Will Jesus "Second coming" present as a woman this time?
- Thread starter WeAreAllOne
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
She also said something that is nowhere else recorded in Scripture. Where did it originate? .
The woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden: But of the fruit of the tree
which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.
Genesis 2:17
The woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden: But of the fruit of the tree
which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.
Genesis 2:17
-
1
- Show all
She also said something that is nowhere else recorded in Scripture. Where did it originate? .
The woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden: But of the fruit of the tree
which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.
Genesis 2:17
The woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden: But of the fruit of the tree
which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.
Genesis 2:17
No, I think Eve added it: neither shall you touch it. It is also possible that Adam
added that in passing God's command onto her. Of course it is also possible God
did say that, but the fact it is not recorded makes that less likely in my view. If Eve
did add it, it would certainly underscore her lack of clarity, allowing for her deception.
added that in passing God's command onto her. Of course it is also possible God
did say that, but the fact it is not recorded makes that less likely in my view. If Eve
did add it, it would certainly underscore her lack of clarity, allowing for her deception.
-
1
-
1
- Show all
If Adam did say it to Eve (neither shall you touch it), then God would have had to have said that to
Adam, else Adam would be bearing false witness to say so. That also makes it more likely that Eve
added neither shall you touch it, since it is nowhere else recorded in Scripture that God said such a thing.
Adam, else Adam would be bearing false witness to say so. That also makes it more likely that Eve
added neither shall you touch it, since it is nowhere else recorded in Scripture that God said such a thing.
-
1
- Show all
Not snarky in the least.
Your invention claim is yet another reason you should read the Bible.
That is not snarky. That's a suggestion.
You aren't aware Jesus gave his flesh and blood as a ransom so to bring salvation.
He said he would not resurrect as flesh and blood.
If he had he would have cancelled that ransom.
He was put to death in the flesh but was resurrected in the spirit.
See Matthew 20 and John 6.
He gave his flesh and blood once for all time.
You're not aware of this.
"Nowhere does Scripture say Jesus no longer remains fully human or fully God."
Scripture tells us
No it does not contradict scripture. John 6, Matthew 20, Hebrews 9. 1 Timothy 2.
Jesus flesh , he himself, was the bread of life. His blood sacrifice was for the seal of the new salvation covenant.
A mortal man in Heaven is not Biblical.
Your invention claim is yet another reason you should read the Bible.
That is not snarky. That's a suggestion.
You aren't aware Jesus gave his flesh and blood as a ransom so to bring salvation.
He said he would not resurrect as flesh and blood.
If he had he would have cancelled that ransom.
He was put to death in the flesh but was resurrected in the spirit.
See Matthew 20 and John 6.
He gave his flesh and blood once for all time.
You're not aware of this.
"Nowhere does Scripture say Jesus no longer remains fully human or fully God."
Scripture tells us
No it does not contradict scripture. John 6, Matthew 20, Hebrews 9. 1 Timothy 2.
Jesus flesh , he himself, was the bread of life. His blood sacrifice was for the seal of the new salvation covenant.
A mortal man in Heaven is not Biblical.
-
1
-
1
- Show all
That is your misunderstanding of what people think.
Jesus has a resurrected, physical, immortal body. God's plan of redemption is for all creation. New creatures and a new heaven and earth.
The idea of a purely mystical fulfillment of God's promises is a Gnostic deception.
He gave his life to take it up again, not to become an incorporeal being.
When Messiah returns he will sit on the throne he bought with his blood. He returns in vengeance as a warrior King.
Nothing in scripture from the first messianic prophecy in Genesis onward could possibly lead us to believe that Jesus would
morph into a female figure.
Don't allow your mind to be poisoned by a worldy ideology.
Jesus has a resurrected, physical, immortal body. God's plan of redemption is for all creation. New creatures and a new heaven and earth.
The idea of a purely mystical fulfillment of God's promises is a Gnostic deception.
He gave his life to take it up again, not to become an incorporeal being.
When Messiah returns he will sit on the throne he bought with his blood. He returns in vengeance as a warrior King.
Nothing in scripture from the first messianic prophecy in Genesis onward could possibly lead us to believe that Jesus would
morph into a female figure.
Don't allow your mind to be poisoned by a worldy ideology.
-
2
-
2
-
1
- Show all
