Versions of the Bible... Which one...?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
F

FridaysChild

Guest
#41
The Message is a paraphrase, like the NLT. That means more of less that the translator reads the original language, then thinks about it a while, then writes in English what he thinks it means to him. In addition, the Message was translated by only one man, Eugene Peterson, so you are definitely going to get a bias towards his thinking and theology.
Exactly! Thank you for stating it so well.

For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.
2Peter 1:21

All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
2 Tim 3:16
 
Jan 25, 2015
9,213
3,189
113
#42
Personally, I have never been a fan of the Amplified Version because it takes too may liberties with the Greek. As far as the KJV I really do not use it much because the English is so very antiquated and it looses a lot of people who are generations removed from that language structure. I do like the NKJV however and usually teach from it when teaching the NT.
Thank you.

I enjoyed the Amplified for the simple reason I didn't have e-sword at the time and it was more descriptive but I haven't read it for a long time. The last year or so I have been reading the KJV but I will try to get a copy of the NKJV.
 
V

Viligant_Warrior

Guest
#43
there is a new one available and well worth a read viz namely 'The Evidence Bible' by Ray Comfort - wincam
I am assuming this is a one-man translation???
Not so much, but Comfort's commentary is heavy-handed and blatantly slanted so as to give the Lordship Salvation interpretations more emphasis.
 
Jan 25, 2015
9,213
3,189
113
#45
It doesn't actually "take liberties" but provides every possible meaning of the Greek word used in any given sentence, relative to the surrounding context. There are occasions when I am not sure all of an expanded meaning is relevant to the passage, but it gives options that some people find helpful in grasping what the text is saying.

As to the OP's question, I have absolutely no problem asking him to consider The Message. Peterson's paraphrase is consistent with the biblical content, and certainly does put the emotion and feeling back into the passages.
Thank you :)
 
Apr 13, 2015
257
1
0
#46
Yes, I avoid all paraphrased versions. To me they are as unreliable as they are varied in their interpretations. Even if one has no background in the original languages one cannot go wrong by staying with such as the NASV, ASV, NKJV, ESV, REVISED, etc.... Although some minor variances exist they are very reliable translations.

Not true !

There are over 300 (Christian, Catholic, Cult) English bibles

which do not match in content, volume or doctrine.

There are two types of Bibles, Holy Bibles and Corrupt bibles.

KJV For we are not as many, which corrupt the word of God:

but as of sincerity, but as of God, in the sight of God speak we in Christ.





 
D

Delivery

Guest
#47
I'm going to try to start reading the Bible more. However, there are numerous Bible versions to choose from. I literally can't stand the KJV OR the NKVJ. I like an easy read, and they aren't one... At least for me; I don't want to argue on whether or not they are easy to read because this is obviously relative.

I really like the NLT. I was wondering if this is accurate? Does it fall in line with the teachings of the KJV? If not, is there any other version that is easier to read but still accurate and of God's Word?
The catholic bible is the next best thing to the KJV.
 
Apr 13, 2015
257
1
0
#48



That's ridiculous, they are different in content, volume and doctrine !
 
V

Viligant_Warrior

Guest
#49

Not true !

There are over 300 (Christian, Catholic, Cult) English bibles

which do not match in content, volume or doctrine.

There are two types of Bibles, Holy Bibles and Corrupt bibles.

KJV For we are not as many, which corrupt the word of God:

but as of sincerity, but as of God, in the sight of God speak we in Christ.
The lies that KJV Onlyists tell about other very reliable and literal renderings of God's perfectly preserved word only in the original languages grow tiresome and thin. Please peddle "KJV Onlyism" elsewhere, as here it is ...

 
Apr 13, 2015
257
1
0
#50




I am not a KJV Only and I am not an Original Only .

All scripture is given by inspiration of God .

There are two types of bibles,

Holy Bibles and Corrupt Bibles !







 
Last edited:

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,144
613
113
70
Alabama
#51

Not true !

There are over 300 (Christian, Catholic, Cult) English bibles

which do not match in content, volume or doctrine.

There are two types of Bibles, Holy Bibles and Corrupt bibles.

KJV For we are not as many, which corrupt the word of God:

but as of sincerity, but as of God, in the sight of God speak we in Christ.


How skilled are you in the original languages?
 
Apr 9, 2015
995
10
0
#52
If your Truly led of the Spirit, you will start out in whatever Bible you have.. but Eventually the Spirit will lead you to the Original Greek/Hebrew, studying that, and with that you need a Concordance, I've used the Strong's concordance ever since 1994. started out in some Parallel Versions of the Bible, found myself going to the King James Version, because of the Concordance Study, from there its Hebrew and Greek , what those Words mean that are in English, no matter how man changes them, its the Original Greek Hebrew, and from that you use a Concordance! I will say this though, man has changed the Word of God, fueled by the 'serpent' to change the Word of God from its Original Greek/Hebrew, this is very Subtle, but allowed so that that oL Girl from Revelation can be full of confusion and Chaos, yet be brought together by the false peace of the coming Man of Sin, who has yet to be revealed to this planet, in his due time, never late , never Early as God Himself is Sovereign and in Control!
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,144
613
113
70
Alabama
#53
not without help it seems and comes highly recommended at the very start of circulation - wincam
Was there a committee connected with this translation or is it like the McCord, Berlely, Moffit, or Philips translations which were created solely by the scholars whose names they bear?
 
Apr 13, 2015
257
1
0
#57
Coulda fooled me.

And which ones would you classify under each category?

While the entire line of scripture are records, the outstanding record of scripture
and the scripture of final authority is the published text and form
of the AV 1611 KJV Holy Bible first edition.

The KJV Holy Bible is the most published, read and loved bible of all time .

The KJV Holy Bible is the most published, read and loved book of all time.




 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,144
613
113
70
Alabama
#58
Thank you.

I enjoyed the Amplified for the simple reason I didn't have e-sword at the time and it was more descriptive but I haven't read it for a long time. The last year or so I have been reading the KJV but I will try to get a copy of the NKJV.
I certainly like the NKJV in deference to the KJV because the translators have made many corrections to misrepresented verb tenses and the English is much more contemporary. The KJV is a good translation but,the only real problem I have with the KJV is not its translational issues but the inferior nature of the Greek texts from which it was translated.
 
Apr 13, 2015
257
1
0
#60
I certainly like the NKJV in deference to the KJV because the translators have made many corrections to misrepresented verb tenses and the English is much more contemporary. The KJV is a good translation but,the only real problem I have with the KJV is not its translational issues but the inferior nature of the Greek texts from which it was translated.
99% of the 5,500+ existing N.T. manuscripts
support the readings
of the KJV Holy Bible.

The N.T. manuscripts of the KJV Holy Bible

predate the existing 45 Alexandrian manuscripts
and the reconstructed Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus.