What Happens to an UNBAPTIZED believer?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Mar 28, 2014
4,300
31
0
It's called studying as in "Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth."
Nowhere does it say study to change the word....or twist the word to suit a doctrine of man... wiki ....webster...Bullinger...(where is prayer and fast)
 
Feb 21, 2012
3,794
199
63
Nowhere does it say study to change the word....or twist the word to suit a doctrine of man... wiki ....webster...Bullinger...(where is prayer and fast)
I haven't changed the word nor twisted anything - you say that because you cannot see nor hear. Through Wiki, Webster and Bullinger I used the definition of the figure of speech - hendiadys. I'm sure you learned about nouns, verbs, about similes, metaphors, and other figures used in language in your English class at school? These things are also applied to the language used in scripture and it is good to know and study them together with prayer.
 

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
Disgustion Continues with no discovery of any passage that says unbaptized believers are condemned:

Nowhere does it say study to change the word....or twist the word to suit a doctrine of man... wiki ....webster...Bullinger...(where is prayer and fast)
Study to show self approved to God, a workman that needs not to be ashamed (prayer & fast is not substitute for that; don't change the word from "study" to "fast."

If you really believe that no commentaries should be consulted by anyone, then stop posting here & making comments, as no one would need to read you, just pray & fast.

Bullinger IMHO was somewhat of a nut.

webster is not very important; Greek/Hebrew lexicons are.

Prayer: Yes, pray for illumination (after you trust Christ as Savior so your prayers will be heard). James 1: wisdom comes from the Lord.

Fast: I don't know of any passage that recommends fasting as an aid to Bible study. I don't know of any passage that commands fasting to the Church. The Received Text (behind KJV) is more pro-fasting than are the most ancient manuscripts.

Of course we hop on rabbit paths, as hendiadys has little to do with the thread topic.

Disgustion Continues with no discovery of any passage that says unbaptized believers are condemned
 

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
Still Nothing Found about Unbaptized Believers being condemned. In Bible interp, one prefers the literal when it makes good sense.

Webster's - the expression of an idea by the use of two usually independent words connected by "and" - emphasis being placed on the noun, not the modifier
Wikipedia - Only had 2 examples of hendiadys - Exodus 15:4 - "the chariots of Pharaoh and his army" = "the chariots of Pharaoh's army; Lev. 25:47 "the alien and the resident" = "resident alien"


That is a misquotation from Lev 25:47. In Hebrew it actually says to (the) Here is what it actually says: "to (the) stranger sojourner, two words to describe a type of resident in Israel. The two words appear to make added description. The "example" does not have 2 nouns joined by AND.

לגר תושב


"John 3:5 This is literally "Except a man shall have been begotten of water and spirit" There is no article to either of the two nouns. "

Now do you have some proof that the lack of an article implies hendiadys? Do you have some proof that whenever two inarticular nouns are joined by kai, that is hendiadys? Or can you prove that hendiadys requires no articles?

In literature there are figures of speech - similes, metaphors, idioms and hendiadys.
It is indeed important to realize that there are figures, yet the rule is to prefer the literal if it makes sense, which it does for water in John 3.I am unaware of any proof that hendiadys occurs in the Bible.

I did not say that "living water" was the figure of hendiadys . . . . water and Spirit is the figure meaning spiritual water which would be "baptized with holy Spirit"
Such an interpretation appears to me to be a big stretch of imagination. I can't see the Lord Jesus telling Nicodemus such a thing; as he could not have understood that. There is no baptism of the Spirit in the OT. What if Nic dies before the Church Age? Then he would not get this baptism before he died. Spirit baptism puts a person into the Body of Christ (1 Cor 12:13), which did not exist in John 3. There is no context for it in John 3.

which is what Jesus was speaking about to the woman at the well - "But whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst; but the water that I shall give him shall be in him a well of water springing up into everlasting life."
which is - "He that believeth on me, as the scripture hath said out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water (But this spake he of the Spirit, which they that believe on him should receive: for the Holy Spirit was not yet given; because that Jesus was not yet glorified)"
Thus obtaining this blessing was out of Nic's reach.

If you are a dispensationalist, why don't you think that "the Kingdom of God" in John 3 refers to the Davidic Kingdom & not the Church? Spirit baptism is out of context there; the Church is out of context there.

Just take the water literal, which requires no tortured fanciful interpretation. Yes, you can read anyone's commentary, but carefully if written by a nut, eat the fish & spit out the bones.

BTW,
15:4 - "the chariots of Pharaoh and his army" makes very good sense read literally. Twisting it to "the chariots of Pharaoh's army" suggests that the old boy didn't own the chariots directly, but surely he did.
 
