okay Red33, now that we are back here -
let's look at YOUR doctrine:
or in the case of HONEST false teachers in hyper-dispensationalist antinomian grace church gap gentile mystery rapture body...NO BAPTISM.
okay...
now i'll sit on this thread and post a half dozen smart-alecky replies waiting for you.
really- do you STILL lie awake at night trying to figure out a way to GET EVEN?
your got da wrongly divided thing goin' on...deal wit it.
let's look at YOUR doctrine:
".....This was recently done again in the July/August 1999 issue of Uplook magazine (published by the Plymouth Brethren). In this their Dispensationalism Issues issue, they presented an excellent overview of dispensationalism. As a matter of fact, we would agree with the majority of what was written. But then, one writer had to add this statement:
“One final word. Like all good things, the study of dispensations can be abused. There are some Christians who carry dispensationalism to such an extreme that they accept only Paul’s Prison Epistles as applicable for the church today. As a result, they do not accept baptism or the Lord’s Supper, since these are not found in the Prison Epistles. They also teach that Peter’s gospel message was not the same as Paul’s….These people are sometimes called ultra-dispensationalists or Bullingerites (after a teacher named E. W. Bullinger). Their extreme view of dispensationalism should be rejected.” 2"
...
"Regarding the “ordinances” of the church, there is no place in Scripture where water baptism and the Lord’s supper are linked. The Lord’s Supper is a memorial that we are instructed in I Corinthians 11 to keep “until He come.” However, we do feel that water baptism is a Jewish ordinance and is something that was phased out during the transition period. It is also rarely pointed out that we are not unique in understanding that water baptism is not for today. Other groups throughout church history, such as the Quakers, have also come to this same conclusion."
Are We Hyper-Dispensationalists?
by David M. Havard
https://www.bereanbiblesociety.org/are-we-hyper-dispensationalists/
They also teach that Peter’s gospel message was not the same as Paul’s < oops. there's Red's false gospel. but ya need TWO of everything when you wrong divide the word of truth.
“One final word. Like all good things, the study of dispensations can be abused. There are some Christians who carry dispensationalism to such an extreme that they accept only Paul’s Prison Epistles as applicable for the church today. As a result, they do not accept baptism or the Lord’s Supper, since these are not found in the Prison Epistles. They also teach that Peter’s gospel message was not the same as Paul’s….These people are sometimes called ultra-dispensationalists or Bullingerites (after a teacher named E. W. Bullinger). Their extreme view of dispensationalism should be rejected.” 2"
...
"Regarding the “ordinances” of the church, there is no place in Scripture where water baptism and the Lord’s supper are linked. The Lord’s Supper is a memorial that we are instructed in I Corinthians 11 to keep “until He come.” However, we do feel that water baptism is a Jewish ordinance and is something that was phased out during the transition period. It is also rarely pointed out that we are not unique in understanding that water baptism is not for today. Other groups throughout church history, such as the Quakers, have also come to this same conclusion."
Are We Hyper-Dispensationalists?
by David M. Havard
https://www.bereanbiblesociety.org/are-we-hyper-dispensationalists/
They also teach that Peter’s gospel message was not the same as Paul’s < oops. there's Red's false gospel. but ya need TWO of everything when you wrong divide the word of truth.
okay...
now i'll sit on this thread and post a half dozen smart-alecky replies waiting for you.
really- do you STILL lie awake at night trying to figure out a way to GET EVEN?
your got da wrongly divided thing goin' on...deal wit it.