I am with you up to here 100 %
.
And here is where we depart. If your talking about maintaining salvation.
Because if you are, you just contradicted what you said above.. You can not claim we are saved by faith alone, Then demand Jesus said we MUST (it is a requirement) that we do works.. Those are contradictions.
The only people claim that ANYONE says this is the group of people attacking those who preach salvation y grace alone through faith alone.
No one that I know, nor myself, teaches otherwise..
Again, The only people preaching otherwise are those who are attacking those who believe in salvation by grace alone through faith alone.. Maybe you need to start reading what they are saying, then you will understand where we are coming from.
Those who suggest fruit is required to maintain, or get saved, are the ones who are in trouble. Because they are teaching self righteous salvation.
Those who teach salvation by grace alone through true saving faith alone would teach that fruit is an automatic result of being saved and faith (see the faith hall of fame in hebrews)
When you add the word MUST, you are adding law to grace, be careful how you word things, If you do not believe they are required to maintain salvation, The reason you are getting flack is because you add the word must,, Must means it is required, And is far different than WILL..
.
And here is where we depart. If your talking about maintaining salvation.
Because if you are, you just contradicted what you said above.. You can not claim we are saved by faith alone, Then demand Jesus said we MUST (it is a requirement) that we do works.. Those are contradictions.
The only people claim that ANYONE says this is the group of people attacking those who preach salvation y grace alone through faith alone.
No one that I know, nor myself, teaches otherwise..
Again, The only people preaching otherwise are those who are attacking those who believe in salvation by grace alone through faith alone.. Maybe you need to start reading what they are saying, then you will understand where we are coming from.
Those who suggest fruit is required to maintain, or get saved, are the ones who are in trouble. Because they are teaching self righteous salvation.
Those who teach salvation by grace alone through true saving faith alone would teach that fruit is an automatic result of being saved and faith (see the faith hall of fame in hebrews)
When you add the word MUST, you are adding law to grace, be careful how you word things, If you do not believe they are required to maintain salvation, The reason you are getting flack is because you add the word must,, Must means it is required, And is far different than WILL..
Are you telling us there is no fruit bearing in your relationship with Jesus and the kingdom at all?