There Are Many Scriptures That Disprove The Trinity

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Nov 19, 2012
5,484
27
0
Re: busted...

and you have demonstrated that you think you are extremely smart and arrogant. You also know how to debate well, but do not know how to teach. The reason I am done is not because I have no reply, the reason I am done is because I do not have the time to keep debating you, or the want to or need to because no matter what I say you will believe in the trinity, and the point of talking about scripture is to teach/preach.
Its called hypocrisy to use renderings that you, yourself, don't even believe in...
 
Nov 19, 2012
5,484
27
0
I know you mean well, but you don't really understand what the Trinity actually is, (or you do believe in it, but don't know how to explain it well). You're going to confuse the people who don't believe in it. I think this is a problem with many Christians -- many Christians themselves don't even know what the Trinity is.

You just stated that there is not one God, but three. That is incorrect. There is only one God, but there are three Persons who are Him. The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are of the same essence and Being. To state otherwise would mean that you would be a tri-theist, and you would be a Trinity denier.

Yes, there is one Godhead. There is one God. There are not three gods.

Please read the Athanasian Creed and look at Bowman's avatar.

No wonder this lad is confused...his premise is incorrect...
 
A

Arwen4CJ

Guest
[SUP]Zechariah 12:10 (NASB)
10 [/SUP]“I will pour out on the house of David and on the inhabitants of Jerusalem, [SUP][h][/SUP]the Spirit of grace and of supplication, so that they will look on Me whom they have pierced; and they will mourn for Him, as one mourns for an only son, and they will weep bitterly over Him like the bitter weeping over a firstborn.

Questions:
1.) Yahweh is speaking here -- but if Yahweh is only the Father, why does He say, "they will look on Me whom they have pierced?"

2.) Why does Yahweh change tenses in the middle of the verse, starting out using "Me," and then switch to "Him?"

It seems to me, at least according to this verse, that Yahweh is at least two Persons.
 
A

Arwen4CJ

Guest
Looking through a lot of the verses on God is the Son, and so far see no proof that they are one. I have decided I'm done this debate though, because I have clearly demonstrated how the trinity is false. you STILL have not explained John 17. Or have shown proof Jesus is God. Either way we will both never agree on this unless someone shows me a verse that says all three are one (which you can't it doesnt exist).
God bless and I hope one day you do find truth.
I look foward to our next debate! You did teach me a lot! You taught me what the trinity really is, confirmed my faith that it isn't real, have bettered my on hand scriptural knowledge, and gave me a few new things to study! In all honesty thanks, I still disagree, but thanks!
I'm sorry to hear that you'll be backing out of this debate. If you ever would like to talk to me privately about this subject, feel free to PM me at any time. I know how confusing debates like this can be in public forums. If you would prefer to talk about this with someone else on this site, I'm sure they would also welcome a private message from you.

I think instead of looking for "proving" and "disproving," the Trinity, it would be better to think in terms of "evidence for" and "evidence against." The doctrine of the Trinity, as other matters of Christian doctrine, really comes down to faith. As you can see from this debate, it's possible to "explain away" some of the proofs that are given....that doesn't mean that the explaining away is right....but I think that's what tends to happen when we go about this in terms of "proof."

In the end, a person must believe in the Trinity by faith.
 
T

tucksma

Guest
I actually did PM you before this haha!
 
A

Arwen4CJ

Guest
Looking through a lot of the verses on God is the Son, and so far see no proof that they are one. I have decided I'm done this debate though, because I have clearly demonstrated how the trinity is false. you STILL have not explained John 17. Or have shown proof Jesus is God. Either way we will both never agree on this unless someone shows me a verse that says all three are one (which you can't it doesnt exist).
God bless and I hope one day you do find truth.
I look foward to our next debate! You did teach me a lot! You taught me what the trinity really is, confirmed my faith that it isn't real, have bettered my on hand scriptural knowledge, and gave me a few new things to study! In all honesty thanks, I still disagree, but thanks!

I have an explination that does make sense, but like i said I'm backing out of this debate. I'm getting tired of wasting my breath. I see where you are coming from, and I disagree.

