A covenant can be broken because there are two parties involved. One or the other can break the covenant.
With that said, making void, or disannulling the covenant cannot be done by anybody else except the one who initiated it, and wrote the terms thereof.
Therefore if the covenant/contract is broken by the one who agreed to the terms, the one who initiated it has the right to take legal action.
There is only one way that legal action is not taken, and that is if the covenant is voided out by the initiator.
Now religion can say that the legal action was taken out on Jesus Christ at Calvary. I believe that.
With that said, we also have to realize that there is still a covenant through Christ. What happens if we break that covenant. Legal action is exacted the same way as the old covenant unless it is made void by the initiator.
Question then, "If we break the covenant of Christ, does that covenant also become disannulled, abolished, and void henceforth having no consequence?
If that be the case, what is the purpose of faith?
With that said, making void, or disannulling the covenant cannot be done by anybody else except the one who initiated it, and wrote the terms thereof.
Therefore if the covenant/contract is broken by the one who agreed to the terms, the one who initiated it has the right to take legal action.
There is only one way that legal action is not taken, and that is if the covenant is voided out by the initiator.
Now religion can say that the legal action was taken out on Jesus Christ at Calvary. I believe that.
With that said, we also have to realize that there is still a covenant through Christ. What happens if we break that covenant. Legal action is exacted the same way as the old covenant unless it is made void by the initiator.
Question then, "If we break the covenant of Christ, does that covenant also become disannulled, abolished, and void henceforth having no consequence?
If that be the case, what is the purpose of faith?