Concave Hollow Earth Theory
- Thread starter kinda
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
I won't being doing a thesis after all, since it would be a disservice to Cellular Cosmogony. Professor U.G. Morrow did extensive work and I will not bother trying to do a lessor work than his. I will do an experiment to verify his work, like any rational person would do, if he believed in something.
Cellular Cosmogony can be found on Amazon for purchase.
Cellular Cosmogony can be found on Amazon for purchase.
-
1
- Show all
Flat earthers keep posting videos proving the Concave Hollow Earth. Great job! From Canada even.
If earth was convex, the bottom 600 feet would be below the horizon, not unless you believe in the inversion layer (mirage).
If the earth was concave, the water would be rising about 600 feet from point to point, and possible the earth as well, depending on layout.
The Toronto Needle is suppose to be 1,800 feet high. The smaller buildings below the Needle shouldn't be visible, if it wasn't for this mirage that keeps happening, or Concave Hollow Earth. You make the call!
Quick reminder: September 5th is rapidly approaching.
Anyways, I actually asked a professional surveyor to survey a lake for me, even offered to pay him, and he said, he was to busy. He thought I was a flat earther, but assured, I'm not. I told him I believe the earth is concave and wanted to test the curvature and see it with my own eyes.
He told me, "even if you are successful, no one will believe you". Well, I'm sure there were other people in the past, that no one believed, that were eventually proven correct later on. I just might be ahead of the curve, or sadly mistaken. Either way, I have most of the material I need to do my experiment. Might need to pick a few things at Walmart, do the initial assessment, than watch science at work.
Anyways, I actually asked a professional surveyor to survey a lake for me, even offered to pay him, and he said, he was to busy. He thought I was a flat earther, but assured, I'm not. I told him I believe the earth is concave and wanted to test the curvature and see it with my own eyes.
He told me, "even if you are successful, no one will believe you". Well, I'm sure there were other people in the past, that no one believed, that were eventually proven correct later on. I just might be ahead of the curve, or sadly mistaken. Either way, I have most of the material I need to do my experiment. Might need to pick a few things at Walmart, do the initial assessment, than watch science at work.
I think our discussion has derailed the other thread. So, we can continue here. .
"I'm not offering proof. But I'm not propagating a theory. I just think if a theory doesn't offer explanations for recurring events, no amount of evidence concerning shape will be convincing. "
It doesn't. Have you read a few pages of this thread? There is a book called, The Cellular Cosmogony. Nothing in the book touches on recurring events???
"Differences in shape, though, necessitates alternative explanations for phenomena. If a theory only has partial explanations, it would stand to reason that it would be more difficult to believe."
Well said?!?! You would have to define partial explanations, examples, and etc. If your saying, since I can't tell you how volcanoes work, than you are having a hard time believing in concave hollow earth. Then...
THE POINT IS WELL TAKEN!
"As far as my curiosity, I was interested how a concave hollow earth would explain certain seemingly naturally occurring events."
That is correct. I asked for proof in what you thought made sense, and didn't get any. So, is this a tie?
Not sure how repeating the same question about volcanoes and earthquakes is so important, especially when you have no proof to show. I find it hypocritical, especially when I stated, I don't think it's possible to know for sure the questions you are asking. It's childish. If this is one of your comedy routines, I think I missed it.
"I'm not offering proof. But I'm not propagating a theory. I just think if a theory doesn't offer explanations for recurring events, no amount of evidence concerning shape will be convincing. "
It doesn't. Have you read a few pages of this thread? There is a book called, The Cellular Cosmogony. Nothing in the book touches on recurring events???
"Differences in shape, though, necessitates alternative explanations for phenomena. If a theory only has partial explanations, it would stand to reason that it would be more difficult to believe."
Well said?!?! You would have to define partial explanations, examples, and etc. If your saying, since I can't tell you how volcanoes work, than you are having a hard time believing in concave hollow earth. Then...