Last edited:
Feb 21, 2012
3,794
199
63
Still Nothing Found about Unbaptized Believers being condemned.
I agree - won't find one . . .
In Bible interp, one prefers the literal when it makes good sense.
That is a misquotation from Lev 25:47. In Hebrew it actually says to (the) Here is what it actually says: "to (the) stranger sojourner, two words to describe a type of resident in Israel. The two words appear to make added description. The "example" does not have 2 nouns joined by AND.

לגר תושב

Okay
"John 3:5 This is literally "Except a man shall have been begotten of water and spirit" There is no article to either of the two nouns. "

Now do you have some proof that the lack of an article implies hendiadys? Do you have some proof that whenever two inarticular nouns are joined by kai, that is hendiadys? Or can you prove that hendiadys requires no articles?

Nope other than English grammar and looking at figures of speech - Bullinger was not my only reference - but anyway - Okay . . . .
It is indeed important to realize that there are figures, yet the rule is to prefer the literal if it makes sense, which it does for water in John 3. I am unaware of any proof that hendiadys occurs in the Bible.

Such an interpretation appears to me to be a big stretch of imagination. I can't see the Lord Jesus telling Nicodemus such a thing; as he could not have understood that. There is no baptism of the Spirit in the OT. What if Nic dies before the Church Age? Then he would not get this baptism before he died. Spirit baptism puts a person into the Body of Christ (1 Cor 12:13), which did not exist in John 3. There is no context for it in John 3. Thus obtaining this blessing was out of Nic's reach.

I believe Jesus was teaching Nicodemus as he taught his disciples or didn't he teach regarding Spirit baptism even though it wasn't available yet? You are correct Spirit baptism puts a person into the body of Christ - as a child of God; i.e. born of the Spirit.
but . . . Okay.

If you are a dispensationalist, why don't you think that "the Kingdom of God" in John 3 refers to the Davidic Kingdom & not the Church? Spirit baptism is out of context there; the Church is out of context there.

Just take the water literal, which requires no tortured fanciful interpretation. Yes, you can read anyone's commentary, but carefully if written by a nut, eat the fish & spit out the bones.
Again, I do believe that Jesus taught concerning the coming of the baptism of Holy Spirit even though it was not yet available. Jesus prepared his apostles and disciples for what was going to come. I don't believe that Bullinger is a nut. I am humble enough to know that I do not know everything and sometimes it helps to use the work of scholars more knowledgeable than I. I also told you Atwood that I agreed with you but I also believe that it could carry both meanings.
BTW, 15:4 - "the chariots of Pharaoh and his army" makes very good sense read literally. Twisting it to "the chariots of Pharaoh's army" suggests that the old boy didn't own the chariots directly, but surely he did.
Exodus 15:4 Pharaoh's chariots and his host hath he cast into the sea: his chosen captains also are drowned in the Red Sea. Pharaoh's chariots and his host (army) = The chariots of Pharaoh's army hath he cast into the sea - putting the emphasis on the WHOLE of Pharaoh's army . . . .
But . . . Okay.

How dull language would be without figures of speech! The land was thirsty. A more vivid picture comes to mind than "The land was dry." Do they mean the same thing? Of course - no twisting, no changing just more emphasis.

 

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
Noting that no passage has been posted which condemns the unbaptized believer, let us give a moment to the hendiadys theory which Peaceful kindly added to our knowledge of the history of the interp of this passage:

The land was thirsty. A more vivid picture comes to mind than "The land was dry." Do they mean the same thing? Of course - no twisting, no changing just more emphasis.
Yes, it is poor interpretation to insist on literal excessively. I intend to investigate hendiadys more. Thanks for bringing that figure of speech to my attention. I note that there are articles on it presented by JSTOR. I intend to keep an open mind on the existence of such a figure of speech. Maybe some deny its existence. Just google JSTOR hendiadys for some articles.

Full text of "Hendiadys: Is There Such a Thing? (Based on a Study of Vergil)"

JSTOR: An Error Occurred Setting Your User Cookie

[That link came out strange; but it works; yet better access is by just Googling]

Sansone's article says:

"If one wishes to consult the standard discussion of the figure of hendiadys in Greek, one is surprised to learn that such does not exist. . . . the figure is ignored in the Greek grammars of [3 listed] . I cannot account for this omission . . . . "

It sounds like he may go on to argue for its existence, though I have not yet gone through my access process to get beyond the first page. This article probably concerns classical Greek.

Thanks anyway, I shall now add it to my bag of mental considerations when interpreting a passage.
 
