What Laws are still valid to christians

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
The law can be broken down into 3 parts:
1) God's moral law and these stand forever.
2) God's Ceremonial or Ritual Law.
3) God's Dietary law.
Actually, God's dietary laws were part of the ceremonial or ritual laws.

The third group would be the laws for governing the nation.
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Really, wow, I didn't have any idea. Do you have something that is in scripture to confirm that. It would be very interesting to me to read up on that Paul is not referring to the law Mosaic Law. Never heard that before. That would put a different slant on everything that I have ever heard.
Wow is right!

I let my mouth overload my theology.

I was thinking of Ro 13:1-5.

Sorry about that.
 
Sep 4, 2012
14,424
689
113
Thanks.

You might be interested to know there is no "letter of the law" and "spirit of the law" in Scripture.

In 2Co 3:6, there is the letter, the tablets of stone (v.3) on which the letter of the law was written,
and there is the Spirit, the writing of the law by "the Spirit of the living God on tablets of human hearts" (v.3).

"The letter (the law) kills, but the Spirit gives life. (2Co 3:6)

The letter kills, the law as an external standard before which all people stand guilty
and condemned to death as lawbreakers (Dt 27:26; Gal 3:10), is the ministry that
brought death (v.7) and condemns (v.9).

The Spirit gives life, by writing the letter (law) on tablets of human hearts (v.3),
and providing the believer with love for God's law, and with power to keep it,
neither of which he had before.

Just sayin'.
Nothing is written on our hearts. That is just figurative language for the indwelling holy spirit. The letter of the law refers to the actual letters of the law that were chiseled in stone, which have no life and are unable to give life. The spirit of the law is the indwelling holy spirit, which is life.

The law of the spirit of life in Christ Jesus has set you free from the law of sin and death. Romans 8:2​
 
Last edited:

KohenMatt

Senior Member
Jun 28, 2013
4,022
224
63
Well, don't you think there are several things to consider here?

First of all, that we don't have all Jesus' NT revelation in the gospels, for he did not give revelation concerning his inauguration of the New Covenant, which made the Old (Sinaitic) Covenant obsolete.
(Heb 8:13)

Secondly, during the life of Jesus, God's people were still under the Mosaic Covenant and Law.
He would not be giving them at that time the terms of the New Covenant and the New Law of Christ
(1Co 9:21; Gal 6:2) which would not be put into effect until the completion of his sacrificial propitiation.

Remember, he also said at that time, ". . .because they sit in the seat of Moses, you must obey
and do
everything that the teachers of the law and the Pharisees tell you." (Mt 23:2-3)

But that no longer applies in the NT under the New Covenant.

We are now under the law of Christ (1Co 9:21; Gal 6:2),
which is the law of love (Mt 22:37-40; Ro 13:8-10), written on our hearts (Heb 8:10),
and which fulfills (accomplishes) the law (Mt 22:37:40; Ro 13:8, 10)
because the Holy Spirit gives the believer to know how to love.

And so thirdly, we must consider the whole revelation of the NT (Mt 22:37-40; 1Co 9:21; Ro 13:8-10)
to correctly understand any of it.
(In advance, Elin, I couldn't quite tell if you were agreeing or disagreeing with me. But if you are agreeing with me in whole or in part, great. This post is addressed to those who disagree with me. If that's you, well then here is my response.)

So how then do we interpret Jesus telling His followers to follow the Law and to teach others the same thing forever. It sounds really nice and happy to use all sorts of references to the "New Covenant" to imply that we shouldn't follow the "Old Covenant".

But in reality, Jesus Himself always followed His Father's Law, and never spoke AGAINST following the Law.
He was circumcised as a Baby.
His mother offered up sacrifices for purity.
He told the Pharisess that though they tithed a tenth of even their smallest herbs, they had forgotten the weightier matters like justice mercy and faithfulness, and they should have practicing these without neglecting the tithe of even the smallest herbs.
He said in Matthew 5 that
1) He didn't come to do away with the law
2) Not one letter was ever to be destroyed
3) If you follow it and teach others to do so, you'd be the greatest in His Kingdom
4) If didn't follow it and you taught others not to, you'd be the least in His Kingdom.

