Alex Jones from InfoWars on BBC: appears to be a madman

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
P

prodigal

Guest
#21
i met alex jones at the bilderberg event. He seemed quite sane. The bbc is very good and extremely experienced at giving the appearance that it pre-plans beforehand. If you ever watch talk shows where one side battles against the other, your see the guests are pre-wound up before the show. This is how the bbc works, its main agenda is to entertain the audience, not inform them. Simple really
 
Apr 29, 2013
23
1
0
#22
He's controlled opposition, meant to steer you 80% truth 20% lies. Check out Bill Cooper instead.
 
D

DragonSlayer

Guest
#23
For years I believed the official version of 9-11 until I discovered what really happened in conferences made by a Christian truth seeker ! I was so astonished by the undeniable facts that until now it's very hard for me to face the truth ! But it's the truth ! The Lord saw everything at 9-11 ! And the Lord would tell the truth and nothing but the truth ! So I wouldn't call sincere people who are innocently looking for the truth " conspiracy theorists " ! They are not " conspiracy theorists " !
They are truth seekers ! And I am one of them ! And I am a firm believer in Jesus ! So you see it's not an atheist thing to not believe the official version of 9-11 ! -David Ray Griffin is not an atheist for instance !- It's a question at looking at facts and nothing else and make unbiased conclusions! It's a question of refusing to be brainwashed by the official propaganda ! The Lord gave us a brain so that we could use it ! So we should never be ashamed to simply use our brain to know the truth ! Besides, the official version of 9-11 totally contradicts natural laws ! Natural laws come from the Lord, and the Lord cannot deny Himself !

I can't tell I know the whole truth about what really happened in 9-11, but undeniable facts clearly prove official propaganda of 9-11 is dead wrong !

For some years I believed Alex Jones was a true seeker of truth, but for the beginning I knew him, I hated so much the fact that he was always presenting " Ron Paul " as the ultimate solution to get rid of the NWO dictatorship in US and in the whole world ! He was talking sometimes about the Lord so he is supposedly not an atheist ! So if he was supposedly a Christian believer I was often wondering why did he never mention Jesus as the ultimate solution to get rid of the NWO dictatorship ?
And it happens years later I discovered that in fact " Ron Paul " had direct ties to the satanic freemasons lobbies !
So Alex Jones is not a true seeker of truth. Also, I thought a lot about 9-11 events...

I deduced it's so obvious 9-11 was a controlled demolition that it's absolutely not possible the perprs would have not think about it ! They are so crafted they even made their massive crime so obvious so that they could mark and control many sincere truth seekers without them knowing it ! My guess is that Alex Jones and the likes were already planned in advance to mark and control most opponents to the NWO dictatorship ! The undeniable facts are too obvious to ignore !
So obvious that even a little child could deduce the official version of 9-11 is dead wrong !

You know, the power of deception and lies is just temporary, just as the power of night and darkness is just temporary !
Soon or later, we will all knew the truth about what really happened ! When the night is over and the daylight comes !

Fiat Lux ! Let there be light ! By the Lord's Freedom !
 

loveme1

Senior Member
Oct 30, 2011
8,083
190
63
#24
Any one not on the pay roll speaking about similar things seem to cease one way or another.
 
Sep 8, 2012
4,367
58
0
#25
Concerning 911
Look up building 7. (No plane or debris even hit it)
Bring up a youtube video of how that 47 story structure came down. - (@ approx. 6 pm E.S.T. - a full nine hours after the towers fell)
Then tell me that wasn't controlled demolitions.
 
R

RachelBibleStudent

Guest
#26
Concerning 911
Look up building 7. (No plane or debris even hit it)
Bring up a youtube video of how that 47 story structure came down. - (@ approx. 6 pm E.S.T. - a full nine hours after the towers fell)
Then tell me that wasn't controlled demolitions.
lol nope no debris hit this building...

WTC7_Smoke.jpg

just ignore all of the smoke pouring out of pretty much the entire height of the building...i'm sure it's completely unscratched underneath...
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#27
lol nope no debris hit this building...