Last edited:
Mar 12, 2014
6,433
29
0
So when Christ said "believe and be baptized" - did he specifically say "water"? I understand that "water" was used in the OT - I understand that John baptized with water for repentance - I understand that John prophesied that there would be one coming that was mightier than he (John) who would baptize with Holy Spirit - I understand that Jesus was baptized in "water" to fulfill the law - I understand that Jesus said He would give us "living water" to drink - I understand that "living water" is the Holy Spirit - I understand that "by one Spirit we are baptized into one body" and "made to drink into one Spirit" - that is baptism in Holy Spirit - that is the ONE baptism.

Water baptism does not save anyone nor does "water" create the new man.
Baptizo means a literal immersion.

Proper exegesis: F.F. Bruce: “baptism in the New Testament is always baptism in water unless the context shows it to be something else; that is to say, the word is always to be understood literally unless the context indicates a figurative meaning” (Questions Answered, p. 106).

Baptism is not used figuratively in Mk 16:16 but a literal immersion in water. Mk 16:15,16 along with Mt 28:19,20 and Lk 24:47 are all accounts of Christ's great commission where disciples (humans) were commanded to do the baptizing and humans administer water baptism as Phillip did with the eunuch.

So water baptism does save, Mk 16:16; Acts 2:38; 1 Pet 3:21 because God has made water baptism the point as to where He saves.
 
Mar 28, 2014
4,300
31
0
I agree - won't find one . . .
[/RIGHT]
Okay

Nope other than English grammar and looking at figures of speech - Bullinger was not my only reference - but anyway - Okay . . . .

I believe Jesus was teaching Nicodemus as he taught his disciples or didn't he teach regarding Spirit baptism even though it wasn't available yet? You are correct Spirit baptism puts a person into the body of Christ - as a child of God; i.e. born of the Spirit.
but . . . Okay.


Again, I do believe that Jesus taught concerning the coming of the baptism of Holy Spirit even though it was not yet available. Jesus prepared his apostles and disciples for what was going to come. I don't believe that Bullinger is a nut. I am humble enough to know that I do not know everything and sometimes it helps to use the work of scholars more knowledgeable than I. I also told you Atwood that I agreed with you but I also believe that it could carry both meanings.

Exodus 15:4 Pharaoh's chariots and his host hath he cast into the sea: his chosen captains also are drowned in the Red Sea. Pharaoh's chariots and his host (army) = The chariots of Pharaoh's army hath he cast into the sea - putting the emphasis on the WHOLE of Pharaoh's army . . . .
But . . . Okay.

How dull language would be without figures of speech! The land was thirsty. A more vivid picture comes to mind than "The land was dry." Do they mean the same thing? Of course - no twisting, no changing just more emphasis.

supposing you were to ask someone the question ...Have you received the Holy Spirit since you believed ? and they answer I know nothing of the Holy Spirit, what would your response be?......
 
Mar 12, 2014
6,433
29
0

my dear fish, you simply must procure for yourself a Bible that has more than one verse in it.
no scripture is privately interpreted.
have a look at post #290. there are a great multitude of scriptures promising salvation to all who believe on the name of Jesus.
there is exactly one place where our Lord said all who believe and are baptized will be saved.

did Jesus contradict all the rest of the Word?
should we re-write and add to all the rest of the scriptures, replacing the word "believe" with "be baptized by human hands in a ritual ceremony" ?
or is this exactly one gospel, that all who believe are sanctified by the Spirit, that "baptism" is a spiritual reality of immersion in, regeneration through, and renewal by the Holy Spirit which is the gift of God, the work of God alone, the earnest of our salvation being given by God, without human hands, to all who hear the Word and receive it, and that it is the custom of the church to celebrate and publicly declare this work of God with the ceremony of water which is a like figure to the work that only God can do, and only God does?

it is good for you to cling to the Word, but reach up and grab hold of it with both hands, taking firm purchase in the body of it, not one loose vine only between your fingers, or you may fall - because there is much here that is strong to hold us up!




how about this Apollos!
he having heard and believed the gospel of the living Christ, was 'aglow with the Spirit' and did not even perceive it!
his brother & sister in Christ taught him what God had done by His Spirit, and he was made bolder and wiser for it - and the scripture does not record that he was re-baptized!

so here is a man who was never 'baptized in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Ghost' by H[SUB]2[/SUB]O -- and yet he was baptized by the Spirit, but did not even know!
when made aware of it he did not seek out a bathtub to make his salvation sure.

perhaps we have finally found scripture about a believer who was not water-baptized into Christ?
what happened to him?
he was immersed by God in the Spirit!
he confounded all who argued with him and mightily declared the risen Christ!
this he did by the Spirit of God, not by H[SUB]2[/SUB]O.
One verse would be all that is necessary to make baptism necessary but there are other verses besides Mk 16:16.