THE POINT IS WELL TAKEN!
"As far as my curiosity, I was interested how a concave hollow earth would explain certain seemingly naturally occurring events."
That is correct. I asked for proof in what you thought made sense, and didn't get any. So, is this a tie?
Not sure how repeating the same question about volcanoes and earthquakes is so important, especially when you have no proof to show. I find it hypocritical, especially when I stated, I don't think it's possible to know for sure the questions you are asking. It's childish. If this is one of your comedy routines, I think I missed it.
I think our discussion has derailed the other thread. So, we can continue here. .
"I'm not offering proof. But I'm not propagating a theory. I just think if a theory doesn't offer explanations for recurring events, no amount of evidence concerning shape will be convincing. "
It doesn't. Have you read a few pages of this thread? There is a book called, The Cellular Cosmogony. Nothing in the book touches on recurring events???
"Differences in shape, though, necessitates alternative explanations for phenomena. If a theory only has partial explanations, it would stand to reason that it would be more difficult to believe."
Well said?!?! You would have to define partial explanations, examples, and etc. If your saying, since I can't tell you how volcanoes work, than you are having a hard time believing in concave hollow earth. Then...
THE POINT IS WELL TAKEN!
"As far as my curiosity, I was interested how a concave hollow earth would explain certain seemingly naturally occurring events."
That is correct. I asked for proof in what you thought made sense, and didn't get any. So, is this a tie?
Not sure how repeating the same question about volcanoes and earthquakes is so important, especially when you have no proof to show. I find it hypocritical, especially when I stated, I don't think it's possible to know for sure the questions you are asking. It's childish. If this is one of your comedy routines, I think I missed it.
"I'm not offering proof. But I'm not propagating a theory. I just think if a theory doesn't offer explanations for recurring events, no amount of evidence concerning shape will be convincing. "
It doesn't. Have you read a few pages of this thread? There is a book called, The Cellular Cosmogony. Nothing in the book touches on recurring events???
"Differences in shape, though, necessitates alternative explanations for phenomena. If a theory only has partial explanations, it would stand to reason that it would be more difficult to believe."
Well said?!?! You would have to define partial explanations, examples, and etc. If your saying, since I can't tell you how volcanoes work, than you are having a hard time believing in concave hollow earth. Then...
THE POINT IS WELL TAKEN!
"As far as my curiosity, I was interested how a concave hollow earth would explain certain seemingly naturally occurring events."
That is correct. I asked for proof in what you thought made sense, and didn't get any. So, is this a tie?
Not sure how repeating the same question about volcanoes and earthquakes is so important, especially when you have no proof to show. I find it hypocritical, especially when I stated, I don't think it's possible to know for sure the questions you are asking. It's childish. If this is one of your comedy routines, I think I missed it.
I was merely trying to decide how extensive the reasoning and how plausible the explanations are behind the theory to make a determination if the theory is worth investing time in.
So, I'll ask one more time, does the theory offer explanations--not proof-- about such things as earthquakes and volcanic activity? I'm not familiar with the scope of explanation concave hollow earth theory has developed. I thought you were. Thus, my questions.
So, the video above is probably the most in depth video of concave hollow earth.
Topics include...
Cell Earth - Seasons
Cell Earth - Up Is In, Down Is Out
Cell Earth - The Glass Sky
Cell Earth - FE vs CE
Cell Earth - Perspective
Cell Earth - Seasons
Cell Earth - Light Doesn't Travel In A Straight Line
Cell Earth - Solar Eclipse
Cell Earth - The Horizon
Cell Earth - The Octahedron
Cell Earth - Lunar Phases
Cell Earth - Lunar Eclipse
Cell Earth - Milky Way
Cell Earth - Meteors
Cell Earth - Sprites & Elves
Cell Earth - Negative Refraction
Cell Earth - Solar Time
Cell Earth - Coriolis Effect
Cell Earth - GPS
Cell Earth - The Father And The Sun
Cell Earth - Comets
Cell Earth - The Great Deluge
Cell Earth - Why Is The Sky Blue
Cell Earth - Airplane Halos
Cell Earth - Red Clouds
Cell Earth - Double Rainbows
Cell Earth - Ocean Tides
Cell Earth - Rainbows & Sundogs
Cell Earth - Megacryometeors
Cell Earth - Gegenschein
Cell Earth - Crystal Field Theory
Cell Earth - The Selenelion
Cell Earth - The Luxembourg Effect
Cell Earth - The Rectilineator
Cell Earth - Octahedron Evidence
Cell Earth - Rapid Fire (Compilation)
Cell Earth - NEOWISE Comet
Cell Earth - Looking For The Curve
Cell Earth - Centrifugal Divergence Gravity
Cell Earth - Airplanes
Cell Earth - Inverted World
Cell Earth - Welcome To Cellular Cosmology
Cell Earth - The Midnight Sun
Topics include...
Cell Earth - Seasons
Cell Earth - Up Is In, Down Is Out
Cell Earth - The Glass Sky
Cell Earth - FE vs CE
Cell Earth - Perspective
Cell Earth - Seasons
Cell Earth - Light Doesn't Travel In A Straight Line
Cell Earth - Solar Eclipse
Cell Earth - The Horizon
Cell Earth - The Octahedron
Cell Earth - Lunar Phases
Cell Earth - Lunar Eclipse
Cell Earth - Milky Way
Cell Earth - Meteors
Cell Earth - Sprites & Elves
Cell Earth - Negative Refraction
Cell Earth - Solar Time
Cell Earth - Coriolis Effect
Cell Earth - GPS
Cell Earth - The Father And The Sun
Cell Earth - Comets
Cell Earth - The Great Deluge
Cell Earth - Why Is The Sky Blue
Cell Earth - Airplane Halos
Cell Earth - Red Clouds
Cell Earth - Double Rainbows
Cell Earth - Ocean Tides
Cell Earth - Rainbows & Sundogs
Cell Earth - Megacryometeors
Cell Earth - Gegenschein
Cell Earth - Crystal Field Theory
Cell Earth - The Selenelion
Cell Earth - The Luxembourg Effect
Cell Earth - The Rectilineator
Cell Earth - Octahedron Evidence
Cell Earth - Rapid Fire (Compilation)
Cell Earth - NEOWISE Comet
Cell Earth - Looking For The Curve
Cell Earth - Centrifugal Divergence Gravity
Cell Earth - Airplanes
Cell Earth - Inverted World
Cell Earth - Welcome To Cellular Cosmology
Cell Earth - The Midnight Sun
This is pretty much my feelings when I hear the earth spins a 1,000 mph and flies 67,000 mph.
"Earth moves very fast. It spins (rotates) at a speed of about 1,000 miles (1600 kilometers) per hour and orbits around the Sun at a speed of about 67,000 miles (107,000 kilometers) per hour. We do not feel any of this motion because these speeds are constant."
https://coolcosmos.ipac.caltech.edu... very fast.,because these speeds are constant.
"Earth moves very fast. It spins (rotates) at a speed of about 1,000 miles (1600 kilometers) per hour and orbits around the Sun at a speed of about 67,000 miles (107,000 kilometers) per hour. We do not feel any of this motion because these speeds are constant."
https://coolcosmos.ipac.caltech.edu... very fast.,because these speeds are constant.
-
1
- Show all
So, I tried to do my survey experiment today, but it turns out my telephoto lens is not strong enough. I also will have to figure what weather pattern is best, to photograph long distance. So, will try and rent a high powered camera, to do this experiment.
One person came up to me and asked what I was doing, it was a long discussion, and actually thought Concave Hollow Earth was interesting. Imagine that! Hmmm.
One person came up to me and asked what I was doing, it was a long discussion, and actually thought Concave Hollow Earth was interesting. Imagine that! Hmmm.