View attachment 52080

just ignore all of the smoke pouring out of pretty much the entire height of the building...i'm sure it's completely unscratched underneath...
well, it would make it one of 3 buildings in the history of the world to free fall defying the laws of physics...directly into it's own footprint.

after "fires"

and this one got hit by a little flying glass and concrete and had a few fires here and there.
come on rach....you can do this.

i'm amazed really - you're brilliant, girl.
why you so blind to this?:eek:
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#28
Concerning 911
Look up building 7. (No plane or debris even hit it)
Bring up a youtube video of how that 47 story structure came down. - (@ approx. 6 pm E.S.T. - a full nine hours after the towers fell)
Then tell me that wasn't controlled demolitions.
not to mention the BBC reporter Jane Stanley reporting that 7 had collapsed....as we see it over her shoulder still standing.
they realize the script is out of sync and pull the shot.

[video=youtube;6mxFRigYD3s]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mxFRigYD3s[/video]

BBC Reports Collapse of WTC Building 7 Early-- TWICE

Jane Stanley disappeared for awhile...had made a few statements she had been handed a report and merely read it.
she refused to discuss it any longer, moved away.

later appeared working some hack local reporter work.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#29
Any one not on the pay roll speaking about similar things seem to cease one way or another.

Requiem for the Suicided: Vince Foster

Who was Vince Foster? What was his relationship to Hillary Clinton at the Rose Law Firm in Arkansas? What was he working on in the Clinton White House? And what secrets did he take to his grave? Join us this week on The Corbett Report as we explore the unanswered questions of the death of Vince Foster, the highest-ranking White House official to die on the job since JFK.


Documentation
The Clinton Body Count
Time Reference: 01:36

etc etc

The Corbett Report | Requiem for the Suicided: Vince Foster
 
G

Grey

Guest
#30
not to mention the BBC reporter Jane Stanley reporting that 7 had collapsed....as we see it over her shoulder still standing.
they realize the script is out of sync and pull the shot.

[video=youtube;6mxFRigYD3s]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mxFRigYD3s[/video]

BBC Reports Collapse of WTC Building 7 Early-- TWICE

Jane Stanley disappeared for awhile...had made a few statements she had been handed a report and merely read it.
she refused to discuss it any longer, moved away.

later appeared working some hack local reporter work.

So it's impossible that they were using a green screen with older footage?
 
R

RachelBibleStudent

Guest
#31
well, it would make it one of 3 buildings in the history of the world to free fall defying the laws of physics...directly into it's own footprint.

after "fires"

and this one got hit by a little flying glass and concrete and had a few fires here and there.
come on rach....you can do this.

i'm amazed really - you're brilliant, girl.
why you so blind to this?:eek:
to begin with it takes just a little bit of math to verify that 7 WTC did not collapse at free fall speed...

'a little flying glass and concrete'? look at the rest of the neighborhood... http://thefuntimesguide.com/wp-content/uploads/aerial-view-above-world-trade-center1.jpg

most of 3 WTC and 4 WTC were gone...6 WTC had a gigantic chunk taken out of it...and 5 WTC had several large gashes and collapsed sections...

and the picture in my previous post shows more than just 'a few fires' in 7 WTC...practically the whole building was burning...

there is nothing here that makes the 'official account' implausible...
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#32
So it's impossible that they were using a green screen with older footage?
go find the time stamps on the video/film.
they got caught.
search for later interviews with her.

that was a LIVE broadcast we were told.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#33
to begin with it takes just a little bit of math to verify that 7 WTC did not collapse at free fall speed...

'a little flying glass and concrete'? look at the rest of the neighborhood... Metasearch Search Engine - Search.com

most of 3 WTC and 4 WTC were gone...6 WTC had a gigantic chunk taken out of it...and 5 WTC had several large gashes and collapsed sections...

and the picture in my previous post shows more than just 'a few fires' in 7 WTC...practically the whole building was burning...

there is nothing here that makes the 'official account' implausible...
lol rach....watch it go down.
no plane, boss.



never in recorded history have buildings collapsed this way due to impact OR FIRE.

these are controlled demolitions.
any 6 year old that's gone to watch the local stadium or old casino come down knows exactly what that looks like.

come on.

just call up a few innocent controlled demos on Youtube and compare.
 
Last edited:

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#34
HERE'S THE COMPANY THAT DID THE JOB(S)

Controlled Demolition, Inc. |

Loizeaux family



Larry Silverstein's nationally aired statement means, simply, that he and others must have prepared WTC Building 7 for demolition. Could this preparation for demolition have taken place on a single afternoon? As we will see below, because it was a 47-story skyscraper containing 2 million square feet of office space, this preparation must have taken at least several weeks. Several weeks, that is, before Sept. 11, 2001.