Being baptized by humans hands IS the baptism of Christ's great commission where humans/disciples baptize others with human hands as Phillip water baptized the eunuch with his human hands. Christ's baptism of the great commission is the one baptism of Eph 4:5 that lasts till the end of the world, Mt 28:19,20.


Apollos was baptized with John's baptism before Christ's baptism came into effect. John preached his baptism was for remission of sins, Mk 1:4. So Apollos' sins were remitted with John's baptism therefore would not need his sin remitted again with Christ's baptism. If John's baptism did not remit sins then John lied.

1) so John's baptism remitted sins. If Apllos had to be re-baptized for remission of sins then John lied about his baptism remitting sins

2) John's baptism allowed entrance into the kingdom, Mt 21:28-31

3) John's baptism was to "to make ready a people prepared for the Lord." Lk 1:17. Those in Acts 2:38 were lost sinners who were not ready and unprepared. If those baptized with John's baptism had to what these unready and unprepared people had to do in Acts 2, then that begs the question what is the difference between being prepared and unprepared and ready and unready?
 
Mar 12, 2014
6,433
29
0
Christ did not say essential; refrain from adding to the text.
The text says
If A & B, then C.

From that you cannot deduce:
If not B, then not C.

Simple logic, aside from the absence of WATER in the text.



I am not the picker, it is you SeaBass. You camp out on rare verses. I read the whole Bible, cover to cover & marked all the passages. And the evidence is more than one can post in one posting here. You reject the WHOLE COUNSEL.



Acts 2 has no unbaptized believers, so you can prove nothing on that topic from Acts 2. And not belng water baptized is not necessarily rejecting a thing. A man might be dying on a battlefield, or in the desert without water. Yet he could trust Christ as Savior. But your water hangup, interfers with your trusting Him as Savior, thus spiritual blindness results.

UNCHERRY PICK

Rom 1:16-17
For I am not ashamed of the gospel: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek. 17 For therein is revealed a righteousness of God from faith unto faith: as it is written, But the righteous shall live by faith.

Rom 3:21-30

But now apart from the law a righteousness of God hath been manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets; 22 even the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ unto all them that believe; for there is no distinction; 23 for all have sinned, and fall short of the glory of God; 24 being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus: 25 whom God set forth to be a propitiation, through faith, in his blood, to show his righteousness because of the passing over of the sins done aforetime, in the forbearance of God; 26 for the showing, I say, of his righteousness at this present season: that he might himself be just, and the justifier of him that hath faith in Jesus. 27 Where then is the glorying? It is excluded. By what manner of law? of works? Nay: but by a law of faith. 28 We reckon therefore that a man is justified by faith apart from the works of the law. 29 Or is God the God of Jews only? is he not the God of Gentiles also? Yea, of Gentiles also: 30 if so be that God is one, and he shall justify the circumcision by faith, and the uncircumcision through faith.

Rom 4:1ff

:1 What then shall we say that Abraham, our forefather, hath found according to the flesh? 2 For if Abraham was justified by works, he hath whereof to glory; but not toward God. 3 For what saith the scripture? And Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned unto him for righteousness. 4 Now to him who works, the reward is not reckoned as of grace, but as of debt. 5 But to him that works not, but believeth on him that justifies the ungodly, his faith is reckoned for righteousness. 6 Even as David also pronounces blessing upon the man, to whom God reckons righteousness apart from works, 7 saying,
Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven,
And whose sins are covered.
8 Blessed is the man to whom the Lord will not reckon sin.

9 Is this blessing then pronounced upon the circumcision, or upon the uncircumcision also? for we say, To Abraham his faith was reckoned for righteousness. 10 How then was it reckoned? when he was in circumcision, or in uncircumcision? Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision: 11 and he received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the righteousness of the faith which he had while he was in uncircumcision: that he might be the father of all them who believe, though they be in uncircumcision, that righteousness might be reckoned unto them; 12 and the father of circumcision to them who not only are of the circumcision, but who also walk in the steps of that faith of our father Abraham which he had in uncircumcision. 13 For not through the law was the promise to Abraham or to his seed that he should be heir of the world, but through the righteousness of faith. 14 For if they that are of the law are heirs, faith is made void, and the promise is made of none effect: 15 for the law works wrath; but where there is no law, neither is there transgression. 16 For this cause it is of faith, that it may be according to grace; to the end that the promise may be sure to all the seed; not to that only which is of the law, but to that also which is of the faith of Abraham, who is the father of us all 17 (as it is written, A father of many nations have I made thee) before him whom he believed, even God, who giveth life to the dead, and calleth the things that are not, as though they were. 18 Who in hope believed against hope, to the end that he might become a father of many nations, according to that which had been spoken, So shall thy seed be. 19 And without being weakened in faith he considered his own body now as good as dead (he being about a hundred years old), and the deadness of Sarah’s womb; 20 yet, looking unto the promise of God, he wavered not through unbelief, but waxed strong through faith, giving glory to God, 21 and being fully assured that what he had promised, he was able also to perform. 22 Wherefore also it was reckoned unto him for righteousness.

Rom 5:1-2
Being therefore justified by faith, let us have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ; through whom also we have had our access by faith into this grace wherein we stand; and let us boast in hope of the glory of God.
Rom 9:30:
What shall we say then? That the Gentiles, who followed not after righteousness, attained to righteousness, even the righteousness which is of faith: but Israel, following after a law of righteousness, did not arrive at that law. Wherefore? Because they sought it not by faith, but as it were by works. They stumbled at the stone of stumbling; even as it is written,
Behold, I lay in Zion a stone of stumbling and a rock of offence:
And he who believes on him shall not be put to shame.

Rom 10:4ff

For Christ is the end of the law unto righteousness to everyone who believes. For Moses writeth that the man that doeth the righteousness which is of the law shall live thereby. But the righteousness which is of faith says thus, Say not in thy heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down:) or, Who shall descend into the abyss? (that is, to bring Christ up from the dead.) But what saith it? The word is nigh thee, in thy mouth, and in thy heart: that is, the word of faith, which we preach.


Gal 2:15-16
We being Jews by nature, and not sinners of the Gentiles, yet knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law but through faith in Jesus Christ, even we believed on Christ Jesus, that we might be justified by faith in Christ, and not by the works of the law: because by the works of the law no flesh shall be justified.

Gal 3:

This only would I learn from you, Received ye the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith? 3 Are ye so foolish? having begun in the Spirit, are ye now perfected in the flesh? 4 Did ye suffer so many things in vain? if it be indeed in vain. 5 He therefore that supplieth to you the Spirit, and worketh miracles among you, doeth he it by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith? 6 Even as Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned unto him for righteousness. 7 Know therefore that they that are of faith, the same are sons of Abraham. 8 And the scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, preached the gospel beforehand unto Abraham, saying, In thee shall all the nations be blessed. 9 So then they that are of faith are blessed with the faithful Abraham. For as many as are of the works of the law are under a curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one who continues not in all things that are written in the book of the law, to do them. Now that no man is justified by the law before God, is evident: for, The righteous shall live by faith; 12 and the law is not of faith; but, He that doeth them shall live in them. Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law, having become a curse for us; for it is written, Cursed is every one who hangs on a tree: that upon the Gentiles might come the blessing of Abraham in Christ Jesus; that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith.

Gal 3:22ff

But the scripture shut up all things under sin, that the promise by faith in Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe. But before faith came, we were kept in ward under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed. So that the law is become our tutor to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith. But now that faith is come, we are no longer under a tutor. For ye are all sons of God, through faith, in Christ Jesus.

Gal 5:5-6

For we through the Spirit by faith wait for the hope of righteousness. For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision avails anything, nor uncircumcision; but faith working through love.

Philip 3:8-9
Yea verily, and I count all things to be loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord: for whom I suffered the loss of all things, and do count them but refuse, that I may gain Christ, and be found in him, not having a righteousness of mine own, even that which is of the law, but that which is through faith in Christ, the righteousness which is from God by faith:

Col 2:6
As therefore ye received Christ Jesus the Lord, so walk in him, 7 rooted and builded up in him, and established in your faith, even as ye were taught, abounding in thanksgiving.

2 Tim 3:15b
the sacred writings which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.

Titus 1:4
to Titus, my true child after a common faith: Grace and peace from God the Father and Christ Jesus our Saviour.

Heb 3:19ff
And we see that they were not able to enter in because of unbelief. Let us fear therefore, lest haply, a promise being left of entering into his rest, any one of you should seem to have come short of it. 2 For indeed we have had good tidings preached unto us, even as also they: but the word of hearing did not profit them, because it was not united by faith with them that heard. For we who have believed do enter into that rest;

Heb 10:39
But we are not of them that shrink back unto perdition; but of them that have faith unto the saving of the soul.

