Understanding God’s election

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
3,255
463
83
Man did not think about God but the Bible clarifies that after the birth of Seth's son men began thinking about God without God instructing or intervening.

Imagine that, natural man, on his own merit and written as such in Genesis that man began to think about God.
All natural men?
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
61,498
30,511
113
This means that God is responsible for man's inabilities, his slavery to sin and the rest of the list because he created fallen man that way.
Your view is somewhat at odds with the Scriptural view, since God put the responsibility on Adam for sin
and death entering the world. But you are correct to say the consequence was imposed by God. He told
Adam what it would be and Adam sinned wilfully. I find it somewhat odd that you seem to think this
poses some kind of insurmountable conundrum when God has already taken responsibility and gave
His Son to become sin for us that we may escape the second death by grace through faith in the shed
righteous blood of Jesus Christ, Who was purposed from before the foundation of the world. This does
not absolve man of his responsibility. You are simply mistaken. Just as God allowed Satan to bedevil Job,
God has allowed Satan to sift us like wheat that the chaff may be removed.
 

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
3,255
463
83
Yes.... Eternally at ease and celibate without stress.

Or, more like boys and girls in elementary school could like the opposite sex, but not desire sexually.
Just happy to be in each other's company.
Yet! Still male and female.

And, it was just not "just like the angels."
Jesus specified which angels.

For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage but are like angels in heaven."

Matthew 22:30

Only God's angels are not given in marriage. For there is a love in heaven that is greater then anything
we can experience on earth.

In the mean while... Satan and his angels are riddled with lusts which resulted in perverse desire.
As seen in Genesis 6, angels were originally created to be able to sexually reproduce. Then denied.

First gay marriages originated with fallen angels craving to replicate the kind of relationship they craved
as they observed men and women involved in deep love.

They are extremely jealous of such marriages which they are unable to have. They hate good marriages.

So be it!
Wow! You're just a walking, talking treasure house of spiritual info. :rolleyes:
 

HeIsHere

Well-known member
May 21, 2022
6,470
2,522
113
Anyone can profane what holy. Anyone can pervert what is good. Thus the principle stated in the admonition in Eccl 7:18 to avoid all extremes. Do you think Paul had good, mushy, flattering , self-aggrandizing, self-exalting feelings about himself when he struggled with sin (Rom 7:21-25)!? The more sensitive and pliable a believer's conscience is, the more he will loathe himself! But it appears you have never experienced this. Are you in perpetual feel good mode, as most of the religious elites of Jesus' day were?
Spoken like a true Reformed person

I stick with leaning into the new nature and walking in the spirit as scripture instructs.

But you should watch this movie, I think you will like it..

Capture.JPG
 

Kroogz

Well-known member
Dec 5, 2023
945
385
63
There is nothing wrong with temporary self-loathing under specific circumstances.
Only a babe in Christ or a carnal believer would say this. There is absolutely no worry,fear, guilt or any type of SELF loathing in the Christian way of life.

Philippians 4:11-13
Not that I am speaking of being in need, for I have learned in whatever situation I am to be content. I know how to be brought low, and I know how to abound. In any and every circumstance, I have learned the secret of facing plenty and hunger, abundance and need. I can do all things through him who strengthens me.

2 Corinthians 12:9
But he said to me, “My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness.” Therefore I will boast all the more gladly of my weaknesses, so that the power of Christ may rest upon me.

That is why the "doctrines of Grace" from the calvies is bogus. Biblical Grace would never lead a believer to even contemplate "self loathing."
 
Dec 7, 2024
297
101
43
I noticed that you "find it interesting that in John 15 Jesus tells his Disciples" he did NOT choose very many to follow him, implying that he had nothing to do with the ministry of Paul to the Gentiles, and indicating that God hates the greater half of humanity.

Yes, that is very interesting--and blasphemous!--unless you glean some other meaning? (I certainly do!)
You are targeting the wrong person. I was on topic. Your charge of blasphemy is groundless.
 

HeIsHere

Well-known member
May 21, 2022
6,470
2,522
113
Only a babe in Christ or a carnal believer would say this. There is absolutely no worry,fear, guilt or any type of SELF loathing in the Christian way of life.

Philippians 4:11-13
Not that I am speaking of being in need, for I have learned in whatever situation I am to be content. I know how to be brought low, and I know how to abound. In any and every circumstance, I have learned the secret of facing plenty and hunger, abundance and need. I can do all things through him who strengthens me.

2 Corinthians 12:9
But he said to me, “My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness.” Therefore I will boast all the more gladly of my weaknesses, so that the power of Christ may rest upon me.

That is why the "doctrines of Grace" from the calvies is bogus. Biblical Grace would never lead a believer to even contemplate "self loathing."

Amen, thank you!!
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
61,498
30,511
113
Only a babe in Christ or a carnal believer would say this.
Oh. And do they not exist in your world view? Or your theology?

Biblical Grace would never lead a believer to even contemplate "self loathing."
Wow. Another Jesus denier in the free will camp.

John 12:25 Anyone who loves their life will lose it, while anyone who hates their life in this world will keep it for eternal life.
 
Dec 30, 2024
79
25
18
Not true. In fact Scripture plainly states that the world could not hold
all the books that could be written concerning things God has done.
John wrote that towards what Jesus had done not everything God did before the WORD became flesh and then did.
 
Dec 7, 2024
297
101
43
No one comes to Jesus unless the Father draws him.(to Jesus)
And Jesus says He will raise those ones up on the last day.
Which means those who are called remain in Jesus so to be raised up on the last day.


John 6:44 (NET)
No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him. And I will raise him up on the last day.

John 6:37-39

New English Translation

37 Everyone whom the Father gives me will come to me, and the one who comes to me I will never send away.[a] 38 For I have come down from heaven not to do my own will but the will of the one who sent me. 39 Now this is the will of the one who sent me—that I should not lose one person of every one he has given me, but raise them all up[b] at the last day.
Footnotes
  1. John 6:37 tn Or “drive away”; Grk “cast out.”
  2. John 6:39 tn Or “resurrect them all,” or “make them all live again”; Grk “raise it up.” The word “all” is supplied to bring out the collective nature of the neuter singular pronoun αὐτό (auto) in Greek. The plural pronoun “them” is used rather than neuter singular “it” because this is clearer in English, which does not use neuter collective singulars in the same way Greek does.

John 6:37-39

Mounce Reverse Interlinear New Testament

37 All pas that hos the ho Father patēr gives didōmi me egō will come hēkō to pros me egō, and kai anyone ho who comes erchomai to pros me egō I will never ou mē turn ekballō away exō. 38 For hoti I have come katabainō down from apo · ho heaven ouranos, not ou to hina do poieō · ho my own emos will thelēma · ho but alla to do the ho will thelēma of ho him who sent pempō me egō. 39 And de this houtos is eimi the ho will thelēma of the ho one who sent pempō me egō: that hina of all pas that hos he has given didōmi me egō I should lose apollymi none mē but alla raise anistēmi them autos up on en the ho last eschatos day hēmera.


John 5

John 7

















 

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
3,255
463
83
That was my point your god did set the limitations and created this fallen incapacitated human nature.

And if he did he is culpable no matter how much it is stated he is not, he created the fallen nature to be that way, it didn't happen by accident.
It must be accepted that the nature of fallen man as described by the doctrine you hold is what God created, it did come by on its own.

God did not think ...... "Oppsies how did that happen?"

This means that God is responsible for man's inabilities, his slavery to sin and the rest of the list because he created fallen man that way.
This dogma is so desperate to make mankind born incapacitated to believe it ultimately removes God's free will.
But the logical consequences are a bitter pill.

You will not be persuaded, but if you understood nuance you would know there is a big difference between being in control and controlling.
God didn't create the fallen nature. If he had, then it could not be said in the creation account that all he created was "very good". The fallen nature resulted because of Adam's sin -- not God's sin! This is not to say that God didn't create the "very good" Adam with the moral/spiritual, psychological, physiological capacity for DEATH (and all that that entails) that would bring great harm upon himself and all his progeny, but God didn't cause Adam to sin even though Adam could not have sinned unless God decreed it, which would even be the case with God's "permissive" will. If God had "forced" A & E to sin, neither of them would have felt genuine guilt, shame and fear after they sinned. Why would they? Or do you think God duped or programmed that kind of response into them. Is there any limit you won't go in order to exalt fallen mankind who Jesus characterized as EVIL!?

The reason you refuse to acknowledge what all the terrible effects of DEATH are that rendered man helpless and hopeless is because you don't see yourself this way, plus you can still push the really stupid alternative that God created "robots" if man doesn't have freewill and the ability to make choices contrary to his nature. This is the way to keep the dumb robot narrative alive. Well...here's a newsflash for you, lady: God cannot will himself to sin, so I suppose you must think God is a robot as well!

Tell me, madam, do you think Abimilech was a created robot because God restrained ("forced") this pagan king from violating Sarah?