Thank you though, you are testing my faith well and I need that to know if I do know the truth of God's word or not.
Thanks. I'll turn that around and say that I hope that you find the truth. Do look over some of the Scripture that I quoted earlier, such as the Isaiah 45 passage and compare it to the Philippians passage.

Like I said before, if you'd like to discuss any of this with me in private, feel free to contact me. Otherwise, I pray that you come to the truth, and I wish you well.
 
Nov 19, 2012
5,484
27
0
In the end, a person must believe in the Trinity by faith.
And...the Holy Bible defines 'faith' as...'acting upon established truth'...with the OT faith-examples listed in Hebrews 11 directly applying to the Trinity of Malek Yahweh...
 
A

Arwen4CJ

Guest
And...the Holy Bible defines 'faith' as...'acting upon established truth'...with the OT faith-examples listed in Hebrews 11 directly applying to the Trinity of Malek Yahweh...
Yes. Biblical faith is based on the truth of God.
 
Nov 19, 2012
5,484
27
0
God The Son...

The one overcoming will inherit all things, and I will be God to him, and he will be the son to Me. (Rev 21.7)

 

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,995
4,615
113
Well see I also disagree on the concept that Jesus preexisted. . .

Then you do not agree with what the BIBLE actually says:

Colossians 1:16-18 (HCSB)
[SUP]16 [/SUP] For everything was created by Him, in heaven and on earth, the visible and the invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities— all things have been created through Him and for Him.
[SUP]17 [/SUP] He is before all things, and by Him all things hold together.
[SUP]18 [/SUP] He is also the head of the body, the church; He is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead, so that He might come to have first place in everything.
John 8:58 (HCSB)
[SUP]58 [/SUP] Jesus said to them, “I assure you: Before Abraham was, I am.”

Revelation 13:4-8 (KJV)
[SUP]4 [/SUP] And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?
[SUP]5 [/SUP] And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months.
[SUP]6 [/SUP] And he opened his mouth in blasphemy against God, to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven.
[SUP]7 [/SUP] And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations.
[SUP]8 [/SUP] And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.

John 17:24 (KJV)
[SUP]24 [/SUP] Father, I will that they also, whom thou hast given me, be with me where I am; that they may behold my glory, which thou hast given me: for thou lovedst me before the foundation of the world.

I think it is time you repent, TURN BACK TO THE TRUE GOD, and confess the lies you have been deceived into believing and have been preaching.
 

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,995
4,615
113
And I agree that he is still the son. Just not God the son.

Wrong, because "offspring of GOD" would automatically be a SECOND GOD, because GOD says reproduction always produces ONLY their "own kind". "SON OF GOD" is a TITLE, that denotes WHO the Father has given the right to inherit all that the HE has, INCLUDING HIS DEITY. It is also called the "BIRTHRIGHT" and it could be given to any man the father chose to give it to, not necessarily the traditional eldest son. If a father thought all his son's were worthless drunkards, he could even give the birthright TITLE "SON OF" to someone outside the family, even a servant; and that Servant would instantly gain the TITLE, "Son of" that Father. AND after receiving it, the possessor of that birthright TITLE, could sell it like ESAU did. AND THE NEW OWNER OF THE TITLE, became KNOWN AS "SON OF" whoever. Now be prepared to have your eyes opened, the TRUTH MIGHT BE BLINDING. HERE IS JESUS PASSING ON THE BIRTHRIGHT TITLE "SON OF JOSEPH", JUST BEFORE HE DIED.

John 19:26-27 (NKJV)
[SUP]26 [/SUP] When Jesus therefore saw His mother, and the disciple whom He loved standing by, He said to His mother, "Woman, behold your son!"
[SUP]27 [/SUP] Then He said to the disciple, "Behold your mother!" And from that hour that disciple took her to his own home.