Sure, there's the 1 word "fulfill" in there, but I would say that any accurate definition of the word "fulfill" needs to be in perfect agreement with the 4 points mentioned above.

If we believe in 1 God, in the OT Jesus Himself gave the Law, and Jesus Himself said that it was forever, and that Jesus Himself said that He never changes.

So then any interpretation of anything in Scripture has to fall in line with that same stance, or we run the risk of implying that God isn't the same yesterday, today and forever.

Again, just to be clear, I'm not saying in any way that our obedience or lack thereof has any bearing on our salvation. The Law wasn't intended for that. The Law, and our obedience to it shows us how to live practically and spiritually, and show that we love Him because we want to obey His commands.
 
Last edited:
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
It is weak because of human nature, not because the Word of God is weak. I don't fear weak gods. LOL
Agreed.

The law of sin (Ro 7:23) in our human nature made it impossible for the law if Moses
to make us righteous through obedience.
 

KohenMatt

Senior Member
Jun 28, 2013
4,022
224
63
Agreed.

The law of sin (Ro 7:23) in our human nature made it impossible for the law if Moses
to make us righteous through obedience.
Agreed. Salvation and righteousness only come through Yeshua.
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
So are you saying we do not need the Word of God to understand the Holy Spirit?
Well, I'm saying what the NT says, that true love wrought by the Holy Spirit
doesn't need regulations to know how to love.

Love given by the Holy Spirit doesn't need to be told to love and worship God,
or to be generous, or kind, or to serve, or to help those in need, or to respect your neighbor,
or not to harm your neighbor, or to make restitution for any wrong to them, etc.

Love worked in the heart by the Holy Spirit will do these things as a way of life without being told how.
 
Mar 4, 2013
7,761
107
0
Well, I'm saying what the NT says, that true love wrought by the Holy Spirit
doesn't need regulations to know how to love.

Love given by the Holy Spirit doesn't need to be told to love and worship God,
or to be generous, or kind, or to serve, or to help those in need, or to respect your neighbor,
or not to harm your neighbor, or to make restitution for any wrong to them, etc.

Love worked in the heart by the Holy Spirit will do these things as a way of life without being told how.
I would agree that the Holy Spirit doesn't need regulations to know how to love. I was wondering if you thought that the Holy Spirit wasn't part of the Mosaic Law or the prophets, and if you thought that it was, or is separated from it now through Christ Jesus.

Zechariah 7:12 (KJV)
[SUP]12 [/SUP]Yea, they made their hearts as an adamant stone, lest they should hear the law, and the words which the LORD of hosts hath sent in his spirit by the former prophets: therefore came a great wrath from the LORD of hosts.
 
D

danschance

Guest
(In advance, Elin, I couldn't quite tell if you were agreeing or disagreeing with me. But if you are agreeing with me in whole or in part, great. This post is addressed to those who disagree with me. If that's you, well then here is my response.)

So how then do we interpret Jesus telling His followers to follow the Law and to teach others the same thing forever. It sounds really nice and happy to use all sorts of references to the "New Covenant" to imply that we shouldn't follow the "Old Covenant".

But in reality, Jesus Himself always followed His Father's Law, and never spoke AGAINST following the Law.
He was circumcised as a Baby.
His mother offered up sacrifices for purity.
He told the Pharisess that though they tithed a tenth of even their smallest herbs, they had forgotten the weightier matters like justice mercy and faithfulness, and they should have practicing these without neglecting the tithe of even the smallest herbs.
He said in Matthew 5 that
1) He didn't come to do away with the law
2) Not one letter was ever to be destroyed
3) If you follow it and teach others to do so, you'd be the greatest in His Kingdom
4) If didn't follow it and you taught others not to, you'd be the least in His Kingdom.

