"Torah Observers" don't follow the clean meat laws

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Nov 22, 2015
20,436
1,430
0
#81
Revelation 14:12 (KJV)

Here is the patience of the saints:

here
are they that keep the commandments of God,

and the faith of Jesus.
And what are the commandments of God in the New Covenant? These commandments are not the Old Covenant as that is a goner. Law-keepers see "commandments" and all they can think of is the Old Covenant. We live in the New Covenant now.

1 John 3:23 (NASB)
[SUP]23 [/SUP] This is His commandment,that we believe in the name of His Son Jesus Christ, and love one another, just as He commanded us.

 
F

FreeNChrist

Guest
#82
MacBestus can defend himself, but I don't find it improper for myself to give a response since you could levy the same charge against me, since he and I obviously share many of the same beliefs against which you are making your charges.

It is disappointing and unfair that you make these charges against us. We have repeatedly explained that our trust and hope is in Messiah Yeshua-Jesus and that we do not study Torah-Law to merit salvation, but do so because we are saved and want to understand Torah-Law the way that Messiah did and walk it the same way that He did. So it's unfair to say that we have "replaced Jesus with the Torah" -- He is there in our focus front and center! There would be absolutely no desire in us to study Torah-Law or walk as He walked if He was not the center of our focus! It would be just as unfair for us to say that some folks on this board have replaced Jesus with Paul. And trust me, many of us could easily build cases to argue that some folks here have put Paul's words over Messiah's words and have too much of a focus on Paul's writings over the gospels and very words of the Messiah. I won't do that because regardless of the esteem that some give Paul and his writings, I understand that they believe Messiah is the center of their focus. Why do you not show us that same courtesy? Or do you really want to get into a debate about who is focused more on the Messiah and esteeming His words above all others? I don't think that would be very profitable for any of us.

It's a little ironic that you are calling us out on not going by the term "Christian" (which, by the way, is not a consensus among Messianics and HRM -- I personally have no problem using the term to describe myself to other mainstream Christians). We generally mean it today to describe a follower of Messiah Yeshua-Jesus. Following on what I said in my previous paragraph, how are we not "Christians" (by the common definition of the word) when our stated desire is to follow Him and highly esteem His words, to walk as He walked? The irony is that I have seen non-Torah-observant folks on this board (some who describe themselves as hyper-grace folks) straightforwardly admit that they do not aspire to walk as Messiah walked and view their understanding of Paul's writings (as well as Peter and James -- basically all post-Gospel NT writings) as more relevant to the Christian today than the Messiah's words. And yet, we Messianics and HRM are charged as the ones not suited for the term "Christian"? Can we make a similar charge against those other folks and call them "Paulians"? No, that wouldn't be productive or beneficial at all.

Brother, I understand you are zealous to follow God and our Messiah -- so are we! So please, stop bringing the false charges against us and try to understand where we are coming from. Just because our beliefs don't align with your understanding of Scripture doesn't mean we have replaced Messiah Yeshua-Jesus with anything or are not desiring to follow Him. On Torah-Law, we have already said repeatedly that our trust and hope is not in the Torah-Law -- that is only in Messiah. And our study and application of the commands of the Torah-Law are a result of our desire to follow Him in the best way we can and believe is in accordance with His walk and the will of the Father as shown throughout the breadth of Scripture.

Blessings to you on your personal journey.
I have made no "charges", but merely accepted what has been said as being what is actually believed.
 
S

sparty-g

Guest
#83
He did that because he was told to do so by James and the other elders because of religious pressure - because it didn't take long for the Judaizers to come in and water down the gospel by bringing the law into it and defiling it with their leaven.

Look at the mess that this ill-advised "wisdom of man" created. The Lord needed to use Gentiles to rescue Paul from the Jewish religious people that were "zealous for the law of Moses."

The Jewish law-keepers that became believers were "zealous for the law". It didn't take them long to defile the gospel of the grace of Christ with their law-keeping requirements.

Acts 21:20-21 (NASB)
[SUP]20 [/SUP] And when they heard it they began glorifying God; and they said to him, "You see, brother, how many thousands there are among the Jews of those who have believed, and they are all zealous for the Law;

[SUP]21 [/SUP] and they have been told about you, that you are teaching all the Jews who are among the Gentiles to forsake Moses, telling them not to circumcise their children nor to walk according to the customs.

The truth is - Paul did say in Galatians that if they circumcised - they make the grace of God of no effect.

Galatians 5:2-4 (NASB)
[SUP]2 [/SUP] Behold I, Paul, say to you that if you receive circumcision, Christ will be of no benefit to you.

[SUP]3 [/SUP] And I testify again to every man who receives circumcision, that he is under obligation to keep the whole Law.

[SUP]4 [/SUP] You have been severed from Christ, you who are seeking to be justified by law; you have fallen from grace.
I'm sorry, but this is a very nonsensical interpretation of what happened there between Paul and James. Please re-read the verses again:

When they heard this, they praised God. Then they said to Paul: “You see, brother, how many thousands of Jews have believed, and all of them are zealous for the law. They have been informed that you teach all the Jews who live among the Gentiles to turn away from Moses, telling them not to circumcise their children or live according to our customs. What shall we do? They will certainly hear that you have come, so do what we tell you. There are four men with us who have made a vow. Take these men, join in their purification rites and pay their expenses, so that they can have their heads shaved. Then everyone will know there is no truth in these reports about you, but that you yourself are living in obedience to the law. -- Acts 21:20-24 (NIV)

The dilemma is clear: The Jewish followers of Messiah Yeshua-Jesus in Jerusalem "have been informed that [Paul] teach[es] all the Jews who live among the Gentiles to turn away from Moses, telling them not to circumcise their children or live according to [their] customs." James knows the reports are untrue -- twisted interpretations of what Paul is preaching and teaching. James' recommendation to Paul is for him to demonstrate that "there is no truth in these reports about you, but that you yourself are living in obedience to the law."

