I have proved to you that nose ring is the more accurate and correct translation, I have asked numerous times now why you think it is not the correct translation, yet at best all I have is "The NIV NKJV are full of garbage thats not in the KJV....... ...... It comes from a false bible"..
Really?
The reason I ask about Nose Ring, is that it is one of the more insignificant differences from the King James 1611 which you can not give any explination as to this difference, esepcailly when the evidence shows that Nose ring is the more accurate translation. The more heavier points are argued over and over with millions of cut and pastes and vidoes lasting for 100 pages over months of posting, but nothing is forthcoming with this point.
IF you can not explain the minor points, then how can I trust the main points? THe foundations are therefore shaky at best, If you ask someone what 3+3 is and they can not give a correct answer or explanation, then how can you trust them when they give lecture on advanced calculus?
This is the same for you, explain to me why nose ring is wrong, surly you must be able to explain such a simple change other than its just "one of those words which Satans bibles have".
You have to prove this, otherwise your house of cards will come tumbling down, seriously, you do have to explain why every difference of punctuation and every change of capital letter has been made to support your claim that the 1611 is the final perfect Bible.
Nose Ring is a correct translation. Prove me wrong.