KJV1611,
Is it passover or Easter in Acts 12.4?
Why don't you compare and explain for us [:
Edit: Are you just quoting someone else, or did you do the research yourself lol
KJV1611,
Is it passover or Easter in Acts 12.4?
Let's find out if it should be Easter of Passover. According to the book of Acts they took Peter during the days of unleavened bread. Any time you see something in parenthesis in the KJV pay close attention, God is trying to show us something.
Act 12:1 Now about that time Herod the king stretched forth his hands to vex certain of the church.
Act 12:2 And he killed James the brother of John with the sword.
Act 12:3 And because he saw it pleased the Jews, he proceeded further to take Peter also. (Then were the days of unleavened bread.)
Act 12:4 And when he had apprehended him, he put him in prison, and delivered him to four quaternions of soldiers to keep him; intending after Easter to bring him forth to the people.
Act 12:5 Peter therefore was kept in prison: but prayer was made without ceasing of the church unto God for him.
According to the book of Leviticus the 14th day of the month was passover. Then on the next day, the 15th day of the month, the feast of unleavened bread begins.
Lev 23:5 In the fourteenth day of the first month at even is the LORD'S passover.
Lev 23:6 And on the fifteenth day of the same month is the feast of unleavened bread unto the LORD: seven days ye must eat unleavened bread.
If they took Peter during the days of unleavened bread, then Passover had already past. Now tell me, were they waiting for Easter to bring him forth to the people or were they going to wait a whole other year to bring him before the people. No, it shouldn't be Passover, it should be Easter just like the KJV says.
One lie that you have probably been told is that Easter is some Romanized Catholic church thing that was not observed by pagans at time of the book of Acts, but this is not true. Easter is the celebration of the sacred feminine AKA - Ishtar, Isis, Ashteroth, Gaia, Venus and probably many other names that I'm not aware of.
We should use the perfect, time-tested version that the Holy Spirit ordained through the work of learned men. The language and words used will never pass away, and people should commit themselves to learning from the true Bible. All modern vernacular translations use flawed sources that deny the Lord's true words, and we should burn any Bible heretically translated using them.
-- The Roman Catholic Church, ca.1500
Yep, if'n it were good 'nuff fer them 'postles, it be good 'nuff fer us'ns. I Like the KJV and use it a lot, I also use the NKJV more and more these days. The real source of truth is not a version of the scriptures...
Joh 16:13 Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come.
Go us.....another Ruckmanite!!!!
I was never told the lie about Easter and knew about it as you described it...
Tell me, Does DOC still hate minorities and still use vile and vulgar profanity when people disagree with him? Does he still wish to physically kill all Apostates with hand grenades?
Oh and how are his 3 ex wives and kids doing? Have they been recovered from all those years of physicall and mental abuse? Does DOC still believe that having physical sex before getting married means you are married under the eyes of God, even though you are not married before the eyes of men? DOes DOC still believe the translators of the KJB were INFALLIBLE!?!?
God never showed you squat, you sound like your god...Dr. Peter Ruckman....and ruckman says "The KJV is the inerrant word of God for English speaking people, God showed me that a long time ago. My faith is firm in God and his word" al the time...
Take your cultist beliefs somehwere else ruckmanite...
Does the KJV teach 3 equal Gods?
I think that if Jesus has a sense ofhumour he is dying.
Remember how he rejoiced in Spirit because GOD had hidden things.....
He is still in the same business.
By old KJV I assume you mean the original 1611. I have a copy of the 1611 version complete with weird spellings and Roman numerals. It says exactly the same thing all other KJV's say - earring. Maybe you haven't researched this? Maybe you heard or read that from a KJV bashing website and swallowed it hook line and sinker without ever investigating it? You know you can find the copy have on line. Just google it.


Also, history is not something that is easily hid. But telling a lie over and over again, and convincing people that they are stupid is very easy. People, you are not stupid, and if you are having doubts then do the actual research.
And as I just said, the Catholic Church of the Inquisition that killed Jews and Christians by the Millions
And as I just said, the Catholic Church of the Inquisition that killed Jews and Christians by the Millions to prevent the spread of Christianity to the Middle East, while the Popes created Islam to dominate the Middle East
The older mss have it the way the new translations do. You say God said it the way the Kjv does. How can you prove this? You can't. Closer to originals time wise is more reliable.
IMO Jesus, lol... idk, what you think?
In your opinion?IMO Jesus, lol... idk, what you think?
IMO Jesus, lol... idk, what you think?
Oh dear... yet another skirting the issue. I have not read anything on a King James Bashing website, I dont go to those either, I love the King James, that is one thing you people fail to understand, that I LOVE THE KING JAMES BIBLE, its just all the nonsense you claim about being the perfect bible that I do not accept and never will.
Anyway, In the King James, it says Earing, correct, I took this from the AV1611 website, The New King James Bible: Counterfeit again I quote.
Genesis 24:47: The "old" KJV reads: "I put the earring upon her face". But the NKJV has different plans for beautiful Rebekah: "I put the nose ring on her nose". Where did it get the ridiculous idea to "cannibalize" Rebekah? Just take a peek at the NIV, NASV, RSV, NRSV!
Other bibles say NoseRing. Now if you are to accept that every capital letter, every full stop and comma in the King James is perfect from God, then obviously you can not have Nose Ring in any other Bible correct? So therefore a ridiculous claim has to be made to snub and pour doubt on the use of Nose Ring, so the best that we so far is the claim that it Cananbalses Rebekah.
If anyone needs to do research then its yourslef and your cult leaders. for millions of people and numerous cultures around the world, it is still standard practice to place a ring in the nose to indicate a person is engaged to be married. In India the rings are often replaced with small studs for everyday wearing, but come wedding and other occasions, elaborate expensive rings are put in.View attachment 64448View attachment 64449
This practice is not really found in MIddle East this day and age, the peopels who practice it and were around in the days of Rebekah have now long gone or simple displaced, moved on or converted to Islam and stopping the practice as a result.
A number of cultures in Africa still practice this, and quite interestingly, there origins can be traced back thousands of years to Middle East.
Therefore Nose Ring is correct use of the word. Obviously the translators of the King James were not that inspired to allow this inaccurate translation to creep in, which is enough proof for myself to show that your claims about the King James is miss-placed and false.
The KJV and the NKJV are not the same bible - they disagree with one another. I don't read nor recommend anyone read the NKJV.
Ah another one putting words into our mouths...The whole debate about which version is the real word of God is FOOLISHNESS!