What you are suggesting -- saying that Paul did indeed teach the Jewish people not to circumcise their children and that the public demonstration was only suggested and done because of religious pressure -- amounts to a massive public deception. Essentially, you're saying that Paul and James colluded to trick the entire Jewish believing community in Jerusalem into believing a lie: that Paul is actually a different man than they are intending to make them think. I'm sorry, but dealing strictly with the text at hand here, there is absolutely no way to exegete that from the passage. The language itself does not allow for it and, even worse, the moral implications of it are appalling. You're attempting to make the final verse read as this:

Then everyone will falsely believe there is no truth in these reports about you, but that you yourself are living in obedience to the law. (but the reports are actually true and you do not live in obedience to the law)

The proper interpretation of the passage is straightforward: James knows the reports about Paul are untrue and advises he make a public demonstration to show they are untrue and that he himself keeps the Torah-Law, to which Paul agrees. It cannot be interpreted any other way. Suppose I wrote something like this:

Sparty-g's friend told Sparty-g, "My coworkers have been informed that you do not have a newborn son. What shall we do? They will certainly hear that you've come to the office holiday party, so do this: show up to the office party with your newborn son and even bring his birth certificate. Then everyone will know there is no truth in these reports about you, but that you do have a newborn son."

How could you read that and conclude that I do not actually have a newborn son? If you apply your same interpretation of the passage in Acts to this scenario, then you have to conclude that I do not have a newborn son, and that I brought someone else's child and a fake birth certificate to the party in order to deceive everyone.

I know your personal theology does not allow you to accept the idea that Paul, even after putting his trust in Messiah Yeshua-Jesus, continued to keep the Torah-Law. But really, you believe it was a grand public deception? And you believe that Paul would go to the extreme of making a false vow with God in order to further perpetuate the public deception? Both of these are very, very bad things to do.

Moreover, your interpretation of Galatians 5 is incorrect. To start, Paul is addressing uncircumcised men (non-Jews). Jewish men are circumcised as boys on the eighth day -- they don't make the conscience decision to become circumcised. So no, he wasn't teaching Jewish people not to circumcise their children here -- they are not even his audience here.

Also, you've missed the entire context and point of this letter: Pharisee brothers in Messiah Yeshua-Jesus were teaching the new non-Jewish believers in Galatia that they had to be circumcised in order to be saved. This is clearly a false doctrine, for salvation is by God's grace through faith. The non-Jewish believers were at risk of falling from grace because they became panicked by believing the false doctrine: they once believed they were saved by grace, but when they heard the message of the Pharisee brothers, they began to doubt they were actually saved. This means they were not actually putting their trust in Messiah Yeshua-Jesus for salvation. So yes, if they take their trust off of Him, believe the lie that they were not actually saved, and then perform ritual conversion through circumcision in order to (as they would have believed) become saved, then yes, they would have fallen from grace, and they are indebted to keep the entire Torah-Law, because their trust is not in Messiah Yeshua-Jesus for salvation, but in their own works. None of this has anything to do with Jews circumcising their children, as you claim.

Besides, circumcision was given to Abraham before the Torah-Law, and was meant for all his physical descendants for all their generations (see Gen. 17). Even if you make a case that the Torah-Law is fulfilled/abolished/whatever in Messiah, that doesn't do away with this instruction given by God to Abraham.
 
S

sparty-g

Guest
#84
I have made no "charges", but merely accepted what has been said as being what is actually believed.
Unless someone here has said, "I have replaced Jesus with the Torah," then yes, you are making a charge. Those are your words, not ours, and are based on your misunderstanding (or misstating) of our position coupled with your interpretation of Scripture. That is from where your charge derives, and which is why it is your charge: None of us Messianics or HRM folks have said or believe that.
 
Nov 22, 2015
20,436
1,430
0
#85
If one is going to live by the law - then he is obligated to live by all of it. There are no "parts" to the Law. Saying that some are for us and some are not is just watering down the Law to make it seem "do-able" but in reality "Mosaic law-keepers" have a very low respect for the Law and in fact break the law every day.

Romans 10:4-5 (NASB)

[SUP]4 [/SUP] For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes.
[SUP]5 [/SUP] For Moses writes that the man who practices the righteousness which is based on law shall live by that righteousness.

We have died to the Law SO THAT we might live unto God.

Galatians 2:19 (NASB)
[SUP]19 [/SUP] "For through the Law I died to the Law, so that I might live to God.


There is no justification or right standing with God because one "keeps the law". Christians live by faith - faith in Christ and what He has already done and we live by His life in us now.

Galatians 3:11 (NASB)
[SUP]11 [/SUP] Now that
no one is justified by the Law before God is evident; for, "THE RIGHTEOUS MAN SHALL LIVE BY FAITH."

The Law is NOT of faith and if you practice the Law - you must live by it.

Galatians 3:12 (NASB)
[SUP]12 [/SUP] However, the Law is not of faith; on the contrary, "HE WHO PRACTICES THEM SHALL LIVE BY THEM."

When we are trying to keep the law of which circumcision is a part of - we are obligated to keep the whole law

(
Remember there are NO PARTS to the law - it is either all or live by Christ by grace through faith in His finished work on the cross and resurrection )

Galatians 5:3 (KJV)
[SUP]3 [/SUP] For I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law.

We can trust the Holy Spirit and the life of Christ in us to lead us into life in Him. Let's eat from the tree of Life - which is Christ Himself in us. The Law is eating from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. Choose Christ. He is our life. He is the Way, the Truth and the Life.
Colossians 3:3 (NASB)
[SUP]3 [/SUP] For you have died and your life is hidden with Christ in God. ( NOT in the law of Moses )
 
Nov 22, 2015
20,436
1,430
0
#86
If we as Christians have died to the law SO THAT we could be joined to Another - Christ Himself and since we have been released from the law and are NOT under the law but under grace. Romans 7:1-6

How are we to live then - if not by the Old Covenant law of Moses?

