If this is right, then please, Give me scripture. I can on the other hand give you many passages that will show my side. Though due to my own rules for this, I will give you just one at this time.
Act 22:3
“I am indeed a Jew, born in Tarsus of Cilicia, but brought up in this city at the feet of Gamaliel, taught according to the strictness of our fathers' law, and was zealous toward God as you all are today.
I do ask that read this in context please. However for one to say that Paul told us we do not need the Law, would they not first need to remove his words in this passage?
As always what God calls together Satan works to seperate it and vice versa. Two kinds of law. One in respect to the things of God and the other in respect to the things of sinful men .The latter offends our God
Continuing the context in order to get to the point of Paul reasoning for changing denominations from the Pharisees with Sadducees to the Nazarene sect/denomination as one of the leaders. Before his conversion it reads
And I persecuted this way
unto the death, binding and delivering into prisons both men and women.As also the high priest doth bear me witness, and all the estate of the elders: from whom also
I received letters unto the brethren, and went to Damascus, to bring them which were there bound unto Jerusalem
, for to be punished. Act 22:4-5
That zealously was false and in the end shows the law of the fathers as another kind of law that comes after men whom Christ called a brood of vipers. By those oral traditions of men, men walked after the flesh as that seen and attempted to kill what they perceived was the competition (the Christians) as in out of sight out of mind. It is the same kind of law of men that the Catholics used as a carbon copy of the fifteenth century reformation.
For we have found this man a pestilent fellow, and a mover of sedition among all the Jews throughout the world, and a ringleader of the
sect of the
Nazarenes:Who also hath gone about to profane the temple: whom we took, and would have judged
according to our law. Act 24:5 …….Not the law of God but as commandments of men
No matter how hard they tried to make all things written in the law and the prophets (sola scriptura) without effect they could not prove it was heresy (a private interpretation of men ) lacking the law of the fathers.
Neither can they prove the things whereof they now accuse me.But this I confess unto thee, that after
the way which they
call heresy, so worship I the God
of my fathers, believing all things which are written in the law and in the prophets: Act 24:13
Again a distinction must be made between the law of God as in all things written in the law and the prophets by the finger of God and those oral tradition as commandments of men .
The difference being Paul worshipped the God of the fathers but the Jews that did not have the Spirit of Christ worshipped their fathers as if were gods that came down in the likeness of men .Therefore in the end of the matter violating the warning to call no man Father or Rabi on earth for one is our Father/Rabbi/Master in heaven