclude that?
a saved person?
not me. so i have no idea what you're talking about.
Okay, in as few words as possible, I will explain again.

Limited atonement says that we are pre-destined for Heaven or Hell.

If God has pre-destined us, then would it really matter if I, having been pre-destined for Hell, were to have faith? No, because limited atonement says I will still go to Hell because it has been fore-ordained by God. So that faith in Christ I had has been annulled by limited atonement.

Would it matter if I, having been pre-destined for Heaven, did not live the life described in the NT as concerning how a child of God should live? No, because it would not matter what I did, I will still be going to Heaven, even if I were to deny Christ. Again, this doctrine annuls faith.

Hope for one's salvation, according to this doctrine, is taken away from the world and given only to those who have been pre-selected to have salvation. Yet, it was one of the reasons why Christ died, to offer salvation to the Gentiles too.

In this doctrine, faith is killed, hope is deadened and those who are not pre-s(elected) are told don't bother either way, you are going to hell.

I much rather point people to Christ then to tell them as that doctrine does, "If you are pre-elected, God will see to it you are. So, come to Him whenever. It really does not matter."
 
Last edited:

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
If God has pre-destined us, then would it really matter if I, having been pre-destined for Hell, were to have faith?
well, i believe saving faith is a gift.
and people who receive are saved.

this is why i am not and will never be of the arminian school.
 
C

cfultz3

Guest
well, i believe saving faith is a gift.
and people who receive are saved.

this is why i am not and will never be of the arminian school.
Though I believe faith is from God, it is up to the individual to make something of it (the seed and what sort of ground it falls on).

BBL: cooking supper.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
Though I believe faith is from God, it is up to the individual to make something of it (the seed and what sort of ground it falls on).

BBL: cooking supper.
yes, so do i.
what does that have to do with the subject?


created for good works that God ordained that we should walk in.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
I much rather point people to Christ then to tell them as that doctrine does, "If you are pre-elected, God will see to it you are. So, come to Him whenever. It really does not matter."
this is silly.
i've never heard anyone say anything like this.

if they do, it's no more absurd that saying: righteousness comes by the Law:rolleyes: