Transgenderism and our Churches

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Ted01

Well-known member
May 14, 2022
1,055
448
83
Well, all your histrionics aside, you failed comprehend my main point which is people who avoid hypotheticals do so because they claim there are too many variables, so why bother. This is exactly what you did.



But this is just a convenient copout.
LOL, RA, stop acting foolish. Your first post on this, which I commented on, contained nothing about "too many variables", did it? You had a totally different approach on it.
 

ResidentAlien

Well-known member
Apr 21, 2021
8,320
3,620
113
LOL, RA, stop acting foolish. Your first post on this, which I commented on, contained nothing about "too many variables", did it? You had a totally different approach on it.
LOL, the mere fact you can't discuss this without resorting to name calling just convinces me you're no at all comfortable with the subject. So, to use your words, you're out. Bye.
 

Ted01

Well-known member
May 14, 2022
1,055
448
83
LOL, the mere fact you can't discuss this without resorting to name calling just convinces me you're no at all comfortable with the subject. So, to use your words, you're out. Bye.
Okay, bye!

But for the record, I called you no names... I did comment on your behavior.
And yes, I am uncomfortable with it... as I said I found your earlier post offensive. Do you care about that? Doesn't seem so.
Bye.
 
B

beaglehound

Guest
Okay, bye!

But for the record, I called you no names... I did comment on your behavior.
And yes, I am uncomfortable with it... as I said I found your earlier post offensive. Do you care about that? Doesn't seem so.
Bye.
OUCH🥴
 
B

beaglehound

Guest
You may not have called RA names Ted01 but you were condescending in your manner!

As far as the"gotcha" thing? Someone made mention of it making the accusation and that he knew it well. I did not use the word except in jest after he brought it up. I'd have to go back to see who it was.
That was an individual like yourself who figured the purpose of the question was to trick or trap. There is nothing wrong with pointing out a fallacy or contradiction using a hypothetical example to make the point.
Interestingly enough we are faced with them everyday whether we like it or not.
 

Ted01

Well-known member
May 14, 2022
1,055
448
83
You may not have called RA names Ted01 but you were condescending in your manner!

As far as the"gotcha" thing? Someone made mention of it making the accusation and that he knew it well. I did not use the word except in jest after he brought it up. I'd have to go back to see who it was.
That was an individual like yourself who figured the purpose of the question was to trick or trap. There is nothing wrong with pointing out a fallacy or contradiction using a hypothetical example to make the point.
Interestingly enough we are faced with them everyday whether we like it or not.
Hmm... perhaps you're right about me being condescending towards @ResidentAlien is true? If so, I do apologize. I did not mean to be, but I have been that way in the past. Also, RA's post about people not liking hypotheticals were fearing being exposed, seemed condescending to me... thus the offense... but that might have triggered to be condescending back, which isn't acceptable.
So, I am sorry for that.

I still disagree about your view on the use of hypotheticals, in general. Three people so far, including yourself and four if we included myself, have indicated some previous understanding that hypotheticals are used to "trick or trap"... that should be sufficient evidence that they are indeed used that way. However, I don't believe that was your intent.

Also, (not meaning to be condescending) is it your role in life to point out things that you perceive as other people's fallacies? If so, and there's nothing necessarily wrong with that, you might want to use this experience in the future. The idea that some of us are sensitive to the use of hypotheticals. Just a thought...
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
60,403
29,639
113
You may not have called RA names Ted01 but you were condescending in your manner!
You don't know either really well, but RA is through and through condescending to many and Ted rarely if ever is.

Look at these condescending statements that came from RA:


Well, all your histrionics aside

you failed comprehend my main point

people who avoid hypotheticals do so because they claim there are too many variables, so why bother. This is exactly what you did.

But this is just a convenient copout.

This is the typical response of someone who is afraid of hypotheticals.

Rather than simply answer, they have to change the question.

Do you not see any of that as being disrespectful?

What would you do if someone held a gun to your head?

That is a hypothetical. I cannot answer that question because I simply do not know what I would do in such a situation.


It has nothing to do with being afraid of hypotheticals, or me wanting
to change the question. Nor is it a cop out. I simply do not know.
 
B

beaglehound

Guest
Hmm... perhaps you're right about me being condescending towards @ResidentAlien is true? If so, I do apologize. I did not mean to be, but I have been that way in the past. Also, RA's post about people not liking hypotheticals were fearing being exposed, seemed condescending to me... thus the offense... but that might have triggered to be condescending back, which isn't acceptable.
So, I am sorry for that.

I still disagree about your view on the use of hypotheticals, in general. Three people so far, including yourself and four if we included myself, have indicated some previous understanding that hypotheticals are used to "trick or trap"... that should be sufficient evidence that they are indeed used that way. However, I don't believe that was your intent.

Also, (not meaning to be condescending) is it your role in life to point out things that you perceive as other people's fallacies? If so, and there's nothing necessarily wrong with that, you might want to use this experience in the future. The idea that some of us are sensitive to the use of hypotheticals. Just a thought...
I get what you are saying. I agreed that hypotheticals can be abused. I also explained that there is a time and place for them.
RA I believe was pointing out that some evade the question because they are afraid of being caught or shown they were wrong. Let's face it politicians deflect and avoid all the time when confronted. Saving face is important to many people.

And no, I do not see my role in life to point out fallacies. However, sometimes holding up the mirror by way of presenting a hypothetical example gets the message across. The person may not like the message and may even be accusatory and evasive.
Perhaps I need to be more blunt and direct.

