Alex Jones from InfoWars on BBC: appears to be a madman

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

loveme1

Senior Member
Oct 30, 2011
8,083
190
63
#61
WHERE ARE ALL THE MOOSLIMS?

still crouched in a cave in afghanistan plotting with their box cutters?

while all these insider coincidences are going on.

ya....sure.

the purple Koolaid is yummy
Or farming poppy?
 
J

jerusalem

Guest
#63
i challenge everyone interested in getting to the heart of all conspiracy theories out there and tying them together to start by understanding just what sovereign citizenship is, how it is almost lost and the steps necessary to re-establish it. to get an overview of this there is a video on you tube entitled 'johnny liberty-reclaiming your sovereign citizenship' i encourage you to watch the entire video before coming to any conclusions. it doesn't focus on aliens or other theories as such but addresses how we lost our rights and how to get them back. the fight is what it has always been. the battle between good and evil.
 
G

Grey

Guest
#64
I would say there's quite a bit more grey zone between good and evil than people think.
 

Noel139

Senior Member
Jul 1, 2013
196
1
18
30
#65
Alex Jones is right on 90% of what he says, but I do not think he knows the LORD or, at least, not as well as he should so the knowledge he possesses has worn him down throughout the years. Without a foundation in GOD this kind of research is very burdensome; knowing what the masons practice, the illuminate's plans, and knowing that most people could care less because they choose to believe a lie. Without GOD's grace you would go mad too.
 

Noel139

Senior Member
Jul 1, 2013
196
1
18
30
#66
I would say there's quite a bit more grey zone between good and evil than people think.
The Bible eliminates grey. If you still live in the grey after you have been saved then you are a Christian Humanist and not a real Christian. There is only black or white, sin or deed, lies or truth, the world or the Word. You cannot accept sin/lies if you want to please the LORD.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#67
I would say there's quite a bit more grey zone between good and evil than people think.
the freemasons like that idea too.
man in the middle.
the grey men
 
P

prodigal

Guest
#68
[video=youtube;gNhqKRugk8Q]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNhqKRugk8Q[/video]


Michael Hastings

On this video you can hear a police radio and the car gives chase looking for the speeding car. Amazingly there are emergency vehicles at the crash scene before the chasing car gets there. Notice the policemans reaction to the car. Allowing the car to cross the accident scene without a second look (treated as a policecar maybe). Also there was an immediate explosion sending the engine and gearbox 150 yards up the road. Now watch the next video...
 
P

prodigal

Guest
#69
[video=youtube;0rHc5pzH-7M]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rHc5pzH-7M[/video]


Apparently the car recording the film is now a reporter. The police giving no information as making their own enquiries.
Wikileaks reported that michael hastings contacted them 2 hours before this accident, saying the FBI were following him.

looking very dodgy
 
P

prodigal

Guest
#70
[video=youtube;gNhqKRugk8Q]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNhqKRugk8Q[/video]


Michael Hastings

On this video you can hear a police radio and the car gives chase looking for the speeding car. Amazingly there are emergency vehicles at the crash scene before the chasing car gets there. Notice the policemans reaction to the car. Allowing the car to cross the accident scene without a second look (treated as a policecar maybe). Also there was an immediate explosion sending the engine and gearbox 150 yards up the road. Now watch the next video...
if you slow the film to look at the car coming in other direction that flashes its lights, it looks like it came from the road which the accident was in ... strange......
 
Sep 8, 2012
4,367
58
0
#71
lol nope no debris hit this building...

View attachment 52080

just ignore all of the smoke pouring out of pretty much the entire height of the building...i'm sure it's completely unscratched underneath...
Are you for real?
Because your argument falls flat on it's face.
No burning skyscraper has ever collapsed.
(Except the three on 911.)
- And this one had no plane hit it. (Notice the perfectly ordered taller buildings around it)
Your NSA handler has to do a better job of oversight.
- Your arguments are mundane.
 
G

Grey

Guest
#72
Are you for real?
Because your argument falls flat on it's face.
No burning skyscraper has ever collapsed.
(Except the three on 911.)
- And this one had no plane hit it. (Notice the perfectly ordered taller buildings around it)
Your NSA handler has to do a better job of oversight.
- Your arguments are mundane.
So where is the presidence for a burning skyscraper that was struck by a fast moving airliner?
 
Sep 8, 2012
4,367
58
0
#73
So where is the presidence for a burning skyscraper that was struck by a fast moving airliner?
What?
- Are we concerned with the cause?
- - An airplane is light. - It's nothing but aluminum and fuel.
- - - A fire is a fire.
- - - - A skyscraper in Spain burned for days without collapsing. - LiveLeak.com - Highrise Building Burns
- - - - - There have been many documented highrise fires without ONE collapsing. - (google it. You will pull up dozens of different buildings, none of which 'burned to collapse')

- - - - - - No plane or debris hit building #7. - (Find video of it collapsing and notice the much taller buildings surrounding it - C'mon man, you respect Eric Blair{George Orwell};........do you need to reread 1984?)
 
Dec 26, 2012
5,853
137
0
#74
So where is the presidence for a burning skyscraper that was struck by a fast moving airliner?
Would a B-25 Bomber crashing into the Empire State building do?

20th Century History

On the foggy morning of Saturday, July 28, 1945, Lt. Colonel William Smith was piloting a U.S. Army B-25 bomber through New York City. He was on his way to Newark Airport to pick up his commanding officer, but for some reason he showed up over LaGuardia Airport and asked for a weather report. Because of the poor visibility, the LaGuardia tower wanted to him to land, but Smith requested and received permission from the military to continue on to Newark. The last transmission from the LaGuardia tower to the plane was a foreboding warning: "From where I'm sitting, I can't see the top of the Empire State Building."1

......

The Crash
At 9:49 a.m., the ten-ton, B-25 bomber smashed into the north side of the Empire State Building. The majority of the plane hit the 79th floor, creating a hole in the building eighteen feet wide and twenty feet high. The plane's high-octane fuel exploded, hurtling flames down the side of the building and inside through hallways and stairwells all the way down to the 75th floor.

World War II had caused many to shift to a six-day work week; thus there were many people at work in the Empire State Building that Saturday. The plane crashed into the offices of the War Relief Services of the National Catholic Welfare Conference. Catherine O'Connor described the crash: [blockquote shade="no"] The plane exploded within the building. There were five or six seconds - I was tottering on my feet trying to keep my balance - and three-quarters of the office was instantaneously consumed in this sheet of flame. One man was standing inside the flame. I could see him. It was a co-worker, Joe Fountain. His whole body was on fire. I kept calling to him, "Come on, Joe; come on, Joe." He walked out of it.2 Joe Fountain died several days later. Eleven of the office workers were burned to death, some still sitting at their desks, others while trying to run from the flames.


Plane That Crashed Into the Empire State Building
 
G

Grey

Guest
#75

Prop plane



There appears to be some differences? In fuel, length, speed, size, and width.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#76

Prop plane



There appears to be some differences? In fuel, length, speed, size, and width.
forget the plane.

examine the towers.
NOTHING but a controlled demo could bring them down.

no plane (unless it was tipped with DU...POSSIBLY) could have penetrated the exterior.
a jet would have crumpled and shattered and fallen apart,
the jet fuel would have completely spent itself upon impact.

just go look at a slow-mo of that "plane" just me-e-e-e-e-l-l-lting right into the building.
just glides right into it like a phantom.


anyhoo.
 
Nov 14, 2012
2,113
4
0
#77
can't subscribe to the conspiracy theories. sorry
 
Dec 26, 2012
5,853
137
0
#78

Prop plane



There appears to be some differences? In fuel, length, speed, size, and width.
Well you two different building types of building construction also. Remember the Empire state building was built in 1929.
Most of the plane in 1929
The twin towers were built between 1975 - 1985. The engineers who designed the buildings designed them to withstand a
Boeing 707 being crashed into the building fully fueled.

[h=1]Towers' Design Parameters[/h][h=2]Twin Towers' Designers Anticipated Jet Impacts Like September 11th's[/h]Structural engineers who designed the Twin Towers carried out studies in the mid-1960s to determine how the buildings would fare if hit by large jetliners. In all cases the studies concluded that the Towers would survive the impacts and fires caused by the jetliners.
Evidence of these studies includes interviews with and papers and press releases issued by engineers who designed and oversaw construction of the World Trade Center.

9-11 Research


9-11 Research: Towers' Design Parameters

They did not design the Empire State building for aircraft crashes. Remember in 1929 this is what they had for aircraft.



 
G

Grey

Guest
#79
Well you two different building types of building construction also. Remember the Empire state building was built in 1929.
Most of the plane in 1929
The twin towers were built between 1975 - 1985. The engineers who designed the buildings designed them to withstand a
Boeing 707 being crashed into the building fully fueled.

Towers' Design Parameters

Twin Towers' Designers Anticipated Jet Impacts Like September 11th's

Structural engineers who designed the Twin Towers carried out studies in the mid-1960s to determine how the buildings would fare if hit by large jetliners. In all cases the studies concluded that the Towers would survive the impacts and fires caused by the jetliners.
Evidence of these studies includes interviews with and papers and press releases issued by engineers who designed and oversaw construction of the World Trade Center.

9-11 Research


9-11 Research: Towers' Design Parameters

They did not design the Empire State building for aircraft crashes. Remember in 1929 this is what they had for aircraft.



Perhaps the engineers were from one of the same companies that said the titanic was unsinkable?






#titanicwasaninsidejob
 
G

GRA

Guest
#80
Perhaps the engineers were from one of the same companies that said the titanic was unsinkable?






#titanicwasaninsidejob
Based on the report that a Titanic design engineer was quoted as saying something on the order of:

"Not even God could sink this ship."

- perhaps it was an 'outside' job... ( as in, out of this world - arranged from the throne of God in heaven... ? ) ;)

:)