The natural man

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#61
It’s actually quite simple

blessed are the poor in spirit for theirs is the kingdom

be like the tax collector and cry out for gods mercy

Confess with your moth the lord and believe in your heart,

ie

1 become bancrupt in spirit
2. believe in gods provision
3. all out to God
 
Jun 11, 2020
1,370
424
83
73
#62
Thanks, You and I will never understand fully all of the purposes of God, because his ways are much higher than our ways, but I believe that his Holy Ghost has given us enough truths, purposes, that we are able to give an answer to anyone that asks us of the hope that is within us. God does not plan, God purposes. Plans can fail, but God's purposes never fail.
Go well brother.
 

throughfaith

Well-known member
Aug 4, 2020
10,467
1,593
113
#63
I think that we agree on the basics. Any man who believes in Messiah, or Christ, whether looking forward like Moses, David and Elijah, whether on the spot like Peter, or whether looking backward like you and I, is born again. The proof of this is irrevocable. Moses and Elijah were on the Mount of Transfiguration in Matthew 17, and that was the Kingdom according to our Lord Himself. And David will be raised a king of Israel (Jer.30:9). Only one born again can see the Kingdom (Jn.3:3-5). What we stumble on (both of us), is that we work in time and God is not so restricted. I will explain my viewpoint thus.

God is eternal. He has no beginning and no end. But God is a Spirit (Jn.4:24). The God-Man Jesus had a beginning. Jehovah says, of Jesus, "this DAY I have begotten you". Both "day" and "begetting" had a beginning. What happened is that the eternal God ADDED something to Himself IN TIME - humanity. Now, this where we come to the limits of our intellect. Was our Lord Jesus born 4,000 years after Adam in Bethlehem, or was He the "Firstborn of Creation" (Col.1:15). Well .... BOTH. But this offends the human intellect. In TIME it is EITHER, OR! It cannot be both. But it is BOTH. God says so in His immutable councils.

The paradox lies in the limits of the human intellect, not in God's Omniscience. WE may ask, how is it that our Lord is before Abraham, or even that He made everything Himself the Man being the first of this creation. But His crucifixion was "from the foundation of the world". My answer is, anything that the eternal God adds to Himself in time is added to His deity and becomes everlasting - that is, not subject to time. So although our Lord is not the first man ever raised from the dead, He is nevertheless "the Firstborn from the dead". But for our limited intellect, God reveals a SEQUENCE to teach us the grand truths. And the grand truth is that God wanted men. He wanted men to display Him by being the only creature in His image and likeness. And He wanted man to be His House - His dwelling on earth. So to achieve this, God sets a sequence of events IN TIME that explain the process that has become everlasting.

This sequence is, (i) incarnation - the Second Person of the Godhead takes human form, (ii) human life - the God-Man lives through all the experiences of life, (iii) human life under Law - the God-Man establishes a righteousness in all the demands of God, (iv) human obedience OUTSIDE of Law - the God-man agrees to the will of the Father to die for the guilty - something NOT required by Law, (v) human death - His deity is untouched because it is eternal, but He dies like every other man, (vi) human resurrection - to experience Hades first and then be made alive again in a glorified body, and (vii) human vindication - He is approved of God by being seated in God's Throne, but must still be set on His Throne over the earth (that is why no Christian should seek political office. His Master has not yet done this and should have preeminence in ALL things.

In this process OVER TIME God shows the ADDITION of human attributes ADDED to the Godhead so that when God does infuse a man, the man receives the accomplished work of Christ as a PACKAGE. For instance, 1st Corinthians 15:45 says that the "last Adam BECAME the life-giving Spirit". The word "BECAME" implies that He was not that before, but now is. But this produces a difficulty. The Spirit with His power to resurrect was there in all eternity. YES, BUT .... God wanted to add this to MAN. It is:- "The last ADAM", indicating that the Last Adam, Jesus Christ, has the power of resurrection in His humanity. And so He is able to say in John 10:18 that He has the power to lay down His life and the power to take it up again.

