The institution of the real presence of Jesus' body in the eucharist.

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
H

Hearer

Guest
#21
Of course he could, no question. but in order for that doctrine to be true, he would habve had to do so at the Last Supper. Do you think the disciples literally atew his flesh pre crucifiaxion?
r
Yes in the form determined by the Holy Spirit and in accordance with Jesus' solemn words. Not then his raw bloody flesh but in the form of bread and wine as is the case with the eucharist.
 
Feb 14, 2011
1,783
4
0
#22
Yes in the form determined by the Holy Spirit and in accordance with Jesus' solemn words. Not then his raw bloody flesh but in the form of bread and wine as is the case with the eucharist.

Very shallow indeed. A religion with no substace,just traditions,and ceremonies. Good for the eyes to see.Corrupt inside, full of dead mans bones.
 
H

Hearer

Guest
#23
Very shallow indeed. A religion with no substace,just traditions,and ceremonies. Good for the eyes to see.Corrupt inside, full of dead mans bones.
The ancient church has a deep spiriituality and prayer-life. It is truly a house of prayer.
 
K

kujo313

Guest
#24
WHO decided which PARABLES to be taken literally and which ones not?
I mean, Jesus said He was a "gate", a "vine" and a shephard. Can I bring my gate to church and say "here He is!" or bring a grape vine?

Jesus was showing us that HE is the Sacrificial Lamb. HE is to save His people in the Passover.

If you think about it, there is no more bread after that last supper. So His "body" is gone. If people say that the Spiritual Gifts died with the apostles, then so did Jesus' "body". They, the people in the room, ate it.

Metaphor. Parable. It all has something to do with the Jewish Feast that was going on at that time. Far from what some religions refer to it today.
 
H

Hearer

Guest
#25
sorry kujo

I am not sure what you mean.

Besides, a spiritual gift given to the apostles which exists to this day is to feed the sheep. To feed the sheep the flesh of Jesus, transubstantiated thoguh prayer and the words of Jesus and the power of the Holy Spirit.

The catholic church thus depends heavily on the power and actions of the Holy Spirit of God and the real presence of Jesus.
 
Feb 14, 2011
1,783
4
0
#26
sorry kujo

I am not sure what you mean.

Besides, a spiritual gift given to the apostles which exists to this day is to feed the sheep. To feed the sheep the flesh of Jesus, transubstantiated thoguh prayer and the words of Jesus and the power of the Holy Spirit.

The catholic church thus depends heavily on the power and actions of the Holy Spirit of God and the real presence of Jesus.
DONT YOU KNOW THAT JESUS IS THE WORD OF GOD? DONT YOU KNOW THAT HIS FLESH IS THE WORD? DONT YOU KNOW THAT EATING HIS FLESH MEANS FEADING YOUR SELF WITH THE WORD? AND NOT WITH BREAD MADE BY MEN?
THE BIBLE IS THE WORD OF GOD AND WE NEED TO INDULGE OURSELVES IN THE WORD. PLEASE NOTE BROTHER.

''WAKEUP''.
 
H

Hearer

Guest
#27
DONT YOU KNOW THAT JESUS IS THE WORD OF GOD? DONT YOU KNOW THAT HIS FLESH IS THE WORD? DONT YOU KNOW THAT EATING HIS FLESH MEANS FEADING YOUR SELF WITH THE WORD? AND NOT WITH BREAD MADE BY MEN?
THE BIBLE IS THE WORD OF GOD AND WE NEED TO INDULGE OURSELVES IN THE WORD. PLEASE NOTE BROTHER.

''WAKEUP''.
Hi

According to John Jesus himself is the living Word. We need to feed on him and his flesh ("sarx" in Greek) and on his real presence not just on his rhema words.

In the catholic church we have two altars. One altar is for the word the other altar is to celabrate Jesus himself as our sacrifice and as the Word made flesh for us.

Jesus died only once but through recollecting his sacrifice we take part in its eternal nature.

Gid bless,
Hearer.
 
K

kujo313

Guest
#28
sorry kujo

I am not sure what you mean.

Besides, a spiritual gift given to the apostles which exists to this day is to feed the sheep. To feed the sheep the flesh of Jesus, transubstantiated thoguh prayer and the words of Jesus and the power of the Holy Spirit.

The catholic church thus depends heavily on the power and actions of the Holy Spirit of God and the real presence of Jesus.
You sure that it's the "flesh of Jesus" and not the Word of God? It HAS to be physical, right? Ain't spiritual?
 
H

Hearer

Guest
#29
You sure that it's the "flesh of Jesus" and not the Word of God? It HAS to be physical, right? Ain't spiritual?
His body and blood, spiritually transformed from bread and wine.The altar of the word is separate and just as important.
 
Feb 14, 2011
1,783
4
0
#30
His body and blood, spiritually transformed from bread and wine.The altar of the word is separate and just as important.
You just fail to understand that jesus is the word of God, and he is the spirit that represents in the bible,the words in the bible are alive,the living words of the bible.
This we must take ,not bread.
 
H

Hearer

Guest
#31
You just fail to understand that jesus is the word of God, and he is the spirit that represents in the bible,the words in the bible are alive,the living words of the bible.
This we must take ,not bread.
sir,

you fail to see we celbrate on two altars, the altar of the word (readings) and the altar of the Word (the presence of Jesus in the sacrifice).