Heb 11:7

By faith Noah, being warned of God concerning things not seen as yet, moved with godly fear, prepared an ark to the saving of his house; through which he condemned the world, and became heir of the righteousness which is according to faith.

1 Pet 1:3ff

Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who according to his great mercy begat us again unto a living hope by the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, 4 unto an inheritance incorruptible, and undefiled, and that fadeth not away, reserved in heaven for you, 5 who by the power of God are guarded through faith unto a salvation ready to be revealed in the last time. 6 Wherein ye greatly rejoice, though now for a little while, if need be, ye have been put to grief in manifold trials, 7 that the proof of your faith, being more precious than gold that perisheth though it is proved by fire, may be found unto praise and glory and honor at the revelation of Jesus Christ: 8 whom not having seen ye love; on whom, though now ye see him not, yet believing, ye rejoice greatly with joy unspeakable and full of glory: 9 receiving the end of your faith, even the salvation of your souls.

1 John 5:4-5

4 For whatsoever is begotten of God overcometh the world: and this is the victory that hath overcome the world, even our faith. 5 And who is he that overcometh the world, but he that believeth that Jesus is the Son of God?

Your "logic" still fails you:


Given: IF A + B, then C

Proves nothing about
If not A...

So if you can get rid of baptism using your flawed logic, then I can use your flawed logic and get rid of believeth.


------------------------

Below is the logic you cannot find a way to get around:

believeth (1) + baptized (2) = saved (3)

You will NEVER get 1 + nothing to = 3


And you clearly are cherry picking verse that teach belief saves while ignoring all the verses that say repentance, confession, baptism blood of Christ, obedience, the engrafted word etc etc all save.
 
Mar 12, 2014
6,433
29
0
You are changing what I posted now. If you don't see the logic, you are disqualified from discussing these matters.

What I said was
Given: If A + B, then C
Does not prove: If NOT B, then not C.

Given that If a man eats meat & drinks juice, he is not short on protein.
Faulty illogical conclusion: If a man does not drink juice, he is short on protein.

There is no flawed logic.
and you cannot get rid of believe because of the 2nd Given,

He who does not believe is condemned!



What sophistry, and what illogic!
You confuse conditional items and logical result
with adding numerals and getting a sum.
And you stick in an equal sign where a result follows, not a sum.

Believe (first thing) + baptized (2nd thing), then result [not =] salvation (3rd thing).

From that conditional statement you cannot deduce that
If not baptized (2nd thing) then result (3rd thing) does not follow.

That is a logical blunder.

If meat (1) and juice (2), then not short on protein (3).
Blunder to deduce:
If not juice , then short on protein.
It has nothing to do with adding sums.
This is logical inference.


Christ put belief before baptism and baptism before salvation so Christ made belief a necessary prerequite to baptism and baptism a necessary prerequisite to being saved.

Your premises is a man who eat meat and drinks juice is not short on protein.

But you imply that drinking juice is not necessary to get protein. If that true then your premise is flawed and untrue for your premise makes BOTH meat and juice necessary to not be short on protein.

Si is or is not juice necessary to keep from being short on protein? if you say "no" then your premise is flawed and untrue. If you say 'Yes' juice is necessary you still lose your argument.



1+2=3 is not illogical or sophistry it's simple mathematics.

1) belief + 2) baptized = 3) saved

The lack of logic comes when you try and get 1 + 0 = 3.
 
Mar 28, 2014
4,300
31
0
Noting that no passage has been posted which condemns the unbaptized believer, let us give a moment to the hendiadys theory which Peaceful kindly added to our knowledge of the history of the interp of this passage:

Yes, it is poor interpretation to insist on literal excessively. I intend to investigate hendiadys more. Thanks for bringing that figure of speech to my attention. I note that there are articles on it presented by JSTOR. I intend to keep an open mind on the existence of such a figure of speech. Maybe some deny its existence. Just google JSTOR hendiadys for some articles.

Full text of "Hendiadys: Is There Such a Thing? (Based on a Study of Vergil)"

JSTOR: An Error Occurred Setting Your User Cookie

[That link came out strange; but it works; yet better access is by just Googling]

Sansone's article says:

"If one wishes to consult the standard discussion of the figure of hendiadys in Greek, one is surprised to learn that such does not exist. . . . the figure is ignored in the Greek grammars of [3 listed] . I cannot account for this omission . . . . "

It sounds like he may go on to argue for its existence, though I have not yet gone through my access process to get beyond the first page. This article probably concerns classical Greek.