Now, in John 7:39 our Lord Jesus had gone through nearly the whole process IN TIME. Incarnation, human life, a Man under Law, and a ma obedient to God outside of Law, were all accomplished. But a very important factor was missing. The wages of sin is death, so if our Lord Jesus had failed to atone for just one little itsy-bitsy sin, He could not be resurrected, and we would still be in our sins. So the resurrection of Jesus was not only to add resurrection to the God-Man, but it was God's irrevocable proof that all sins had been dealt with. Until this proof was established, the God-Man, as the Spirit which gives to men the full PACKAGE of the God-Man, could not be given. This is the process of establishing the full human experience into the Godhead, so that He can dispense Himself into man and have men LIKE HIM. It was established in TIME by a series of events. But when added to Deity, it became everlasting.

So you are right. Adam believed God concerning Eve's Seed. Adam did not have full knowledge of the atonement work of Christ, but he believed and called Eve "mother of the LIVING". Abraham and Job followed, believing in the RESURRECTION even though they were sinners. Moses and David had a better view of Jesus, but their view of Jesus was enough for FAITH to do its work. Peter is given a vision. Paul is given a vision. And every Christian looking back on, and who believes in Jesus, THOUGH HIS KNOWLEDGE IS NOT COMPLETE, is born again and receives the Spirit of John 7:39. How can we be sure? Because in 2nd Timothy 2:10, "... we obtain the salvation which is in Christ Jesus with eternal glory." And in Hebrews 5:9; "And being made perfect, he became the author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him". The salvation of Jesus Christ has BOTH eternal glory and is eternal. But the AUTHOR of this salvation "BECAME ... !" That means that He was not the author, and then went through a process that made Him that later.

I define this a "LOGICAL MYSTERY" - a contradiction in itself, but nevertheless TRUE. It is so logically set forth in God's Word, but it possesses a factor that the human intellect cannot quite grasp. Which just shows how high our God is, and that we should bow our knee that He even deigns to reveal this to men.
I do not believe anyone was born again until Jesus was Glorified . So no one was regenerated in the Old testament. Also I'm not sure what you mean by ' looking forward ' . Peter was not looking forward to the cross . He tried to prevent Jesus from going. He also chopped a man's ear off for trying to take him . None of the diciples understood the very thing that you could want to look ' forward ' to ?
 

throughfaith

Well-known member
Aug 4, 2020
10,467
1,593
113
#64
I think that we agree on the basics. Any man who believes in Messiah, or Christ, whether looking forward like Moses, David and Elijah, whether on the spot like Peter, or whether looking backward like you and I, is born again. The proof of this is irrevocable. Moses and Elijah were on the Mount of Transfiguration in Matthew 17, and that was the Kingdom according to our Lord Himself. And David will be raised a king of Israel (Jer.30:9). Only one born again can see the Kingdom (Jn.3:3-5). What we stumble on (both of us), is that we work in time and God is not so restricted. I will explain my viewpoint thus.

God is eternal. He has no beginning and no end. But God is a Spirit (Jn.4:24). The God-Man Jesus had a beginning. Jehovah says, of Jesus, "this DAY I have begotten you". Both "day" and "begetting" had a beginning. What happened is that the eternal God ADDED something to Himself IN TIME - humanity. Now, this where we come to the limits of our intellect. Was our Lord Jesus born 4,000 years after Adam in Bethlehem, or was He the "Firstborn of Creation" (Col.1:15). Well .... BOTH. But this offends the human intellect. In TIME it is EITHER, OR! It cannot be both. But it is BOTH. God says so in His immutable councils.

The paradox lies in the limits of the human intellect, not in God's Omniscience. WE may ask, how is it that our Lord is before Abraham, or even that He made everything Himself the Man being the first of this creation. But His crucifixion was "from the foundation of the world". My answer is, anything that the eternal God adds to Himself in time is added to His deity and becomes everlasting - that is, not subject to time. So although our Lord is not the first man ever raised from the dead, He is nevertheless "the Firstborn from the dead". But for our limited intellect, God reveals a SEQUENCE to teach us the grand truths. And the grand truth is that God wanted men. He wanted men to display Him by being the only creature in His image and likeness. And He wanted man to be His House - His dwelling on earth. So to achieve this, God sets a sequence of events IN TIME that explain the process that has become everlasting.