That was a binding passage of the BIRTHRIGHT Title "Son of Joseph"; that gave all of the inheritance and property Jesus had that HE inherited from Joseph, to John, so that John could use it to take care of Jesus' Mother. Because HIS brothers still were lacking in Faith, JESUS passed His Birthright TITLE, "Son of Joseph" on to JOHN. What many do not realize is that in ISRAEL at that time, all property had to be in the Husband's Name, and could only be passed on to another male, even a non family member.

HENCE "SON OF GOD" does not mean "offspring of GOD".
 
Last edited:
Nov 18, 2013
511
7
0
I think it is time you repent, TURN BACK TO THE TRUE GOD, and confess the lies you have been deceived into believing and have been preaching.
Let's start with the biggest Trinitarian lie of all "God is a person" or rather "God is multiple persons."

When are Trinitarians going to repent of their unscriptural, speculative heresies by which they endeavor to deceive the world?

WHere is it ever said "God is made in the image of man?"

You show me.
 

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,995
4,615
113
Let's start with the biggest Trinitarian lie of all "God is a person" or rather "God is multiple persons."

When are Trinitarians going to repent of their unscriptural, speculative heresies by which they endeavor to deceive the world?

WHere is it ever said "God is made in the image of man?"

You show me.

YOU ARE TRYING TO USE THE WRONG DEFINITION OF THE WORD "Person"

Merriam-Webster

Person = Individual

Individual =
of, relating to, or existing as just one member or part of a larger group


Sorry, you do not get to use the Definition you want,

You have you use the definition we used when our Doctrinal Statements were written.


Night.
 
Mar 4, 2013
7,761
107
0
Re: Study up...

Deuteronomy 6:4-5 (KJV)
[SUP]4 [/SUP]Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD:
[SUP]5 [/SUP]And thou shalt love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might.

I find nowhere in the Bible the phrase "dividing God" or "divide God." (???????) I don't think anybody here is doing that. The words that come close are "God not dividing" are contained in this scripture.
2 Timothy 2:15 (KJV)
[SUP]15 [/SUP]Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
Trinity means "God is divided into three" or even worse it means "three Gods."

That's right. It's not in the Bible. It's completely alien to the Bible. That's why you don't find the word "trinity" in the bible.

Of course we confess that Jesus Christ is the son of God, and the Holy Spirit is sent by the Father.

The godly conceive of this without dividing God. So how does Paul the apostle to the gentiles, conceive of it.

The word God denotes the Father, and connotes the godhead, which is to say, The Father and the Logos and the Holy Spirit, as all three form a unity in heaven for all are one. Christ is the image of God, so how will you separate the reality from the image if one can conceive of neither because both are beyond human conception?

Jesus said "The Father is in me and I am in the Father. I and the Father are one."

So even if one could conceive of separate heavenly entities, how will you distinguish them?"

What is the point of this philosophizing? So you can burn people at the stake who disagree with you?

Just reflect on the fate of Byzantium, the capital city of Trinitarianism, and Rome too, which has spent much of its life being the capital city of European debauchery. For what purpose serves Trinitarianism? You tell me.
I do not dispute. But I really want to know what you advocating, and explaining how that fits, relating it to this verse.

1 Corinthians 15:28 (KJV)

[SUP]28 [/SUP]And when all things shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him, that God may be all in all.

I couldn't agree more that "one" means "Unit of one."
Gjolll.

I didn't see an answer to this so I thought to re-post from #847.
I reckon that there is no answer for 1 Corinthians 15:28 that says "then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him"....In all reality I have a hard time with this verse, and I really wanted it explained and confirmed with other scriptures. Thanks in advance for anyone that has input confirmed by the entire Bible.
 
A

Arwen4CJ

Guest
Let's start with the biggest Trinitarian lie of all "God is a person" or rather "God is multiple persons."

When are Trinitarians going to repent of their unscriptural, speculative heresies by which they endeavor to deceive the world?

WHere is it ever said "God is made in the image of man?"

You show me.
You are not listening to how we define "Person."

By "Person," we do not mean that human or human-like or whatever. We do not mean a physical form. What we do mean is something that is not an impersonal force. Thus, even spirits have personhood because they are not impersonal forces.
 
