I'm not "Preterist".
I believe the tribulation period is yet future, even from our present-day perspective.
I agree, the AC is yet future, from our present-day perspective; he will be "revealed" at the start of the future Trib years, as I've said in many past posts.
I did
not say it did.
Read again, more carefully.
The "great tribulation," i.e. the last 1260 days / 42 mos / 3.5 yrs, NOR the
entire 7-yr tribulation have yet come into play. Certainly not.
They are also
yet future, from our present-day perspective; ONLY verses Lk21:
12-24a speak of the "70ad events" which, as v.12 says, must come "
BEFORE ALL" the beginning of birth pangs that vv.8-11 had just described... and which "beginning of birth pangs" are what "kick off" the
future tribulation period according to Paul speaking of its "ARRIVAL" / its manner of arrival, in 1Th5:2-3 and that passage's correlations / parallel passages.
So, yes, I agree
the trib and its
AC are
"future"... Lk21:
12-24a is referencing
neither of those.
But that passage (Lk21:12-24a)
does supply "chronology" issues.
In Luke 21:12-24a,
the only part of the Olivet Discourse covering the 70ad events, that section starts out informing us that "before" the beginning of birth pangs can occur, the 70ad events of vv.12-24a must take place
including "and they shall be led away captive into all the nations," and "Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles UNTIL..." which are two
lengthy things that correspond with Daniel 9:26b's "desolation
S [
plural] are determined" in
that "sequential" passage of Dan9:24-27a/b/c, with
v.27a/b/c being
yet "future" aka the trib years, and v.26
b identifying the person-of-interest (the AC) of that
"future" time-period.