The False Teaching (& Truth) of what happens at the Rapture.

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
The resurrection OF the dead is at the end at the great white throne judgment. The resurrection FROM the dead refers to Jesus and His body.
OK, I agree that there are just 2 resurrections; one for the saved and one for the unsaved.
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
"""The fact that John didn't mention others is immaterial. We know that ALL believers from Adam on are included because of all the verses I have shared that clearly speak of a single resurrection of the saved."""

Maybe that is progress.
So you agree rev 20 can not be the first resurrection.
Well, this comment proves that you aren't making any progress at all. I have already proved that it is from ALL the translations that say that.

Only part...( and that resurrection mentioned in rev 20 has no mention of when.
Not difficult to ascertain. It occurs after the Trib.

As it refers to them as ALREADY RESURRECTED)
Not when at all. Nothing about when.
Context does tell us. Sometimes the Bible speaks as if an event has already occurred but hasn't yet. Such as Rom 8:30 - And those he predestined, he also called; those he called, he also justified; those he justified, he also glorified.

Have you been glorified yet? That means receiving an imperishable body.

And the timeframe is way off.
Only in your own mind.

( which is after Armageddon and after the return on white horses. in fact we do not see any Resurrection at the return on white horses . none in the Bible)
Follow the Bible. Start with ch 19 and then just keep reading through at least v.6.
 
Mar 4, 2020
8,614
3,680
113
yes i agree
Definately a pretrib rapture to heaven.
Thanks.
you think I'm promoting pre-trib rapture theology now? If that's how it came off then I sincerely repent of that sin. If anything, I hold to the truth of the post-trib rapture.
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
then we agree rev 20 is not the first resurrection as it has been previously implied.
Why do you continue to ask such a ridiculous question? v.5 plainly SAYS the resurrection of the martyrs is the FIRST resurrection.

.....Can not be, as you pointed out.
i've never "pointed that out". You're just trying to deflect since you have been refuted from Scripture.

Only says they are resurrected some time in the past.
Please quote or cite the actual verse that you think says this.

And we agree they are only part of the resurrection.
Sure. The REST of that resurrection is ALL other believers. 1 Cor 15:23 makes that very clear.

But each in turn: Christ, the firstfruits; then, when he comes, those who belong to him.

Please explain this verse and what is being referred to.
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
We see that the resurrection of 1thes 4 can not be the resurrection of Rev 20.
How do we "see" that? The Bible only speaks of one resurrection for the saved and one for the unsaved.

So please explain how they cannot be the same.

And I also said this in the post you are referring to:

I've asked you to exegete the verses I've quoted over and over, but to no avail.

Why won't you address the verses that I have been sharing?
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
24,791
13,147
113
How do we "see" that? The Bible only speaks of one resurrection for the saved and one for the unsaved.
That does not mean that the first resurrection (the resurrection of the righteous) cannot be in three phases. Why does the Bible compare the first resurrection to a Hebrew harvest? Because a Hebrew harvest was in three phases: (1) the first fruits, (2) the main harvest, and (3) the gleanings. And that is applied exactly to the first resurrection: (1) Christ the First Fruits, then (2) the Resurrection/Rapture which includes the entire Church, and finally (3) the resurrection of the Tribulation saints (Rev 20).

The reason why Revelation 20 connects the first resurrection to the martyred saints is because that chapter also includes the second resurrection (the resurrection of damnation) before the Great White Throne Judgment.
 

ewq1938

Well-known member
Oct 18, 2018
4,929
1,258
113
That does not mean that the first resurrection (the resurrection of the righteous) cannot be in three phases. Why does the Bible compare the first resurrection to a Hebrew harvest?

It doesn't. There isn't three phases of the first resurrection. All the saved dead will rise at the same time.
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
That does not mean that the first resurrection (the resurrection of the righteous) cannot be in three phases.
please explain 1 Cor 15:23 then. But each in turn: Christ, the firstfruits; then, when he comes, those who belong to him.

I see 2 resurrections here: Jesus as the first one, and specifically called "firstfruits", and then ONE MORE, placed "when He comes".

