Simply, this would destroy the hype we are in.
???
Of course, Hebrews 2:3 -4 acknowdleges, so great salvation spoken by the Lird and the confirmation through signs and wonders the Apostles did inculding the author which is Paul. Yes I am not looking for the answers of mere opinion of men but what the Bible says. Seems to me you have not again diciphered, rightly divided God word through Paul. In 2 Thesallonians 3:17-18, speaks of this truth that the token, a proof that it is his letter is about God' grace. Yet you seem to deny the same grace.
How so?
Hebrews 2:3-4
3 How shall we escape, if we neglect so great salvation; which at the first began to be spoken by the Lord, and was
confirmed unto us by them that heard him;
4 God also bearing them witness, both with signs and wonders, and with divers miracles, and gifts of the Holy Ghost, according to his own will?
Paul already knew what was preached by Christ and His disciples, and therefore didn't need instruction of that preaching, especially when Jesus appeared to Paul personally, which, in Paul's mind, would certainly have confirmed to him that what those he was persecuting had indeed heard what was true for them then, and so no need for confirmation from other men what he saw with his own eyes and heard with his own ears.
I quoted where Paul clearly stated to the churches he had planted that what he taught to him was not taught to him from men, but from Christ:
1 Thessalonians 2:13 For this cause also thank we God without ceasing, because,
when ye received the word of God which ye heard of us, ye received it not as the word of men, but as it is in truth, the word of God, which effectually worketh also in you that believe.
Ephesians 3:3 How that
by revelation he made known unto me the mystery; as I wrote afore in few words,
Not the "word of men," such as what you hear in your Sunday school or from the pulpit when you attend. All of that is the word of men teaching something from the English translations of the Bible, but Paul taught what he had heard directly from God. The writer of Hebrews laid no such foundation as to have heard it all from God directly, but from the eleven apostles.
So, I don't understand how this can be so easily overlooked and trodden under foot on the basis of some seeming similarities in English translations in other passages that simply don't carry the weight of proof for Paul allegedly being the author.
Historically, Clement thought Paul was the author, but Tertullian thought it was Barnabas. So even historically there was broad-based thinking about the authorship with there being no consensus even among the Nicene and Ante Nicene writers that far back in time.
So, realistically, given that the writer of Hebrews was writing only on the side of the Kingdom Gospel rather than the Gospel of Grace as spoken by Paul in 1 Corinthians 15: 1-4, no. They are not at all fixated on the same focus of centrality for the Gospel that is currently in force today, which is faith alone, not by works, as Paul preached exclusively.
MM