Show me a woman who's comfortable in a pair of jeans, and I'm good to go.
THIS IS WHAT you said
'show me a womans who's comfortable in jeans'
what woman is comfortable in jeans? I just told you why they are the most uncomfortable item of clothing ever designed! Women actually dont like wearing them. I speak as a woman lol
Yes, and I plainly explained to you what I meant by that statement in my consequential comment here:
I only mentioned jeans because they're casual. I have nothing against dresses and what have you, and I certainly would never place any sort of clothing demands upon a woman. I really meant "comfortable" more in the sense that she didn't need to dress to impress. I'm really not impressed with fancy clothes, but that's just me.
In other words, I was talking more about a woman not needing to worry about dressing to impress me because I'm much more concerned about/interested in what's in a woman's heart and mind than how she looks outwardly.
Additionally, I see DOZENS OF WOMEN (at least) wearing jeans DAILY, so you're definitely not the spokeswoman for all women, so perhaps you should turn it down a notch or two with your comments here which are allegedly made on behalf of all women.
man some peoples reading comprehension skills are kinda lacking on this forum
There's nothing wrong with my reading comprehension skills, but I'm actually glad that you mentioned this.
Just so you know, the phrase "rules of engagement", which is the actual title of this thread, doesn't really mean "rules for people getting engaged in order to get married", which seems to be the vein that you're following here.
The phrase is actually a military phrase, and here is what it means:
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/rules-of-engagement
rules of engagement
noun
[ plural ]
orders that soldiers fighting in a war are given about what they can and cannot do:
The soldier fired on a wounded man, an apparent breach of the rules of engagement.
It seems to me (I could be mistaken) that tourist used this military phrase as a sort of double entendre (a word or phrase that is open to two interpretations) to both describe the dos and don'ts of dating in a more generic sense, which is what I've been commenting on, and the actions which might eventually lead to an actual wedding engagement in a more specific sense, which is what you've apparently been commenting on.
I say this based upon such "rules" as these in his opening post:
What rules do certain residents of CC follow in their pursuit of love? I will offer a few insights of my own. The rules listed are of equal importance for myself.
Have no fear of rejection.
Develop a tolerance for pain as you may end up with a broken heart. Be strong for you will survive. Life will go on.
Faint heart does not win fair woman.
Marry only for love.
Pay attention to detail.
Accept the woman for who she is at this moment. Positive refinement comes only from God over a long period of time.
I must be willing to accept God's discipline for my own positive change that she may find appealing.
Be patient but let your resolve be resolute.
Pursue with wild abandon in your heart. Do not hold back.
Never settle for second best or someone else's hand-me-downs
Do not date for the purpose of having a one-night-stand, as that is vanity and pointless.
Do not pursue anyone that you would not consider marrying. Do not waste your time.
Offer only the best that has been provided by God. Do not lie. Be honest in all things.
Her feelings are more important than my own desires.
I do not believe in long, protracted engagements. Either you know what you want or you don't.
Play for keeps or get out of the game. This game is for serious players only and not the timid.
All is fair in love and war.
In the rules that I've bold-faced in red, there are references to "war" ("rules of engagement" in a military sense as in proper dos and don'ts) and references to actual engagements which could lead to marriage ("rules of engagement" in a literal sense as in what rules to follow to possibly wind up engaged for marriage).
In any case, in no way, shape, or form was I suggesting that a woman should get married in a pair of jeans, although she's perfectly fine in doing so if that is what she and her spouse decide upon.
Hopefully, this brings some clarity here because you've continually greatly misunderstood what I've actually said here and the context in which I've said it.
1
