Peter was a minister to the circumcision (Galatians 2:7-9), and he was quoted as saying this about the mystery that was revealed to Paul in 2 Peter 3:16
As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.
Of course, if you want to believe that Peter understood everything that Paul was taught by the ascended Christ himself, I am fine too. Its not a salvific issue.
As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.
Of course, if you want to believe that Peter understood everything that Paul was taught by the ascended Christ himself, I am fine too. Its not a salvific issue.
But, 2 Peter 3:10 KJV is perfect harmony with Paul's easily understood words about the coming of the Lord:
When speaking of "the day of Christ" and when "that day" shall come (the same singular day, not two "days" separated by 7 years), did not Paul say the Man of Sin must be revealed before the "gathering together" of the saints, and that the Lord shall destroy the wicked "with the brightness of His coming"?
Yes, both Peter and Paul taught when the Lord comes as "a thief in the night" it will be accompanied by destruction.
Let's not indict the Lord on charges that He failed to adequately warn the church about the most important event in Earth's history since Calvary, OK?