For a Controlled Demolition, Call Controlled Demolition, Inc.

Controlled Demoliton, Inc. (CDI), of Baltimore, Maryland is one of the world's leaders in demolishing large buildings. Owned for three generations by the Loizeaux family, CDI details on its website the 'World Records' that the company holds in demolishing huge structures -- monuments such as the former Kingdome in Seattle. The CDI website also relates the timespans that have been required for the company's accomplishments.

How much time would be required for the planning and emplacement of charges for the symmetric implosion of WTC Building 7 that we saw on 9-11? WTC Building 7 was a 47-story tower that sat less than 100 feet from other skyscrapers. We read on the CDI site about a 17-story building of reinforced concrete in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia -- the Sheikh A. Alaki Apartment Building -- which collapsed while under construction by the Bechtel Corporation in 1998.

Preparation for demolition of WTC Building 7 must have preceded 9-11 by weeks, if not months.

The CDI site relates: 'At the request of Bechtel, Controlled Demolition, Inc.'s team mobilized to the site in less than 24 hours, prepared the central-core, flat slab, reinforced concrete structure in another 27 hours, and put the balance of the building on the ground with absolute safety just 96 hours after the start of demolition preparations.'

96 hours. Four days. This was the time needed for emergency demolition of a 17-story building of reinforced concrete by a CDI team.

A building in Detroit, Mich. of comparable size to WTC Building 7 -- the J L Hudson store, standing 35 stories tall and containing 2.2 million square feet -- took CDI almost five months to prepare and bring down in 1998.

The CDI site reports that after four months of study by associate contractors:

CDI's 12-person loading crew took 24 days to place 4,118 separate charges in 1,100 locations on columns on nine levels of the complex. Over 36,000 ft of detonating cord and 4,512 non-electric delay elements were installed in CDI's implosion initiation system, some to create the 36 primary implosion sequences and another 216 micro-delays to keep down the detonation overpressure from the 2,728 lbs of explosives which would be detonated during the demolition.
So. Four months, plus an additional 24 days, were needed to place the charges necessary to demolish, within its 420-foot-by-220-foot footprint, a building 12 stories smaller than WTC Building 7.

How, then, could the preparation and emplacement of charges to "pull" WTC Building 7 be accomplished in a single afternoon? In particular, during the tumultuous afternoon of Sept. 11, 2001, right there at 'Ground Zero'?

garlic & grass
grassroots journalism of america's politcal soul



RUBBISH - LUCKY LARRY GANGSTER WAS IN ON IT FROM THE START.
 
G

Grey

Guest
#35
You do know its the BBC right? So the time is going to be different.

And have you considered the possibility that they said the wrong name of the building?
 
R

RachelBibleStudent

Guest
#36
not to mention the BBC reporter Jane Stanley reporting that 7 had collapsed....as we see it over her shoulder still standing.
they realize the script is out of sync and pull the shot.

[video=youtube;6mxFRigYD3s]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mxFRigYD3s[/video]

BBC Reports Collapse of WTC Building 7 Early-- TWICE

Jane Stanley disappeared for awhile...had made a few statements she had been handed a report and merely read it.
she refused to discuss it any longer, moved away.

later appeared working some hack local reporter work.
so now we -can- believe what the news says?

this is a perfect example of 'cherry picking' your 'evidence'
 
R

RachelBibleStudent

Guest
#37
HERE'S THE COMPANY THAT DID THE JOB(S)

Controlled Demolition, Inc. |

Loizeaux family



Larry Silverstein's nationally aired statement means, simply, that he and others must have prepared WTC Building 7 for demolition. Could this preparation for demolition have taken place on a single afternoon? As we will see below, because it was a 47-story skyscraper containing 2 million square feet of office space, this preparation must have taken at least several weeks. Several weeks, that is, before Sept. 11, 2001.

For a Controlled Demolition, Call Controlled Demolition, Inc.

Controlled Demoliton, Inc. (CDI), of Baltimore, Maryland is one of the world's leaders in demolishing large buildings. Owned for three generations by the Loizeaux family, CDI details on its website the 'World Records' that the company holds in demolishing huge structures -- monuments such as the former Kingdome in Seattle. The CDI website also relates the timespans that have been required for the company's accomplishments.

