U.S. Supreme Court declines stay 4 clerk refusing to issue gay marriage certificates

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
M

Mitspa

Guest
Please demonstrate your "proofs" she is in perfect obedience by the constitutional standard.
If you read the constitution you can see it very easily ...as even the other supreme court justices called this act the most unconstitutional act the court had ever taken....
 
N

nw2u

Guest
Besides the fact that the supreme court ruling is an unlawful act that this lady has no obligation to yield to under our constitution nor the laws of God. She is in perfect obedience by the constitutional standard and biblical truth...but to do what is right, is not always easy.
What makes it unlawful?
 
M

Mitspa

Guest
Christians are under no obligation whatsoever to respect this ruling...
 
N

nw2u

Guest
Christians are under no obligation whatsoever to respect this ruling...
Here's my issue. I agree with this. I agree it's a sin against God's laws. I agree it's wrong in those contexts. Where I have an issue is with the definition of separation of church and state. If we agree that the feds don't have a right to tell us where, when, or how to go to church, or even to go at all, endorsing no religion yet allowing all that do no harm or break laws of the "state", how does this exempt an elected official from duty?

I do agree she is very courageous and I am glad she did this.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,727
3,661
113
"If absence of law is anarchy, selective enforcement is tyranny" John Adams .. nicely sums up one aspect of Penn's long post.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,727
3,661
113
Here's my issue. I agree with this. I agree it's a sin against God's laws. I agree it's wrong in those contexts. Where I have an issue is with the definition of separation of church and state. If we agree that the feds don't have a right to tell us where, when, or how to go to church, or even to go at all, endorsing no religion yet allowing all that do no harm or break laws of the "state", how does this exempt an elected official from duty?

I do agree she is very courageous and I am glad she did this.
See post #154 and see what you think.
 
M

Mitspa

Guest
Kentucky's or the U.S.?
well I don't know anything about Kentucky's but clearly this ruling was unconstitutional ..even as the other justices said it was... We have no obligation to obey this ruling as Christians .
 
V

Viligant_Warrior

Guest
Hold on a sec....so when she was asked to give marriage licenses to all other kinds of (hetero) sinners, she was cool with that?
Missing the point here. As are most of the others irrationally chastising this country clerk. Though some of the couples are not Christian, and therefore unrepentant for past fornication, adultery, or other sexual sin, they at least presented themselves to apply for a biblically recognized marriage: i.e., one man, one woman. Same-sex marriage is not mentioned in the Bible, but same-sex relationships are condemned as sin. While that sin can be forgiven, entering into a same-sex marriage is indicative of unrepentance among Christians and unbelief among the rest of the world. A Christian is of no obligation whatsoever to assist sin. Peter settled that when he and John were hauled before the Sanhedrin after his Temple Sermon.

Acts 5, NASB
29 Peter and the other apostles replied: "We must obey God rather than men! 30 The God of our fathers raised Jesus from the dead--whom you had killed by hanging him on a tree.

31 God exalted him to his own right hand as Prince and Savior that he might give repentance and forgiveness of sins to Israel.

32 We are witnesses of these things, and so is the Holy Spirit, whom God has given to those who obey him."


Because of the witness of the Holy Spirit and His revelation to men of God's truth, we know what God expects of us. You unrighteously condemn this woman for doing what you should be doing.


Or when she was asked to give certificates of divorce to people, that didn't strike her as immoral?
County clerks don't give certificates of divorce. Neither do judges. There is no such thing in American society as a "certificate of divorce." We have "divorce decrees," and those are given through a pre-written court order -- usually authored by the plaintiff attorney in a divorce proceeding -- signed by the judge once agreement to dissolution, property disbursement, and child custody and visitation details are worked out. The decree details each of those aspects. The clerk simply records it in the county records.

The closing words of your post are too deliberately inflammatory to even acknowledge by commenting.
 

Omni

Banned
Aug 12, 2015
539
7
0
well I don't know anything about Kentucky's but clearly this ruling was unconstitutional ..even as the other justices said it was... We have no obligation to obey this ruling as Christians .
You have no obligation, because you're not a judge!
 