Thanks anyway, I shall now add it to my bag of mental considerations when interpreting a passage.
When Philip preached Jesus to the eunuch, what could he have said to make him say ...look there is water what hinders me from being baptised?...what did he tell Simon and the others that when the believed they were baptised....your faith is in your interpretation of the scripture...not in God
 

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
Noting that no passage has been posted which condemns the unbaptized believer, . . .
When Philip preached Jesus to the eunuch, what could he have said to make him say ...look there is water what hinders me from being baptised?...what did he tell Simon and the others that when the believed they were baptised....your faith is in your interpretation of the scripture...not in God
Beware of bearing false witness, NewB, liars go to the Lake of Fire.

My faith has found a resting place,
Not in device or creed;
I trust the everliving One,
His wounds for me shall plead;
I need no other argument,
I need no other plea;
It is enough that Jesus died,
& that He died for me.


Now what is it about these scriptures which demands Rocket-Science interpretation?

Sirs, what must I do to be saved?
Believe on the Lord Jesus, & you shall be saved.


Thou shalt call His name Jesus, for
He shall save His people from their sins!


I believe that & I trust my Savior with my eternal destiny.

When will you stop arguing & start trusting completely?
 
K

Kerry

Guest
Beware of bearing false witness, NewB, liars go to the Lake of Fire.

My faith has found a resting place,
Not in device or creed;
I trust the everliving One,
His wounds for me shall plead;
I need no other argument,
I need no other plea;
It is enough that Jesus died,
& that He died for me.


Now what is it about these scriptures which demands Rocket-Science interpretation?

Sirs, what must I do to be saved?
Believe on the Lord Jesus, & you shall be saved.


Thou shalt call His name Jesus, for
He shall save His people from their sins!


I believe that & I trust my Savior with my eternal destiny.

When will you stop arguing & start trusting completely?
Good job, everyone should be baptized but it is not a requirement for salvation. Amen brother
 
K

kennethcadwell

Guest
Good job, everyone should be baptized but it is not a requirement for salvation. Amen brother
It's not a requirement for salvation ????
Jesus said you can not enter heaven unless you are born again of water and spirit, and He commanded baptism in Matthew 28, and Mark 16. Believing on Jesus as your Lord and Savior requires that you do as He commanded us to do. If you don't then He makes it clear that He is not your true Lord.

Luke 6:46-49
And why call ye me, Lord, Lord, and do not the things which I say? Whosoever cometh to me, and heareth my sayings, and doeth them, I will shew you to whom he is like: He is like a man which built an house, and digged deep, and laid the foundation on a rock: and when the flood arose, the stream beat vehemently upon that house, and could not shake it: for it was founded upon a rock. But he that heareth, and doeth not, is like a man that without a foundation built an house upon the earth; against which the stream did beat vehemently, and immediately it fell; and the ruin of that house was great.


Jesus says here that if you do not do the things He tells you to do, your fall and ruin will be great.

Lets look again at the great commission;

Matthew 28:16-20
[h=3]The Great Commission[/h][SUP]16 [/SUP]Then the eleven disciples went to Galilee, to the mountain where Jesus had told them to go. [SUP]17 [/SUP]When they saw him, they worshiped him; but some doubted. [SUP]18 [/SUP]Then Jesus came to them and said, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. [SUP]19 [/SUP]Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, [SUP]20 [/SUP]and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.”

Here He commands baptizing, and says to also when teaching others to teach them to obey/observe everything He commanded.

 

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
Still no one has come up with any verse that condemns the unbaptized believer.

Christ put belief before baptism and baptism before salvation
so [sic, there it is; the false so/therefore of Seabass!]
Christ made belief a necessary prerequite to baptism and baptism a necessary prerequisite to being saved.
If Christ mentioned the word baptism before the word salvation in one verse, that proves nothing unless there is proper inferential language defining the relationship. There is no language of necessity in the text between baptize & salvation. What you see is that if a man believes & is baptized he will be saved -- but the same is true about believing and brushing your hair. For over & over salvation is offered just for believing. Thus baptism cannot be essential.
If A & B, then C;
If not A, then not C;
Illogical false inference from that, If not B, then not C.

You may as well argue from "Jesus saith unto her, Go, call thy husband, and come hither." That if someone calls, then thy results, because of word order! or that if the woman has a thy that means she has a husband, because of word order.

Your premises is a man who eat meat and drinks juice is not short on protein.
But you imply that drinking juice is not necessary to get protein. If that true then your premise is flawed and untrue for your premise makes BOTH meat and juice necessary to not be short on protein.
Bear not false witness, Seabass.