Sure, there's the 1 word "fulfill" in there, but I would say that any accurate definition of the word "fulfill" needs to be in perfect agreement with the 4 points mentioned above.

If we believe in 1 God, in the OT Jesus Himself gave the Law, and Jesus Himself said that it was forever, and that Jesus Himself said that He never changes.

So then any interpretation of anything in Scripture has to fall in line with that same stance, or we run the risk of implying that God isn't the same yesterday, today and forever.

Again, just to be clear, I'm not saying in any way that our obedience or lack thereof has any bearing on our salvation. The Law wasn't intended for that. The Law, and our obedience to it shows us how to live practically and spiritually, and show that we love Him because we want to obey His commands.
Jesus did not always follow the Mosaic laws, atleast not all of it.
1) He and His disciples did break the Sabbath when they harvested grain to eat.
2) He healed on the Sabbath.

He broke these laws because it was His job to come to Earth and remove the heavy yoke of the Mosaic laws. He brought us His new yoke which light and easy to bear by fulfilling the law.
 

KohenMatt

Senior Member
Jun 28, 2013
4,022
224
63
Jesus did not always follow the Mosaic laws, atleast not all of it.
1) He and His disciples did break the Sabbath when they harvested grain to eat.
2) He healed on the Sabbath.

He broke these laws because it was His job to come to Earth and remove the heavy yoke of the Mosaic laws. He brought us His new yoke which light and easy to bear by fulfilling the law.
He didn't break God's laws. He broke the Pharisees faulty interpretations of the Law.

It's not in the Torah to not heal on the Sabbath.
It's not in the Torah to not eat on the Sabbath (They weren't harvesting, they were eating).
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Let’s see. God gave the Law to Moses,
Jesus is the creator of all things,
and Jesus said His witness alone was not true unless
His Father that gave the Law to Moses backed it up.
So without the Mosaic Law Jesus’ ministry is insufficient?

I think He is indicating that. I believe that, how about you?
Well, that's a lot of boot-strapping to make the regulations of the Mosaic law necessary in the NT.

It's better to use what is specifically stated in the NT regarding the Mosaic law,
rather than to boot-strap Scriptures together based on connections between Scriptures which are not
stated in Scripture.

And what is specifically stated in the NT regarding the Mosaic law are several things:
1) it was changed because the Aaronic priesthood on which it was based was changed (Heb 8:9-12),
2) it was set aside as the means to righteousness and salvation because it was weak and useless
to obtain them (Heb 7:18-19),
3) it is now fulfilled in Christ Jesus' law of love (Mt 22:37-40; Ro 13:8-1), and
4) Christ Jesus' law of love is written on our hearts by the Holy Spirit (Heb 8:10).

These are somewhat different than your boot-strapping to make the regulations of the Mosaic law
necessary in the NT.
 
Last edited:

KohenMatt

Senior Member
Jun 28, 2013
4,022
224
63
Well, that's a lot of boot-strapping to make the regulation of the law of Moses necessary in the NT.

It's better to use what is specifically stated in the NT regarding the Mosaic law,
rather than to boot-strap Scriptures together based on connections between Scriptures
which are not stated in Scripture.

And what is specifically stated in the NT regarding the Mosaic law is several things:
1) it was changed because the Aaronic priesthood on which it was based was changed (Heb 8:9-12),
2) it was set aside as the means to righteousness and salvation because it was weak and useless
to obtain them (Heb 7:18-19),
3) it is now fulfilled in Christ Jesus' law of love (Mt 22:37-40; Ro 13:8-1),
4) Christ Jesus' law of love is written on our hearts by the Holy Spirit (Heb 8:10).

These are somewhat different than your boot-strapping to make the regulations of the Mosaic law
necessary in the NT.
Remember that there is more than just that 1 word "fulfill". Jesus said we should follow the Law and teach others to do so. He can't end or annul the very thing He told His followers to do forever.
 
