Was Paul Really A False Apostle?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
C

cfultz3

Guest
Paul claimed to be a Pharisee (Acts 23:6, Phil 3:5) - well into his 'Christian ministry'. Messiah commanded me to avoid the teachings of the anti-Law Pharisees (Mt 16:6-12).
So God told you to go back to the Pharisees Laws, the same Laws Jesus fought against. Never knew God and Jesus was at war.
 

homwardbound

Senior Member
Oct 24, 2012
15,507
226
63
There are many on CC who seem to be following this line of doubting/questioning Paul. Hebrew Roots/Judaizers.

I don't know anywhere where it says people will suddenly find the truth in the end, but rather they will lose it in the end. Denying Paul's apostleship is a falling away.
Actually did not Paul, only point us to trust God through Christ period, never in him, for he said it many times he was just a person that has put his trust in God through Son
 
N

nathan3

Guest
After viewing the amount of people attacking Paul and other inaccuracies and false-hoods having to do with peoples "understanding"
of the Bible, I know this scripture has come to pass:


Amos 8:11-12

King James Version (KJV)

11 Behold, the days come, saith the Lord God, that I will send a famine in the land, not a famine of bread, nor a thirst for water, but of hearing the words of the Lord:

12 And they shall wander from sea to sea, and from the north even to the east, they shall run to and fro to seek the word of the Lord, and shall not find it.
 
Last edited:
C

cfultz3

Guest
I just do not understand why these people who teach about half of the New Testament are not ashamed to admit that the Holy Spirit was not able to keep out from His written Word things which they say are false, and thus, imbedding in people's mind that the Bible is riddled with falsehood.

Not only is this an attack on Christianity, but on Jesus Christ' Covenant itself, seeing that what we have from God as New Testament Scripture is being belittled as man-made Scripture.

Surely, this attack is being taken into consideration by those here protecting their Christ-following roots?
 
Aug 17, 2013
96
0
0
It's a good example. I'd say, do not do what he did. This applies to our pastors or anyone we look up to if they don't go by the Word.
Yet many are not claming Paul to be a mere "pastor", but an "apostle" with a much greater standard.

On the other hand, does this law apply to believers now? And what was/is the meaning of appearing before Him in Jerusalem 3 times a year?
The appearance was to Jerusalem (Psa 84:7) at the Temple to present offerings (Deu 16:16,17; 12:5,6), and to learn of YHVH's Torah/Law (Deu 31:11-13). Since the Temple is not extant, it is my belief that this particular law does not apply to faithful believers now.

Makes sense if Peter didn't say "Bear in mind that our Lord’s patience means salvation, just as our dear brother Paul also wrote you with the wisdom that God gave him." in verse 15 which confirmed
a. Paul is a brother in Christ.
b. God gave Paul wisdom to write.
In fact, there's much wisdom in his teachings that is hidden from the world c.f. 1 Cor 2:6-16.
1. The Greek text of 2Pet 3:15 does not include "God gave him". It only says "wisdom given him". The Greek text does not identify the source of Paul's wisdom. James 3:15 states that there is a devilish sort of wisdom.
2. The Greek text does not identify Paul as a "brother in Christ". Only as a "brother". Not all "brothers" are good brothers, cf Mt 10:21.
3. Whatever hidden wisdom Paul allegedly reveals, is it witnessed to by additional writers? Or preached only by Paul alone? Is Paul greater than Messiah's standard for Himself (cf Jn 5:31)?

Now to his teachings, the obvious one that doesn't go well with the law is circumcision, if we don't believe that the OT has already taught circumcision in the heart. So what do you say?
The Tanach teaches that circumcision of the heart and flesh are both necessary. Faith plus obedience, which Messiah, and the twelve, and James the elder all preach.
 
Aug 17, 2013
96
0
0
In other words: My faith in Messiah has grown much stronger since I took half of the New Testament Scripture out.......
I prefer "My faith in Messiah has grown much stronger since I rejected 27% of what men, by their own traditions, have erroneously included"
 
C

cfultz3

Guest
Yet many are not claming Paul to be a mere "pastor", but an "apostle" with a much greater standard.
So, if Paul is not an apostle, as it is mentioned about 9 times, then the Spirit failed in delivering God's Message uncorrupted? Either we have the Truth in written words or you are attacking the Spirit in His administration of protecting God's word.
 
Aug 17, 2013
96
0
0
In other words: how would you feel if others called you the same for, say, adding to Scripture.
That's not my point.

My point is, the Protestants here can easily get on my case for allegedly "removing" Scripture (from their perspective). I can also just as easily claim the same about the Protestants.

It is a two way street.
 
Aug 17, 2013
96
0
0
In other words: the Apostle to the Gentiles have his enemies.
In other words: you deny that Messiah commissioned His 11/12 Jewish apostles to be the Apostles to the Gentiles (Matthew 28:18-20)?

I find it quite incredulous to believe the alleged claim that the ministry to the small population of Jews were given to the 12, and the rest of the much larger Gentile world was given to one man!
 
C

cfultz3

Guest
I prefer "My faith in Messiah has grown much stronger since I rejected 27% of what men, by their own traditions, have erroneously included"
You prefer in calling half of Scripture as false, seeing that Paul wrote it. You are not attacking words on a piece of paper, you are attacking God Himself by denying half of His New Covenant.

My faith in Messiah has grown much stronger since I became non-Pauline.
 