We do have laws in the New Covenant.
They are exciting laws that bring life and wholeness to us all - because these are all Christ Himself in us.

There is no greater revelation than to know Him and the Father and to
plumb the depths of their love and grace towards us which Paul says in Eph. 2:7 - the Father will be doing for all the ages to come to us.

Ephesians 2:7 (NASB)
[SUP]7 [/SUP]so that in the ages to come He might show the surpassing riches of His grace in kindness toward us in Christ Jesus.

Jesus fulfilled the law.
The law was a mere shadow of the real substance which is Jesus Himself.

Read the law to see Jesus in it and to know that Jesus did that for us and His life in us now leads us in all things. Those who are led by the Spirit of God are the sons of God.

We now live by:

1) The law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus. ( Romans 8:2 )

2) The law of love ( Romans 13:10 James 2:8 )

3) The law of faith ( Romans 3:27 and the law of Moses is NOT of faith - Gal. 3:12 )

4) The law of liberty ( James 1:25 )

5) The law of Christ - which is Christ Himself in us. ( Gal. 6:2 )

We can trust the Holy Spirit in us to lead us in all affairs of life. We don't go back to the law of Moses that were a shadow of the real thing which is Christ in us.. Jesus is more then enough.

Yes...we glory in the laws that we have in the New Covenant because they are all Christ Himself living in and through us. ( Gal.2:20 and Col. 3:3 )

Galatians 5:22-23 (NASB)

[SUP]22 [/SUP] But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness,

[SUP]23 [/SUP] gentleness, self-control; against such things there is no law
.
 
S

sparty-g

Guest
#87
If one is going to live by the law - then he is obligated to live by all of it. There are no "parts" to the Law. Saying that some are for us and some are not is just watering down the Law to make it seem "do-able" but in reality "Mosaic law-keepers" have a very low respect for the Law and in fact break the law every day.

Etc., etc.
I'm assuming this response is to me, even though my post wasn't quoted. If we're having a discussion, we should respond to each other's questions. I'll be really brief:

Question 1: Regarding Acts 21, do you interpret "Then everyone will know there is no truth in these reports about you, but that you yourself are living in obedience to the law" to mean something other than what it straightforwardly says, in a manner that means the reports were actually truthful and that James and Paul colluded in a grand public deception because of "religious pressure", by which Paul presented himself in a false manner and made a false vow with God?

And before you jump to 1 Cor. 9:20ff, I will preempt you by saying these verses are about Paul empathizing with the people he is trying to reach, not that he keeps the Torah-Law sometimes in a deceitful manner, but other times he exercises his "freedom" in not keeping it. Also, your interpretation of these verses cannot trump the straightforward meaning of the passages in Acts. Let's stick to the discussion of Acts. Please answer the question above. Thank you.
 
Nov 22, 2015
20,436
1,430
0
#88
I'm assuming this response is to me, even though my post wasn't quoted. If we're having a discussion, we should respond to each other's questions. I'll be really brief:

Question 1: Regarding Acts 21, do you interpret "Then everyone will know there is no truth in these reports about you, but that you yourself are living in obedience to the law" to mean something other than what it straightforwardly says, in a manner that means the reports were actually truthful and that James and Paul colluded in a grand public deception because of "religious pressure", by which Paul presented himself in a false manner and made a false vow with God?

And before you jump to 1 Cor. 9:20ff, I will preempt you by saying these verses are about Paul empathizing with the people he is trying to reach, not that he keeps the Torah-Law sometimes in a deceitful manner, but other times he exercises his "freedom" in not keeping it. Also, your interpretation of these verses cannot trump the straightforward meaning of the passages in Acts. Let's stick to the discussion of Acts. Please answer the question above. Thank you.
I have already stated what Paul had to say about the law of Moses and the true Christian life based on Christ Himself. There was an extreme Hebrew Roots guy here by the name of "disciplemike" - look up his threads and you will see that this perversion of the gospel was refuted by many people.

He tried to do what you and your other friend are trying to do here and people will not desert their Lord to commit spiritual adultery to go back to the law of Moses for life and living. Rom. 7:1-6

I have as much interest in going over the law of Moses and law-keeping as I do in the amount of ants in the Amazon rainforest. These posts are not for those that are trying to pervert the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ by getting people to go back to the law of Moses. They are for others to read and allow the Holy Spirit in them to trust in the life of Christ in them.

Titus 3:9 (NASB)
[SUP]9 [/SUP] But avoid foolish controversies and genealogies and strife and disputes about the Law, for they are unprofitable and worthless.


Here is what I said again about the circumcision and Paul and the law of Moses concerning Acts and I repeat it so that young believers will not be deceived by this extreme sect of the Hebrew Roots. Not all Hebrew Roots are like this - I will post that truth after this post for them to see.

He did that because he was told to do so by James and the other elders because of religious pressure - because it didn't take long for the Judaizers to come in and water down the gospel by bringing the law into it and defiling it with their leaven.

Look at the mess that this ill-advised "wisdom of man" created. The Lord needed to use Gentiles to rescue Paul from the Jewish religious people that were "zealous for the law of Moses."

The Jewish law-keepers that became believers were "zealous for the law". It didn't take them long to defile the gospel of the grace of Christ with their law-keeping requirements.

Acts 21:20-21 (NASB)
[SUP]20 [/SUP] And when they heard it they began glorifying God; and they said to him, "You see, brother,
how many thousands there are among the Jews of those who have believed, and they are all zealous for the Law;

[SUP]21 [/SUP]
and they have been told about you, that you are teaching all the Jews who are among the Gentiles to forsake Moses, telling them not to circumcise their children nor to walk according to the customs.