Jesus was the living Word as well as gave us words from God.

You also do not take into account the incarnation, the fact that Jesus came and died in the flesh. That is why we have to consume his flesh.

Docetism is an old heresy that tries to spiritualize Christ and deny he came in the flesh. Which is why the eating of the flesh is so important.

Jesus did not want us merely spiritualizing what he was about. The word flesh is sombre and significant and central. He was not talking about words but his incarnate bloody sacrifice.

John 6 Jesus said...also the Bread that I shall give for the life of the world is My flesh (body).

2John1: 7For many deceivers have gone out into the world, those who do not acknowledge Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh This is the deceiver and the antichrist.
 

dscherck

Banned [Reason: persistent, ongoing Catholic heres
Aug 3, 2009
1,272
3
0
#32
You sure that it's the "flesh of Jesus" and not the Word of God? It HAS to be physical, right? Ain't spiritual?
Why can't it be both? Our Lord makes Himself manifest both in the physical AND spiritual sense. Why do you think He's limited to one or the other?
 

dscherck

Banned [Reason: persistent, ongoing Catholic heres
Aug 3, 2009
1,272
3
0
#33
Of course he could, no question. but in order for that doctrine to be true, he would habve had to do so at the Last Supper. Do you think the disciples literally atew his flesh pre crucifiaxion?
r
He said it was His Flesh. Do you think the one who hung the Earth upon the Heavens is bound by the dictates of time? If He decided to make His Flesh available to the disciples prior to the offering of that same Flesh on the Cross, He is certainly capable of doing so. And He said that what He was offering them was His Flesh. Why should we doubt His words?
 
K

kujo313

Guest
#34
Why can't it be both? Our Lord makes Himself manifest both in the physical AND spiritual sense. Why do you think He's limited to one or the other?
because catholics have the gall to go to an african tribe that worships the sun as their "god" and say "no! he's in this wafer!"

none of that has to do with the fulfillment of any Jewish feast or tradition. It's just image worship.
 

dscherck

Banned [Reason: persistent, ongoing Catholic heres
Aug 3, 2009
1,272
3
0
#35
because catholics have the gall to go to an african tribe that worships the sun as their "god" and say "no! he's in this wafer!"

none of that has to do with the fulfillment of any Jewish feast or tradition. It's just image worship.
Well, in contrast to the African tribes, we do have the word of Our Lord in the Scriptures telling us quite clearly that the bread "is my Body."

This of course perfectly parallels the Jewish Paschal feast where a spotless lamb was eaten. Jesus is the spotless lamb whose flesh must be eaten in fulfillment of the Paschal sacrifice.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#36
I have already responded. We are to eat the Word made flesh, for we live not on bread alone but every word that proceeds from God. This means we have to consume Jesus himself as the Word. We cannot get away from having to eat Jesus as the Word made flesh. The only way this possible is by what Jesus provided when he instituted the eucharist by declaring the bread and wine to be his body and blood.

This differs from the bread fed to the multiitudes because there after Jesus was teaching against worldliness again.

Nowwhere do we see Jesus so solemly declaring the truth. We cannot spiritualize everything that Jesus so solemly said otherwise he did not really come in the flesh nor really die as he said he must and as the scriptures declare!

That is heresy.
No you did not respond to what I posted. You did what everyone else does and are just sticking to a few remote verses and ignoring the rest of the conversation.

Jesus said whoever eats will never hunger, never thirst. never die, Live forever./ be raised by him on the last day. So why do you not believe him? Why do you continually eat food which dies. when jesus said you can eat and never die?
 
K

kujo313

Guest
#37
Well, in contrast to the African tribes, we do have the word of Our Lord in the Scriptures telling us quite clearly that the bread "is my Body."

This of course perfectly parallels the Jewish Paschal feast where a spotless lamb was eaten. Jesus is the spotless lamb whose flesh must be eaten in fulfillment of the Paschal sacrifice.
Actually, Jesus said that His body was to be "broken", not eaten.

(going to take the gate off of his fence because Jesus said He was a gate. duh!)
 
K

kujo313

Guest
#38
Well, in contrast to the African tribes, we do have the word of Our Lord in the Scriptures telling us quite clearly that the bread "is my Body."

This of course perfectly parallels the Jewish Paschal feast where a spotless lamb was eaten. Jesus is the spotless lamb whose flesh must be eaten in fulfillment of the Paschal sacrifice.
We're to celebrate the Passover as a rememberence of Jesus, not because it IS Jesus (it's not).
 

dscherck

Banned [Reason: persistent, ongoing Catholic heres
Aug 3, 2009
1,272
3
0
#39
Actually, Jesus said that His body was to be "broken", not eaten.

(going to take the gate off of his fence because Jesus said He was a gate. duh!)
"Take, Eat, this IS my body, which is broken for you."

Sure seems like we're supposed to eat His Body.

That said, the gate analogy doesn't really make sense here. In that instance, it's quite clear he was speaking figuratively. In the institution of the Eucharist, He's going out of His way to emphasize the literalness of His words.
 

dscherck

Banned [Reason: persistent, ongoing Catholic heres
Aug 3, 2009
1,272
3
0
#40
We're to celebrate the Passover as a rememberence of Jesus, not because it IS Jesus (it's not).
It's a precursor, an sort of prophetic celebration. Christ is the perfect Paschal lamb. And just like the passover lamb, we need to eat His Body.