This sequence is, (i) incarnation - the Second Person of the Godhead takes human form, (ii) human life - the God-Man lives through all the experiences of life, (iii) human life under Law - the God-Man establishes a righteousness in all the demands of God, (iv) human obedience OUTSIDE of Law - the God-man agrees to the will of the Father to die for the guilty - something NOT required by Law, (v) human death - His deity is untouched because it is eternal, but He dies like every other man, (vi) human resurrection - to experience Hades first and then be made alive again in a glorified body, and (vii) human vindication - He is approved of God by being seated in God's Throne, but must still be set on His Throne over the earth (that is why no Christian should seek political office. His Master has not yet done this and should have preeminence in ALL things.

In this process OVER TIME God shows the ADDITION of human attributes ADDED to the Godhead so that when God does infuse a man, the man receives the accomplished work of Christ as a PACKAGE. For instance, 1st Corinthians 15:45 says that the "last Adam BECAME the life-giving Spirit". The word "BECAME" implies that He was not that before, but now is. But this produces a difficulty. The Spirit with His power to resurrect was there in all eternity. YES, BUT .... God wanted to add this to MAN. It is:- "The last ADAM", indicating that the Last Adam, Jesus Christ, has the power of resurrection in His humanity. And so He is able to say in John 10:18 that He has the power to lay down His life and the power to take it up again.

Now, in John 7:39 our Lord Jesus had gone through nearly the whole process IN TIME. Incarnation, human life, a Man under Law, and a ma obedient to God outside of Law, were all accomplished. But a very important factor was missing. The wages of sin is death, so if our Lord Jesus had failed to atone for just one little itsy-bitsy sin, He could not be resurrected, and we would still be in our sins. So the resurrection of Jesus was not only to add resurrection to the God-Man, but it was God's irrevocable proof that all sins had been dealt with. Until this proof was established, the God-Man, as the Spirit which gives to men the full PACKAGE of the God-Man, could not be given. This is the process of establishing the full human experience into the Godhead, so that He can dispense Himself into man and have men LIKE HIM. It was established in TIME by a series of events. But when added to Deity, it became everlasting.

So you are right. Adam believed God concerning Eve's Seed. Adam did not have full knowledge of the atonement work of Christ, but he believed and called Eve "mother of the LIVING". Abraham and Job followed, believing in the RESURRECTION even though they were sinners. Moses and David had a better view of Jesus, but their view of Jesus was enough for FAITH to do its work. Peter is given a vision. Paul is given a vision. And every Christian looking back on, and who believes in Jesus, THOUGH HIS KNOWLEDGE IS NOT COMPLETE, is born again and receives the Spirit of John 7:39. How can we be sure? Because in 2nd Timothy 2:10, "... we obtain the salvation which is in Christ Jesus with eternal glory." And in Hebrews 5:9; "And being made perfect, he became the author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him". The salvation of Jesus Christ has BOTH eternal glory and is eternal. But the AUTHOR of this salvation "BECAME ... !" That means that He was not the author, and then went through a process that made Him that later.

I define this a "LOGICAL MYSTERY" - a contradiction in itself, but nevertheless TRUE. It is so logically set forth in God's Word, but it possesses a factor that the human intellect cannot quite grasp. Which just shows how high our God is, and that we should bow our knee that He even deigns to reveal this to men.
Are you saying they were regenerated in the OT ?
 

ForestGreenCook

Well-known member
Jul 8, 2018
8,396
1,204
113
#65
Could you give a simple example?
Every time that you use some scripture that you think gives the natural man the ability to understand the things of the Spirit, and I then give you a scripture that does not harmonize with your theory and interpretation of the scripture that you are using to make the natural man have spiritual ability. There are plenty of my posts to reflect that. Refresh your memory by rechecking them.
 

ForestGreenCook

Well-known member
Jul 8, 2018
8,396
1,204
113
#66
The majority of believers do not understand the things of the Spirit.Some people hear the Gospel several times ,even over many years until they finally believe. Which contradicts Calvinism
I have, also, told you many times that when a newly born babe in Christ is first born, he survives on the milk of the word, not understanding much until he gradually grows into maturity. There are some things about God that you, nor I do not know, and probably never will know, because his ways are much higher than our ways. The unregenerate natural man, on the other hand, knows nothing about the things of the Spirit.
 

