What does the Law REALLY say?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Elin

Banned
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
The New Covenant was given to Abraham as a promise and fulfilled in Jesus Christ. For me it is the Covenant of Old since we are all children of Abraham by promise to him, and grace in Messiah.
The promise of a Savior is not a covenant.

Abraham was not under the new covenant.

The new covenant was not revealed until Jer.
 

Elin

Banned
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Are you saying you do not know the covenant made with Abraham? That
covenant, promise, brit, was God's oath to Abraham that his descendants would possess the Gate, Jesus Christ, of their enemies, the Gentiles. This is the Gospel.

Where is this covenant found?
 

KohenMatt

Senior Member
Jun 28, 2013
4,054
257
83
Does it have to be only in the law to be God's truth?

Is Gal 3:10 not also God's truth?
Does it have to only be in the epistles to be God's truth?


If you're not even going to take the time to answer my question and provide some actual context from the actual Law itself, it's a waste of my time.

It appears you are either unwilling to, unable to, or are scared to see what God actually said when He gave the Law. If you took the time to read the Law, you would understand what it says. And sadly, it appears (and I hope I'm wrong) that you have no clue what it actually says.
 

Elin

Banned
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Quoting Galatians or even Matthew isn't quoting what the Law actually says.

I know exactly what Matthew 5 says (to follow the Law), and I know who my High Priest is.

But what I'm getting at here is that
no one really cares to actually quote the Law itself and what it requires and promises.
Because all of that has to be seen in the light of the words spoken by the Son
in these last days (Heb 1:1-2) through the NT writers.

And the first thing we learn is that all those who rely on observing the law are under a curse (Gal 3:10).

You would have us understand the Word of God apart from the revelation of the NT writers spoken in these last days?

You are putting asunder what God has joined, his latter revelation given by the Son,
which casts light on his former revelation given by the prophets of old (Heb 1:1-2),
and which is superior as Jesus is superior to the angels or Moses (Heb 1, 3).
 

Elin

Banned
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
You need to know what the Law actually says before you can discredit it.
We don't "discredit" it. . .God has set it aside (Heb 7:18-19) in favor of justification by faith only.

You need to know what the Law actually says to understand what Paul is saying about it.
You don't need to know what the Law "says" in order to understand Heb 7:18-19
that it has been set aside because it was weak and useless to obtain righteousness.

I'm beginning to wonder if people have ever read the Law or have any idea what it says.:confused:
Should I wonder if you have read the NT or have any idea about what it says regarding the Law?
 

Elin

Banned
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
There is no law of Moses without the curse, but with Yeshua there is law without the curse. You anwered yourself here,.

You quoted my opening with people are always using the teaching that the law was a tutor while knowing nothing of the law.

Christ teaches us that all of the law is fulfilled in love, the law of love.
This does not take away from the value of the law without the curse.
There is no law of Moses without the curse.

There is only the law of Christ without the curse.

Jesus Christ tells us the law stands as it is unless heaven and earth pass away, for it is easier for that to occur than the law to be abolished.
You left out the part about being fulfilled, which Jesus did.

In Revelations it is repeated that we are blessed in keeping the commandments of God
Rev 22:13
I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last.
Jesus never taught that there are any commandments or laws that are abolished,
Jesus also never taught that the sacrificial system is abolished (Heb 10:1-4, 10-14),
or that the old covenant is obsolete (Heb 8:13).
Your point is mute.

But what is not mute is your setting the OT against the NT.
And you're saying Heb 7:18-19 is a lie?

You cannot be taken seriously if you do not understand the relationship
between the OT and the NT (Heb 1:1-4, 3:1-6), and set them one against the other.


Rev 22:14 Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.
And those are the commands of Christ in the law of Christ.




 

Elin

Banned
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
And where in the Law does it say that it requires perfect obedience and death if it isn't done perfectly?
The Word of God states it in Gal 3:10; Dt 27:26.

And what provision is there if man disobeyed parts of the Law?
Sacrifices, cleansings, purifications, restitution, etc.

Keeping in mind that "it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away (remit) sin" (Heb 10:4).

 

JaumeJ

Senior Member
Jul 2, 2011
21,407
6,692
113
The way the things get turned around. If you read in Revelation you will find it separates the commandments of God and the testimony of Jesus Christ. There is a reason they are spoken separately.

Jesus gave us "a`new commandment that we should love one another as He has loved us." Nowhere does He say it rescinds the law. As for the law of Moses with the curse, it only has the curse if you do not accept Jesus Christ. Please do not add to nor take away from the Word of God, for He does not lie.

Rev 12:17
And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.
 

Elin

Banned
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
The only thing that makes the curse of the Law of Moses inseperable would be
The Word of God states that God himself made them inseparable when he gave them (Dt 27:26; Gal 3:10).

not knowing the grace of Jesus Christ's gift of His very own Blood for the non-imutation of sin for all who believe Him.
This does not take away the prophecy, the wisdom, and the blessing of
the law, only the curse of the Law. Read the rest of the Word, and you will learn this.
Read the Word of God and believe that God has set aside the Mosaic law
because it was weak and useless to obtain righteousness (Heb 7:18-19),

and we are now under the law of Christ (Mt 22:37-39; 1Co 9:20-21;
Gal 6:2) which fulfills (accomplishes) the law (Mt 22:40; Ro 13:8-10).
 
Last edited:

Elin

Banned
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Elin said:
Ex 19:5-6 doesn't really state its purpose,
only the consequences of keeping it.