The truth is - Paul did say in Galatians that if they circumcised - they make the grace of God of no effect.

Galatians 5:2-4 (NASB)
[SUP]2 [/SUP]
Behold I, Paul, say to you that if you receive circumcision, Christ will be of no benefit to you.

[SUP]3 [/SUP]
And I testify again to every man who receives circumcision, that he is under obligation to keep the whole Law.

[SUP]4 [/SUP] You have been severed from Christ, you who are seeking to be justified by law; you have fallen from grace.
 
Nov 22, 2015
20,436
1,430
0
#89
The true Christian life is lived by grace through faith only - nothing to do with the law of Moses. As we have received Christ - we are to walk in Him and all that He has done.

Colossians 2:6-7 (NASB)
[SUP]6 [/SUP] Therefore as you have received Christ Jesus the Lord, so walk in Him,

[SUP]7 [/SUP] having been firmly rooted and now being built up in Him and established in your faith, just as you were instructed, and overflowing with gratitude.

Real Christians have died on the cross with Christ and rose again at His resurrection to serve God in newness of life and not in the oldness of the letter.

If anyone comes with the message that "
You must now follow the law of Moses as in observing the Sabbath or feasts days - if you do not - then you are dis-obeying God and sinning."....

..if you hear this - run from it because it is an anti-Christ belief system just like the Judaizers that came in to the Galatians and tried to get them to follow the law of Moses only their route was by circumcision. Some do it by eating certain foods only which is a sign of the those falling away from the faith ( 1 Tim. 4:1-5 )

Paul said that he did not stand for the Judaizers message for one hour so that the truth would remain with them. Gal. 2:5

Galatians 2:5 (NASB)
[SUP]5 [/SUP] But we did not yield in subjection to them for even an hour, so that the truth of the gospel would remain with you.

I do not look at all Hebrew Roots adherents as all the same. As I have said before - there are many that are of authentic Jewish descent and they like their traditions but they do not say that others need to observe the Sabbath or feasts as in the law of Moses or you are dis-obeying God and sinning. They observe these things to see Christ as the fulfillment of them - not as something they "need" to do now.

This group has excellent teaching son how Christ has fulfilled the Law and show Christ in every part of the Old Testament. Jesus said that all the scriptures speak about Him.

This group of believers are a major blessing to us in the body of Christ and are not Judaizers such as Paul encountered and that are also in the extreme sects of Hebrew Roots that say believers in Christ must "
observe the Sabbath and the feasts like in the law of Moses - or they are dis-obeying God and sinning".

Those - run away from as fast as you can! - but do not put all Hebrew Roots people in the same boat as the extreme sects because they are not the same.

 

Grandpa

Senior Member
Jun 24, 2011
11,551
3,190
113
#90
When we follow the light we follow Jesus in the new covenant. What the new covenant in and how we are to follow Jesus is explained in scripture. Eze 37:24 And David my servant shall be king over them; and they all shall have one shepherd: they shall also walk in my judgments, and observe my statutes, and do them.
Eze 37:25 And they shall dwell in the land that I have given unto Jacob my servant, wherein your fathers have dwelt; and they shall dwell therein, even they, and their children, and their children's children for ever: and my servant David shall be their prince for ever.
Eze 37:26 Moreover I will make a covenant of peace with them; it shall be an everlasting covenant with them: and I will place them, and multiply them, and will set my sanctuary in the midst of them for evermore.
Eze 37:27 My tabernacle also shall be with them: yea, I will be their God, and they shall be my people.

We are also told Christ will fulfill. We see He does that--Christi is the innocent blood there were only symbols of before, we are now the temple of God, Christ is the high priest, we have not only the words of the law in writing and on stone but in our hearts. what diet and circumcision were symbolic of and meant to remind us of spiritual laws are now told us in our spirit through the Holy Spirit. These things, in Christ's time on earth, were called Law of Moses and the prophets God gave scripture to wrote it in the language of the times. If we say it means the spiritual laws given to our hearts, the same ones given in Mt Sinai, we say we don't believe scripture. All scripture is from one God, God cannot disagree with God.
Its glaringly simple for those who are in Christ.

How do we receive anything from the Lord? By Grace through Faith.

How do we follow our Good Shepherd? By Grace through Faith.

If we are working at our own carnal understanding of what we think the law says we are not following Christ by Grace through faith. We are following by our own work and understanding.

Shouldn't we have learned something from the Hebrews in the Old Testament or should we just keep repeating their mistakes? rhetorical, of course...
 
Nov 22, 2015
20,436
1,430
0
#91
Question: "Who were the Judaizers?"

Answer: There have always been those who balk at the idea of God’s salvation being offered freely to those who believe. They reason that such a grand gift as forgiveness from such a holy God must require some kind of payment from us. We thank God for His grace, but we understand that He expects us to somehow earn that grace—in other words, there must be something that we can do to pay off the debt we owe to God.

In the early church, those who taught a combination of God’s grace and human effort were called “Judaizers.” The word Judaizer comes from a Greek verb meaning “to live according to Jewish customs.” The word appears in
Galatians 2:14 where Paul describes how he confronted Peter for forcing Gentile Christians to “Judaize.”

A Judaizer taught that, in order for a Christian to truly be right with God, he must conform to the Mosaic Law. Circumcision, especially, was promoted as necessary for salvation. Gentiles had to become Jewish proselytes first, and then they could come to Christ.

The doctrine of the Judaizers was a mixture of grace (through Christ) and works (through the keeping of the Law). This false doctrine was dealt with in
Acts 15 and strongly condemned in the book of Galatians.

