In an earlier post, it states Paul is speaking in the first person singular and expressing his own opinion about not "suffering" women to speak.
There was a direct response to this, defending Paul's personal opinion, weakly arguing that David, in Psalms attributed to him, also spoke in the first person singular. This is true, however one must have the presence of mind to realize when David, which translates totally as Beloved, is sometimes referring to Jesus Christ, Yeshua, as the Beloved and King, and others referring to himself, with the Holy Spirit rightly dividing the difference for the believing reader.
As per the reasoning, by men, of how the women should be, it is definitely something of a bygone time, and not only the women were obliged to follow such dictates or perhaps die, so the men too, in order to pacify and not offend, adhered to this archaic way.
Now, if all of this thinking does hold true, why not simply not allow women to speak in public, walk several paces behind the husband, and be kept behind screens in the assembly?
Why not go back to the traditions of man from the days of Paul, taking a lesson from Islam.
Those of you who honestly believe a Holy Spirit filled woman cannot speak in the assembly are believing without compassion or mercy, and I am certain with little scrutiny it will be discovered there is none in the hearts of the same for anyone. It seems also that now laws, the laws they have invented, are their master. Mercy and compassion are of Jesus Christ, Yeshua, and punitive laws, because of the Blood of the Lamb, allow for mercy always.
Now, PLEASE, pay attention to the Word and believe it, for it is inspired by God, Yahweh.
Gal 3:27 For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.
Gal 3:28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Gal 3:29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.