How much time would be required for the planning and emplacement of charges for the symmetric implosion of WTC Building 7 that we saw on 9-11? WTC Building 7 was a 47-story tower that sat less than 100 feet from other skyscrapers. We read on the CDI site about a 17-story building of reinforced concrete in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia -- the Sheikh A. Alaki Apartment Building -- which collapsed while under construction by the Bechtel Corporation in 1998.

Preparation for demolition of WTC Building 7 must have preceded 9-11 by weeks, if not months.

The CDI site relates: 'At the request of Bechtel, Controlled Demolition, Inc.'s team mobilized to the site in less than 24 hours, prepared the central-core, flat slab, reinforced concrete structure in another 27 hours, and put the balance of the building on the ground with absolute safety just 96 hours after the start of demolition preparations.'

96 hours. Four days. This was the time needed for emergency demolition of a 17-story building of reinforced concrete by a CDI team.

A building in Detroit, Mich. of comparable size to WTC Building 7 -- the J L Hudson store, standing 35 stories tall and containing 2.2 million square feet -- took CDI almost five months to prepare and bring down in 1998.

The CDI site reports that after four months of study by associate contractors:

CDI's 12-person loading crew took 24 days to place 4,118 separate charges in 1,100 locations on columns on nine levels of the complex. Over 36,000 ft of detonating cord and 4,512 non-electric delay elements were installed in CDI's implosion initiation system, some to create the 36 primary implosion sequences and another 216 micro-delays to keep down the detonation overpressure from the 2,728 lbs of explosives which would be detonated during the demolition.
So. Four months, plus an additional 24 days, were needed to place the charges necessary to demolish, within its 420-foot-by-220-foot footprint, a building 12 stories smaller than WTC Building 7.

How, then, could the preparation and emplacement of charges to "pull" WTC Building 7 be accomplished in a single afternoon? In particular, during the tumultuous afternoon of Sept. 11, 2001, right there at 'Ground Zero'?

garlic & grass
grassroots journalism of america's politcal soul



RUBBISH - LUCKY LARRY GANGSTER WAS IN ON IT FROM THE START.
as you have been told several times before...'pull' does not mean 'blow it up'...

here is what 'pulling' a building -actually- looks like...

[video=youtube;1uxlrcQL5Dk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uxlrcQL5Dk[/video]

besides...even if they -did- blow up 7 WTC and didn't want anyone to know about it...then they certainly would not have -said it on national television-
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#38
so now we -can- believe what the news says?

this is a perfect example of 'cherry picking' your 'evidence'
??

did ya miss it?
they reported LIVE that building 7 had collapsed.
yet there it was still standing behind her.
they cut the tape.

cough
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#39
as you have been told several times before...'pull' does not mean 'blow it up'...

here is what 'pulling' a building -actually- looks like...

[video=youtube;1uxlrcQL5Dk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uxlrcQL5Dk[/video]
OMGOSH....i showed you they lied about pull it.
there were no firefighters or demo guys there at that time.

and pull it means nothing more than TAKE IT DOWN.

i'm too disgusted at the moment to bother getting simple real demo videos and asking you to do a side by side comparison of the 9-11 stuff.

maybe tomorrow.

it should be pretty simple.

really.

see.....you don't PULL a building in the middle of the buildings falling and whatnot. it takes weeks to set up for a free-fall-into-footprint demo.

come on rachel. you're embarassing yourself.
one of the few left who still fights for this garbage.

they lied, man.
they're still lying.
and laughing.

i got no more stomach for it today.

k....ttyl

besides...even if they -did- blow up 7 WTC and didn't want anyone to know about it...then they certainly would not have -said it on national television-
they had a lot to do.
they made a TON of mistakes.

the evidence is everywhere.
but the death-knell is in the cover-up.
it always is.

look at the 9-11 commission and NIST.
think watergate.

take care dear...i feel for ya.
 
Sep 8, 2012
4,367
58
0
#40
It's a waste of time, zone. - (Get it? Time Zone?)
You can't talk people into believing their lying eyes.
Building 7 came down like a controlled demolition even though no planes hit it, (and there was a minor fire up near the top toward the back.)
Every one knows a minor fire in the upper floors will cause a building to come down in it's footprint?
- - Sure it's never happened before, and it hasn't happened since but......by golly, this was 911! And if the officials on 911!!! say it came down because it was weak, - well then it did!! (911!!!)