At the Jerusalem Council in
Acts 15, a group of Judaizers opposed Paul and Barnabas. Some men who belonged to the party of the Pharisees insisted that Gentiles could not be saved unless they were first circumcised and obeyed the Law of Moses.

Paul made the case that, in Christ, there was no longer any distinction between Jew and Gentile, for God had purified the hearts of the Gentiles by faith (
Acts 15:8–9). He said it plainly in Galatians 2:16: “A man is not justified by observing the law, but by faith in Jesus Christ. So we, too, have put our faith in Christ Jesus that we may be justified by faith in Christ and not by observing the law, because by observing the law no one will be justified.”

To add anything to the work that Christ did for salvation is to negate God’s grace. We are saved by grace alone, through faith alone, not by returning to the Law. “I do not set aside the grace of God, for if righteousness could be gained through the law, Christ died for nothing” (
Galatians 2:21).

There are many groups today with beliefs/practices very similar to the Judaizers of the New Testament. The two most prominent would be the
Hebrew Roots Movement and the Roman Catholic Church. The teachings of the Hebrew Roots Movement are virtually identical to those of the Judaizers whom Paul rebuked in Galatians. A primary focus of the Hebrew Roots Movement is to put followers of Christ back under the bondage of the Old Testament Law.

The Roman Catholic Church teaches a doctrine similar to that of the Judaizers of the New Testament in this way: its doctrine is a mixture of law and grace. At the Council of Trent in the 16th century, the Catholic Church explicitly denied the idea of salvation by faith alone.

Catholics have always held that certain sacraments are necessary for salvation. The issues for the 1st-century Judaizers were circumcision and Sabbath-keeping. The issues for modern-day Catholics are baptism, confession, etc. The works considered necessary may have changed, but both Judaizers and Catholics attempt to merit God’s grace through the performance of ritualistic acts.

First Timothy 4:3 says that, in later times, false teachers will “forbid people to marry and order them to abstain from certain foods, which God created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and who know the truth.” This sounds suspiciously close to some of the teachings of Roman Catholicism, which requires priests to be celibate (“forbidding to marry”) and proclaims some food to be off-limits during Lent (“abstaining from certain foods”).

The Judaizers upheld the Mosaic Law as necessary for salvation; Catholics uphold man-made tradition as necessary; both view Christ’s death as being insufficient without the active and continued cooperation of the one being saved.

The Bible is clear that the attempt to add human works to God’s grace overlooks the very meaning of grace, which is “undeserved blessing.” As Paul says, “If by grace, then it cannot be based on works; if it were, grace would no longer be grace” (
Romans 11:6). Praise the Lord, “Christ has set us free. Stand firm, then, and do not let yourselves be burdened again by a yoke of slavery” (Galatians 5:1).

https://gotquestions.org/Judaizers.html
 

Ahwatukee

Senior Member
Mar 12, 2015
11,159
2,373
113
#92
Its glaringly simple for those who are in Christ.

How do we receive anything from the Lord? By Grace through Faith.

How do we follow our Good Shepherd? By Grace through Faith.

If we are working at our own carnal understanding of what we think the law says we are not following Christ by Grace through faith. We are following by our own work and understanding.

Shouldn't we have learned something from the Hebrews in the Old Testament or should we just keep repeating their mistakes? rhetorical, of course...

Hello Grandpa,

Well said and regarding this, I would add the following for those, who like Israel, are attempting to obtain righteousness through the works of the law:

"What then shall we say? That the Gentiles, who did not pursue righteousness, have obtained it, a righteousness that is by faith; but the people of Israel, who pursued the law as the way of righteousness, have not attained their goal. Why not? Because they pursued it not by faith but as if it were by works. They stumbled over the stumbling stone.

And it appears that, not only did Israel stumble over the stumbling stone, but many Gentiles as well. Paul called the works of the law "weak and miserable principles." And Peter, in his address to those Pharisees who were claiming that the Gentile believers must be circumcised and made to obey the Law of Moses said to them, "why are you trying to put a yoke on the necks of the Gentile believers that neither we nor our ancestors have been able to bear? That "Yoke" Peter spoke of is referring circumcision and keeping the law of Moses as a way of getting right with God.

The law is holy and righteous, but because of our sinful natures we cannot keep it, which brings condemnation and death when we fail at it.
 
M

MacBestus

Guest
#93
You can 't do both. Only one or the other.

Galatians 3:11-12
[FONT=&quot]11 But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God, it is evident: for, The just shall live by faith.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]12 And the law is not of faith: but, The man that doeth them shall live in them.

So you have to choose, working at the law or coming to Christ and receiving rest from your work. But you people have already made your choice, haven't you? Its whats known biblically as 'stiffnecked'.

How do people think it is possible to work at their understanding of law, or torah, and follow the Lord by faith? It amazes me how many try to come in and teach that have no real understanding. You would think you would learn what Christianity is first before trying to teach people.

Did you know that the law can't be followed carnally? You can't fulfill it by your strength and understanding. Did you know that is why there are so many "interpretations" on what it is to follow law, or torah, whichever word you want to use? Because every person thinks they have the correct understanding of how to carnally follow the law.

Romans 7:14 For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin.

If you want to follow the law you have to die to your work and understanding of it and abide in Christ, by faith. He is the one that grows the spiritual fruit of obedience. He personally Does it. Your understanding, nothing personal, is way too shallow and inept to come close to being able to perform what God wants. Mine too. That's why we don't rely on our own understanding.


If you try something and you fail what do you do? Try again. What if you have tried 50 times and failed every time. Wouldn't you try to find a different way to do it? One that you could succeed at? You are effectively teaching people how to fail and how to pretend that its not failure. There is a Real Way that guarantees Real Success. But you have to stop pretending that you are succeeding at your own way before you can come to this New Way. You have to walk in the light, which means being honest first and foremost.

Matthew 11:28-30


[/FONT]
Hello Grandpa!