M

Mitspa

Guest
You have no obligation, because you're not a judge!
not sure of your point? I have no obligation because it unlawful under our constitution and under the laws of God...
 

Omni

Banned
Aug 12, 2015
539
7
0
Missing the point here. As are most of the others irrationally chastising this country clerk. Though some of the couples are not Christian, and therefore unrepentant for past fornication, adultery, or other sexual sin, they at least presented themselves to apply for a biblically recognized marriage: i.e., one man, one woman. Same-sex marriage is not mentioned in the Bible, but same-sex relationships are condemned as sin. While that sin can be forgiven, entering into a same-sex marriage is indicative of unrepentance among Christians and unbelief among the rest of the world. A Christian is of no obligation whatsoever to assist sin.


Sure, as a Christian under God's law, she's under no moral obligation to like homosexuality, much less to condone it or facilitate it, but as an agent for a legally and politically secular country, she is under an obligation to carry out her duties as and when she's given them. Therein lies a conflict of interest that many would consider sufficient grounds for instant dismissal.
 
M

Mitspa

Guest
Sure, as a Christian under God's law, she's under no moral obligation to like homosexuality, much less to condone it or facilitate it, but as an agent for a legally and politically secular country, she is under an obligation to carry out her duties as and when she's given them. Therein lies a conflict of interest that many would consider sufficient grounds for instant dismissal.
No...she has no obligation under our constitution to obey this ruling ...the constitution is above all judges or rulings and each individual is responsible to uphold its truth.
 

Omni

Banned
Aug 12, 2015
539
7
0
No...she has no obligation under our constitution to obey this ruling ...the constitution is above all judges or rulings and each individual is responsible to uphold its truth.
That homosexual marriage is legal in all 50 states, is clear evidence of its legal validity, don't ya think?
 
V

Viligant_Warrior

Guest
That homosexual marriage is legal in all 50 states, is clear evidence of its legal validity, don't ya think?
No! It wasn't passed by the people or the legislatures/Congress. It was law "written" (illegally and unconstitutionally) by activist judges including five on the U.S. Supreme Court. Your statement would only be valid if States' Rights were applied and each state got to make a legislative or referendum decision.
 
M

Mitspa

Guest
That homosexual marriage is legal in all 50 states, is clear evidence of its legal validity, don't ya think?
No not if you believe the constitution is the law...which it is... so its a illegal act by the court and should be reproved by the people and rejected and resisted by all the people.
 
M

Mitspa

Guest
In our system we are under the constitution not judges..we yield to the judges in that they uphold the constitution ...if they reject the lawful authority of the constitution, we reject their authority and resist them according to the authority of the constitution.
 

jsr1221

Senior Member
Jul 7, 2013
4,265
77
48
While I don't agree for same sex marriage... If she was that uncomfortable, why couldn't she quit her job? She knew who she was working for when she first took the job, now all of a sudden, her Christian beliefs come to play? Her Christian beliefs didn't seem important enough to tell her boss she would rather resign than give a gay marriage certificate.. I know a lot of people on here may disagree, but just saying. I know a lot of you don't work for a Christian company... How far would you be willing to go with your beliefs? Would you quit your job over something you felt was unbiblical? Because I feel that's what she should have done.
 
M

Mitspa

Guest
While I don't agree for same sex marriage... If she was that uncomfortable, why couldn't she quit her job? She knew who she was working for when she first took the job, now all of a sudden, her Christian beliefs come to play? Her Christian beliefs didn't seem important enough to tell her boss she would rather resign than give a gay marriage certificate.. I know a lot of people on here may disagree, but just saying. I know a lot of you don't work for a Christian company... How far would you be willing to go with your beliefs? Would you quit your job over something you felt was unbiblical? Because I feel that's what she should have done.
Why should she quiet her job...she is doing what is right and legal... she is doing what the PEOPLE elected her to do. Of course she should not quit and she is a hero for standing for the truth.