Are there verses that Jesus comes in phases? Please show me if you believe that.

Finally, "those who belong to Him" obviously refers to EVERY saved person in history, because He is the Savior especially of those who believe. That would include everyone from Adam forward.

Why does the Bible compare the first resurrection to a Hebrew harvest?
It doesn't. You only imagine that was what Paul had in mind. Everyone in Paul's day understood what first fruits referred to. And Acts 26:23 specifically says that Jesus was "the first to rise from the dead", an obvious reference to receiving His imperishable glorified body.

Recall how many people were brought back to life BEFORE Jesus was resurrected: widow's son in 1 Kings 17:22, Lazarus, another widow's son, and lots of saints who came out of their graves at the crucifixion. Yet, Jesus is the FIRST human to receive a glorified body. None of the others did.

Because a Hebrew harvest was in three phases: (1) the first fruits, (2) the main harvest, and (3) the gleanings. And that is applied exactly to the first resurrection: (1) Christ the First Fruits, then (2) the Resurrection/Rapture which includes the entire Church, and finally (3) the resurrection of the Tribulation saints (Rev 20).
Nice try. But nope. Your 3 phases are not supported by Scripture. If you were right, the Bible would not refer to believers getting their glorified bodies in the singular.

The reason why Revelation 20 connects the first resurrection to the martyred saints is because that chapter also includes the second resurrection (the resurrection of damnation) before the Great White Throne Judgment.
There is no connection between "those who belong to Him" and the SECOND resurrection at all.
 
Jul 23, 2018
12,199
2,775
113
I say with ALL the authority of the Bible that the resurrection of the martyrs IS the first resurrection. v.5 plainly says so. I gave you many many verses that say that. But you didn't include v.5 in your comments about Rev 20.

The second, or NEXT, resurrection will be of the unsaved, who will be summoned to the GWT.
The ones martyred by the ac is the first resurrection?
 
Jul 23, 2018
12,199
2,775
113
I say with ALL the authority of the Bible that the resurrection of the martyrs IS the first resurrection. v.5 plainly says so. I gave you many many verses that say that. But you didn't include v.5 in your comments about Rev 20.

The second, or NEXT, resurrection will be of the unsaved, who will be summoned to the GWT.
Here it is
5 But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection.

Who is in the first resurrection?

The second resurrection obviously omits those risen in the first.

Again who is in the first resurrection?
 
Jul 23, 2018
12,199
2,775
113
Why do you continue to ask such a ridiculous question? v.5 plainly SAYS the resurrection of the martyrs is the FIRST resurrection.


i've never "pointed that out". You're just trying to deflect since you have been refuted from Scripture.
"""Why do you continue to ask such a ridiculous question? v.5 plainly SAYS the resurrection of the martyrs is the FIRST resurrection."""
So you do confirm those martyred by the ac are the first resurrection?

What about others dying naturally and saved for the last 1900 years?
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
24,791
13,147
113
Where does Christ teach He Returns in Phases before His Second Coming?
That is not what was said. When Christ comes FOR His saints He does not come to the earth but comes "in the air" (or stays well above the earth) while all the saints rise to meet Him. But at the Second Coming He comes down to earth with His saints and angels. And in that coming He also stands on the Mount of Olives, which then splits in two.
And He also destroys those gathered at the battle of Armageddon. The Second Coming is to execute judgment.
 

ewq1938

Well-known member
Oct 18, 2018
4,929
1,258
113
That is not what was said. When Christ comes FOR His saints He does not come to the earth but comes "in the air" (or stays well above the earth) while all the saints rise to meet Him. But at the Second Coming He comes down to earth with His saints and angels.

Same day. He both meets saints in the clouds and also goes to Armageddon with them. It's ONE MORE COMING not three like pre-trib creates.
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
24,791
13,147
113
Same day. He both meets saints in the clouds and also goes to Armageddon with them. It's ONE MORE COMING not three like pre-trib creates.
Why don't you sit down and examine the absolute ABSURDITY of that scenario? Let alone the fact that it ignores the Marriage of the Lamb.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.