A

Arwen4CJ

Guest
[SUP]John 8:23-30 (NASB)
23 [/SUP]And He was saying to them, “You are from below, I am from above; you are of this world, I am not of this world. [SUP]24 [/SUP]Therefore I said to you that you will die in your sins; for unless you believe that [SUP][a][/SUP]I am He, you will die in your sins.” [SUP]25 [/SUP]So they were saying to Him, “Who are You?” Jesus said to them, “[SUP][b][/SUP]What have I been saying to you from the beginning? [SUP]26 [/SUP]I have many things to speak and to judge concerning you, but He who sent Me is true; and the things which I heard from Him, these I speak to the world.” [SUP]27 [/SUP]They did not realize that He had been speaking to them about the Father. [SUP]28[/SUP]So Jesus said, “When you lift up the Son of Man, then you will know that [SUP][c][/SUP]I am He, and I do nothing on My own initiative, but I speak these things as the Father taught Me. [SUP]29 [/SUP]And He who sent Me is with Me; He [SUP][d][/SUP]has not left Me alone, for I always do the things that are pleasing to Him.” [SUP]30 [/SUP]As He spoke these things, many came to believe in Him.
 
A

Arwen4CJ

Guest
You are not listening to how we define "Person."

By "Person," we do not mean that human or human-like or whatever. We do not mean a physical form. What we do mean is something that is not an impersonal force. Thus, even spirits have personhood because they are not impersonal forces.
The definition that VCO used from the dictionary is better than my statement above. The point is that we are not mean physical form.
 
T

tucksma

Guest
Wrong, because "offspring of GOD" would automatically be a SECOND GOD, because GOD says reproduction always produces ONLY their "own kind". "SON OF GOD" is a TITLE, that denotes WHO the Father has given the right to inherit all that the HE has, INCLUDING HIS DEITY. It is also called the "BIRTHRIGHT" and it could be given to any man the father chose to give it to, not necessarily the traditional eldest son. If a father thought all his son's were worthless drunkards, he could even give the birthright TITLE "SON OF" to someone outside the family, even a servant; and that Servant would instantly gain the TITLE, "Son of" that Father. AND after receiving it, the possessor of that birthright TITLE, could sell it like ESAU did. AND THE NEW OWNER OF THE TITLE, became KNOWN AS "SON OF" whoever. Now be prepared to have your eyes opened, the TRUTH MIGHT BE BLINDING. HERE IS JESUS PASSING ON THE BIRTHRIGHT TITLE "SON OF JOSEPH", JUST BEFORE HE DIED.

John 19:26-27 (NKJV)
[SUP]26 [/SUP] When Jesus therefore saw His mother, and the disciple whom He loved standing by, He said to His mother, "Woman, behold your son!"
[SUP]27 [/SUP] Then He said to the disciple, "Behold your mother!" And from that hour that disciple took her to his own home.

That was a binding passage of the BIRTHRIGHT Title "Son of Joseph"; that gave all of the inheritance and property Jesus had that HE inherited from Joseph, to John, so that John could use it to take care of Jesus' Mother. Because HIS brothers still were lacking in Faith, JESUS passed His Birthright TITLE, "Son of Joseph" on to JOHN. What many do not realize is that in ISRAEL at that time, all property had to be in the Husband's Name, and could only be passed on to another male, even a non family member.

HENCE "SON OF GOD" does not mean "offspring of GOD".
I'm curious, doesn't a person (your definition) only inherit his birthright once their father dies? and if so when did God die? If not then never mind, that's just how I thought it worked.
 
Nov 19, 2012
5,484
27
0
Let's start with the biggest Trinitarian lie of all "God is a person" or rather "God is multiple persons."

When are Trinitarians going to repent of their unscriptural, speculative heresies by which they endeavor to deceive the world?

WHere is it ever said "God is made in the image of man?"

You show me.


The verse below mandates three hypostases and one ousia...

πορευθεντες ουν μαθητευσατε παντα τα εθνη βαπτιζοντες αυτους εις το ονομα του πατρος και του υιου και του αγιου πνευματος