Earlier I presented a similar scenario about a transgendered disclosing the fact she was transgendered.
The poster pretty much said he would feel the transgendered betrayed him, should be shown the door and he who tell everyone in the church what was going on.
I considered that very very harsh. Rather than say that in so many words I asked a what if question. A hypothetical. What if you were suffering a heart attack during the church service. Would you allow this same person you were vilifying to try and save your life?
That is not entrapment or a gotcha moment. That is gently trying to point out the fallacy or flaw in the reasoning.
 

oyster67

Senior Member
May 24, 2014
11,887
8,705
113
Who said the person was an EMR? You could be suffering a heart attack during a church service and this same person who his trained in such matters is there to save your life. Would you allow the person to do it? It is a simple question. It is a yes or no.
Yes.

I'm a loner who would like to pretend I am independent and don't need anybody's help, but deep down I know that this is just pride talking. Even Jesus was humble enough to let sinners draw water for him. Many of the prophets were supported by widows and such. God provides in mysterious ways.
 
B

beaglehound

Guest
You don't know either really well, but RA is through and through condescending to many and Ted rarely if ever is.

Look at these condescending statements that came from RA:


Well, all your histrionics aside

you failed comprehend my main point

people who avoid hypotheticals do so because they claim there are too many variables, so why bother. This is exactly what you did.

But this is just a convenient copout.

This is the typical response of someone who is afraid of hypotheticals.

Rather than simply answer, they have to change the question.

Do you not see any of that as being disrespectful?

What would you do if someone held a gun to your head?

That is a hypothetical. I cannot answer that question because I simply do not know what I would do in such a situation.


It has nothing to do with being afraid of hypotheticals, or me wanting
to change the question. Nor is it a cop out. I simply do not know.
So they are both condescending. Fine! Then they should both apologize to each other.

You don't know what you would if someone were holding a gun to your head?
I know what I would do.
I'd be praying! 🙂
Hypotheticals can help diffuse a situation. You are faced with a hypothetical when deciding whether or not to buy life insurance or health insurance or home insurance.

Yes you are correct. I don't know Ted01 or ResidentAlien.
 
B

beaglehound

Guest
Yes.

I'm a loner who would like to pretend I am independent and don't need anybody's help, but deep down I know that this is just pride talking. Even Jesus was humble enough to let sinners draw water for him. Many of the prophets were supported by widows and such. God provides in mysterious ways.
Love the answer! 👍
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
60,403
29,639
113
You don't know what you would if someone were holding a gun to your head?
I know what I would do.
I'd be praying! 🙂
Hypotheticals can help diffuse a situation. You are faced with a hypothetical when deciding whether or not to buy life insurance or health insurance or home insurance.
No, I have no idea. I could faint or die of a heart attack before praying ever entered my mind as a stop gap.
I am not sure what you mean about hypotheticals diffusing a situation. Ted very thoroughly explained why
he does not care to answer hypotheticals and the other boiled it down to a failure to evaluate one's values,
calling it a cop out and fear of exposing their heart... which was totally disrespectful and also logically fallacious.
 
B

beaglehound

Guest

calling it a cop out and fear of exposing their heart... which was totally disrespectful and also logically fallacious.
Then you should be telling the person who made those remarks, not me.
Hypotheticals being used to diffuse? I answered that a few posts back when I was speaking with Ted01
 
B

beaglehound

Guest
There is no point in me saying anything to him because he has me on ignore.
Magenta , I like you, I enjoy you when I'm on here. You have been very helpful. There is obviously some history between you and RA. Perhaps that is why you came to Ted01's defence and were rather strong with me regarding my comments to Ted01. Perhaps not. It doesn't matter. What I don't want to do is get into a quarrel with you about other personalities.
I've been here about a week. I'm not sure how much longer I will stick around. I'll see.

If I feel others are benefiting from my input that would be nice. If I feel I'm getting something back so much the better.

I've only had to report one user who had posted a most vile picture of our Lord. And I've seen a lot in my time. This one was truly despicable.
For the most part, I'm finding most of the posters pretty and conscientious in being respectful.
I'm hoping to keep it that way.
 
Jun 20, 2022
6,460
1,330
113
A noble position... truly.

I must ask though... if you were to witness to a trans-person and they demanded that you not refer to them by the sex that they were born with at birth, but rather what they have transitioned to, would you?
depends upon the attitude they are demanding this of me.
after all, i firmly Believe, those types of people [older (not children and teenagers) adults {20 & Up}] have some possession or mental disorder. i tend more to think possession. so, when they come in awareness of me, who is full of the Holy Spirit, you can detect attitude due to their Rebellion towards God, WHO, has given them over to a Reprobate Mind.
so, if i get attitude before i ever say my first words, i simply say to their demands, "the LORD Rebuke, You, Satan!"
and i turn and walk away.

When God has given someone over to a Reprobate Mind, you need to Cast the Possession Out. but not on a street corner, grocery store, public. you just Rebuke them and generally by rule, know, you will meet them again.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
60,403
29,639
113
Magenta , I like you, I enjoy you when I'm on here. You have been very helpful. There is obviously some history between you and RA. Perhaps that is why you came to Ted01's defence and were rather strong with me regarding my comments to Ted01. Perhaps not. It doesn't matter. What I don't want to do is get into a quarrel with you about other personalities.
I've been here about a week. I'm not sure how much longer I will stick around. I'll see.

If I feel others are benefiting from my input that would be nice. If I feel I'm getting something back so much the better.

I've only had to report one user who had posted a most vile picture of our Lord. And I've seen a lot in my time. This one was truly despicable.
For the most part, I'm finding most of the posters pretty and conscientious in being respectful.
I'm hoping to keep it that way.
Rather strong? In what way? I said nothing against you.

Never mind. I was trying to be helpful, and provide a different point of view.
Yours did seem off, since you initially completely overlooked RA's offenses.