Sure he did. You think he's breathing air in the upper atmosphere? I expect that he suffered a lighter form of death than most of us, but I'm sure his physical body could not handle being without food for so many years!
1Co 15:20 But now is Christ risen from the dead, and become the firstfruits of them that slept.
1Co 15:21 For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead.
1Co 15:22 For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive.
1Co 15:23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ's at his coming.
I believe this also proves that being a firstfruit that has been resurrected means they are alive as in immortal so the very first firstfruit would also have been resurrected as immortal or "glorified".
The idea has to do with resurrection--not glorification. They are connected, but you're reading "glorification" into "resurrection" here, confusing the issues.
And you sidestepped my question--what about Sampson? What about the ability of Philip to be translated after witnessing to the Ethiopian eunuch. Your argument seemed to rest on the evidence that because Jesus could "walk through walls," he had to have been glorified.
If a physical body can do supernatural things, it must already be glorified, you say. But Philip was not glorified. Sampson was not glorified. And yet these men could do supernatural things with their physical bodies.
And so your argument doesn't hold up. Just because Jesus walked through walls does not say he had yet been glorified. He still had scars inflicted upon his old body!!
Again, we know the dead in Christ are resurrected as immortals...
Let me stop you right there, before you lay this down as a fact. Christians have been raised from the dead in their old bodies. There is no necessity that resurrection be associated with glorification.
However, the 2nd Coming is a different matter. In this case, resurrection leads instantly to glorification. The old bodies have obviously been dissolved, since the dead in Christ have been dead, in some cases, for centuries! There are no bodies to resuscitate!
...so obviously Christ would also have been resurrected as immortal. He simply retained his mortal; wounds/scars as proof of who he was and that he did actually resurrect from the dead. He was not resurrected back to mortal life.
Jesus did not have to have scars to prove who he was! The proof intended was to show that the old body could be restored, before glorification. Both supernatural healing and immortalization are realities, but do not have to be proven simultaneously.