You suggest we cannot serve Yahushua and attempt to keep Torah.

"You can 't do both. Only one or the other."

I would say it is more likely that you cannot do either only. Because one leads to the other.

I will ignore your misuse of Paul in general, as you have stated you believe your own definitions of words over all bible dictionaries and concordances. And speak only to your proof texts.

You offer:
Galatians 3:11-12
11*But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God, it is evident: for,*The just shall live by faith.
12*And the law is not of faith: but, The man that doeth them shall live in them.

In this verse we are told that Paul is speaking to those who try to justify themselves through the law. I am justified by my faith in Messiah. I am not trying to buy my way in. I have faith in GRACE.

You continue;
"So you have to choose, working at the law or coming to Christ and receiving rest from your work. "

So your view is attempt to NOT sin and you are damned. Sin and be saved. Really?

1john 3:4**Whoever commits sin transgresses also the law, for sin is the transgression of the law.

Romans 3:4**By no means: yea, let*יהוה*be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged.

*5**But if our unrighteousness commend the righteousness of*יהוה, what shall we say? Is*יהוהunrighteous who taketh vengeance? (I speak as a man)

*6**By no means: for then how shall He judge the world?

*7**For if the truth of*יהוה*hath more abounded through my lie unto his glory; why yet am I also judged as a sinner?

*8**And not rather, (as we be slanderously reported, and as some affirm that we say,) Let us do evil, that good may come? whose damnation is just.

Romans 3:31**Do we then make void the law through faith? By no means: yea, we establish the law.

Romans 6:1**What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that favour may abound?

*2**By no means. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?

Romans 6:8**Now if we be dead with the Messiah, we believe that we shall also live with him:

*9**Knowing that the Messiah being raised from the dead dieth no more; death hath no more dominion over him.

*10**For in that he died, he died unto sin once: but in that he liveth, he liveth unto*יהוה.

*11**Likewise reckon ye also yourselves to be dead indeed unto sin, but alive unto*יהוהthrough Yahushua the Messiah our Saviour.

*12**Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body, that ye should obey it in the lusts thereof.

*13**Neither yield ye your members as instruments of unrighteousness unto sin: but yield yourselves unto*יהוה, as those that are alive from the dead, and your members as instruments of righteousness unto*יהוה.

Romans 7:7**What shall we say then? Is the law sin? By no means. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.

Romans 7:12**Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.

Romans 7:24**O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death?

*25**Thanks be to*יהוה*through Yahushua the Messiah our Saviour. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of*יהוה; but with the flesh the law of sin.


Paul speaks for himself. We are under grace. Should we break the law? YHWH forbid.

You go on:
"But you people have already made your choice, haven't you? Its whats known biblically as 'stiffnecked'."

I would say someone who follows the doctrine of continuing to sin after finding salvation is closer to that description. As far as making my choice, i will follow Messiah and Paul as they taught in the bible.

You continue:
"How do people think it is possible to work at their understanding of law, or torah, and follow the Lord by faith? "

it is really quite simple. No need for amazement. Live as Messiah lived and taught.

You continue:
"It amazes me how many try to come in and teach that have no real understanding. You would think you would learn what Christianity is first before trying to teach people.*"

Exactly! You should read that sentence again. Then read this one. It is Messiah speaking.

Matthew 5:*19**Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.

Notice you won't loose your salvation for lawlessness. Salvation is a free gift. You just will have a lesser reward. I am fairly certain Yahushua understood this better than Grandpa from the Internet, so you will excuse me if I choose his words over yours.

You continue:
"Did you know that the law can't be followed carnally? You can't fulfill it by your strength and understanding."

Yes. But you can try. Just like babies learn to walk by struggling and failing. Over and over. Hundreds of times just to roll over. Thousands of times to crawl. Thousands more to walk or run. In fact you never outgrow falling. By Your logic we should not encourage any baby to learn to walk. Some will figure it out, but we will tell them they are wrong to do so. This is your logic.

You go on: "Did you know that is why there are so many "interpretations" on what it is to follow law, or torah, whichever word you want to use? Because every person thinks they have the correct understanding of how to carnally follow the law."

And I reply there are even more interpretations on how to sin. We all have several. We are not perfect. THAT IS WHAT GRACE IS FOR. At least those trying to keep Torah in limited human ways are
To not sin.


Romans 7:14*For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin.

Exactly! Perhaps you should read Romans straight through instead of looking for the verses that you can cling to for your dogma. It explains all this wonderfully.

You continue: "If you want to follow the law you have to die to your work and understanding of it and abide in Christ, by faith. He is the one that grows the spiritual fruit of obedience. He personally Does it."

So if we don't try and follow his path we will? Show me chapter and verse on that please.

You continue:" Your understanding, nothing personal, is way too shallow and inept to come close to being able to perform what God wants. Mine too. That's why we don't rely on our own understanding."

Amen

You go on:
"If you try something and you fail what do you do? Try again. What if you have tried 50 times and failed every time. Wouldn't you try to find a different way to do it? "

Some things are hard to learn. Walking, potty training, musical instruments, language, the list goes on and on. And when we learn these, we are not trying to be perfect at them for all we try be as perfect as possible. We are just happy to be as good as we can and try to be better.

You continue:
"One that you could succeed at? You are effectively teaching people how to fail and how to pretend that its not failure."

We get better through practice.

And as to "There is a Real Way that guarantees Real Success. But you have to stop pretending that you are succeeding at your own way before you can come to this New Way. You have to walk in the light, which means being honest first and foremost."

That is why I try to do and teach as Messiah did and taught, while looking forward to his return. While resting assured in his Grace providing my salvation. Living sinfully does not glorify Messiah.
 