D

danschance

Guest
He didn't break God's laws. He broke the Pharisees faulty interpretations of the Law.

It's not in the Torah to not heal on the Sabbath.
It's not in the Torah to not eat on the Sabbath (They weren't harvesting, they were eating).
If you want to think the sky is green, go for it.

But removing heads of wheat from the wheat is harvesting. He broke the letter of the law yet may of still conformed to the spirit of the law. Either way part of Jesus' mission was to do away with the Mosaic law and institute a new covenant of grace.

We consistently see Jesus condemn the way the law has been promulgated by the Jewish leaders. It is mind boggling that some Judaizers still try to foist the Mosaic laws on us today.
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Nothing is written on our hearts. That is just figurative language for the indwelling holy spirit. The
letter of the law refers to the actual letters of the law that were chiseled in stone, which have no life and are unable to give life. The spirit of the law is the indwelling holy spirit, which is life.
Remembering that the phrases "the letter of the law" and the "spirit of the law" are not in Scripture."

All that is in Scripture is "the letter" and "the Spirit."

The non-Biblical phrase of "the letter of the law," coupled with the Biblical phrase "the letter kills," and
the non-Biblical phrase of "the spirit of the law," coupled with the Biblical phrase "the Spirit gives life,"
suggest the unBiblical notion that the external, literal sense of Scripture is deadly (kills) or unprofitable,
while the inner, spiritual (mystical or mythical) sense is life giving.

That is what I am trying to point out.

That false notion has its basis in the two unbiblical phrases above.

The law of the spirit of life in Christ Jesus has set you free from the law of sin and death. Romans 8:2
Yep!

And the letter kills (2Co 3:6).
 
Last edited:
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Elin said:
Well, don't you think there are several things to consider here?

First of all, that we don't have all Jesus' NT revelation in the gospels, for he did not give revelation concerning his inauguration of the New Covenant, which made the Old (Sinaitic) Covenant obsolete.
(Heb 8:13)

Secondly, during the life of Jesus, God's people were still under the Mosaic Covenant and Law.
He would not be giving them at that time the terms of the New Covenant and the New Law of Christ
(1Co 9:21; Gal 6:2) which would not be put into effect until the completion of his sacrificial propitiation.

Remember, he also said at that time, ". . .because they sit in the seat of Moses, you must obey
and do
everything that the teachers of the law and the Pharisees tell you." (Mt 23:2-3)

But that no longer applies in the NT under the New Covenant.


We are now under the law of Christ (1Co 9:21; Gal 6:2),
which is the law of love (Mt 22:37-40; Ro 13:8-10), written on our hearts (Heb 8:10),
and which fulfills (accomplishes) the law (Mt 22:37:40; Ro 13:8, 10)
because the Holy Spirit gives the believer to know how to love.

And so thirdly, we must consider the whole revelation of the NT (Mt 22:37-40; 1Co 9:21; Ro 13:8-10)
to correctly understand any of it.
(In advance, Elin, I couldn't quite tell if you were agreeing or disagreeing with me. But if you are agreeing with me in whole or in part, great. This post is addressed to those who disagree with me. If that's you, well then here is my response.)

So how then do we interpret Jesus telling His followers to follow the Law and to teach others the same thing forever.
That is answered in my response above.

Where is his "forever" part?

I know he said "until all is fulfilled," which he did in submitting to all its regulations,
as well as accomplish all it could not accomplish.

"Forever," I don't remember.
 
Mar 4, 2013
7,761
107
0
If you want to think the sky is green, go for it.

But removing heads of wheat from the wheat is harvesting. He broke the letter of the law yet may of still conformed to the spirit of the law. Either way part of Jesus' mission was to do away with the Mosaic law and institute a new covenant of grace.

