My evidence is scripture. No where is scripture is Ezekiel told to build a copy of what he saw. He's told simply to write down what he saw. He isn't told to tell Israel to build it. It just isn't there. Yes- I'm certain of this. Secondly, when the building effort began 13, or 14 years later-- it was a rebuilding effort. An attempt to rebuild what had already been before-- it was not a new project for a new and greater temple beyond what Solomon had built. Again-- 'the evidence' is scripture, which is clear. The project that was undertaken was not according to Ezekiel's vision.
A couple of other things-- what Ezekiel saw, had no roof. You have to admit, that it would be rather silly for Zerubbabel's project to be built according to that vision.
It's incredibly sad to me that there are millions of Christians who are waiting for a king to come and reign on a throne on earth, from Jerusalem, and for sacrifices to be made once again in a temple. It's exactly what the Jews were waiting for and expecting--- and they missed the coming of Christ entirely, while he walked among them.
Lastly-- I never said that what Ezekiel saw was "a blueprint for the church." Those are your words. He saw 'the church.'
But yes, you do you.
A couple of other things-- what Ezekiel saw, had no roof. You have to admit, that it would be rather silly for Zerubbabel's project to be built according to that vision.
It's incredibly sad to me that there are millions of Christians who are waiting for a king to come and reign on a throne on earth, from Jerusalem, and for sacrifices to be made once again in a temple. It's exactly what the Jews were waiting for and expecting--- and they missed the coming of Christ entirely, while he walked among them.
Lastly-- I never said that what Ezekiel saw was "a blueprint for the church." Those are your words. He saw 'the church.'
But yes, you do you.
-
1
- Show all