M

MacBestus

Guest
#94
Morning MacBestus,

You cannot keep the Law of Moses and be under grace, for they cancel each other out. Either you're under the law or under grace, but not both. Jesus appearing in the flesh and did for us what we could not do, which was meet the righteous requirements of the law perfectly and on our behalf. Jesus freed us from the law, for sin gets its power from the law and condemns us when we fail at it.

"God saved you by his grace when you believed. And you can’t take credit for this; it is a gift from God. Salvation is not a reward for the good things we have done, so none of us can boast about it. "

"You who are trying to be justified by the law have been alienated from Christ; you have fallen away from grace."


"For all who rely on the works of the law are under a curse, as it is written: “Cursed is everyone who does not continue to do everything written in the Book of the Law.” Clearly no one who relies on the law is justified before God, because “the righteous will live by faith.” The law is not based on faith; on the contrary, it says, “The person who does these things will live by them.”Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us, for it is written: “Cursed is everyone who is hung on a pole." He redeemed us in order that the blessing given to Abraham might come to the Gentiles through Christ Jesus, so that by faith we might receive the promise of the Spirit."

As believers we should not be trying to meet the righteous requirements of the law, but we should be trusting in Christ who provided salvation for us, fully and completely. I tell you the truth, if you go before the Lord proud of your attempt to keep the works of the law along side of Christ's fulfillment of it, you will not inherit the kingdom of God.

By attempting to keep the works of the law you are attempting to gain favor with God by your own efforts and are therefore not trusting in Christ. We who are in Christ have been crucified with Him and have therefore died to the law.

You are using James 2:17 above, but James is not saying that we are saved by works. If it were by works then it would not be by grace that we are saved, but by our own efforts. In that case we would be working our way to heaven instead of trusting in Christ. Consider the man on the cross who was crucified with Christ when he said, "Lord, remember me when you come into your kingdom." And Jesus said to him "truly is say to you, today you will be with me in paradise." That man could not come down off the cross to be baptized or to do any good works, yet he was saved by his faith in Christ.

If you put yourself under the law, then you have to keep the entire law. And when you break it, you have broken the entire law. Jesus met the righteous requirements of the law, satisfying it because we could not and cannot meet its requirements. Why are you rebuilding what brings wrath and condemns us?


I think the disconnect we have is that I am not trying to keep the law for salvation. Look at the wording in the verses you chose. "Rely on, justified by, etc."

I rely on Grace for Salvation. Not my works. But I also try and not sin. Which is violation of the law.

Do you see the difference?
 
M

MacBestus

Guest
#95
MacBestus can defend himself, but I don't find it improper for myself to give a response since you could levy the same charge against me, since he and I obviously share many of the same beliefs against which you are making your charges.

It is disappointing and unfair that you make these charges against us. We have repeatedly explained that our trust and hope is in Messiah Yeshua-Jesus and that we do not study Torah-Law to merit salvation, but do so because we are saved and want to understand Torah-Law the way that Messiah did and walk it the same way that He did. So it's unfair to say that we have "replaced Jesus with the Torah" -- He is there in our focus front and center! There would be absolutely no desire in us to study Torah-Law or walk as He walked if He was not the center of our focus! It would be just as unfair for us to say that some folks on this board have replaced Jesus with Paul. And trust me, many of us could easily build cases to argue that some folks here have put Paul's words over Messiah's words and have too much of a focus on Paul's writings over the gospels and very words of the Messiah. I won't do that because regardless of the esteem that some give Paul and his writings, I understand that they believe Messiah is the center of their focus. Why do you not show us that same courtesy? Or do you really want to get into a debate about who is focused more on the Messiah and esteeming His words above all others? I don't think that would be very profitable for any of us.

It's a little ironic that you are calling us out on not going by the term "Christian" (which, by the way, is not a consensus among Messianics and HRM -- I personally have no problem using the term to describe myself to other mainstream Christians). We generally mean it today to describe a follower of Messiah Yeshua-Jesus. Following on what I said in my previous paragraph, how are we not "Christians" (by the common definition of the word) when our stated desire is to follow Him and highly esteem His words, to walk as He walked? The irony is that I have seen non-Torah-observant folks on this board (some who describe themselves as hyper-grace folks) straightforwardly admit that they do not aspire to walk as Messiah walked and view their understanding of Paul's writings (as well as Peter and James -- basically all post-Gospel NT writings) as more relevant to the Christian today than the Messiah's words. And yet, we Messianics and HRM are charged as the ones not suited for the term "Christian"? Can we make a similar charge against those other folks and call them "Paulians"? No, that wouldn't be productive or beneficial at all.

Brother, I understand you are zealous to follow God and our Messiah -- so are we! So please, stop bringing the false charges against us and try to understand where we are coming from. Just because our beliefs don't align with your understanding of Scripture doesn't mean we have replaced Messiah Yeshua-Jesus with anything or are not desiring to follow Him. On Torah-Law, we have already said repeatedly that our trust and hope is not in the Torah-Law -- that is only in Messiah. And our study and application of the commands of the Torah-Law are a result of our desire to follow Him in the best way we can and believe is in accordance with His walk and the will of the Father as shown throughout the breadth of Scripture.

Blessings to you on your personal journey.
Thank you for the second witness
 
M

MacBestus

Guest
#96
I have made no "charges", but merely accepted what has been said as being what is actually believed.
Actually what you have done is continuously bourne false witness. And you even lie again in this comment.

You have not believed what is being said as what was believed because you constantly lie about what is said by people disagreeing with you.

There was a time when Messiah had this to say to the mainstream believers of his day. Perhaps there is a warning to those today who lie today.

John 8:39 They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Yahushua saith unto them, If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham.

40 But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, which I have heard of יהוה: this did not Abraham.

41 Ye do the deeds of your father. Then said they to him, We be not born of fornication; we have one Father, even Elohim.