We consistently see Jesus condemn the way the law has been promulgated by the Jewish leaders. It is mind boggling that some Judaizers still try to foist the Mosaic laws on us today.
If one believes that the Pharisees were following the Mosaic Law, they must think again. In these verses Jesus is blatantly saying that they didn't know the writings of Moses. So, I agree with you when you say "We consistently see Jesus condemn the way the law has been promulgated by the Jewish leaders."

John 5:44-47 (KJV)
[SUP]44 [/SUP]How can ye believe, which receive honour one of another, and seek not the honour that cometh from God only?
[SUP]45 [/SUP]Do not think that I will accuse you to the Father: there is one that accuseth you, even Moses, in whom ye trust.
[SUP]46 [/SUP]For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me: for he wrote of me.
[SUP]47 [/SUP]But if ye believe not his writings, how shall ye believe my words?

Not only that, all of what Jesus taught before His death is Old Testament.

Hebrews 9:15-17 (KJV)
[SUP]15 [/SUP]And for this cause he is the mediator of the new testament, that by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions that were under the first testament, they which are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance.
[SUP]16 [/SUP]For where a testament is, there must also of necessity be the death of the testator.
[SUP]17 [/SUP]For a testament is of force after men are dead: otherwise it is of no strength at all while the testator liveth.

Jesus didn't do away with the law at all. In fact He said the very opposite.

Luke 16:17 (KJV)
[SUP]17 [/SUP]And it is easier for heaven and earth to pass, than one tittle of the law to fail.
Matthew 5:17 (KJV)
[SUP]17 [/SUP]Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.

If fulfill means to do away with, then Jesus was of a double tongue, and neither one of us believe that.
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
I would agree that the Holy Spirit doesn't need regulations to know how to love. I was wondering if you thought that the Holy Spirit wasn't part of the Mosaic Law or the prophets, and if you thought that it was, or is separated from it now through Christ Jesus.

Zechariah 7:12 (KJV)
[SUP]12 [/SUP]Yea, they made their hearts as an adamant stone, lest they should hear the law, and the words which the LORD of hosts hath sent in his spirit by the former prophets: therefore came a great wrath from the LORD of hosts.
The indwelling of the Holy Spirit in the hearts of the people of God did not occur until the NT.
 
Jan 27, 2013
4,769
18
0
27Then he took a cup, and when he had given thanks, he gave it to them, saying, "Drink from it, all of you. 28This is my blood of the
(NEW) covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins. Matthew 26
Hebrews 9
11-28
16In the case of a will,[43] it is necessary to prove the death of the one who made it, 17because a will is in force only when somebody has died; it never takes effect while the one who made it is living.9( who died )17because a will is in force only when somebody has died; it never takes effect while the one who made it is living.

18This is why even the first covenant was not put into effect without blood
.
19When Moses had proclaimed every command of the law to all the people, he took the blood of calves, together with water, scarlet wool and branches of hyssop, and sprinkled the scroll and all the people.
20He said, "This is the blood of the covenant, which God has commanded you to keep

24For Christ did not enter a sanctuary made with human hands that was only a copy of the true one; he entered heaven itself, now to appear for us in God’s presence.

the whole bible (66 books) took time to be put together.
15For this reason Christ is the mediator of a new covenant, that those who are called may receive the promised eternal inheritance—now that he has died as a ransom to set them free from the sins committed under the first covenant.

the whole bible (66 books) took time to be put together.
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
He didn't break God's laws. He broke the Pharisees faulty interpretations of the Law.

It's not in the Torah to not heal on the Sabbath.
No work was to be done on the Sabbath, not even food preparation.

Nor did Jesus dispute that it was against the law.
He agreed, and claimed to be the giver of law.

It's not in the Torah to not eat on the Sabbath (They weren't harvesting, they were eating).
Plucking off the stalk, which they were doing, is harvesting.
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Remember that there is more than just that 1 word "fulfill". Jesus said we should follow the Law and teach others to do so. He can't end or annul the very thing He told His followers to do forever.
I'm not sure of either to what law you are referring, the Decalogue or more than that, or

where he told us to do it forever.

Could you please specifify.