well, discussing behaviors or conduct of the people involved is not the facts as none of us are privy to another's thoughts
yet that is just what the prosecutor tried to do...introduce 'evidence' that could not be known unless received telepathically
I was far more interested in what the judge said, which he gets my vote for, then how he looked or sounded
pretty sure if the jury comes back with an unfavorable verdict, there will be a re-trial if allowed
we've all heard the expression tampering with evidence; that prosecutor was doing that but not with something physical