42 Yahushua said unto them, If Elohim were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from Elohim; neither came I of myself, but he sent me.

43 Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word.

44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

45 And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.

46 Which of you convinceth me of sin? And if I say the truth, why do ye not believe me?

47 He that is of יהוה heareth יהוה's words: ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of יהוה.
 
D

Depleted

Guest
#97
The Law was simple in design. It's purpose was to show Man how perfect God is, so we drop to the ground and call out, "God, I cannot do it. Save me!"

And yet, look what has happened instead.
I think it is interesting how one can conclude that the Torah-Law was designed to show us our sin, but then after we learn that we are sinners in desperate need of God's grace and mercy through our Messiah Yeshua-Jesus, the normative Christian response is to continue to do many of those things that the Torah-Law says are sin.

That's something I have thought about for a long time, especially as I read through the first several chapters of Romans. Essentially, Paul says and we admit that by showing us our sin, the Torah commands essentially define what is obedience vs. what is disobedience. God says through His Torah commands revealed through Moses "Do these things" and "Don't do these things". So, to me, it's an interesting conclusion when one agrees with Paul that the purpose of the Torah is to convict the world of their sin by showing them what it means to be holy or sinful, but then concludes that those same standards used to judge the world do not apply to the follower of Messiah Yeshua-Jesus.

In keeping the focus of this thread in mind, (e.g.) God through the Torah-Law says not to eat pork. So, the world is then convicted by their eating of pork in violation of this command. The worldly person (hopefully) says, "I have sinned and fallen short of God's standard, and need God's salvation through Messiah Yeshua-Jesus." But then after accepting Messiah Yeshua-Jesus as their personal savior, that same person concludes that eating pork is not a violation of God's will.

How does a command convict a worldly person of his or her sinful state but then not apply to that same person after choosing to follow Messiah Yeshua-Jesus? Or to ask it backwards: How can a believing person do the very thing that was used to convict him or her of their sinful state before becoming a believer?

I would have to conclude that, if some certain Torah command does not convict me now as a believer, then it doesn't make sense that it would have convicted me before I was a believer -- or, in other words, have been part and parcel of the Torah-Law that was used to convict me. Conviction is meant to be the process by which God taps on our heart and says something like, "Hey, you should do this certain thing you're not doing, or don't do this certain thing you are doing." So, if before becoming a believer, He taps on my heart and says, "Hey, you shouldn't be eating pork," what sense is it for me to feel free to eat pork after becoming a believer? Of course, people come to the LORD by many different ways or different specific sins about which they may be convicted, so I'm not saying that God specifically convicts people of eating pork (or at least not routinely -- it's different for each person), but I read Paul as saying that all of the Torah (which would include all of the Torah commands contained within, which includes the command not to eat pork) are purposed to show us our sin, which is consistent with the abundance of other verses that confirm the Torah commands define sin and that sin (by definition) is the transgression of the Torah.

So what does that mean about the commands to avoid eating the meat of unclean animals? Are they included in the Torah-Law that convicts the world of sin, but do not convict the believer? I would have to conclude that if they are not intended to convict us now as believers, then they are not included in the Torah-Law that convicts the world of their sin before becoming believers -- but we know that they are, in fact, listed in that same Torah-Law. So, do they convict the world or no? If yes, how does it then make sense for us to do what formerly convicted us? If no, then how do we explain them being included in the Torah-Law but somehow excluded from what convicts the world?

Honest questions, no judgment. Hoping there is something I can learn from this discussion or, at the very least, better understand fellow brothers and sisters in Messiah.
Back in the olden days, (the 1960's), when NASA was shooting for the moon, the calculations had to be 100% perfect. The exact degrees needed to land there. Why? Because 1 degree off would have had them miss the moon by massive amounts.

You've done something similar to that in the beginning of your post to make the ending so far away from what I said that it stopped mattering.

I said, "
to show Man how perfect God is."

You said that I said, "to show us our sin."

The rest was merely justification for telling me I'm wrong for something I never said.

Sorry. My heart is like yours -- into legalism. Even with that, I know I can't, so have to keep refocusing on God. He can and does.

Might want to keep on going with Romans. The first few chapters really do tell us how we are failures, no matter what our game plan is. The middle is what God does about it. The end is what it looks like when we follow him, instead of our game plan.
 
D

Depleted

Guest
#98
I don't say that. The bible does by giving the signs of it's arrival thst are as yet unfulfilled. More accurately it days we are in the transition period. Do you have verses that say it already has fully been instituted?
John 19:28-30
 
D

Depleted

Guest
#99
Unless someone here has said, "I have replaced Jesus with the Torah," then yes, you are making a charge. Those are your words, not ours, and are based on your misunderstanding (or misstating) of our position coupled with your interpretation of Scripture. That is from where your charge derives, and which is why it is your charge: None of us Messianics or HRM folks have said or believe that.
It's charges, is it?

Since you assumed I did replace God with the Torah, you might want to back up from some of your own assumptions. That's where your mind keeps taking this. Interesting that now you're reversing it.
 
D

Depleted

Guest
Its glaringly simple for those who are in Christ.

How do we receive anything from the Lord? By Grace through Faith.

How do we follow our Good Shepherd? By Grace through Faith.

If we are working at our own carnal understanding of what we think the law says we are not following Christ by Grace through faith. We are following by our own work and understanding.

Shouldn't we have learned something from the Hebrews in the Old Testament or should we just keep repeating their mistakes? rhetorical, of course...
Personally, I think it's only "glaringly simple" for anyone with above average eyesight. This whole thread is giving me a headache because of the massive amounts of verse quoting complete with italics, bold, underlined, and multi-colored fonting. And above all else, I'm going even more bonkers when the text starts hitting Size 1 or less.

So, kudos for it being simple for you. Can we trade eyesight? lol

(If not, I'll reach for my aspirin next.)