This is logic.
I am not implying anything, just demonstrating logic.
Given (assuming).
Given that a man who eats meat & drinks juice is not short on protein,
Given that a man drinks no juice,
It is illogical and a fallacy to deduce from these 2 givens that
A man who does not drink juice is short on protein.

This is plain logic and has no dispute except by an irrational person.

1+2=3 is not illogical or sophistry it's simple mathematics.
1) belief + 2) baptized = 3) saved
The lack of logic comes when you try and get 1 + 0 = 3.
You again practice sophistry and illogic.
Logical inference is not doing sums.
You have no right to assign to "belief" the numeric value of 1,
then to assign "baptized" the numeric value of 2.
They have no such numeric value.
Neither does salvation have the numeric value of 3.

And there are no numeric values to sum up.

Belief/faith + 0 yields salvation over & over in the Bible.
And this is not adding sums, but inferential logic.

What is the believer's belief worth?
What is his salvation worth? How much is eternal life worth?
Water baptism is a human work useless for salvation (0).

But we are not rating matters with numerical values.
This is logical inference.
If faith, then salvation.

Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, & you SHALL BE saved.

For by grace you have been saved through faith,
And that not of yourself, not of works lest anyone should boast.
 
Last edited:
K

kennethcadwell

Guest
Atwood our Lord Jesus commanded baptism in the great commission.
What happens to somebody who does not obey the Lords commands ?????
 

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
Still no one has come up with a verse about what happens to the unbaptized believer.

Atwood our Lord Jesus commanded baptism in the great commission.
What happens to somebody who does not obey the Lords commands ?????
All commands must be obeyed, Kenneth, or

Lake of Fire, Kenneth, & that includes you who do not obey!

You and everyone else will go to the Lake of Fire, since you do not obey the Lord's commands. Partial obedience (per James) is unsatisfactory. Trying is unsatisfactory. You must be perfect!

So since all disobey the Lord, all go to the Lake of Fire, including you --

Exception to the above:

unless you trust the Lord Jesus to save you. Those who dismiss the Savior & make the Lord Jesus a mere chance-giver have no hope until they trust Him as Savior.

Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you shall be saved.
 
K

kennethcadwell

Guest
Still no one has come up with a verse about what happens to the unbaptized believer.



All commands must be obeyed, Kenneth, or

Lake of Fire, Kenneth, & that includes you who do not obey!

You and everyone else will go to the Lake of Fire, since you do not obey the Lord's commands. Partial obedience (per James) is unsatisfactory. Trying is unsatisfactory. You must be perfect!

So since all disobey the Lord, all go to the Lake of Fire, including you --

Exception to the above:

unless you trust the Lord Jesus to save you. Those who dismiss the Savior & make the Lord Jesus a mere chance-giver have no hope until they trust Him as Savior.

Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you shall be saved.
I do believe and obey the Lord Atwood;

I believe Him to be my Lord and Savior

I believe in being baptized and have been baptized because He commanded it.

I believe in repenting of sins, and have repented of mine. Because He said repent or parish.

I believe in confessing Him before others, and I do confess Him as my Lord and Savior in front of others.
Because He said confess Me before men, and He will confess us before the Father, but if you deny Him in front of others He will deny you to the Father.

I believe in helping others, because He said to help others in need and not to turn some one away, not even an enemy.


Matthew 22:36-40[SUP]36 [/SUP]Master, which is the great commandment in the law?
[SUP]37 [/SUP]Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.
[SUP]38 [/SUP]This is the first and great commandment.
[SUP]39 [/SUP]And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.

[SUP]40 [/SUP]On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.


Matthew 5:44-45
[SUP]44[/SUP]But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you,

[SUP]45 [/SUP]that you may be children of your Father in heaven.


John 14:12-17

[SUP]12 [/SUP]Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do; because I go unto my Father.
[SUP]13 [/SUP]And whatsoever ye shall ask in my name, that will I do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son.
[SUP]14 [/SUP]If ye shall ask any thing in my name, I will do it.
[SUP]15 [/SUP]If ye love me, keep my commandments.



Well and you also just answered your own question. You said if you don't obey the commandments the Lord gives you go to the lake of fire. He commanded baptism.
Then also there you go again condemning me and others again, which is not the way of the Lord.

We are suppose to walk in love, forgiveness, and helping others, not condemning others.
 
Mar 28, 2014
4,300
31
0


But we are not rating matters with numerical values.
This is logical inference.
If faith, then salvation.


If faith without works is dead...( an empty profession of faith) does it still mean If faith,then salvation???? According to you Belief/faith + 0 yields salvation over & over in the Bible.