That says it pleased the Lord. Nothing about the wrath of God being upon Jesus. Try again. Surely you have more than one passage composed of two verses that props up your doctrine.
If Jesus indeed was sacrificed as a substitute for man then that should be your STARTING PLACE.
I totally understand your need for clinical definitions that suit you.
But to be put to death for another and escape the actual wrath of that punishment ( no beating, no bruising, no crushing, no nails, no cross and no death) is one thing, but then to just assume there was no substitute of Gods wrath is taking your clinical definitions into heresy.
He became a curse.
He took upon him the sin of the world.
He experienced Gods rejection.
The JUDGEMENT OF THE WORLD , GODS WRATH, WAS UPON HIM.
IF you leave out substitute then you corrupt Jesus mission.
IOW, You now need to take "wrath" from judgement.
In your new limited "understanding" that you are trying to reframe Jesus mission, you have a need for wrath to become what you have made it.
Basically you are now taking the position that there can not be ANY WRATH in the gt.
Not an ounce or a sliver.
That is silly.
But nonetheless the core of your position.
I notice you left out God killing aaron on horeb.
Was there wrath?
See, i don't need it to be a certain way. You do.
We have 2 COMPLETELY different starting places and defending rabbit trails ( making you go against the word) is what i make my opponent do.
Glad i can just read it and accept it.
That bible you stay away from is not a mental book.
Your mental gymnastics on wrath proves you can not handle multifaceted truth.
We see you guys over and over in that dwarfed mindset of " show me where it says 'white bird' on the white bird" ..." See it can not be a white bird, you guys are liars"
Pure comedy.