ForestGreenCook

Well-known member
Jul 8, 2018
8,396
1,204
113
#67
Peter could have only have been given the Holy Spirit until After the resurrection, namely Acts 2 .
38He that believeth on me, as the scripture hath said, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water.
39(But this spake he of the Spirit, which they that believe on him should receive: for the Holy Ghost was not yet given; because that Jesus was not yet glorified.) Notice in John 7 the Holy Spirit had not yet been given and look at the reason why? This is the bible completely refuting your Calvinism.
How many times am I going to have to explain the different functions of the Holy Spirit, as the quickening Holy Spirit, and the revelator which is the Holy Ghost?.
 

ForestGreenCook

Well-known member
Jul 8, 2018
8,396
1,204
113
#69
Its bad enough that some Arminians teach you can lose salvation without calvinists saying some cannot even believe the Gospel to even be saved.
The Gospel is good news to all who hear and believe and don't believe. Its Still good news ,that Jesus has died for their sins . I believe the weeping in hell will be because of the awful realisation that they refused to believe the good news so as to be saved .
Believing the gospel is not the cause of eternal salvation, but a product of already having been saved eternally.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#70
Believing the gospel is not the cause of eternal salvation, but a product of already having been saved eternally.
This is out there my friend. Beliefe is not the result of justification it is the cause of it.

and you wonder why people have a hard time with your theology
 

throughfaith

Well-known member
Aug 4, 2020
10,467
1,593
113
#71
Every time that you use some scripture that you think gives the natural man the ability to understand the things of the Spirit, and I then give you a scripture that does not harmonize with your theory and interpretation of the scripture that you are using to make the natural man have spiritual ability. There are plenty of my posts to reflect that. Refresh your memory by rechecking them.
Read Romans 7 and see that we are still the Natural man also . We yield to one or the other.
 

throughfaith

Well-known member
Aug 4, 2020
10,467
1,593
113
#72
Believing the gospel is not the cause of eternal salvation, but a product of already having been saved eternally.
Scripture says otherwise Eph 1 .13-14 . Your working off . " it has to be the case because, I know this to be true ...."
 

throughfaith

Well-known member
Aug 4, 2020
10,467
1,593
113
#73
Believing the gospel is not the cause of eternal salvation, but a product of already having been saved eternally.
This is the error your making . No one is saying believing ' causes' . God ' causes ' when we believe . Its all God . He just doesn't believe for us . 1cor 1.21 . Eph 1 .13,14
 

throughfaith

Well-known member
Aug 4, 2020
10,467
1,593
113
#74
Believing the gospel is not the cause of eternal salvation, but a product of already having been saved eternally.
Thats because you have the cart before the horse . See folks may say " oh your always on at calvinists ..." Well out of all the theology within christianity, and I don't say this just to be sensational. But its the furthest off Biblically. I was shocked when i first started to look into this. It all started when i questioned works based salvation . I noticed Calvinsm for all its claims on OSAS , practically ( and I say this carefully) is a works based theology. It is a legalistic based theology. The more i looked beyond the P i was shocked to see how its possible the the system is so off and yet its called ' Christian ' . I don't say it to be mean . I've seen lots of people come out from it and be all the better for it . Thats my heart.
 
Jun 11, 2020
1,370
424
83
73
#75
I do not believe anyone was born again until Jesus was Glorified . So no one was regenerated in the Old testament. Also I'm not sure what you mean by ' looking forward ' . Peter was not looking forward to the cross . He tried to prevent Jesus from going. He also chopped a man's ear off for trying to take him . None of the diciples understood the very thing that you could want to look ' forward ' to ?
Actually, I said Peter was "on the spot" - meaning that he was together with our Lord. He neither looked forward (in time) to Messiah, nor did he look backwards (in time) as we do. As to hindering our Lord Jesus' death, you propose a difficulty. Are we born again because of Christ's death? Or is it an act of the Holy Spirit in the spirit of a man (Jn.3:6)? The death of our Lord was for sin and sins - a work of atonement OUTSIDE of us. Being BORN is by FAITH in Jesus - a Person (Jn.1:12-13, 3:14-16).

