Gas attack in Syria

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Sep 4, 2012
14,145
557
113
This is supposedly the research/educational facility that they obliterated. Look at all the little animal assadists smiling about all of the chemical weapons they can make at home to kill their neighbors with.

Dau8YHcXcAAZiHL.jpg
 

Waggles

Senior Member
Sep 21, 2017
1,983
342
83
South Australia
adelaiderevival.com
Listening to Macron, May, Trump, and Nikki Haley at the U.N. sprouting
their justifications for attacking another nation without declaring war, etc.
it is patently obvious that the rule of law is finished.
Truth never had a chance.

Foreign policy outcomes are simply determined by "might is right"
No need for evidence > fake news justifies actions taken
Rules of engagement no longer apply
bomb and attack whoever you need to [just like Israel does]
and watch out "we are bigger than you so we will do it again."

Sleep well tonight and tuck you children in with a fairytale story
with the knowledge that the world is more secure and stable.
Nothing can go wrong ... ...

 
Sep 4, 2012
14,145
557
113
Has it been verified yet?
I have no idea about what that facility is used for. Apparently education is one of those things. A number of people were posting that on social media. I haven't looked into it further. My quip about the the little animal assads was sarcasm
 

Huckleberry

Senior Member
Aug 25, 2013
1,634
53
48
No missiles intercepted, and no civilian casualties.
 

peacenik

Senior Member
May 11, 2016
3,071
24
38
Gas attack? What gas attack?


The History Of Syrian False Flags Exposed


https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-04-15/take-red-pill-history-syrian-false-flags-exposed





Remember this photo of a kid laying next to her ‘dead’ parents who were ‘killed’ by Assad and this photo went viral and got thousands of retweets and had people crying all over Twitter?









Here is that same kid moments later:










Link has several more fakes photos and scripted gas "attack" scenarios.
 

tanakh

Senior Member
Dec 1, 2015
3,441
203
63
70
The chance of finding anything now is very slim. The news moves on Trump and Macron turn to Iran with Trump making threatening noises again of unspecified actions against the Iranian regime. I have no particular liking for the Iranian Government but neither have I any desire for another world war. As I see it and have said before Trump appears to be itching for an all out war with someone and would leap at any opportunity to start one.
 

peacenik

Senior Member
May 11, 2016
3,071
24
38
The chance of finding anything now is very slim. The news moves on Trump and Macron turn to Iran with Trump making threatening noises again of unspecified actions against the Iranian regime. I have no particular liking for the Iranian Government but neither have I any desire for another world war. As I see it and have said before Trump appears to be itching for an all out war with someone and would leap at any opportunity to start one.



You took the words right out of my mouth. There have been so many historical false flags and down right lies used to create wars such as the faked Gulf of Tonkin incident or the blatant lie about impending WMD attack by Saddam. Each used with success by those who had a pro war agenda. These faked gas "attacks" are but the latest example by such warmongers. Since they did not get a universal consensus on invading Syria, they will soon direct their contempt and warmongering efforts against Iran which has far more enemies among the Arab states than does Syria.
 

Desdichado

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2014
7,507
183
63
I think a war with Iran would be the bloodiest we've seen since Vietnam. Possibly WWII.

Part of the reason why it may seem so ripe to the Neocons/Neolibs is the supposed Persian hunger for liberal governing institutions. There would be a greater probability of "success" in the aftermath, thereby granting their foreign policy program some of the political capital it's lost since the Iraq War.

I'm kinda "nutty" about these things. I don't think the problem is Trump or Obama when it comes to these matters, but rather the more entrenched Beltway elitists who smile ironically when they hear "Fortunate Son."



