In still another example, this past Sunday’s edition of British paper the Independent contained an article by a prominent psychologist, Dr. Glenn Wilson. The title: “Not All Pedophiles Are Bad People—We Need to Have a Sense of Proportion.” The article reads:
Not all paedophiles are bad people - we need to have a sense of proportion | The Independent
In my studies of the Pedophile Information Exchange in the 1980s, many members admitted sexual feelings for children which they had been able to contain or turn to social good. Some gravitated toward occupations such as schoolteacher or social worker, where they could enjoy the company of children without plotting abuse. … It is possible to be attracted to children as a sexual orientation without acting upon those desires.
So—in this man’s view, these feelings can apparently be turned to social good. This psychologist
spoke to the Telegraph, and said that “pedophilia should be viewed as a type of ‘sexual orientation’
which is not necessarily acted upon” (emphasis added).
Ask yourself: Does the idea that pedophiles won’t necessarily act on their desire to have sex
with children comfort you? Would you support a pedophile who wants to be your child’s teacher
or social worker so he can “enjoy the company of children”?
Does it reassure you that “it is possible” to be attracted to children without acting on that?
This Salon.com article is aimed at helping you sympathize with a celibate man who
is attracted to children. But even he says that anyone who acts on those feelings is
a “monster.” The psychologist in Britain says everything is OK because pedophiles
probably won’t prey on children.
But think about this: If genetics determine morality, then why would it be wrong
for a pedophile to gratify his desires?
How does it make sense to label a “born that way” pedophile who fulfills his desires
a “monster”—but then to say that a “born that way” homosexual should fulfill his
desires and even marry, because he was “born that way”?
Add to that the “pedophilia epidemic” in Hollywood, exposed this past summer
in the film An Open Secret. These are people with enormous social influence.
You can’t have it both ways. Either genetics determines morality or it doesn’t.
And the truth is—it doesn’t.
Hollywood’s Pedophilia Epidemic Exposed in ‘An Open Secret’
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...hilia-epidemic-exposed-in-an-open-secret.html#
Many researchers taking a different view of pedophilia - latimes
As Selwyn Duke recently wrote,
Today, mainly due to the effort to legitimize homosexuality, the notion that “it’s okay if I was born that way” has taken hold. Often articulated as “God doesn’t make mistakes,” it’s rhetorically very effective.
Of course, whether an atheist who considers the world naturally flawed or a theist believing it supernaturally fallen, cleft lip, Spina bifida, Down syndrome, club foot, Tay-Sachs disease, and other abnormalities make clear that God’s perfection isn’t enjoyed by man. And is it logical to consider the brain the one organ immune from this imperfection? Note also that the same psychologists telling us homosexuality is innate also say that psychopaths are born and not made. Now, if some people were born with homicidal instincts, would it be alright for them to commit murder?
In truth, if it is wrong to condone pedophilia despite some people supposedly being born
with it, then it is also wrong to justify homosexuality for that reason.
Get Ready
eople Are Trying to Normalize Pedophilia now
https://www.thetrumpet.com/article/13207.2.0.0/get-ready-people-are-trying-to-normalize-pedophilia