C

cfultz3

Guest
That's not my point.

My point is, the Protestants here can easily get on my case for allegedly "removing" Scripture (from their perspective). I can also just as easily claim the same about the Protestants.

It is a two way street.
So, you are denying half of the New Covenant because some are doing it? Do you think that could be a little dangerous for a soul?
 
Aug 17, 2013
96
0
0
So God told you to go back to the Pharisees Laws, the same Laws Jesus fought against. Never knew God and Jesus was at war.
Not so, my friend.

YHVH commanded His Torah/Law.
The Pharisees developed their own man-made traditions which they allowed to cloud YHVH's Law.
YHVH sent Messiah to destroy the Pharisees' traditions and return His people back to His Law.

The Pharisees were in fact not Torah/Law observers. The Pharisees substituted their own traditions (which they called "the Oral Torah/Law") in place of YHWH's Commandments ("Written Torah/Law"). Mainstream Christians misunderstand the Pharisees' observance of their "Oral Torah" and thus wrongly believe them to be strict followers ofYHWH's Written Torah. The Pharisees believed they were themselves wholly righteous because of their strict observance of Oral Torah, confusing obedience to it with obedience to Written Torah. Pharisee Paul misunderstood this as well: cf Phl 3:5,6.

We see confirmation in the writings of Josephus and the Dead Sea Scrolls: the scribes and Pharisees were actually those who abandoned much of Written Torah and were loose in its observation; they were also the group that "loosened the commands" by modifying Written Torah through their own traditions in Oral Torah. The Sadducees were in reality the strict Torah observant group. We also have additional confirmation of this in Scripture when we see Messiah preaching against the Pharisees (and their associated scribes) on various occasions, and not the Sadducees. We must indeed be more Torah-observant than the lawless, liberal Pharisees (Mt 5:20, 2Pet 3:17)!
 
Aug 17, 2013
96
0
0
After viewing the amount of people attacking Paul and other inaccuracies and false-hoods having to do with peoples "understanding" of the Bible, I know this scripture has come to pass:

Amos 8:11-12

King James Version (KJV)

11 Behold, the days come, saith the Lord God, that I will send a famine in the land, not a famine of bread, nor a thirst for water, but of hearing the words of the Lord:

12 And they shall wander from sea to sea, and from the north even to the east, they shall run to and fro to seek the word of the Lord, and shall not find it.
Actually, I would say that the pro-Paulines have rejected YHVH's Law. They claim it's done away with, of the old dispensation, old covenant ... "we have something new now, that doesn't involve His Law!"

I suggest that they are the ones that no longer hear "the words of YHVH".
 
Aug 17, 2013
96
0
0
I just do not understand why these people who teach about half of the New Testament are not ashamed to admit that the Holy Spirit was not able to keep out from His written Word things which they say are false, and thus, imbedding in people's mind that the Bible is riddled with falsehood.

Not only is this an attack on Christianity, but on Jesus Christ' Covenant itself, seeing that what we have from God as New Testament Scripture is being belittled as man-made Scripture.

Surely, this attack is being taken into consideration by those here protecting their Christ-following roots?
1. Paul's words compose 27% of the Protestant New Tesatment, not half.
2. I do not say that the H.S. cannot keep things out of His Word. Instead, one must understand Deu 13:1-5 that He actually sends false prophets to test us! Can we discern between the two trees we have before us?
3. Which "Bible" is riddled with falsehood?
4. It's interesting that we have those who advocate that believers cannot and should not do what Messiah did (follow YHVH's Law), and yet call them "Christ-followers"! How ironic! :rolleyes:
 
N

nathan3

Guest
Actually, I would say that the pro-Paulines have rejected YHVH's Law. They claim it's done away with, of the old dispensation, old covenant ... "we have something new now, that doesn't involve His Law!"

I suggest that they are the ones that no longer hear "the words of YHVH".
People do a lot of things in the name of religion, yourself included. But allow Paul to speak for himself . Paul never told people Not to keep the ten commandments and like commandments. Christ told people to observe the law of the ten commandments, as Paul did also.

Paul however was not under the old Covenant of blood ordinances, and he never taught people to observe the old blood covenant as Christians. That would be sacrilegious .and Paul was right to keep people from that.

Do you observe the old blood rituals ?
 
Aug 17, 2013
96
0
0
So, if Paul is not an apostle, as it is mentioned about 9 times, then the Spirit failed in delivering God's Message uncorrupted? Either we have the Truth in written words or you are attacking the Spirit in His administration of protecting God's word.
Who mentioned that Paul is an apostle 9 times?
 
S

sureshjames

Guest
many will try to distract you but dont believe in them
paul was an apostle for gentiles
do you not know apostless accepted paul later
dont believe in false teachings stick to the truth


may god bless you
 
Aug 17, 2013
96
0
0
You prefer in calling half of Scripture as false, seeing that Paul wrote it. You are not attacking words on a piece of paper, you are attacking God Himself by denying half of His New Covenant.
Paul is not God. ;)

Do you read from the Catholic or Ethiopic Orthodox canon? If not, why not? Are you attacking God Himself by denying those books which are believed to be His Word?
 
Aug 17, 2013
96
0
0
So, you are denying half of the New Covenant because some are doing it? Do you think that could be a little dangerous for a soul?
It is more dangerous for a soul to not obey YHVH's commandments to test all prophets.