You took the words right out of my mouth. There have been so many historical false flags and down right lies used to create wars such as the faked Gulf of Tonkin incident or the blatant lie about impending WMD attack by Saddam. Each used with success by those who had a pro war agenda. These faked gas "attacks" are but the latest example by such warmongers. Since they did not get a universal consensus on invading Syria, they will soon direct their contempt and warmongering efforts against Iran which has far more enemies among the Arab states than does Syria.
 

peacenik

Senior Member
May 11, 2016
3,071
24
38
FAIR.org (a liberal media critics group) reports several reportedly liberal media sources lament the lack of more interventionism in Syria:


Media Support US Violence Against Syria, But Long for More


Corporate news outlets seemed genuinely upset that more U.S. violence was not forthcoming by Gregory Shupak

https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/04/22/media-support-us-violence-against-syria-long-more


note the sources cited: NY Times, Washington Post, Guardian, the Atlantic

Recall that Wapo and the NY Times beat the drums for Bush's war on Iraq more than any other news source.

By contrast, I have previously posted links opposing war and interventionism in Syria which were all conservative.
 

peacenik

Senior Member
May 11, 2016
3,071
24
38
More international inspections in Syria: https://news.antiwar.com/2018/04/25...gain-visit-syrias-douma-collect-more-samples/

So far, no evidence of nuclear or chemical fallout which would prove Trump's claim that his targets produced outlawed weapons. ''Since the US, France, and Britain already attacked Syria on April 13 over the Douma allegations, they are probably not looking forward to the results. Anything that challenges their allegations is likely to be dismissed as in some way flawed, or indicative of a coverup, despite experts saying such a coverup would be physically impossible.''
 

Billyd

Senior Member
May 8, 2014
3,102
105
63
The US has a stockpile of obsolete tomahawk cruise missiles. It looks like the French president and US president have found a way to dispose of the stockpile and maybe test a new class of missiles. We'll see.
 

jameen

Senior Member
Feb 5, 2018
350
46
28
31
Manila
No missiles intercepted, and no civilian casualties.
Russia showed some missiles intercepted by Syrian SAMs

click here to see the photos: https://russia-insider.com/en/russia-displays-pieces-us-missiles-it-says-were-shot-down-syria-says-two-unexploded-missiles/ri23289

No wonder I am doubting that for 100 missiles launched by US navy, 3 targets were chosen as targets.

It does not make sense. perhaps the Russian military is telling the truth that indeed the original targets are up to 10 but most of the missiles were intercepted.
 

peacenik

Senior Member
May 11, 2016
3,071
24
38
https://steemit.com/news/@clarityof...syria-was-a-false-flag-conducted-by-the-white



Massive Compilation of Media Material Proving April 7, 2018 Chemical Attack in Dhouma Syria Was a False Flag Conducted By The White Helmet Terrorists




Lord West, Former head of the British Royal Navy states it was likely a false flag involving the White Helmets - "Chemical attack doesn't ring true. What benefit was there. In the past some of the Islamic groups have used chemicals and there would be huge benefits for them. The White Helmets are not neutral. They are on the side of the groups that are fighting Assad."


"This is a US mistake that started seven years ago. We know they sent in the CIA to overthrow Assad. The CIA and Saudi Arabia together in covert operations tried to overthrow Assad. It was a disaster. Eventually it brought in ISIS as a splinter group to the jihadists that went in ..."




In other words, by attacking Assad, it undermines his military, allows radical groups like ISIS to grow, promotes further instability in that country and in that region, creates massive outflow of refugees which causes problems for Europeans and nearby countries (as well as the USA), and ultimately gives Western governments such as the USA and France a ready excuse to "justify" attacking Syria thereby increasing war and war profits.

We saw false flags like that in the Gulf of Tonkin and Bush's spurious claims of WMD. Tens of thousands of American troops were killed by their own government because of these treasonous lies. How many more must die before people finally awaken to the truth that these reports are nothing but treasonous lies and "justifications" designed to promote more war?


Final question or questions: what will be the next false flag - a confrontation with an Iranian vessel? Another civilian jet plane shot down to foment further hate for the USA and the West? Planting of fabricated WMD, gas, or other weaponry? An assassination of a political figure in that region? The emergence of another heavily financed radical group?

What next?