But as to being born again, I tend to agree with you - based on John 7:39 and 20:22. But it raises a difficulty. Both Moses and Elijah, AND three of twelve Apostles were on the Mount of Transfiguration and our Lord Jesus calls that His Kingdom (Matt.16:28). To SEE the Kingdom, a man must be born again. Thus, Moses, Elijah and three Apostles must have been born again BEFORE Christ was risen. Even more difficult is that a man's lifetime is all the time he has to believe. Hebrews 9:27 gives the next event as judgment. Moses must have become born again before he died - some 1,500 years before Christ was raised from the dead. And even more difficult is that Moses must have been in RESURRECTION to be in the Kingdom because (i) his body is fought for in Jude, and (ii) the old body is not fit for the Kingdom (1st Cor.15:50).

Now, maybe you are getting an inkling of why we must address the PROCESS of Christ as both God and Man IN TIME and IN ETERNITY - our "LOGICAL MYSTERY" - as I did in my previous posting. It is a complicated business, and somewhere along the way we will reach the limit of our human intellect. Scripture cannot be wrong, but we have limited understanding.

May the Lord bless us and give us His light on the subject.
 

ForestGreenCook

Well-known member
Jul 8, 2018
8,396
1,204
113
#77
Read Romans 7 and see that we are still the Natural man also . We yield to one or the other.
I have admitted, and confirm that the scriptures teach that after we are regenerated, we still carry the baggage of our fleshly nature with us, which causes a warfare within us of the Spirit against the flesh. Before we have been regenerated, we have only one personality, but after regeneration, we have two personalities.
 

ForestGreenCook

Well-known member
Jul 8, 2018
8,396
1,204
113
#78
Scripture says otherwise Eph 1 .13-14 . Your working off . " it has to be the case because, I know this to be true ...."
You keep repeating the same scriptures that we have discussed previously. I do not think it is profitable to keep repeating them.
 

ForestGreenCook

Well-known member
Jul 8, 2018
8,396
1,204
113
#79
This is the error your making . No one is saying believing ' causes' . God ' causes ' when we believe . Its all God . He just doesn't believe for us . 1cor 1.21 . Eph 1 .13,14
I am making no error! "Save" in 1 Cor 21 is not referring to eternal deliverance, but a deliverance, here in time, There is a deliverance (salvation), for believing babes in Christ, when they come unto a knowledge of the righteousness of God, by preaching to them, the gospel.

The purpose of God's called preachers, is not to save (deliver) people eternally, God has already accomplished that by his sovereign grace, without the help of mankind, but it is to deliver (save) his regenerated babes in Christ from a lack of knowledge of the gospel, that reveals to them how that God has already accomplished their eternal deliverance (salvation).
 

ForestGreenCook

Well-known member
Jul 8, 2018
8,396
1,204
113
#80
Thats because you have the cart before the horse . See folks may say " oh your always on at calvinists ..." Well out of all the theology within christianity, and I don't say this just to be sensational. But its the furthest off Biblically. I was shocked when i first started to look into this. It all started when i questioned works based salvation . I noticed Calvinsm for all its claims on OSAS , practically ( and I say this carefully) is a works based theology. It is a legalistic based theology. The more i looked beyond the P i was shocked to see how its possible the the system is so off and yet its called ' Christian ' . I don't say it to be mean . I've seen lots of people come out from it and be all the better for it . Thats my heart.
I commend you on your dedication to study. And believe that you are sincere in your beliefs, but I encourage you to keep an open mind to the scriptures that I am referring to you.

The largest problem with almost all of the regenerated children of God is; that they do not understand the difference in the salvation scriptures. Salvation, saved and save, by Strong's interpretation, means; deliverance, delivered and deliver. The scriptures teach that there is an eternal deliverance, and there are deliverance's that the regenerate receive here in time.

The scriptures, also, teach that the truths of the doctrine of Christ are limited to the few, the remnant, the 144000. and become a mystery to the rest of God's regenerated children. I do not understand many of God's purposes, and this one confuses me the most, because the doctrine of Christ is the most comforting, secure, and peace offering doctrine of any that I have confronted.

I realise that Christ's doctrine is very unpopular with the majority, because of the limitation of it, and rightly so, but it has always been accepted in this way sense the days in which Christ preached it himself.

I know, without a doubt, that I will receive the harshest criticism from all on this forum, and be tagged as conceded, and prideful, but all that I ask, is that you keep an open mind, and seriously think about what I am presenting.