I go with the NT explanation, which clearly states that it was given as a tutor to lead us to Christ.
OK then, what did God states that it's purpose was when He gave it?
God states in his Word that its purpose was as a tutor to lead us to Christ (Gal 3:24).
 

Elin

Banned
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Elin said:
seed_time_harvest said:
I see the scripture that you gave and I wanted to ask you if any man was able to fulfill that scripture in Exodus 19:5-6;And if any man were not able to fulfill it,then I would wonder since we know that GOD is fair,
why would he give them that scripture
To teach him that very thing.
What passage in the Law states that very thing?
The Word of God states it that the law was given as a tutor to lead to Christ the Savior (Gal 3:24),
because no one could save himself through law keeping.
 

Elin

Banned
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Does it have to only be in the epistles to be God's truth?
It has to be in agreement with the epistles to be God's truth.

If you're not even going to take the time to answer my question and
provide some actual context from the actual Law itself, it's a waste of my time.
My context will always be taken from the whole counsel of God, not just part of it.

It appears you are either unwilling to, unable to, or are scared to see what God actually said when He gave the Law. If you took the time to read the Law, you would understand what it says. And sadly, it appears (and I hope I'm wrong) that you have no clue what it actually says.
You are dead wrong.
 
Feb 9, 2010
2,486
39
0
All the physical ordinances and laws as such were done away with because Jesus nailed them to his cross taking them out of the way because they were contrary to us,which means they had no spiritual salvation blessings to them,but all the moral laws including the 10 commandments are still active and never pass away.

The Bible says love works no ill towards their neighbor,therefore love is the fulfilling of the law.

Love is the fulfilling of the law,which means love people perfectly,which you can only do if you are led by the Spirit,and the physical laws and ordinances has nothing to do with that and to be right with God.

Jesus said the two greatest commandments are to love God and people.

That is all we have to do is love people perfectly and we have fulfilled God's law,which we can only do by the Spirit,which if we are led of the Spirit then we love God perfectly.

As far as the temple of Israel it will be rebuilt and they will go back to animal sacrifices and do it Old Testament style,the physical laws and ordinances,which the man of sin will step in to their temple and tell them to stop animal sacrifices and that he is their God.
 

Elin

Banned
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
The way the things get turned around. If you read in Revelation you will find it separates the commandments of God and the testimony of Jesus Christ. There is a reason they are spoken separately.

Jesus gave us "a`new commandment that we should love one another as He has loved us."
Nowhere does He say it rescinds the law.
Not so.

The Word of God states that Jesus gave us only two commands,
on which hang all the law and the prophets.
These two commands are the law and the prophets.
There are no more.

The Word of God states that the law is fulfilled (accomplished) in Jesus' commands (Ro 13:8-10).

There are no other commands than these two (Mt 22:37-39), for they would be redundant.

As for the law of Moses with the curse, it only has the curse if you do not accept Jesus Christ.
That's not what the Word of God states in Dt 27:26.

Please do not add to nor take away from the Word of God, for He does not lie.
Please do not say the NT is "adding" to the Word of God,
and please do not take away the NT Word of God, for he does not lie.

Rev 12:17 -
And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.
I don't do private and uncertain interpretation of prophetic riddles,
because they can be, and are, validly interpret by others to mean things entirely different.
 

JaumeJ

Senior Member
Jul 2, 2011
21,407
6,692
113
I believe you are incorrigable. This is may assessment of your obsession with the subject at hand. You should read what Jesus Christ said to the Apostles in John. There is no personal interpretation of what you are calling a riddle when it comes to the quote from Revelation. It has the coordinating conjunction, and, between which keep the commandment of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ. I believe I do my best on the first complete thought, and I know I have the testimony of Jesus Christ.

This is not a riddle, it is spoken in plain words, but you make it a riddle. I must leave you to your own devices for you do not demonstrate any brotherhood or willingness to understand what is true. Good-bye.
 

Elin

Banned
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Elin said:
JaumeJ said:
Rev 12:17 -
And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.
I don't do private and uncertain interpretation of prophetic riddles,
because they can be, and are, validly interpret by others to mean things entirely different.
I believe you are incorrigable.
The Judaizers thought the same of Paul.

This is may assessment of your obsession with the subject at hand. You should read what Jesus Christ said to the Apostles in John.
There is no personal interpretation of what you are calling
a riddle when it comes to the quote from Revelation.
And yet others validly interpret it to mean things entirely different.

Prophecy is given in riddles, which can be interpreted in more than one way.

 

KohenMatt

Senior Member
Jun 28, 2013
4,054
257
83
It has to be in agreement with the epistles to be God's truth.


My context will always be taken from the whole counsel of God, not just part of it.


You are dead wrong.
Good. I'm sincerely glad to hear that. Now cite some scriptures to prove your interpretations. If you believe that the whole Word is in agreement with itself, then it should be easy.
 

JaumeJ

Senior Member
Jul 2, 2011
21,407
6,692
113
As it is written, it is important for believers to keep the commandments of God and the witness of Jesus Christ. There is no twisiting of the words, they are plaine. Two different instructions in the words.

Rev 12:17 -
And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.

There is no interpretation when we read the words, they are plain. I beg all who believe Jesus Christ to keep the commandments of God and have the witness of Jesus Christ......... It is not a favor it is our due.

Good night from here, and may God bless you who are in Jesus Christ and keep you.