J
jinx
Guest
If you depend on water baptism to save you then more than your biscuits is gonna' get burnt.
For the cause of Christ
Roger
Oh good grief.... what do you have against following commandments?
If you depend on water baptism to save you then more than your biscuits is gonna' get burnt.
For the cause of Christ
Roger
Why do you assume that I don't? Why do you insist on adding to what Christ has done?Oh good grief.... what do you have against following commandments?
After reading this its obvious you have no clue what baptism is in the first place.If you depend on water baptism to save you then more than your biscuits is gonna' get burnt.
For the cause of Christ
Roger
At best you have made a misapplication. The scripture you rely upon Acts 2:38 is clearly not water baptism. Contextually and linguistically it cannot be supported from the text. I agree that Acts 8:36-39 is water baptism. And properly administered to boot.from what you type inhere in the forums it always seems like your against going against water baptism, and that is a command from GOD, so I just put 2 and 2 together and figure you have a problem with following commandments.
and I didn't write acts 2:38. so I didn't add anything.
Captain Obvious is my alter ego. Your contribution is very thought provoking.After reading this its obvious you have no clue what baptism is in the first place.
If acts 2:38 isn't water baptism then what kind of baptism is it?At best you have made a misapplication. The scripture you rely upon Acts 2:38 is clearly not water baptism. Contextually and linguistically it cannot be supported from the text. I agree that Acts 8:36-39 is water baptism. And properly administered to boot.
Water baptism has its place just not in salvation. Salvation is solely the province of grace.
Commandment wise I'm still working of Luke 10:27
For the cause of Christ
Roger
Some things leave no room for compromise. When you get the context right and the translation correct you'll discover it's not me that you are having a problem with but a few little hiccups in the doctrine.roger you always think I'm wrong, at everything. I hate talking with you, it's like talking to a brick wall.
Holy Spirit Baptism. The word translated baptized in the verse is baptizeo a derivative of bapto. Baptizo implies a submersion like a sunken ship. This presents obvious problems for water baptism since we cannot live long without air. Holy Spirit baptism however is a submersion with no need to be brought back up. Bapto is a dipping and is used to illustrate water baptism.If acts 2:38 isn't water baptism then what kind of baptism is it?
Some things leave no room for compromise. When you get the context right and the translation correct you'll discover it's not me that you are having a problem with but a few little hiccups in the doctrine.
Don't judge me too harshly at least not yet. I have been wrong in the past. I'm certain I must have been.
For the cause of Christ
Roger
brickwall.
After reading this its obvious you have no clue what baptism is in the first place.
Holy Spirit Baptism. The word translated baptized in the verse is baptizeo a derivative of bapto. Baptizo implies a submersion like a sunken ship. This presents obvious problems for water baptism since we cannot live long without air. Holy Spirit baptism however is a submersion with no need to be brought back up. Bapto is a dipping and is used to illustrate water baptism.
For the cause of Christ
Roger
Well thanks. Jesus does not change, the same yesterday, today and forever. The word of God does not change not one jot or tittle. Perhaps we need a few more who are set for the defense of the faith once and for all delivered to the saints.brickwall.
Everybody has a problem with keeping commandments. Rom 8:does anyone have a problem with following commandments?
1 John 1:8 if we say we have no sin we deceive ourselves and His truth is not in us. For by the law comes knowledge of sin.does anyone believe that it is a sin not to follow commandment?
Of course that's why we have an advocate with the Father Who makes intercession for us. Heb 7:25does anyone believe that sin separates us from GOD?
Whoops here's where the train jumps off the track. You just dumped grace for works. There is a spiritual concept here that you are not grasping. We do not discard the commandments but the commandments no longer are sin to us. Christ has fulfilled all the commandments for us. Only perfect keeping of commandments is sufficient for God. Failing in even the smallest degree is complete failure in Gods eyes.does anyone believe that when JESUS said go and baptise and when Peter (who was given the keys of heaven) acts 2:38 that these were commandment?
Through grace sin no longer has any power over us. When believers sin they suffer only a loss of fellowship with the Father. The Father never brings us under His condemnation again. Never. Our sins are removed as far as the east is from the west never to be remembered again. All our sins are under the blood. All past, present and future. That is not a license to sin and those that go there are demonstrating a lack of repentance toward sin. The new creature in Christ has a new nature that hates sin and loves righteousness. 2 Cor 5:17It is necessary to do what ever GOD ask us to do and if we don't it is sin, and that sin will keep you from heaven. disobedience is sin.
I demonstrated from the text that in the original language it can be nothing else. The bible was not written in English so the men who translated it had a huge task to take the original and make it as accurate as possible.You are the first person that I've ever heard day that this passage means Holy Spirit baptism, and it simply does not work in this verse for many reasons.
The apostles received the Holy Spirit in the upper room before Pentacost. John 20:221. Never once in the bible is the HS baptism a command. It is given by the Holy Spirit as a blessing/gift. Peter is giving a command to be baptized. Even the apostles had to wait for their HS baptism. They didn't recieve it upon their own command.
It is precisely what John said when he saw Jesus. A baptism John could not give only God.2. I've never in the bible read where the HS baptism is for the remission of sins. There are no references to this whatsoever.
The Jews were baptizing long before John. John's baptism was different in that John said it was in preparation for the coming kingdom of God. A baptism of repentance. the Jews knew of the Holy Spirit baptism because Joel prophesied it. Joel 23. If you think back to the 1st century you'd realize that these people knew what Johns baptism was. It was water. When Peter told them to be baptized it is obvious that they'd realize he was referring to water and not something else.
Holy Spirit Baptism. The word translated baptized in the verse is baptizeo a derivative of bapto. Baptizo implies a submersion like a sunken ship. This presents obvious problems for water baptism since we cannot live long without air. Holy Spirit baptism however is a submersion with no need to be brought back up. Bapto is a dipping and is used to illustrate water baptism.